This patch simply adds a check of cached values to see if agerestriction enabled before
fetching the biblio object
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes the different ->recalls accessors implemented on this
bug be more standard. This means:
- They don't do special things like default sorting or stripping out
special parameters. That's all left to the caller and the methods are
clean: they just return the related objects
- Useful filtering methods for Koha::Recalls resultsets are added. The
only used one (in the end) was ->filter_by_current. It seems like a
better approach, because it gives devs more control on how they want
to chain things, and there's a single place in which to maintain the
criteria of what is 'current' or 'finished'. This clearly makes the
'old' column obsolete IMHO, at least in the use cases I found. This is
covered by tests as well.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This doesn't rely on the other statuses, and requires only cached
preference check, so lets allow the possibiliy of an early exit
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Similar to first patch, move a count only conditionally used into
the conditional
This could be updated to use DBIC, but the itemtype conditionals
add complexity
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We essentially copy the code from GetReservesControlBranch here, because we
also calculate 'branchfield'
Setting it to "" vs undef makes no difference in this code, so lets not fetch this
again later.
Rename the variable to make it clearer where the branchcode came from
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We retrieve two counts that are only needed if rules for hold limits are defined.
The DB counts should only be fetched once the rules are confirmed to exist
Further improvement would be possiblke by allowing them to be passed in (or cached?)
from CanBookBeReserved as they rely only on patron/biblionumber and not item specific information
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
If you cancel holds in bulk, the list is not updated as we enqueued the
task. But the "Update hold(s)" button will explode if clicked.
Test plan:
Place several holds on a bib record
Use the "Cancel selected" link to cancel holds in bulk
The job is enqueued and the hold list still show the holds you cancelled
Click "Update holds"
=> Without this patch you get an ugly 500
Can't call method "found" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 1060
=> With this patch applied the table is refresh, no crash (and there is
a warning in the log, that may not be necessary)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Before diving into removing ModReserveFill, I propose this:
In order to perform real-life testing of the new Koha::Hold->fill
method, this patch makes the ModReserveFill method, just call the new
one.
To test:
1. Apply this patchset
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Circulation* \
t/db_dependent/SIP/*
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
and some more...
There are lot of inconsistencies in our ->search calls. We could
simplify some of them, but not in this patch. Here we want to prevent
regressions as much as possible and so don't add unecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch fixes tests failures due to bad checks in the controller.
The tests deserve to be rewritten.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Most of the changes here are simple, this can be read to view the changes
Testing that holds can be placed via staff client, and opac, and are disallowed
when expected is the best test plan, beyond running the unit tests
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The expiration date picked by the patron (or librarian) when placing a
hold is lost when a waiting hold is reverted.
We need a separate DB field to store this value and restore it when
needed: patron_expiration_date
The new behaviours are now:
Create a hold and specify an expiration date:
expirationdate=patron_expiration_date
Fill the hold:
expiration_date is calculated
expiration_date set to the calculated value or to
patron_expiration_date if anterior
patron_expiration_date not modified
Revert the waiting status:
expirationdate set back to patron_expiration_date
Cancel expire reserves:
if < expirationdate OR < patron_expiration_date
Note: This change should not be needed but won't hurt
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Bontemps <florian.bontemps@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Test plan:
Set item level itypes to biblioitems.
Find a record with itemtype NULL, having an item.
Place a hold. Without this patch, it crashes.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: ThibaudGLT <thibaud.guillot@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
To make sure we have logging the values from DB.
It will reduce DB action_log table size when we log the full object and
it contains DateTime object.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Potentially we could have logged a change when no date was passed.
This patch moves the test before logging and updates POD
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are times when an item that is waiting for pickup needs to have the expiration date extended. This would give staff the ability to modify one by one, as needed, the reserves.expirationdate for a given item awaiting pickup.
Test Plan:
1) Place a hold, trap an item for it such that is is waiting
2) Attempt to update the expiration date
3) Note the new date is not saved
4) Apply this patch, restart all the things!
5) Attempt to update the expiration date
6) The new date should be saved!
Signed-off-by: Abbey Holt <aholt@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Our query for lowest priority holds only needs to adjust holds on the biblio we are looking at
so I add biblionumber
Additionally we can simply find the end of the array and use that rather than 99998
so I set new_rank to scalar @priority
Lastly, we don't need to fetch the lowest priority holds if we are ignoring lowest priority
so I move it into the conditional
To test:
1 - Add holds with lowest priorty to 2 records in the catalog
2 - Add a hold on a third record
3 - Note errors in log like:
[2021/07/23 17:47:17] [WARN] splice() offset past end of array at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 1649
4 - Apply patch and restart all the things
5 - Add a new hold on third record - no warns
6 - Make one of the holds on third record have lowestPriority (click rightmost arrow with line at bottom)
7 - Note no warns
8 - Adjust other holds on record and note no warns
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If the hold is not found (e.g. already cancelled), we should
return earlier without crashing:
Can't call method "borrowernumber" on an undefined value at /usr/share/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 521
(Note: line number from 19.11)
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Add a hold, go to user menu with holds in OPAC.
At the same time, cancel this hold from staff.
Now click the Cancel in OPAC.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaces a few more trivial cases where we were using
library->branchemail with a fallback to KohaAdminEmail to just use the
new library->from_email_address method directly instead.
There were also a couple of cases where we were passing borrowernumber
and the patrons library from address too.. this is unneccesary as the
code in _send_email_massage will already default to patron library from
address if we do not pass an override.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Added a semicolon.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This fixes an issue in the way we calculate the check for hold policy 'from_home_library'
Currently we change the comparison based on ReservesControlBranch, however, that should
only control the rule we fetch, not how we compare
When ReservesControlBranch is set to "patron's home library" we compare the patron's branch to
the patron's branch, this is useless and means we pass the check for all branches all of the time
We should instead compare the patron's branch to the item's branch, and only fetch the rule using ReservesControlBranch
To test:
1 - Have a record with an item from library A and library B
2 - Set the 'Default checkout, hold and return policy'->Hold policy->From home library for all libraries
and ensure you have no branch specific/itemtype specific rules set
3 - Attempt to place a hold on the record for a patron from library B
4 - Note that only the library B item is holdable - place a title level hold (do not choose an item)
5 - Check in the item from library A
6 - It fills the hold - This is incorrect - ignore the hold
7 - Apply patch
8 - Restart all the things
9 - Check in the item from library A
10 - No hold found
11 - Check in the item from library B
12 - Hold found, correctly
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Bug 28503: Clarify what ReservesControlBranch controls
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The expected behaviour for "On shelf holds allowed" setting for the circulation rules (Koha administration > Patrons and circulation > Circulation and fines rules):
- Allow holds only on items that are currently checked out or otherwise unavailable.
- If set to "Yes", patrons can place holds on items currently checked in.
- If set to "If any unavailable", patrons can only place holds on items that are not unavailable.
- If set to "If all unavailable", patrons can only place holds on items where *all* items on the record are unavailable.
(Adapted from https://bywatersolutions.com/education/preparing-for-library-closures)
These rules should also work when using ILS-DI, but currently they don't. This bug makes sure that the "On shelf holds allowed" rules work correctly when using ILS-DI to place holds.
Test plan:
1. Enable ILS-DI (set the ILS-DI system preference to Enable).
2. Go to Koha administration > Patrons and circulation > Circulation and fines rules.
3. Work through steps 4-5 for each of the settings for "On shelf holds allowed" for all libraries/patron categories/item types:
. "Yes", "If any unavailable", and "If all unavailable"
4. Staff interface - place a hold on a record with items available for loan, the rules should work as expected before and after the patch is applied:
. "Yes"
==> information column in the item table displays "Not on hold", the hold is placed, cancel the hold
. "If any unavailable" and "If all unavailable"
==> the hold is not placed, message is "Cannot place hold. No items are available to be placed on hold.", red "X" in the hold column and the information column displays "Not on hold".
5. ILS-DI - place a hold on a record with items available for loan (note: without the patch, holds can be placed):
. Query to place a hold using ILS-DI on a title that have all its items available,
example query: http://127.0.0.1:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=HoldTitle&patron_id=1&bib_id=1&request_location=127.0.0.1
==> Without the patch the hold is placed but it shouldn't be allowed, cancel the hold
. Query to place a hold using ILS-DI on an available item,
example query: http://127.0.0.1:8080/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=HoldItem&patron_id=1&bib_id=1&item_id=1)
==> Without the patch the hold is placed but it shouldn't be allowed, cancel the hold
6. Run the tests prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t - these should pass.
7. Apply the patch (and flush_memcached and restart_all if using koha-testing-docker).
8. Run through steps 3-6 again, and note the changes when "If any unavailable" and "If all unavailable" options are used:
. For the staff interface: there should be no change in behavour and should work as expected, for the red "X" in the items table additional text is added "onShelfHoldsNotAllowed".
. For ILS-DI: these should now work as expected, with holds not placed, and this message in the results returned <code>onShelfHoldsNotAllowed</code> (check to confirm no holds place for either the patron or the item)
. Tests: should still pass.
9. Sign off.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch alters C4/Reserves.pm to pass back 'noReservesAllowed' when
allowedreserves=0. This allows passing to the user an appropriate
message about the availability of items for holds
This patch also fixes a FIXME about using effective_itemtype to fetch item rules
To test:
1 - Set one itemtype to allow no holds
2 - Set 'Holds per record' to 0 for another itemtype/patron combination
3 - Create or find 2 records, each with items only of the itemtypes above
3 - Attempt to place a hold for a patron on each record above
4 - The message will be 'Too many holds'
5 - Apply patch and repeat
6 - Message should be "Cannot place hold: no item are available to be placed on hold"
7 - Try placing a multihold with either record above and a holdable record,
message should end "Cannot place hold on some items'
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Rebase - Fix test expectation
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds an optional param 'ignore_hold_counts' to the routine, while still forbidding holds when 0 are allowed
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
JK: Commit message amended: Fixed title formatting
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The HOLD MODIFY log at the end of ModReserveAffect is not using an
up-to-date $hold object.
$hold is modified at
1201 $hold->set_waiting($desk_id);
But not refreshed before logged (and so the timestamp is not logged
correctly).
Test plan:
Turn on HoldsLog
Place an item on hold
Check it in to mark it waiting
Confirm that the timestamp logged is the one from the check in, not when
you created the hold
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes a hold from holds queue when captured by check in.
To test:
1. check out an item from a book with multiple items for patron_1
2. place a biblio level hold for patron_2
3. perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
CHECK => holds queue shows the placed hold
4. check in the item from step 1 and confirm hold for patron_2
SUCCESS => hold for patron_2 is no longer in holds queue
5. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest the check is for holdability and in
ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted the check is for
checkoutability. These comments should make it more clear because the
notforloan value is used for these two different purposes and is a bit
confusing (we might want to add a new field "notforhold" in future to
make the code self documenting)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted function is checking whether an
item can be checked out and it incorrectly only checks the positive
notforloan values when there can be also negative notforloan
values. If notforloan value is not 0 then it means the item cannot be
checked out. In the case of ordered items the value is negative (-1)
and thus before this change the checkout availability was reported
incorrectly.
To test:
1) Run prove t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Notice it fails
2) Apply this patch
3) Run prove t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Notice it passes now.
To test via Koha sandbox (Alternatively):
1) Create circ rule with If all unavailable
2) Create new biblio
3) Order a new item to the biblio via acquisitions and set the not
for loan value to Ordered / -1
4) Notice you cannot place a hold to the biblio
5) Apply patch
6) Notice you can now place a hold to the biblio
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This fixes the warning:
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 860.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The patch "Bug 19116: Hold not set to waiting after transfer" added a
new meaning to 'Reserved' return value of C4::Reserves::CheckReserves
function. Let's remove double usage and have separate Transferred
return value so we can differentiate between attached and non-attached
holds. This will come useful in future refactorings.
This patch does no changes to the logic except in the
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl and circulation.pl we now give
similarly to waiting state notice about hold being transferred.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a new item level hold so that pickup library is different
than where the item is currently. Then return the item so that hold
is being attached and transferred.
3) Go to branchtransfers.pl and try to create a new transfer: it
should prompt you with message "Item is attached to a hold and
being transferred for XXX" and provide you with option to cancel
the hold or to ignore the transfer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
ModeReserveAffect was setting all transfers in the queue to received by
looping through a resultset. This patch updates the logic to try and
catch the in_transit transfer and receive just that one instead.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
A few lines of code were added to CheckReserves containing the wrong
use of two perl functions: grep and split on bug 25232.
A test was added even making these things pass.
Test plan:
Run t/db../Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This routine is only used internally and incorrectly overrides
the precedence of holds rules - it should be removed
This patch removes the routine, adjusts tests, and adds test to
confirm correct precedence is followed
To test:
1 - At the All Libraries level, create a circ rule for a specific patron category and a specific item type that only allows 1 hold
2 - At the branch-specific level for Branch A, create an All/All rule that allows 2 holds
3 - confirm ReservesControll is set to patron's library
4 - find a patron from Branch A of the category for which you made your rule
5 - find two bibs with items of the itype got which you made your rule
6 - place a hold on one bib. success!
7 - try to place a hold on the second bib. you're told you cannot because the patron is only allowed 1 hold
8 - apply patch, restart services
9 - try to place your second hold again, success!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
Look into diff and confirm the comment does make sense
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If you merge two records with holds in them following error happens
without this patch:
[WARN] DBD::mysql::st execute failed: called with 4 bind variables when 3 are needed [for Statement "SELECT * FROM reserves WHERE biblionumber = ? AND (found <> ? AND found <> ? OR found is NULL) ORDER BY reservedate ASC" with ParamValues: 0=Null!, 1=Null!, 2=Null!] at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 2002.
To test:
1) Notice prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t fails with above error
2) Apply patch
3) Notice prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item is checked in and marked 'Waiting' or already 'Waiting'
and there is a desk attached to the session, the item is marked
waiting at the current desk of the current library.
The information is displayed on the OPAC and on the intranet. The
patron can then know at which desk he can retrieve his document.
Desk Management (Bug 13881) is now useful.
Test plan :
1. apply Bug 24201
2. $KOHA_PATH/installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl
3. Check out some document to someone
4. make another one reserve this document
5. check in the document
6. you can see the document is attach to the current library
7. create some desks and attach one to your session (see Bug 13881 and
Bug 24201)
8. cancel the preceding reserve and redo steps 3 to 5
9. you should see the document is waiting at the current library and
current desk on:
a. the intranet document request page
b. the intranet borrower holds tab
c. the item list where the document is listed on the bibliographic
details
d. the borrower's OPAC holds tab.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA
Following Josef Moravec QA comments :
- rewrite Koha::Hold->desk according to Object Oriented Koha
Guidelines and use it to fetch desk name in various templates
- remove unused Desks.GetName
- Check for columns existence in db update
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA: useless change
Maybe it was a relic of something usefull... anyway
not anymore.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) Fix POD
Koha::Desk and not Koha::Library...
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As bug 25333 changed the 'phone' transport type to 'talkingtech', we can
now re-add 'phone' as a transport type again, and allow it to behave and
support the same notices as the email transport type.
Test Plan;
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Restart all the things!
4) Disable TalkingTechItivaPhoneNotificationi if enabled
5) Enable new PhoneNotification system preference
6) Go to a patron's messaging preferences, not you can select the
'phone' option for all the same notices as the 'email' option
7) Enable the phone option for all the message types
8) Browser to the Notices and slips editor
9) Add a phone notice version for each notice you wish to test
10) Test some notices ( CHECKIN, CHECKOUT, etc )
11) Notices should show in the patron's messages as 'phone' notices
Signed-off-by: Christopher Zorn <Christofer.Zorn@ajaxlibrary.ca>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the --reason option to cancel_expired_holds which allows
the library to optionally set a reason for cancellation when running the
cronjob. This will prompt the HOLD_CANCELLED notice to be sent to the
patron.
To test:
1/ Ensure the unit tests continue to pass after the patch
(t/db_dependent/Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t)
Also:
1 - Add an expired hold for a patron:
INSERT INTO RESERVES (borrowernumber, biblionumber, expirationdate, found,branchcode,itemnumber) VALUES (5,5,'2020-01-01','W','CPL',983);
2 - Set ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay to Allow
3 - Run the cronjob:
perl misc/cronjobs/hold/cancel_expired_holds.pl --reason EXPIRED
4 - Visit the patron's notices tab
5 - Confirm they have been sent a cancellation notice
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From its inception, phone notices via Talking Tech have not behaved like
other notices. Instead of reading notices generated by Koha, the Talking
Tech scripts largely generate their own notices.
We would like to pave the way to having "generic" phone notices that can
be processed by plugins to support arbitrary telephony vendors ( we will
be targeting Twilio initially ).
To that end, it seems sensible to begin by changing the messaage
transport type for Talking Tech from 'phone' to 'itiva' to
highlight its specificity and difference from standard message
transports.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Test Talking Tech outbound script
5) Note no changes in functionality
Signed-off-by: Christopher Zorn <Christofer.Zorn@ajaxlibrary.ca>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
JD amended patch: remove uneeded indentation change in sample_notices_message_transports.sql
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Plain simple:
my $home_library = Koka::Libraries->find( {branchcode => $item->homebranch} );
This patch replaces 'Koka' by 'Koha'.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
