The current call checks for truth against a returned hash, we need
to check the 'status' value
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In the case of 'AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable' we check all existing reserves against
all existing items. This patchset reduces the number of DB/subroutine calls
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <amitddng135@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
PROCESSED gave the apearance that the item processing had been completed
whereas in reading the code it appears to actually signify that the item
is awaiting/in proessing state.
This patch updates the variable to be PROCESSING consistently throughout
the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This prevents checking out to a patron an item with hold to someone
else in the In Processing state via staff interface.
Also the checkout error message via SIP is now a more clearer one: "Item is
on hold for another patron." Before it was "Item cannot be issued:
$confirmation".
Also the branch transfer and batch checkout pages are adapted to this new
confirmation message as well.
To test:
1) Create bib level hold to an item for patron A
2) Check-in that item via SIP2, now the hold state should be "In processing"
3) Apply patch
4) Try to checkout the item to patron B via staff interface and
notice we get now confirmation prompt do we really want to do it
because it is in processing.
In order to not have to setup SIP2 server, alternatively steps 1) and
2) can be done so that you check-in the item in staff interface and
make it Waiting, and then with SQL change it to "In processing":
UPDATE reserves SET found = "P" WHERE reserve_id = XXX;
UPDATE reserves SET waitingdate = NULL WHERE reserve_id = XX
UPDATE reserves SET expirationdate = NULL WHERE reserve_id = XXX;
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The patch "Bug 19116: Hold not set to waiting after transfer" added a
new meaning to 'Reserved' return value of C4::Reserves::CheckReserves
function. Let's remove double usage and have separate Transferred
return value so we can differentiate between attached and non-attached
holds. This will come useful in future refactorings.
This patch does no changes to the logic except in the
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl and circulation.pl we now give
similarly to waiting state notice about hold being transferred.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a new item level hold so that pickup library is different
than where the item is currently. Then return the item so that hold
is being attached and transferred.
3) Go to branchtransfers.pl and try to create a new transfer: it
should prompt you with message "Item is attached to a hold and
being transferred for XXX" and provide you with option to cancel
the hold or to ignore the transfer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
With the first uses of Koha::Item->request_transfer and
Koha::Item::Transfer->cancel having been added, we need to update
GetTransferFromTo to respect transfers that have been requested but
not yet sent and not cancelled.
Test plan
1/ Run the included unit test
2/ Confirm the "Transfers to recieve" page loads
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Update C4::Circulation::AddReturn to use Koha::Item->get_transfer to
find requested transfers and use Koha::Item::Transfer->receipt to complete
transfer requests if they have arrived at their destination or return the
relevant 'WrongTransfer', 'WasTransfered' and 'TransferTrigger' messages
to the end user.
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch changes the original implementation so the item object is
refreshed altogether instead of explicitly pinpointing a specific field
we identified an edge case can leave out from ->store. I propose this
alterate implementation because what this bug highlights is the fact we
don't code thinking calls to things can have side-effects (like this
case, with AddReturn updating the onloan status (and maybe other
things?).
To test:
1. Make sure circ tests pass with and without this patch
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If any item is currently checked out to a patron, and the item is then checked out directly to another patron without manually checking the item in first, the items.onloan column will remain NULL.
This will only happen if the new checkout will be due the same day as the previous checked.
This is caused by the item being returned without updating the item object from storage afterward. Even though AddIssue will call AddReturn which sets the value of onloan to NULL in the database, we are not passing in the item object by reference, so it's onloan value remains set to a date. Then we set the onloan value to the same date. Because the value does not change in the object, the column does not get marked dirty.
We could update the object from storage first, but it seems more efficient to mark the column as dirty manually to avoid that otherwise unnecessary fetch.
Test Plan:
1) Apply these patches
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Marti Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The deadlock reports tell us that multiple transactions are
waiting for a X lock on a record but using a secondary index
on borrowernumber and itemnumber. Since we have the issue_id
at hand already, we should use that and benefit from the clustered
index (on PK) instead of using a secondary index.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
While this won't prevent the deadlock, it should catch the case where
a deadlock causes the DB update to fail and provide feedback to the user
and rollback the transaction
I don't know how to trigger the deadlock, I can only confirm that we see it, and
that this should catch it.
To test:
1 - Apply patches
2 - Checkout several items to a patron
3 - Confirm that 'Renew all' feature continues to work as expected and all items are renewed
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To prevent conflict with Encode::encode
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a difference between YAML::Load and YAML::XS::Load
From YAML::XS pod:
"YAML::XS only deals with streams of utf8 octets"
Test plan:
We are going to test 1 occurence and QA will confirm others don't
contain typos.
0. Don't apply the patches
1. Create a new itemtype with code=❤️
2. Create a new item using this itemtype (to biblionumber=1 will work)
3. Fill OpacHiddenItems with
itype: [❤️]
4. Search for "street shuffle" or any terms that will return the biblio
Notice that the item is there (there is an error in logs)
5. Apply the patches
6. Repeat 4 and confirm that the item is now hidden
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From tht YAML pod:
"""
This module has been released to CPAN as YAML::Old, and soon YAML.pm will be changed to just be a frontend interface module for all the various Perl YAML implementation modules, including YAML::Old.
If you want robust and fast YAML processing using the normal Dump/Load API, please consider switching to YAML::XS. It is by far the best Perl module for YAML at this time. It requires that you have a C compiler, since it is written in C.
"""
See also
https://gitlab.com/koha-community/qa-test-tools/-/merge_requests/35
Test plan:
Try some place where YAML::XS is not used and confirm that it works
correctly
QA note: This patch removes some uses of YAML that were not useful
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Since bug 26639 we have auto savepoint enabled and the LOCK TABLE query
in C4::Circulation::SendCirculationAlert is not correctly handled.
From the MySQL doc that is copied few lines before, "LOCK TABLE will
commit any transactions", but here we don't have a savepoint and the
release for a non-existent savepoint will throw a DBI exception.
This patch removes the unecessary transaction and prevent the following
error when a renewal is done:
> DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::mysql::_exec_svp_release(): DBI Exception: DBD::mysql::db do failed: SAVEPOINT savepoint_0 does not exist [for Statement "RELEASE SAVEPOINT savepoint_0"] at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Circulation.pm line 3590
Test plan:
1. Enable RenewalSendNotice
2. Add some email address to patron and select the email box from the message preference "Item checkout and renewal" in order to receive renewal emails.
3. Check 1 item out to a patron
4. Renew it
Signed-off-by: Andrew Nugged <nugged@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In the previous patch you may have noticed many warns when running the tests
We add guarantor charges to a variable to determine if over the limit, but we don't initialize that value
We should
To test:
1 - Apply first patch and follow test plan
2 - Note warns when proving test
3 - Apply this patch
4 - prove
5 - No more warns
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 15494, the same method "get_yaml_pref_hash" has been added to two modules,
Koha/Config/SysPref.pm and Koha/Util/SystemPreferences.pm
We only need the one from Koha::Config::SysPref and remove the whole
Koha::Util::SystemPreferences module.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
must return green
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
1. Check using git grep command that addDate does not exist
2. Check the patch that addDuration is spelt right
3. Check that tests pass t/Calendar.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Currently checkins can fail for one of two known reasons:
1 - Duplicate issue ids
2 - Anonymous borrower configuration issues
In the first case we refer to the 'data problems' or 'data corrupted' section of the about page. All errors are on the 'System information' tab and this is what we should mention
In the second case we refer to the data problems section, but information is in another section on the tab. Additionally, during checkin we issue an 'Error' but on the about page we call it a 'Warning' we should upgrade to error and specify what is broken
Additionally this patch fixes the warning that should display while issuing to a patron if anonymous is not set and patron has selected privacy
To test:
1 - Enable system preference OPACPrivacy
2 - Set system preference AnonymousPatron to '0'
3 - Log in a a patron on OPAC and set your privacy to never
4 - Issue a book to that patron in the staff client
5 - Note there is no warning
6 - Return the book
7 - Note the circulation page displays an error and the checkin fails and refers to 'data problems'
8 - Apply patch
9 - Issue another book to patron
10 - Note warning on the circulation page
11 - Try to check in a book again
12 - Check the new message makes sense
13 - Click the link to 'about.pl' check that errors are displayed
14 - Check the logs
15 - Confirm updated error message makes sense
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch remove the private sub used in GetIssuingCharges in favor
of get_effective_rule
It corrects the wrong precedence for rules and adds tests to cover this
subroutine
NOTE: the 'branch' for the discount will be determined by the signed in branch,
this is a bug to be fixed in the future
To test:
1 - Define a rentalcharge for an itemtype
2 - Define a 10% discount for library A, category A, all itemtypes
3 - Define a 50% discount for all libraries, category A, same itemtype
4 - Attempt to checkout an item from library A of the matching itemtype
5 - The 50% discount is applied
6 - Apply patches
7 - Attempt to checkout an item from library A of the matching itemtype
8 - The 10% discount is applied
prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Actually, the GetRecords service gives many information :
bibliographic data (marcxml field)
item data (items field)
issue data (issues field)
The issue data should not be sent by these service, its a privacy problem.
Biblio title and author are redundant.
This patch changes to use Koha::Checkouts to get issues informations with only the addition of item barcode.
Test plan :
1) Enable ILS-DI webservice
2) Checkout an item
3) Go to {opac}/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id={biblionumber}
4) Check the issues tag content
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The SQL code was duplicated, I combine them here
frombranch needs to take input
switch owning to frombranch in second script
initialize hash as empty list, not a reference
add a newline after printed output if not mailing notices
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch fixes a perlcritic issue and also replaces tabs with four
spaces where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The provided patch adds the following functionality:
* Add --owning to both advance_notice.pl and overdue_notice.pl
* Add --library to advance_notice.pl like the way overdue_notice.pl already works
When specifying "--owning" both scripts will use items.homebranch instead of
issues.branchcode to determine sending library.
For advance_notice.pl this affects non-digest DUE and PREDUE, but not digest notices.
To test:
1. Have a patron who wants advance notices as email with 2 days in advance (not digest)
2. Have the first overdue date set 3 days past due date
3. Have issue for that patron where date_due is 2 days away where the item homebranch differs from the issuing branch
4. Have issue for that patron where date_due is 3 days old
5. Run advance_notices.pl without --owning
6. Run overdue_notices.pl without --owning
7. Confirm that two messages were created for that patron with the sender being the issuing branch
8. Delete messages or create two more issues according to (3) and (4)
9. Run advance_notices.pl with --owning
10. Run overdue_notices.pl with --owning
11. Confirm that the two messages created has the item homebranch as sender
Extra feature for advance_notices.pl is that it adds "--library" the same way overdue_notices.pl has.
Adding variants of that flag in steps (5) and (9) above can confirm this option as well.
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Björn Nylén <bjorn.nylen@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Timothy Alexis Vass <timothy_alexis.vass@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This squashed commit fixes:
- a small error in the checkouts related JS
- GetRenewCount now returns 6 values when a call to it succeeds, a
failed call should also return the same number of values. This commit
adds these additional values.
- Some changes in issue.t had broken the tests for unseen renewals (the
unseen tests were using variables that had been moved out of the tests'
scope).
- Also now using Koha::CirculationRules::set_rules to set circ rules
rather than using SQL queries.
- Fixed expected number of return values from GetRenewCount
- Moved unseen tests in issue.t to the bottom of the file to remove the
risk of interference with other test circ rules.
- There was a real mess in C4/Circulation.pm due to a bad rebase back in
February. Frankly it's a wonder anything worked at all. This commit
fixes that problem and reinstates the correct patch for
C4/Circulation.pm
- Somehow I'd never noticed this before but the columns in smart-rules.tt
were misaligned when UnseenRenewals was turned off. This was due to the
display of a <td> not being conditional when it should have been. This
is now fixed.
- This commit also fixes items 1 & 2 descibed by Katrin in comment #74 ->
comment #76.
- Fixed missing check for too_unseen in opac-user.tt, this test did used
to exist but got lost during sizeable rebase a few weeks ago :-(
- Added test for too_unseen to all AUTO_RENEWAL notice templates apart
from de-DE (as previously requested by Katrin)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements changes requested by Katrin in QA feedback
(comment #38):
- Fix QA script failures
- Fix alter table column order mismatch
- Use new convention for JS strings
- Fix terminology
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds support for unseen renewals.
Here we retrofit knowledge of unseen renewals and add the display of unseen
renewal counts and warnings, in addition to adding the ability to
specify a renewal as being "unseen".
The functionality added here is goverened by the UnseenRenewals syspref.
Signed-off-by: Sally Healey <sally.Healey@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There were a couple changes that had no effect, so cleaned those up
Typo 'is' for 'if'
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This commit makes the changes suggested by Katrin in comment #50:
- Changed syspref from RecordIssuer to RecordStaffUserOnCheckout
- Changed terminology from "issue" to "check out" and variations
- Fixed name display to use patron-title.inc
- Made issuer column DEFAULT NULL consistently between issues and
old_issues and between the DB update and kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the recording and display of the item issuer. This
behaviour is governed by the RecordIssuer syspref, if disabled (the
default), no recording or display of issuer will take place.
Signed-off-by: Ben Veasey <B.T.Veasey@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1) Apply patch, update database, restart services
2) Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds sysprefs if not already active
3) Go to circulation rules and set a value under 'Decrease loan holds
(day)' that is DIFFERENT from decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
4) Check out an item with holds and confirm that the value from the rule
is used instead of the system preference
5) Confirm tests pass before and after the patch
t/db_dependent/DecreaseLoanHighHolds.t
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Henry Bolshaw <bolshawh@parliament.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds unit tests for the newly introduced
_RestoreOverdueForLostAndFound method in C4::Circulation.
Test plan
1/ Read the new tests added to t/db_dependent/Circuation.t to ensure
they make sense
2/ Run the tests and verify they pass
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds handing for the new values available for the lostreturn
policy settings.
* undef - Do nothing, leave fees and fines as they were at the point of
lose.
* refund - Refund the lost item fee only
* charge - Refund the lost item fee and charge a fresh overdue fine
dated for a return on the date the item is 'found'
* restore - Refund the lost item fee and restore the original overdue
fine (dated for a 'return' on the date the item was 'lost'
Test plan
1/ apply patch
2/ updatedatabase, restart_all
3/ verify finesmode and CalculateFinesOnReturn and WhenLostChargeReplacementFee are on
4/ verify WhenLostForgiveFine is set to "Forgive"
5/ verify circ rules include fines
6/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge"
7/ create 4 overdue checkouts that will incur fines
8/ run fines.pl
9/ confirm 4 items checked out with accruing fines
10/ confirm all 4 items have a replacement price
Item 1
11/ mark the first item lost
12/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
13/ check item in
14/ verify that lost fee is gone and overdue charge has not returned
Item 2
15/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine"
16/ mark second item lost
17/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
18/ check item in
19/ verify that lost fee is gone and a new overdue charge has been made
Item 3
20/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and restore overdue fine"
21/ mark third item lost
22/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
23/ check item in
24/ verify that lost fee is gone and the old overdue charge has been restored
Item 4
25/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Leave lost item charge"
26/ mark fourth item lost
27/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
28/ check item in
29/ verify that lost fee remains and the overdue charge is still gone
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The $checkouts variable was not defined in the PatronLibrary case at
all and in the else case the SQL join was totally missing.
To test:
1) Without this patch notice prove
t/db_dependent/Circulation/TooMany.t fails
2) With this patch notice prove
t/db_dependent/Circulation/TooMany.t succeeds
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The lines to calc due date are doubled
ModDateLastSeen is not needed as we set the item not lost and we can set
the date as we do for date last borrowed and save a DB store
Largely this is reading the code and confirming the changes make sense
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Check out items, confirm it works as before
3 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Staff can create smart rules with empty (undefined) fine grace period.
In Overdues.pm undefined firstremind means 0, do the same in Circulation.pm.
To test:
1. Apply these patches
2. Run:
kshell
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simply passes skip_record_index calls to Koha:Item:store
for all the changes done in AddReturn.
Testing is really verifiying that items are still correctly indexed at the end
For both search engines
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with multipel items
2 - Populate both:
UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
3 - Confirm that checking in an item correctly updates the item status in search results
4 - Test with items issued, and items not issued
5 - Test when generating a transfer (checkin at different branch)
6 - Test when item was marked lost
7 - Test when filling transfer
Signed-off-by: Séverine Queune <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It came to light that it's not clear to all users that a checkin results
in the completion of a transfer if one exists for the item being checked
in. This patch adds such a notification to the error messages loop to
highlight that the item has been recieved from it's sending brnach.
To test
1/ Setup a transfer from branch A to branch B
2/ Check the item in at branch B
3/ Note that a new message appears in the 'Check in message' alert box
saying "Item recieved from branch A"
4/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries would like to not only block the circulation of a guarantor based on fines owed by guarantees, but would also like to block circulation for all guarantees as well. Basically, if a family as a whole reaches a certain threshold of fines, the entire family will be blocked from checking out items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set NoIssuesChargeGuarantorsWithGuarantees to $14
3) Create a family of four ( 2 guarantors, 2 guarantees ) where the parents guarantee both children
4) Give 3 of the 4 a $5 fine
5) None of them should be able to check out items
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t .. 6/12 Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Circulation.pm line 1460.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item that has triggered a hold is in transit to a library,
if the item is accidently shelved instead of scanned at the pickup library,
and then checked out to another patron, the holds shows the item still in transit
in the status, but says that it is waiting at the library, and the since date has vanished!
Test plan:
1) Place an item at Library A on hold for Patron 1 of Library B with pickup library at Library B
2) Check in the item at Library A to trigger the hold transfer
3) At Library B, check out the item to Patron 2 (click Yes)
=> The hold is not marked as in transit and is back to priority 1
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
