This patch also corrects an error in the description of
NewSubscription().
Named parameters for this function cannot come soon enough.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
These tests are split in two parts: "db dependent" and "db
independent".
GetNextSeq requires DB only when checking for irregularities.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
A lot of tests were just a call to a funtion without any arguments,
whereas the function expect at least one argument.
These tests were kept, but all return values are now undef when a
mandatory argument is missing, so return values are consistent.
The part where subscription periodicity is changed could not work
because of ',' appended to each key in ModSubscription call. So it's
rewritten, taking into account the new API for subscription frequencies.
This script should leave your database intact because it revert any
modification made.
Also fix some warnings in C4::Serials and in C4::Items.
And fix a typo in koha-tmpl/.../subscription-numberpatterns.tt
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comment: Work as described. No errors
Tested, again, without trouble.
With a suscription, tests successful.
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a regression test for doing a form-based catalog
search using an index that contains the string 'ns' in its name. In
this case, the index being tested is 'Code-institution'.
To test
-------
[1] Prove -v t/db_dependent/Search.t should have two failed tests;
one each for GRS-1 and DOM testing.
[2] After applying the main patch for this bug, the tests should
pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
[1] Fix regression on bug 10663
Looks like the regression was introduced by a glitch during rebasing.
[2] Fix errors in Circulation_issue.t
The change in AddRenewal() turned up an issue with how the test
script issued one of the test items.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch uses understandable codes instead of magical numbers for the
aqorders.orderstatus field.
+ execute sql queries in unit tests into a transaction.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Right now there is no way to change the budget or fund when receiving an
item, which is annoying, particularly at the end of the fiscal year when
every item not already received has to be switched to the following
year's budget. This patch adds the ability to change the budget and fund
when receiving.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Create an order for a vendor, choosing a fund to use for that order.
3) Receive the order, leaving the fund unchanged. Make sure the fund
did not change.
4) Create another order for a vendor, choosing a fund to use for that
order.
5) Receive the order, this time changing the fund. Make sure the fund
is changed.
6) Run the unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
7) Sign off.
(Notes: this patch depends on the Acquisitions.t unit test improvements
in bug 10274; the seemingly-unrelated change in SQLHelper quiets an
irritating warning caused by the NewOrder call in ModReceiveOrder)
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Given how easy it is to accidentally receive items from one invoice on
multiple invoices, the ability to merge invoices can be quite handy.
This patch adds that ability to Koha's Acquisitions module.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Run unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
3) Create two invoices from the same vendor for merging, and receive at
least one order on each.
4) Do a search on the Invoices page that brings up both the invoices you
created.
5) Check the boxes next to the two invoices.
6) Click "Merge selected invoices."
7) Choose which invoice you want to keep (the default will be the first).
8) Click "Merge."
9) Confirm that the resulting invoice has all the orders you received
listed on it.
10) Sign off.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Merged several invoices sucessfully - with and without received
orders, open and closed. Works nicely.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In particular, verify that the pending filter option works.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In the C4::Acquisition module, 2 routines do the same work. This patch
merges these 2 routines.
Test plan:
test the acqui/orderreceive.pl, acqui/uncertainprice.pl
and serials/acqui-search-result.pl, acqui/parcel.pl scripts.
Note: on acqui/parcel the basket filter is a search on basket name (was
on basket id, which was not relevant).
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa.pm, no adverse bahaviors noted. All sub calls updated.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch makes the web-based self-check module pages
specify that no browser (or proxy caching) occur at all.
This prevents a security issue where letting the SCO session time out,
then hitting the back button allowed one to view the previous
patron's session.
This patch adds an optional fifth parameter to output_with_http_headers(),
and output_html_with_http_headers(), a hashref for miscellaneous
options. One key is defined at the moment: force_no_caching, which if
if present and set to a true value, sets HTTP headers to specify no
browser caching of the page at all.
To test:
[1] Start a web-based self-check session and optionally perform
some transactions.
[2] Allow the session to time out (it may be helpful to set
SelfCheckTimeout to a low value such as 10 seconds).
[3] Hit the back button. You should not see the previous patron's
self-check session.
[4] Verify that prove -v t/Output.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Veal <ed.veal@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test plan:
1) set an empty string for the ReservesMaxPickUpDelay pref
2) place a hold on an item
3) check in the item
4) click on "Print and confirm"
5) an error occurs
> The 'days' parameter (undef) to DateTime::Duration::new was an 'undef'
6) apply the patch
7) repeat steps 1 to 4
8) the error does not occur anymore.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
An empty string didn't do it for me, I had to set the
variable for the systempreference to NULL. I am not sure
if this can happen when editing from the interface, but
this change should not have any ill side effects and it has
unit tests!
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Koha::DateUtils::output_pref took 4 parameters and the last one is a
boolean, so some calls were:
output_pref($dt, undef, undef, 1)
This patch changes its prototype to
output_pref({
dt => $dt,
dateformat => $dateformat,
timeformat => $timeformat,
dateonly => $boolean
});
An alternative is to call the output_pref routine with a datetime
object, without using an hashref:
output_pref($dt);
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch also temporarily removes any existing
budgets to avoid issues where tests can fail if there
is already an active budget in the database.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This adds a test case for the new default sort
order for GetBudgets().
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This corrects a failing test and follows a recommendation
by the maintainer of DBIx::Class. This patch also
adds a couple new directories for t/00-testcritic.t to
check.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The patron lists feature is somewhat similar to the record lists feature
in that it allows a librarian to create a list of patrons for later
retrieval and manipluation. These lists can then be used with the batch
patron modification tool.
Test Plan:
0) Apply the patch for Bug 8798
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Access the patron lists feature from Koha's Tools menu.
4) Create a new list via the "New patron list" button.
5) For this list, click the "Edit" button, and change the list name.
6) For this list, click the "Add patrons" button, and search for and
add some patrons to your list.
7) For this list select some patrons to remove them.
8) Try both adding some new patrons, and removing some old patrons
as a single action.
9) Click the "Patrons" link on the Koha toolbar
10) Search the patrons, or browse by letter to get patron results
11) Check the checkboxes next to one or more patrons, and add the
selected patrons to your existing list.
12) Change the "Selected patrons" pulldown to "All resultant patrons"
and add them to your list.
13) Check the checkboxes next to one or more patrons, and add the
selected patrons to a new list.
14) Try manipulating a list of patrons using the batch patron
modification tool.
15) Go back to the Patron Lists feature and delete your lists.
16) Run 'prove t/db_dependent/PatronLists.t'
Signed-off-by: Nora Blake <nblake@masslibsystem.org>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
* Added base class files for all tables in koha using
DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader.
* Added a (very basic) test file for C4::Context
* Also added dependencies in required files.
To Test:
[1] Install patch
[2] Make sure you can still connect to Koha
[3] You may optionally run this test script:
use Koha::Database;
use Data::Dumper;
my $db = Koha::Database->new();
my $schema = $db->schema();
print Dumper($schema->resultset("Borrower"));
If you run this file you should get a DBIx dump of the borrowers table.
Signed-off-by: wajasu <matted-34813@mypacks.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This adds a test to verify that the public subscription
note is returned by a subscription search.
To test:
[1] Verify that t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch gives Koha the ability to merge authority records using the
same interface used by bibliographic records, though slightly different
methods for selecting which records to merge. The two ways to select
records are as follows:
1) Records can be selected from authority search results by clicking
the "Merge" link for two records.
2) Authority records can be merged from the reservoir by clicking the
merge-related links in the Manage staged MARC batch screen.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Do a search for an authority record that will turn up multiple
identical records (or at least two records that you don't mind
merging).
3) Click the "Merge" link for the first record.
4) Click the "Merge" link for the second record.
5) Choose which fields from which record you want to appear in the
resulting record.
6) Confirm that those are the fields that exist in the resulting record.
7) Stage an authority record (for example, an authority record you
saved from your catalog.
8) Search for a record to merge with it using the "Search for a record
to merge in a new window" link.
9) Merge these records, confirming that the resulting record (after
going through the entire merging process) matches your expectations.
10) Set up a matching rule for authorities, and export an authority from
your catalog that will match based on that rule. For MARC21, the
following is a good choice for a rule:
Matching rule code: AUTHPER
Description: Personal name main entry
Match threshold: 999
Record type: Authority record
[Match point 1:]
Search index: mainmainentry
Score: 1000
Tag: 100
Subfields: a
11) Stage the record you just exported, choosing the matching rule you
just created.
12) Merge the record using the "Merge" link, confirming that the
resulting record (after going through the entire merging process)
matches your expectations.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch in series.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch enhances t/db_dependent/Search.t to test indexing and
searching of authority records. It supplies a sample authority file
for MARC21 (consisting of the record for William Shakespeare from the
Library of Congress) and a sample UNIMARC authority file supplied
by Henri-Damien Laurent.
It also adds tests for both MARC21 and UNIMARC authorities.
When the main patch for bug 7421 is applied, t/db_dependent/Search.t
should pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a regression test that verifies that searching the
UNIMARC 'item' index for a value that is indexed by virtue of being
included in the fallback index definition for the 995 field works for
both GRS-1 and DOM.
The main patch will allow t/db_dependent/Search.t to pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a few basic search and indexing tests for UNIMARC,
using sample data provied by Frédéric Demians. The new tests
by no means completely cover the possibilities, but should be
considered a starting point for future tests.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Search.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch refactors t/db_dependent/Search.t so that it can be
subsequently modified to add tests for indexing and searching
UNIMARC records without duplicating the setup code.
This patch also moves the MARC21 records from t/db_dependent/data/zebraexport
to t/db_dependent/data/marc21/zebraexport so that UNIMARC sample
data can be slotted in t/db_dependent/data/unimarc/zebraexport.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Search.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
There was some churn in previous patches about the desired
name of the music publisher number index, so this patch
adds tests to confirm that both the old and new names
work as CCL keywords.
To test:
[1] Verify that t/db_dependent/Search.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch expands t/db_dependent/Search.t to run
the same tests using both the GRS-1 and DOM indexing
modes. It also adds hooks in zebra_config.pl to make
it easier to stage test cases for non-MARC21 Zebra
indexing.
Note that in DOM mode one of the tests is currently a
TODO, as relevance ranking for wegihted queries differs
between GRS-1 and DOM.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Search.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch updates the unit tests for the BibTeX export
to add a regression test for supplying the author for
non-UNIMARC records. It also adjusts the test to reflect
the change in quote character from "" to {}.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Record.t passes
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes some incoherences of the routine
GetBooksellerWithOrders().
Now it considers the field $estimateddeliverydateto and it replaces it
by now() only if it is undef.
Also, it doesn't test if $aqbookseller.deliverytime is not Null anymore
but if $deliverytime = null or undef, it replaces it by 0.
It also verifies if $delay is >= 0 and return undef if it is a negative
value.
To Test:
Before, this routine sorts out the BookSellerWithLateOrders. If a
bookseller did not specify a deliverytime, it would never appears in
the list of LateOrders. Moreover, if the field "Estimated delivery
date to" was specified, it didn't take care of the value and it
returns the late order up to today's date.
Now, the returned list considers all the fields give and if the
delivery time of the bookseller is not specified, it calculates the
late orders as if the deliverytime is 0. By default, all booksellers
which have orders in late until today are listed unless "estimated
delivery date to" is specified.
prove t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t ..
[Some warnings about uninitialized values]
WARNING: GetBooksellerWithLateOrders is called with a negative value at C4/Bookseller.pm line 135.
t/db_dependent/Bookseller.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The borrowers table needs to be cleared after the items table
(last_returned_by column).
Some checks were missing for GetRenewCount and AddRenewal.
Now the tests simulated a renewal for a item and check that the renews
left is decremented.
Moreover the issuingrules tables should be cleared and filled with known
values.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds some unit tests wrapped in a transaction for
C4::Circulation.pm.
Circulation_Branch.t adds tests for routines which deal with
branch_item_rules,branch_borrower_circ_rules,
default_branch_circ_rules, default_circ_rules, and
default_branch_item_rules in the database.
Circulation_issue.t adds tests for routines which deal with accountline
and issues in the database.
NOTE: Some commented tests have to be fixed, and some tests can be added.
More, other routines of Circulation.pm are tested in the patches:
10692 UT: Routines about transfers in Circulation.pm need unit tests
10710 UT : OfflineOperation's routines in C4/Circulation.t need unit tests
10767 UT: Routines which interact with the table issuingrules in C4/Circulation need unit test
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_issue.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation_issue.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=16, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.40 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.44 CPU)
Result: PASS
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_Branch.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation_Branch.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=10, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.00 sys + 1.02 cusr 0.06 csys = 1.14 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comment: Well, I don't know exactly what to do with this, so
I left it to QA
a) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_Branch.t works well and without erros
b) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_issue.t works without errors for me
ONLY if I have a issuingrule for All, All with 1 as renewals allowed, in
other cases it fails.
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds return values to DeleteTransfer:
Undef if no parameters are given
1 if a Transfer is deleted
0E0 if a wrong parameter is given
It also fixes some unit tests in t/db_dependent/Circulation_transfers.t
To test:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_transfers.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation_transfers.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=14, 20 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.39 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.44 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comment: Applied 10681 and 10692 before 10698
Run prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_transfers.t without errors
No koha-qa errors on all 3 patches
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The move avoids a problem where many modules would gain
a dependency on C4::Auth just because C4::Members needs access
to hash_password().
This patch also adds a couple unit tests for the new password
hashing code.
To test:
[1] Verify that there are no regressions on the test plan for bug
9611.
[2] Verify that t/AuthUtils.t and t/db_dependent/Auth.t pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The next and previous links should completely refresh the shelf.
For example:
[<] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [>]
Before this patch, the next and previous links were the same as the 1
and 6.
With this patch, after clicking on next, we will get:
[<] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [>]
This patch adds a new AJAX script to get the shelf browser block.
Test plan:
- On a detail biblio page, click on a "Browse shelf" link.
- Play with the next and previous links.
- Deactivate Javascript (using NoScript for example) and check that you
get the same behavior (but the page is reloaded).
- Launch the unit tests: prove t/db_dependent/ShelfBrowser.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Galen found a case where the cookies array was not built flat. I add a
unit test for that (check the cookie array is flat) and also test the
cookies output of get_template_and_user so we are sure the &language=
parameter is correctly handled.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
- Tests in t/db_dependent/Auth.t pass
- Tested in intranet, OPAC logged in, OPAC logged out
* Adding a valid language code to the URL switches the language
as expected
* Adding an invalid language code causes no change
Nice feature!
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Bug 10925 removes the last call to C4::Utils.
The module becomes useless and can be deleted.
Verify that t/db_dependent/Context.t still successfully passes.
git grep hashdump
git grep maxwidth
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa.pl, no subs from the module are used anywhere
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This fixes a regression introduced by the patch for bug
9394 -- when printing a hold slip using the 'print and confirm'
button, the slip would contain only the text 'reserve not found',
not a full hold slip.
This patch also adds a regression test.
To test:
[1] Check in an item that would fill a hold. Use the 'print
and confirm button' to confirm the hold.
[2] The printout will only contain text to the effect of
'reserve not found'.
[3] Apply the patch.
[4] Repeat step 1. This time, a full hold slip should be printed.
[5] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Pass all tests, new and old, and QA script.
Verified wrong and corrected behaviour.
Note: Sometimes there will not be the message 'reserve not found'
showing up, but hold information for a different record. This happens
when there exists a reserve_id with the borrowernumber of the patron
in question in your database.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adds tests for CheckReserves with lookahead parameter.
Adds tests for AddReturn with regard to future reserve messages.
The following test cases are added, resulting in 8 new tests:
a) Add a reserve without date, CheckReserve should return it
b) Add a reserve with future date, CheckReserve should not return it
c) Add a reserve with future date, CheckReserve should return it if lookahead
is high enough
d) Check ResFound message of AddReturn for future hold
Test plan:
Run the test. No fails?
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
