Thispatch adds the new method and alters addorderiso2907.pl to use this
rather than GetRecordImportMatches
To test:
1 - Import the attached record several times
2 - Set up a matching rule:
TitleAuthor threshold: 100
Matchpoint:
search index: title, score: 100, tag: 245$a
search index: author, score: 100, tag:100$a
3 - Edit one of the imported records to have a different author
4 - Stage the file again. and match using the matchpoint above
5 - Note that matches are found and listed on batch management, with the lowest scored match last
6 - Choose that match
7 - In acquisitions, add to a basket from the staged file
8 - Check the box for the record
9 - Note the match lists the biblionumber for the highest scoring match, not the chosen one
10 - Add an order and note it is for the wrong biblio
11 - Appy patch
12 - Restart_all
13 - Stage the file again and choose a lower scoring match
14 - Confirm when adding to basket this match is preserved
15 - Complete order and verify correct biblio ordered
16 - Stage again, select no match
17 - Confirm no match listed when adding to basket, and choose 'Do not look for matching records' while adding
18 - Confirm order is created on a new biblio
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Currently this syspref only bokcs the literal 'return' from a patron, i.e. the checkin
It still processes transfers, refunds lost items, updates NotForLoan status etc.
We should block all of these things
To test:
1 - Set BlockReturnOfWithdrawn to block
2 - Set an item as lost and withdrawn
3 - Check it in
4 - Item is found
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat 1-3
7 - Checkin is blocked, item still lost
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's caused by a version mismatch of Test::MockModule with D10,
which does not have this commit: fef9e742e4
We should remove the chaining here.
Test plan:
Confirm that Auth.t still pass, and is fixed on D10
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
Without follow-up patch, Auth.t should fail:
not ok 5 - No permission response
not ok 6 - checkauth returned failure
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Without next patch, run Auth.t.
Should fail now before next patch resolves problem:
not ok 2 - Login of patron2 approved
ok 3 - Did not return previous session ID
not ok 4 - New session ID not empty
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a method for filtering Koha::Holds resultsets by the
status belonging to Koha's concept of 'found'.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Holds.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a unit test which returns 2 authority records
via an implicit OR when searching for strings from two different
authority records.
Test plan:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Search.t
Signed-off-by: Jan Kissig <jan.kissig@th-wildau.de>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Acquisition/Order.t
This test should fail without the follow-up and pass with it.
* not ok 53 - No croak on missing biblionumber when cancelling an order
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
From the description of commit d25f3e8437
"""
Bug 22709: (RM follow-up) Clean up plugin tests
The plugin tests were failing due to failed rollbacks and run order.
This patch moves them into their own directory and adds a reset test to
restore the original state of the plugin system after the tests have
run.
"""
This is wrong, the tests are run in a random order.
We don't need this file.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Found by bug 32350.
The test does not need this value at all..
Test plan:
Run test.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/TestBuilder.t
And now run the whole test suite :)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Note: Test will be extended in follow-up. This fixes the
module_bit hash to follow the FK path from user_permissions
to permissions to userflags. One step was missed in the
existing test, although it did not fail. The change here
revealed that now.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/TestBuilder.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This script has a pattern to delete rows depending on a given
date/number of days, we should use the filter_by_last_update
Koha::Objects method.
No need for another method and tests, everything is already tested
there.
This patch also suggests to rename the reference to "background" and
"bg" with "jobs", which seems more appropriate and not an abbreviation
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Instead of deleting, I added a count :)
Note that one of the purges eventually deletes my
older jobs..
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/BackgroundJobs.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Jenkins reported:
not ok 1 - No jobs found without userenv
We need to check if there are jobs without borrowernumber.
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Highlighted by Bug 32030: fix test builder for boolean
The attribute is named "unique_id", not "unique"
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Highlighted by Bug 32030: fix test builder for boolean
# Failed test 'Checkouts with auto-renewal can be renewed earliest on due date if no renewalbefore'
# at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 343.
# got: '2022-11-18T14:16:12'
# expected: '2022-12-02T00:00:00'
# Failed test 'Checkouts with auto-renewal can be renewed earliest on due date if no renewalbefore'
# at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 349.
# got: '2022-11-18T14:16:12'
# expected: '2022-12-02T23:59:00'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5
We were reaching return $now
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Unit tests for add_to_bundle functionality that prevents bundle nesting.
Test plan
1) Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
2) The test should fail
3) Apply the second patch
4) Re-run the test and watch it pass.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The test cases here still assumed UTF-8 enocding in the middle
of the process. Can be much simpler.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If we are waiting for ajax (there is a sleep 1s) and the alert pops up
at the same time, Selenium is raising "unexpected alert open"
We should not wait for the ajax request, but better wait for the
alert actually.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Can't call method "itemnumber" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/Recall.pm line 343.
We should set item_level and not let TestBuilder pick a value.
This may have been caught (make it more obvious) by the recent change to
TestBuilder for boolean (Bug 32030: fix test builder for boolean)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
There is a missing wait_for_ajax call at after we click but wait_for_ajax
is waiting for the return of success, and the alert is there.
22:01:57 koha_1 | STRACE: /usr/share/perl5/Try/Tiny.pm:123 in Selenium::Remote::Driver::catch {...}
22:01:57 koha_1 | /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm:361 in Try::Tiny::try
22:01:57 koha_1 | (eval 541):1 in Selenium::Remote::Driver::__ANON__
22:01:57 koha_1 | (eval 543):2 in Selenium::Remote::Driver::__ANON__
22:01:57 koha_1 | /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm:654 in Selenium::Remote::Driver::_execute_command
22:01:57 koha_1 | t/db_dependent/selenium/authentication_2fa.t:282 in Selenium::Remote::Driver::get_alert_text
22:01:57 koha_1 | /usr/share/perl/5.32/Test/Builder.pm:334 in main::__ANON__
22:01:57 koha_1 | /usr/share/perl/5.32/Test/Builder.pm:334 in (eval)
22:01:57 koha_1 | /usr/share/perl/5.32/Test/More.pm:809 in Test::Builder::subtest
22:01:57 koha_1 | t/db_dependent/selenium/authentication_2fa.t:291 in Test::More::subtest
22:01:57 koha_1 |
22:01:57 koha_1 | # Looks like you planned 7 tests but ran 4.
22:01:57 koha_1 |
22:01:57 koha_1 | # Failed test 'Enforce 2FA setup on first login'
22:01:57 koha_1 | # at t/db_dependent/selenium/authentication_2fa.t line 291.
22:01:57 koha_1 | Error while executing command: no such alert at /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm line 411.
22:01:57 koha_1 | at /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm line 356.
22:01:57 koha_1 | # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 4.
22:01:57 koha_1 | [20:59:37] t/db_dependent/selenium/authentication_2fa.t
Test plan:
Confirm that the test pass (execute it in a loop, hundreds of times)
Confirm that the behaviour of 2FA "enforced" (see bug 30588) is still
working as expected.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
NOTE: I have the impression that this unit test is quite
rudimentary. I do not see the apply function tested?
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Templates.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
tcohen amended: stray deps
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
# Failed test at t/db_dependent/Koha/ERM/Agreements.t line 111.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[0]{user_role_id} = '2'
# $expected->[0]{user_role_id} = Does not exist
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 4.
Another fix may be better, please suggest if you disagree
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We should not (never) remove all patrons before tests
Test plan:
0. Don't apply the patch
1. Check an item out
2. Run the tests
=> Fail
3. Apply the patch
4. Create a patron with the erm permission
5. Run the tests
=> Must return green
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch returns the query string from build_query_compat
Under Zebra, either works for the link, for ES we need the simple string
I expand the test for get_components_query to test both engines
To test:
1.0) Set search engine to Elasticsearch
1.1) Go to Tools > Stage MARC records for import
1.2) Upload the example file
1.3) In the form, choose the format 'MARCXML'
1.4) Click 'Stage for import'
1.5) Click 'Manage staged records'
1.6) Click 'Import this batch into the catalog'
2) Change MaxComponentRecords to 10
3) In the staff interface, search the catalog for 'easy piano'
4) Click on the record 'Easy piano pieces for children'
5) Click on the 'show all component parts' link at the bottom of the Components tab
--> it searches for HASH(...) - returns no results
6) Try the same in OPAC
--> it searches for HASH(...) - returns no results
7) Apply patch and restart all
8) repeat 3-6
9) Results returned!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes a security breach in C4::Auth::check_api_auth introduced by bug 31378, where when someone called an api with the parameters userid and auth_client_login, check_api_auth would automatically asume the user calling was that userid.
This patch also introduces C4::Auth::create_basic_session(), a function that creates a session and adds the minimum basic parameters.
Signed-off-by: David Cook <dcook@prosentient.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Some libraries need to recalculate a patron's expiration date any time they are updated via a patron import from file.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons/Import.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Yes, it should be the last statement.
Actually the preceding delete is unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Triggered by seeing Koha::Account. Copy and paste ;)
But a bunch of other modules should (at least formally) be there.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Hooks added:
after_recall_action with new action add
How to test:
Run tests in t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Recall_hooks.t
Sponsored by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
[EDIT} Adding get_from_storage ;) For current consistency.
See further bug 32107.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch updates the `av_expand` occurences to `strings` to match the
change of the return structure of `_strings`.
We replace `+av_expand` in the headers with `+strings`, the expected
object method name from `api_av_mapping` to `api_strings_mapping` and
the internal hash key from `av_expand` to `strings`.
Test plan
1) Run the included unit tests.. all should still pass.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch updates the last remaining test that mentioned the now defunkt
x-koha-av-expand header.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Instead of a global av-expand flag (through a header) this patch
proposes to allow specifying +av_expand at the x-koha-embed header
level. This allows a more fine-grained control on what objects get avs
expanded. e.g.:
GET /patrons/123
x-koha-expand: +av_expand,checkouts.item+av_expand
=>
{
"_str": {
"city": { "str": "Córdoba", ... }
},
...
"checkouts": [
{
...,
"item": {
"_str": {
"not_for_loan_status": { "str": "Reference material", ... },
...
},
...
}
}
]
}
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Object.t \
t/Koha/REST/Plugin/Query.t \
t/db_dependent/Koha/REST/Plugin/Objects.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the returned data structure be simpler:
_str => {
attribute_1 => {
category => 'some_category_name',
str => 'description',
type => 'av'
},
...
}
The description is sensible to context, so if public => 1 is passed,
then lib_opac is passed, and lib is returned otherwise. Whenever we add
language to the combo, we will add it to the implementation.
Tests are adjusted accordingly, also to reflect the public => 1 use
case.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Object.t \
t/db_dependent/Koha/REST/Plugin/Objects.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Add tests in t/db_dependent/Koha/Object.t and
t/db_dependent/Koha/REST/Plugin/Objects.t
Sponsored-by: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Hook actions added:
after_hold_action adds new actions transfer, waiting and processing
How to test:
Run tests in t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Holds_hooks.t
Sponsored by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch perltidys the tests added lately. It also removes some
commented debugging lines.
Note: There's an attempt to write tests on the full auth workflow that
is commented out but left there on purpose for now.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Several FIXME comments added on the report addressed here.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Koszyk <lukasz.koszyk@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds routes for handling authentication providers to the REST
API.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/auth_providers.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Koszyk <lukasz.koszyk@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Koszyk <lukasz.koszyk@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Koszyk <lukasz.koszyk@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
- Agreements: Added tests for search and filter_expired as well as some missing comments; fix user flags
- Licenses: Updated tests to be on par with agreements; fix user flags
- EHoldings Packages: New tests on par with others
- EHoldings Titles: New tests on par with others plus import titles tests
- EHoldings Resources: New tests - get and list
- Documents: New tests; Only has GET endpoint; Tests to better mirror real documents lifecycle through a license;
- Users: New tests
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Field <jonathan.field@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Rollback should really be the last statement.
I am leaving get_from_storage here, but add a comment that it seems
unneeded at this moment. The Koha::Account::Offset->new and
C4::Stats::UpdateStats wont change the line.. But since the distance
in code is becoming a bit larger, I wont complain.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Hooks added:
after_account_action with new action add_credit
How to test:
Run tests in t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Account_hooks.t
Sponsored by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
On bug 29697, an explicit call to 'warn' was added, but no tests were
added for that behavior.
This patch adds that.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio/Metadata.t
=> FAIL: There's a warn, no tests for it :-(
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: A new test was added, no more warns printed
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch simplipfies the tests, and highlighs the fact the introduced
method should add filters to the current resultset.
It also aligns the tests with the currently adopted style.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Make sure syspref "opacbookbag" is set to "Allow".
2. Make sure syspref "HoldsNeedProcessingSIP" is set to "Don't fulfill".
3. Place a hold on an item.
4. Return item via SIP at the pickup library.
5. View biblio in Opac.
6. Note that it says "Available" as status.
7. Add biblio to Cart.
8. Open Cart.
9. Note that it says "Available" as status.
10. Apply patch.
11. Reload Opac page.
12. It should now say "On hold".
13. Reload Card page.
14. It should also say "On hold".
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio/Metadata.t
Fails with:
not ok 10 - 951-952s-953 in 245,100,942,951,953,999,952,952,952,952,952,952,952,952
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If not counting patrons holds, found or unfound, we no longer need this option
introduced by bug 28078
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes three changes:
1 - The borrower's own holds are not counted towards HighHolds limit
2 - We exclude all hold counts from CanItemBeReserved
3 - Static mode should only decrease hold when over the decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue, not when equal
Previously a patron's hold could put the count over the threshhold, and
if the patron is only allowed 1 hold per record, and the hold wasn't found before
the checkout, it would make all items unholdable, thus lowering the theshhold for
dynamic HighHolds
To test:
1 - Set sysaprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 1
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 1
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - "over the number of holdable items on the record" / dynamic
decreaseLoanHighHoldsIgnoreStatuses - blank
2 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record and loan period of 5
3 - Find/create a record with 3 items
4 - Place a title level hold for two different patrons
5 - Attempt to checkout item - note warning about high holds
6 - Cancel checkout
7 - Set decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - "on the record" / static
8 - Attempt checkout - note warning about high holds
9 - Apply patch
10 - Checkout item - no warning
11 - checkin item, replace hold
12 - Set decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - "over the number of holdable items on the record" / dynamic
13 - Checkout item - no warning
14 - prove t/db_dependent/DecreaseLoanHighHolds.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This shows that HomeOrHoldingBranch syspref is incorrectly not used by
_CalculateAndUpdateFine() when it decides which circ rule to use.
Run "prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/_CalculateAndUpdateFine.t" to
notice the tests now fail.
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This shows that HomeOrHoldingBranch syspref is incorrectly not used by
TooMany() when it decides which circ rule to use.
Run "prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/TooMany.t" to notice the tests
now fail.
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run without next patch. Should fail.
Run with next patch. Should pass.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31881
Make use of Koha::Cache::Memory::Lite to avoid hitting the database and
creating plugins object for every call to Koha::Plugins->call
Test plan:
1. Make sure plugins still work by executing
`prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Plugins.t`
2. Run the test script provided in the following patch to see how it
affects performances
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures HoldFeeMode is considered when displaying a message
to patrons on the OPAC that says they'll be charged a hold fee when
placing or collecting the hold.
When HoldFeeMode is set to not_always or "only if all items are checked
out and the record has at least one hold already" then the hold fee
message should only show if all items on the record are checked out, AND
the record has at least one hold already - both of these conditions must
be met.
To test:
1. Go to Administration -> Patron categories
2. Edit your patron category and give a hold fee of $1.
3. Go to Administration -> System preferences and search for
HoldFeeMode. Set to 'only if all items are checked out and the record
has at least one hold already' if not already set. Keep this tab open.
4. In another tab, open the OPAC.
5. Search the OPAC for a record with one item which is NOT checked out.
6. Go to place a hold on this record. Confirm you see a message saying
that you will be charged a hold fee, even though not all items are
checked out and the record does not have a hold --> This is the bug.
7. Apply patch and restart services.
Items available, no holds placed
8. Repeat steps 5-6. This time, you should NOT see the hold fee message.
Items available, holds placed
9. In your staff interface tab, find the same record.
10. Place a hold for a different patron on this record.
11. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, no holds placed
12. In your staff interface tab, cancel the hold placed on this record.
13. Check out the item to a different patron.
14. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
should NOT see the hold fee message.
No items available, holds placed
15. In your staff interface tab, keep the item checked out to another
patron.
16. Place a hold for a third patron on this record.
17. In your OPAC tab, find this record again and go to place a hold. You
SHOULD see the hold fee message.
Multiple holds
18. Search the OPAC for a record. Make sure your search will return more
than one result, including our test record.
19. Check the checkbox for our test record, plus another record where
the item is not checked out.
20. Click the Place hold button to place holds on all of our selected
records. You should only see the hold fee message above our test record.
21. In your staff interface tab, test setting HoldFeeMode to the other
values and confirm the hold message shows on the OPAC as expected.
22. Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua Libraries Trust
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This will fix t/db_dependent/www/batch.t and t/db_dependent/www/search_utf8.t
QA - improvement ideas welcome! It's definitely not the best we can do.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/www/search_utf8.t t/db_dependent/www/batch.t
must return green
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
With the follow-up changes, the return value is no longer a scalar, but
a hashref, but the tests weren't updated accordingly.
This patch fixes this situation.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This can be used to instruct staff how the item should handled when
it's checked in. For example items notforloan status has been
changed as "Invoiced item" while item has been on loan. When it's
checked in staff sees that they should put item aside for further
processing.
To test:
1. Apply patch and update database if needed
2. Set items notforloan status as -1 (or create new one)
3. Add line "-1: ONLYMESSAGE" to UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
4. Check item out for patron.
5. Check item in.
=> Description of notforloan status should be displayed.
=> Confirm notforloan status hasn't changed.
Also prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Sponsored-by: Koha-Suomi Oy
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We are seeing the following lines several times in the codebase
$cache->clear_from_cache("default_value_for_mod_marc-");
But values are never set for this key.
Test plan:
Ask you, "Is the above correct?"
Use the correct 'git grep' and 'git log' and confirm the assertion.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Error while executing command: no such element: Unable to locate element: //*[@id="circ_returns_checkin"]/div[2]/div[1]/div[2]/button at /usr/share/perl5/Selenium/Remote/Driver.pm line 411.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Cannot wait more for element '//input[@type="submit"]' to be visible at /kohadevbox/koha/t/lib/Selenium.pm line 189.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The tests create a new branch to make sure one exists without rules. We then add a rule
and delete it. We can simply create the new branch and never assign a rule
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The code for get_processingreturn_policy was very similar to
get_lostreturn_policy. Combining the two methods allows for use of
get_effective_rules which uses get_effective_rule_value which is cached.
This should reduce lines of code and improve performance
Tests updated and adjusted as well
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This enhancement gives the ability to set a policy for the lost item
processing fee that may get charged additional to the lost item
replacement cost. The processing fee can be:
- refunded
- refunded if unpaid
- kept
To test:
Set-up
1. Find an item, Item A. Go to Administration -> Item types and edit the
item type for Item A. Add a default replacement cost and a processing
fee and Save.
2. Go to Administration -> system preferences and set the following:
- WhenLostChargeReplacementFee: Charge
- BlockReturnOfLostItems: Don't block
3. Scroll down to the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Set
the refund lost item replacement fee policy to 'refund lost item charge'.
4. Edit Item A and set a replacement cost.
Reproduce
5. Check out Item A to Patron A.
6. Click the barcode to view Item A's information. Edit Item A and set
the Lost status to 'lost'.
7. Go back to Patron A's checkouts. The item should now be checked in
with two new charges applied - a lost item fee (the item's replacement
cost) and a lost item processing fee (set in item types).
8. Check in Item A to mark it as found.
9. Go back to Patron A's account. Notice the lost item fee has been
refunded, but the processing fee remains.
10. Manually pay or write off the processing fee. This enhancement
removes the need for this manual step.
11. Apply the patch and restart services
Test with lost item - refund
12. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge'.
13. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
14. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
15. Repeat steps 6 to 8 (do not check it yet).
16. Go back to Patron A's account. Pay the processing fee.
17. Repeat step 9.
18. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded (you'll now be in a credit because the
paid processing fee was also refunded).
Test with lost item - refund_unpaid
19. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge (only if unpaid)'.
20. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
21. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
22. Repeat steps 16 to 19.
23. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee should have been
refunded but not the processing fee, as this was already paid.
Test with lost item - leave
24. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'leave lost item
processing charge'.
25. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
26. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee and processing fee
should have been refunded but not the processing fee.
Other tests
27. Confirm tests pass
- t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha/CirculationRules.t
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
2. Observe test failure
1..3
ok 1 - before change, original borrowernumber found
not ok 2 - after change, changed borrowernumber found in holds
# Failed test 'after change, changed borrowernumber found in holds'
# at t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t line 167.
# got: '3786'
# expected: '3787'
ok 3 - after change, changed borrowernumber found in illrequests
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
not ok 4 - store borrowernumber change also updates holds
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
In those rare cases when authorities are updated by an external agency (or
even internally, by reviewing and correcting an exported authority file)
when the heading tag will be changed (seems odd but happens:
111 Congress ==> 110 Corporate body.Congress ;
100 Person ==> 110 Corporate body (a company named with person's name ;
151 City--object ==> 150 Object (city) etc.)
and then the authority record in Koha database will be updated with
bulkmarcimport or by calling directly ModAuthority from a custom script,
the merge function "doesn't know" that the change to the authority type
has been made and, consequently, doesn't adequately change the tag in
related fields in biblio records (as it would if two different records
with different authtypecode were merged with Koha interface).
This is because at the moment when merge function is being called
by ModAuthority:
Koha::Authority::Types->find($autfrom->authtypecode)
Koha::Authority::Types->find($authto->authtypecode)
both have the same value (because $mergefrom == $mergeto).
Therefore in case when $mergefrom == $mergeto and the heading tag changes,
$authtypefrom and $authfrom calculated in merge in the ordinar way are
misleading and should not be taken unto consideration.
Test plan:
==========
1. run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t
2. you should see problems in "Test update A with modified heading tag
(changing authtype)"
3. apply the patch
4. run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t again
5. the test should pass
Alternatively:
1. have an authority record used in biblio;
export it to file;
change 1XX heading tag to a different (but reasonable) value
and possibly change also the content of the heading
(one can delete also 942 but it doesn't matter);
make bulkmarcimport.pl -a -update -file <modified_auth_file> and
see that the tag in biblio record has not been changed (whereas
the type of authority record did change);
2. make orders in database (so that the authority type and the tag of
the field in biblio record correspond); apply the patch;
3. repeat the test from 1.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We are now using the patron category selects on almost all system
preferences, but OpacHiddenItemsExceptions was still missing.
To test:
- Before applying the patch:
- Add patron categories to OpacHiddenItemsExceptions using |
- Add configuration to OpacHiddenItems
- Verify all works as expected in the OPAC
- Apply patch, run database update
- Verify the system preference shows the correct settings from before
- Verify feature still works as expected
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
SendPasswordRecoveryEmail relies on the calling script to tell if there is an
existing valid recovery already. If there's an expired recovery-entry the
members/notices.pl script will try to create a new entry resulting in a duplicate
key error.
This patch fixes the bug by removing the need for the calling script to do the check as
since SendPasswordRecoveryEmail does the same thing anyway.
SendPasswordRecoveryEmail will now use DBIx ->update_or_create instead of looking at
the $update param to determine if it should update an existing entry or create a new.
The update param is removed from all calling scripts and test are updated.
To test:
1. Generate a password recovery mail for a patron
2. Let it expire.
3. Generate a new password recovery from staff to the same patron - Fail!
4: Apply patch
5. Generate a new password recovery from staff to the same patron - Success!
6. Opac password recovery flow should also work.
7. Tests pass.
Sponsored-by: Lund University Library
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds support for searching additional_fields when retrieving
invoices using C4::Acquisition::Invoices.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: The Research University in the Helmholtz Association (KIT)
Signed-off-by: Michaela Sieber <michaela.sieber@kit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds a tst for copy without subfields. I also clarify what eachstep does
so the next user/coder understands current behaviour
Update existing or add new: In the case where the field/subfield exists
we update, if we have two fields - one with the subfield, and one without, we
add the subfield to the one without
Copy field:
- If given a subfield - we will add to existing fields in the record
- If not given a subfield - we create an entirely new field
The logic of all of this is tricky, makes sense in a certain light, any complaints
are for a new bug :-)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Move a few tests into separate subtests.
Replace the BEGIN block.
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Replacing the vars statement.
Adding a larger subtest.
Removing TransformVersionToNum.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Context.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1) Set "RenewalPeriodBase" syspref to "the current date",
"CircControl" to "the library the item is from." and
"HomeOrHoldingBranch" to "the item's home library (homebranch)."
2) Run tests in t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and verify
that fails (the script should actually crash before all
can be run).
3) Apply the patch
4) Verifiy that all tests now pass
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
A subest in t/db_dependent/Holds.t leaves behind database cruft.
Test Plan:
Using koha-testing-docker:
1) SELECT branchcode FROM branches
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
3) SELECT branchcode FROM branches
Note cruft
4) reset_all
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
3) SELECT branchcode FROM branches
No cruft!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Resolves:
Use of uninitialized value $request_method in string eq at /usr/share/koha/C4/Auth.pm line 1122.
Use of uninitialized value $return in numeric gt (>) at /usr/share/koha/C4/Auth.pm line 1155.
We also remove the double logout from Auth.t
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Auth.t
Check if you do not see the warns anymore.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Comment speaks for itself. Look at surrounding code.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Try t/db_dependent/Koha/Auth/TwoFactorAuth.t on cmd line.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We need to replace 0 with 'disabled', and 1 with 'enabled'
Sponsored-by: Rijksmuseum, Netherlands
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes not required (for now) query parameters as we can
query using q= on those. They can be added back eventually, if needed.
Attributes now match the database as well.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch alters the code in the ES QueryBuilder. Reflecting
how things are handled in build_query_compat we clean the query,
but not the limits. In Zebra we simply recursivly call buildQuery,
but the ES query structure
This patchset adds a new ability to save searches on the staff client, and display them in the results
page on staff or opac as a new filter.
New filters can be added from the results page after a search, and there is an admin page for updating
deleting and renaming filters
There is a new permission to control management of these filters
New filters can be added that are not displayed along with facets, this allows for building custom links
using these filters to keep URLs shorter
Due to bug 30528 testing in ES is recommended
To test:
1 - Apply patches and update database and restart all
2 - Enable new system preference 'SavedSearchFilters'
3 - As superlibrarian perform a search in staff client, something broad like 'a'
4 - Note new 'Save search as filter' link on results page
5 - Click it, save search as new filter, check 'Staff client' visibility
6 - Perform another search
7 - Note the filter now appears above facets
8 - Click to it filter results
9 - Note results are limited by the new filter, and it is checked in the facets
10 - Confirm click the [x] removes the filter
11 - Go to administration->search filters
12 - Confirm the filter appears
13 - Edit and mark as OPAC visible
14 - Test OPAC to ensure it shows and can be applied/removed
15 - Copy URL with filter applied
16 - In adminsitration mark filter as not visible on staff or opac
17 - Confirm link above still works
18 - Create a new staff with catalogue and search filters permission
19 - Ensure they can access/save filters
20 - Remove filter permission and ensure they cannot
21 - Disable system preference
22 - Confirm links to search filters page are removed from admin home and admin sidebar
23 - Confirm filters do not appear on results and cannot be created
24 - Enable pref
25 - Create a filter
26 - From search filters page, click 'Edit search'
27 - Confirm you are taken to advanced search page letting you know which filter you are editing
28 - Confirm you can change searhc options and save
29 - Confirm you can perform the search from this page
Sponsored-by: Sponsored by: Round Rock Public Library [https://www.roundrocktexas.gov/departments/library/]
Signed-off-by: Michal Urban <michalurban177@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
