Basically, when you check the checkbox for the superlibrarian permission
in the patron record, it will disable and uncheck all the other
permission checkboxes. When you uncheck the checkbox for the
superlibrarian permission, it will renable those boxes. There is also
some JS code there to ensure that the other boxes are disabled when
returning to the change permission screen (i.e. the patch is not just a
click handler).
In the event that the checkboxes for superlibrarian and other
permissions are already checked, the user will be shown a pop-up window
explaining that the superlibrarian permission is mutually exclusive to
the others (since it already includes the others) and that the
permissions for that patron will then be reset to just include the
superlibrarian permission.
Comment: Tested on master. Works as described.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
first, replicate:
go to More -> permissions on any user. Notice that it says various things "privileges, flags, permissions" they are interchangeable and inconsistent.
also note that some of the permissions are nonsensical and/or not descriptive enough, or not using canonical terminology (borrowers instead of patrons, for example)
To test:
interface consistency changes
-> means "turns into"
- page title - privileges -> permissions
- breadcrumbs - privileges -> permissions
- headings - privileges -> permissions
- "set flags" button -> save
Permissions that have changed description:
- Catalogue changes to "Required for staff login" in bold (this was the original impetus for this boatload of changes)
- reports
- editauthorities
- management
- serials
- updatecharges
- circulate
- parameters
- borrowers
- tools
- staffaccess
- edit_patrons (only on updatedb, not on new db)
- Read through and make sure there are no typos, and that the descriptions seem to jive with what privileges the permission gives the user. Suggestions are, in fact, welcome.
- If you are feeling ambitious, go ahead and create a new, clean database and check the wording there as well - it should match what has been done in the db update.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Tested both with existing database and new database
Signed-off-by: Elliott Davis <elliott@bywatersolions.com>
Tested with existing database. Introduces no new mysql-isms.
Kudos for adding that syspref in bold, that got me when I first started with Koha
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
