This is a partial, perhaps temporary fix. "<", ">",
and "&" characters in patron comments (AKA reviews)
are converted to "<", ">", and "&" to avoid
certain attacks, e.g., a user entering a <script> tag
in a comment.
A more permanent fix should scrub all (or perhaps just
unsafe) tags from submitted comments entirely.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
Enhanced the ability of catalogers to specify how
bib and item records should be added, replaced, or
ignored during a staging import.
When an import batch of bib records is staged and commit,
the user can now explicitly specify what should occur
when an incoming bib record has, or does not have, a match
with a record already in the database. The options are:
if match found (overlay_action):
create_new (just add the incoming record)
replace (replace the matched record with the incoming one)
use_template (option not implemented)
ignore (do nothing with the incoming bib; however, the
items attached to it may still be processed
based on the item action)
if no match is found (nomatch_action):
create_new (just add the incoming record)
ignore (do nothing with the incoming bib; in this
case, any items attached to it will be
ignored since there will be nothing to
attach them to)
The following options for handling items embedded in the
bib record are now available:
always_add (add the items to the new or replaced bib)
add_only_if_match (add the items only if the incoming bib
matches an existing bib)
add_only_if_add (add the items only if the incoming bib
does *not* match an existing bib)
ignore (ignore the items entirely)
With these changes, it is now possible to support the following use cases:
[1] A library joining an existing Koha database wishes to add their
items to existing bib records if they match, but does not want
to overlay the bib records themselves.
[2] A library wants to load a file of records, but only handle
the new ones, not ones that are already in the database.
[3] A library wants to load a file of records, but only
handle the ones that match existing records (e.g., if
the records are coming back from an authority control vendor).
Documentation changes:
* See description above; also, screenshots of the 'stage MARC records
for import' and 'manage staged MARC records' should be updated.
Test cases:
* Added test cases to exercise staging and committing import batches.
UI changes:
* The pages for staging and managing import batches now have
controls for setting the overlay action, action if no match,
and item action separately.
* in the manage import batch tool, user is notified when they
change overlay action, no-match action, and item action
* HTML for manage import batch tool now uses fieldsets
Database changes (DB rev 076):
* added import_batches.item_action
* added import_batches.nomatch_action
* added 'ignore' as a valid value for import_batches.overlay_action
* added 'ignored' as a valid value for import_records.status
* added 'status' as a valid value for import_items.status
API changes:
* new accessor routines for C4::ImportBatch
GetImportBatchNoMatchAction
SetImportBatchNoMatchAction
GetImportBatchItemAction
SetImportBatchItemAction
* new internal functions for C4::ImportBatch to
determine how a given bib and item are to be
processed, based on overlay_action, nomatch_action,
and item_action:
_get_commit_action
_get_revert_action
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
I've refactored the subs I added in the previous commit so that they make a little
more sense and are in better places in the code base. I was really hoping to make use
of existing subs, but they all seemed so specific to particular uses.
The icons now show up on the OPAC item details page.
TODO: The icons still don't show up in the OPAC search results page.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
This patch adds the ability to associate icon images with authorized values.
They're not displayed anywhere yet, though. There's also a database update
in here. I took version "3.00.00.075", but I can change that later if it gets
taken before I commit these patches.
DOCUMENTATION CHANGES: When you add or edit authorized values, you can now
associate image icons with them. These icons come from the same icon sets
that you can have with your itemtypes, such as media type. They don't show
up anywhere yet, but that's coming. Keep an eye on
http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2047
for more updates.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
I'm extracting some of the icon manipulation logic so that I can get to it from the authorized values pages.
There should be no functionality or documentation changes with this commit.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
I've rearranged the two directories where media type icons live.
I've also added two more collections of icons, one from
http://apps.carleton.edu/campus/library/bridge_icons/
and one from liblime (Tina). The first has a license restriction that I added
to the "Licenses" tab on the "About" page.
Then, I've adjusted the Item Types Administration page so that it can deal
with multiple collections of icons.
I also added a test script to verify that the two identical icon directories
are actually identical.
DOCUMENTATION CHANGE: It's possible that we need to add something to the administration
documentation to indicate how you can add more sets of icons if you want. You simply add
directory to koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/img/itemtypeimg/ and to
koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/prog/itemtypeimg. The icons should start showing up.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
Make any MARC data available to labels module;
Also add a csv output option, allowing export of relevant
biblio data do a 3rd party label layout application.
Note: This patch REQUIRES a forthcoming updatedatabase patch !
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
The patch update the DB by adding a row in the subscription table (serialsadditems), that is filled with the value of the syspref.
then, the syspref is deleted.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
Check verifies that all subfields for each tag
are assigned to the same editor tab (or are ignored).
This situation can lead to data corruption, because
if an incoming MARC record has a field whose subfields
are assigned to different tabs, the first time that
record is saved in the bib editor, the field
will be split into multiple versions, each containing
the subfields assigned to a given tab.
Errors identified by this test known
in the MARC21 frameworks - I'm working on a patch to
correct those.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
