4d8b1ec786
I took as a base the patch of F. Demians, but made a lot of changes, so I think it is more logical to create a new patch as the behavior is not the same as previous patch. I tried to define DOM config files as a "miror" of record.abs, so the behavior be the same. If it is OK, we will be able to improve indexing later, for example suppressing warns, managing indicators or subdivisions, etc. I made some little changes to record.abs : - comments - 216 was indexed in Conference-name as well as Trademark. I suppose that "Conference-name" is an error, so I indexed only in Trademark - index 2 new notes : 340 / 356 The only difference between record.abs and DOM is that DOM config files does not index complete fields, but subfields. Ex : melm 200 ===> <kohaidx:index_subfields tag="200" subfields="abcdfgjxyz"> I took all the subfields from the UNIMARC Authorities manual. The only subfields not indexed are numeric subfields : $7, $8 for language of record, and $0,2,3,5,6 for 4XX/5XX/7XX To test : - index a set of bib and auth records with GRS-1 - make some searches on different kind of authorities - index the same records with DOM - make the same searches - You are not supposed to see differences Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de> As I am not a UNIMARC user it's hard for me to test this, but while testing other authority related patches I noticed that I couldn't index the UNIMARC authorities of the sample base. The files are obviously missing and reindex_zebra.pl notes this. With this patch applied, indexing works and authorities are searchable in my installation. Signed-off-by: Vitor Fernandes <fvernandes@keep.pt> Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
marc21 | ||
normarc/biblios | ||
unimarc |