51f0a0b722
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible to distinguish between different types of reservation failure. Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved(): -ageRestricted -tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves ############# - TEST PLAN - ############# ((-- AGE RESTRICTION --)) STAFF CLIENT 1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16". 2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years. 3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record. 4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached) ((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --)) 0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value) STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC 1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower. 2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations. ((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --)) 3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items" ((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --)) 1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower. 2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element. (Not individual results "Place hold") 3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be reserved just fine. Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values. t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible. Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch> Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
modrequest.pl | ||
modrequest_suspendall.pl | ||
placerequest.pl | ||
renewscript.pl | ||
request.pl |