Jonathan Druart
93244efa3c
If a hold is selected from the result list, we should let the ability to select an item-level hold. Test plan: I. Detail page 1/ Go to a bibliographic record detail page 2/ Click "Place hold" 3/ Select a patron => No change expected, you can select an item II. Search result, multiple holds 1/ Search for an item with more than one search result 2/ Select several items, click 'Place hold' 3/ Enter a patron card number => No change expected, item level holds are not available. III. Search result, single hold 1/ Search for an item with more than one search result 2/ Select only one item, click 'Place hold' 3/ Enter a patron card number => With this patch applied, item level hold is available. The screen is the same as when you place a hold from the bibliographic record detail page => Without this patch you cannot place an item-level hold QA notes: We could go a bit further and remove the 2 biblionumbers and biblionumber from hold script, as well as remove the checkMultiHold in request.tt. We should not have a biblionumbers param that contain a list of biblionumber separated by '/' but several biblionumber parameters instead. QA notes 2: About placerequest.pl, see bug 19618 comment 27. Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com> Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
request.tt |