"Renew All" -function aka. 65-66-messages work like this: 66-return messages has renewed items in BM-fields and non-renewables go into BN-fields.
If all items were renewable, then the reply message looks like:
Reply:
13.07.2022 10:06:17:530 OUTESTI1 6610005000020220713 100616AOOUPK|BM564N15977171|BM564N09203960|BM564N23261720|BM564N25161958|BM564N23455012|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHC4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHAY6AZCEFE
If items include renewables and non-renewables, the response includes the renewed items first, then a HASH mixed into the first BN-field, then rest of the renewed ones like they should show in BN-fields and after that, anohter HASH:
13.07.2022 14:41:32:610 OUTESTI1 6610003000420220713 144130AOOUPK|BM564N23455012|BM564N23261720|BM564N25161958|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHBN564N09203960|BN564N04191259|BN564N15977171|BN564N13788332|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHAY8AZC7C5
If all loans were unrenewable (this test included just one item), you first get a HASH in a BN-field, and another at the end.
13.07.2022 14:49:00:037 OUTESTI1 6610000000120220713 144858AOOUPK|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHBN564N19874533|C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASHAY9AZDD3B
Our self checkout/checkin machine can handle/parse these reply messages correctly, but this might not be the case with all self checkout/checkin devices.
Test Plan:
1) Unit test patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
3) Note failures
4) Apply this patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
6) Tests pass!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: lmstrand <lmstrand@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Kyle M Hall
bb7fc5025b
