b72de01813
Instead of using the machine sortable form of the callnumber from cn_sort the table was only sorting on the callnumber. This tries to fix it using the same technique as for sorting the differently formatted dates. To test: - If your database has items with suitably cataloged items, use these. Otherwise you could use the examples from the bug report: - Catalog items with the following barcodes: B 29 V55 1998 B29 .C55 2008 B29 .L24 1983 B29 .L264 1998 B29 .P666 2004 Make sure the LOC is selected in $2 as source of classification This makes sure the sortable form of the callnumber is calculated correctly. - Go to inventory - Search for your items - Before patch, they should sort on callnumber as above, after the patch the correct sort order should be: B29 .C55 2008 B29 .L24 1983 B29 .L264 1998 B29 .P666 2004 B 29 V55 1998 Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| js | ||
| lib | ||
| prog | ||