Nick Clemens
eb956eb4cf
Since the holds table can be split we need to calculate the
first priority for each table. However, currently we use the
first in the loop, not taking into account the waiting status.
This patchset sets the first_priority to the first non-found hold
Additionally, some clean-up is done to not display the alter
priority arrows for waiting holds.
To test:
1 - Place several holds on a title
2 - Confirm one of the holds to be waiting
3 - Attempt to move the last hold to the top
4 - Nothing happens
5 - Apply patch
6 - Note that the waiting hold has no options to move in the list
7 - Attempt to move the last hold to the top
8 - It moves as expected!
9 - Split the holds queue by pickup library
10 - PLace some holds for pickup at another branch
11 - Confirm moving these holds works within their own table
12 - Unsplit the queue
13 - Ensure the holds end where you expect (moving in a split
table didn't move above holds form another table)
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| css | ||
| en | ||
| img | ||
| js | ||
| sound | ||