Bug 11694: [QA Followup] strip out time portion when setting suspension date for...
authorKyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:40:55 +0000 (08:40 -0500)
committerGalen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:51:03 +0000 (16:51 +0000)
commitcb62a47bbf6fde22ac3bc4e33481c403b8c2c193
treeb691ff9bc3dd2cad68ba23ed54806f7e7c28c40c
parent17cf2657ef7fe0e293cdf4956b75f8e39c0aeeed
Bug 11694: [QA Followup] strip out time portion when setting suspension date for individual hold

This patch fixes an issue originally reported by bug 11702.

RM note: the patch is clear enough and doesn't break existing tests,
but on the other hand, I have been completely unable to reproduce
the original issue.

To test:

[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t passes

Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
C4/Reserves.pm