Bug 12630: Prioritizing "Hold starts on date" -holds causes all other holds to be...

Bug 12630: Prioritizing "Hold starts on date" -holds causes all other holds to be prioritized as well!

-------------------------
-- REPLICATE LIKE THIS --
-------------------------

0. Enable AllowHoldDateInFuture-system preference!

1. Select a biblio with some holds.
2. Place a hold with the "Hold starts on date"-attribute set to future.
3. More the specific hold up on the priority queue.
4. Add another normal hold, observe how it is prioritized with the "Hold starts on date"-hold, leaving old holds to the prioritization queue tail.

Unfair eh?

Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit 05ac7e0d4a1d4247df43f4a83ead509cfaffa04c)

Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8c509cf33029b376b9e426ede788c44654876b75)
Signed-off-by: Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki@biblibre.com>