From bcd566c5f6a847d7b3f359af119bb8218f23bf77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:31:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 18014: QA follow-up: Use ok() instead of is() for '>'
 comparison

Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>

Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
---
 t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t b/t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
index d3ebc25f1a..57fcc883ef 100755
--- a/t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
+++ b/t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ subtest 'AddAuthority should respect AUTO_INCREMENT (BZ 18104)' => sub {
     isnt( $id1, $id2, 'Do not return the same id again' );
     t::lib::Mocks::mock_preference( 'marcflavour', 'UNIMARC' );
     my $id3 = AddAuthority( $record, undef, 'GEOGR_NAME' );
-    is( $id3 > 0, 1, 'Tested AddAuthority with UNIMARC' );
+    ok( $id3 > 0, 'Tested AddAuthority with UNIMARC' );
     is( $record->field('001')->data, $id3, 'Check updated 001' );
 };
 
-- 
2.39.5