From fb77238117cf94388bea896d57b7cf78e47fd43a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Clemens Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:56:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Bug 21958: Allow 'e' subfield for authorities This bug specifically changed the code to allow for e in authority record This is a tricky issue, see link for discussion: https://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2008/2008-dp05-1.html It seems to be allowed, but possibly not useful? In either case I think for now we can allow in the test to fix this error and possibly open a new bug for further discussion Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart --- t/db_dependent/Heading.t | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/t/db_dependent/Heading.t b/t/db_dependent/Heading.t index e2f7064667..1615ea0eaa 100755 --- a/t/db_dependent/Heading.t +++ b/t/db_dependent/Heading.t @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ subtest "MARC21 tests" => sub { ok(!C4::Heading::valid_heading_subfield('100', 'e'), '100e not valid for bib'); ok(C4::Heading::valid_heading_subfield('100', 'a', 1), '100a valid for authority'); - ok(!C4::Heading::valid_heading_subfield('100', 'e', 1), '100e not valid for authority'); + ok(C4::Heading::valid_heading_subfield('100', 'e', 1), '100e valid for authority'); ok(C4::Heading::valid_heading_subfield('110', 'a'), '110a valid for bib'); ok(!C4::Heading::valid_heading_subfield('110', 'e'), '110e not valid for bib'); -- 2.39.5