Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds tests for the new 'feature': i.e. searchResults passes
the added $xslt_variables to the XSLTParse4Display method.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The previous assumption was wrong, we just need to return the last one.
The tests mean to have 2 different values in the claimed_on dates.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch removes the unused method, and cleans the tests.
To test:
1. Verify Koha::Libraries->pickup_locations is not used in the code:
$ git grep 'Koha::Libraries\->pickup_locations'
=> SUCCESS: no uses
2. Apply this patch
3. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Libraries.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We "mocked" the claim date to make sure we were not going to hit this
problem, but it's not done on the correct claim, it should be done on
the last one (so second).
from Koha::Acq::Order->claimed_date
294 my $last_claim = $self->claims->last;
295 return unless $last_claim;
296 return $last_claim->claimed_on;
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Remove unused Elasticsearch parameters 'key_prefix' and 'request_timeout'.
Refactor so that get_elasticsearch_params only returns parameters used
by Search::Elasticsearch, add class accessor for index_name.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Replace remaining Catmandu dependant code with the Search::Elasticsearch
equivalent.
To test:
1) Apply patch
2) Run tests in t/Koha/SearchEngine/Elasticsearch.t, t/Koha/SearchEngine/ElasticSearch/*
and t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/*
3) All tests should pass
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test proves now that a 'destructive merge' is removed by
DelAuthority.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t. Should fail when you
do not apply the other two patches and pass with them.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes Koha::Item->pickup_locations and
Koha::Biblio->pickup_locations always return an arrayref.
Test are adjusted to reflect this:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch and repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If an item is the last one of a biblio that have biblio-level hold
placed on it, we should block the deletion.
It takes effect if the hold is found (W or T), to follow existing
behavior for item-level holds.
If we want to block deletion for any holds we should deal with it on a
separate bug report.
Test plan:
0/ Setup
Apply the patches
Create Biblio B1 with 1 item
Create Biblio B2 with 2 items
Create Biblio B3 with 1+ item
Create Biblio B4 with 1+ item
Create Biblio B5 with 1+ item
Place a biblio-level hold on B1 and B2
Place an item-level hold on B3 and B4
Confirm the item-level hold for the items of B3 to mark it waiting.
1/ Delete those 6 items in a batch
=> delete of item from B1 is blocked on first screen - only 1 item left
and there is a biblio-level hold on the record
=> delete of items from B2 is *not* blocked on first screen - One of
them will block the deletion, but so far we are not aware of that
situation
=> delete of item from B3 is blocked on first screen - there is a
waiting item-level hold placed on the item
=> delete of item from B4 is *not* blocked - there is a hold but it is
not found
=> delete of item from B5 is *not* - there is no reason to block its
deletion
Note that you can only select items from B2, B4 and B5
2/ Select them and confirm the deletion
=> Nothing happened and you get a message saying that one of the 2 items
from B2 is blocking the whole deletion process
3/ Remove the biblio-level hold from B2
4/ Repeat 1
=> The deletion has been effective!
=> Note that there is something a bit weird as we are blocking items
from a biblio that has biblio-level holds on it (not found), but we
do not blocking the deletion of an item with a waiting item-level hold
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Run this test to see that export_elasticsearch_mappings.pl doesn't export
staff_client/opac fields.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's entirely possible that some libraries are relying on the current
before for part of their workflow. Do to this possibility, it seems like
a good idea to control this behavior via a system preference.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "don't trap"
4) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
5) Place a hold on that item
6) Check in the item
7) Note the item is not trapped for hold
9) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "trap"
10) Check in the item
11) Koha should now ask if you'd like to trap the item for the hold!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Negative notforloan statuses should allow holds to be placed but not captured.
Due to coronavirus, we have libraries setting all returned materials to a negative notforloan value of Quarantine for several days.
They're using UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin to set that status automatically. However, those items are still capturing for holds,
even though those items cannot be checked out until the notforloan status is removed.
In cases like an On Order item where we do want the hold to fill at checkin,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin should be used to clear that notforloan status so the hold can fill.
In master, if I set an item to a not for loan but holdable status ( < 0 ) I can place the hold,
capture the hold and set it to waiting, but *not* check it out to the patron!
This does not make sense. I should not be able to trap an item for checkout unless it can be checked out.
Test Plan:
1) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
2) Place a hold on that item
3) Check in the item
4) Trap the item for that hold
5) Attempt to check the item out to the patron, you will be unable to
because it is notforloan
6) Apply this patch
7) Restart all the things!
8) Repeat steps 1-3
9) The screen should no longer ask if the item should be trapped
to fill the hold!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Ingram <Catherine.Ingram@cedarparktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Since our use ok Koha::Objects, there's been an implicit instantiation
happening in ->search that has somehow hidden the fact that classes need
instantiation...
This change in ->delete and ->update made it clear because of the
failures/hangs on the tests.
This patch instantiates Koha::Patron::Categories before attempting to
call ->update.
The original patches for this bug are correct and the only issue here is
that we need to document better than for some methods, instantiation is
not implicit and is required first. This is awkward and I would prefer
to force everyone to call ->new first. But I understand it would be
inconvenient.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Template/Plugin/Categories.t
=> FAIL: Notice it hangs, Ctrl+c to abort
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests dong hang, and in fact pass
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When regressions are found, we introduce regression tests :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch improves the semantics of the update routine to more clearly
separate the 'fields' we're modifying from the 'options' we wish to
apply to the modification.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
# Failed test 'check_password hook tests'
# at t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Patron.t line 83.
[The password was rejected by a plugin]# Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 5.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Sponsored-by: Cork Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Angela O'Connor Desmond <angela.oconnordesmond@staff.ittralee.ie>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
So far we only record the number of claims and the date of the last
claim, in the aqorders table.
To keep track of the different claim dates, this patchset is going to
make the following DB changes:
* Create a new table 'aqorders_claims' (id, ordernumber, claimed_on)
* Remove the two columns from the aqorders table: claims_count and
claimed_date
This will allow to display the different claim dates where needed: on
the late orders page, and the basket page.
To avoid additional fetches of Koha::Acquisition::Orders, GetLateOrders
has been moved to Koha::Acquisition::Orders->filter_by_late
That way we are going to add consistency, robustness, and cover the
feature with new tests.
Test plan:
0/ Create a bunch of new orders. Make sure they are from different
vendor (with different delivery time).
1/ Go to the late orders page and claim some orders
2/ Reclaim some of those orders
3/ Confirm that you can see the different claim dates for a given orders
(the history of the late orders claims is kept and displayed)
4/ Bonus point: Regression tests:
a. Modify the closedate of the basket in the database. That
will allow you to make sure the patch set did not introduce regressions.
It would be good to test the different filters on the late orders page:
* delay
* Estimated delivery date from/to
* Vendor
b. Confirm that the subtotal and the total values from the late orders
page is correct.
c. Test the update database entry: do not apply these patches, claims
some orders against master. Apply the patch, execute the update DB entry
then confirm that the number of claims is correct (note that the dates
will not as it is not possible to guess them).
QA note: the branchcode parameter has been removed from filter_by_late.
At first glance it seems that it was not used.
Sponsored-by: Cork Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Angela O'Connor Desmond <angela.oconnordesmond@staff.ittralee.ie>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1. Create a course (disabled)
2. Add a reserve to this course for an item and set a homebranch
different from the item's homebranch
3. Enable the course
4. Verify that the item's homebranch has changed
5. Disable the course
6. Verify that the item's homebranch was reset to its initial value
7. prove t/db_dependent/CourseReserves/CourseItems.t
Sponsored-by: Université de Lyon 3
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
