The previous patch removed search_boxes_loop - that's okay, it was always
getting the same three values.
If we don't do something in the template though, we get no boxes
Ultimately this should be a include, and not a hardcoded loop, but keeping changes
small for backporting
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
It could lead to server freeze if set to a big value (we are pushing
into an array and so RAM is being fulfilled, and CPU is looping).
I don't understand the point of this cookie.
var numPar = $("#booleansearch fieldset p").size();
if (numPar > [% search_boxes_count | html %]){
jQuery.cookie("num_paragraph", numPar,{ path: '/'});
}else{
jQuery.removeCookie("num_paragraph", { path: '/'});
}
But "#booleansearch fieldset p" does not exist, it's not 'p' but 'div'
elements.
I've removed the code related to num_paragraph and the "Return to the
last advanced search" feature still works as before.
From this comment:
# determine what to display next to the search boxes (ie, boolean option
# shouldn't appear on the first one, scan indexes should, adding a new
# box should only appear on the last, etc.
The only bit that is not working as described is "adding a new box
should only appear on the last", but it has been working this way for
a long time already I think, and I don't see it as a bug.
Test plan:
Read the code, check that the above is correct.
Search for regression in this "return to last adv search" feature added
by bug 13307.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - edit AcquisitionLog, NewsLog, NoticesLog to change their values
2 - in About Koha, see the errors noted above
3 - apply patch, restart services
4 - re-edit AcquisitionLog, NewsLog, NoticesLog to change their values again
5 - reload About, see errors are cleared
6 - confirm that actions are logged as expected when logs are on, not logged when logs are off
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If you look at Bug 24764 and Bug 26942 we adjusted the TinyMCE for the News tool so it will not do some types of automatic code clean up.
The TinyMCE editor for system preferences which can be enabled by 'UseWYSIWYGinSystemPreferences' has the same problems.
We should make the configurations the same.
To Test:
1. Turn on 'UseWYSIWYGinSystemPreferences'
2. Go to a system preference like 'RestrictedPageContent'
3. Try entering something like '<i class="fa fa-facebook-official" aria-hidden="true">TEST</i>' in the Source Code window
4. It gets cleaned up by the editor
5. Try something like '<a href="https://www.test.com" referrerpolicy=""no-referrer-when-downgrade">TEST</a>'
6. It's cleaned up by the editor.
7. Try something like '<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans” rel=“stylesheet">'
8. Cleaned up by editor.
9. Apply patch
10. Try step 3, 5, and 7 again.
11. It should not be changed by the editor
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes the 'Requested item type' column not showing for holds
history in OPAC.
It was due to a template variable not being set. When solved, it become
clear that an import was missing for a template plugin.
To test:
1. Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
2. Add a couple item-type constrained holds
3. See them in the holds history page
=> SUCCESS: Item type column shows
4. Enable OPACHoldsHistory
5. Look for them in the OPAC
=> FAIL: The item type column doesn't show
6. Apply this patch
7. Repeat 5
=> SUCCESS: The column shows! The item type is described!
8. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
GetItemsInfo sorts the items using serial fields if the biblio is
defined as a serial
The fields may not be defined. We can add a fallback to blank in this case
To test:
1 - Mark a record with items as serial in the marc (942$s)
2 - At least one of the items should have no enumchron defined
3 - Load the detail page
4 - Warns in logs:
[WARN] Use of uninitialized value in string comparison (cmp) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Items.pm line 811.
5 - Apply patch and restart all
6 - Reload the details page
7 - No more warns
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In test suite db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t actually shows :
1..10
ok 1 - Patron with no dateofbirth is always valid for any category
ok 2 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2015-03-01, is 5, should be valid=0
ok 3 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2015-02-27, is 5, should be valid=1
ok 4 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2009-02-28, is 11, should be valid=0
ok 5 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2015-02-28, is 7, should be valid=1
ok 6 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2009-02-27, is 11, should be valid=0
ok 7 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2016-08-27, is 3, should be valid=0
ok 8 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2009-03-01, is 11, should be valid=1
ok 9 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2007-08-27, is 12, should be valid=0
ok 10 - Today=2020-02-28, dob=2015-02-28, is 5, should be valid=1
Some ages are incorrect :
1) dob=2009-03-01, is 11
=> it is age 10
so valid=1 in category 5 to 10
2) dob=2015-03-01, is 5
=> it is age 4
so valid=0 in category 5 to 10
3) dob=2015-02-28, is 7
=> this date of birth is already tested
I suppose here dob is wrong, age wanted is 7 in the middle of age restrictions.
so dob=2013-02-28
This patch fixes ages.
Also adds the category code 'AGE_5_10' in messages to display age limits
Test plan :
Run prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t without and with patch
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
File koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/js/browser.js is not parsed by translation
process, which uses koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/js/**/*.js
We must move it to prog/js.
Test plan :
1) Perform a search on staff interface
2) Click on a result
3) Check you see records browser
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In masthead.inc there is a wrapper for the main search bar called #opac-main-search. Prior to Bug 20168 that warpper had a class name of 'mastheadsearch'.
Historically CSS/JS customization of the main search bar was done via the mastheadsearch class.
Test plan:
1. Inscept the element on the OPAC main page and see the element with an ID of 'opac-main-search'.
2. Apply patch
3. Inscept that same element and you should now also see a class of 'mastheadsearch'.
4. Nothing visually should be different with the patch applied.
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds $e to 111 and 611, but removes it from 100 and 110 as it's
used for the relator term there and should not be copied. Same for 111$j.
Test plan:
1. Have a biblio record with, for example, 711 field with a $e subfield.
2. Have two auth records: one with 111 field reflecting the 711 field and second similar but without $e subfield
3. Have LinkerModule set to Default
4. Run link_bibs_to_authorities.pl
5. 711 should remain unlinked since there were two record found by the Default Linker and no one was chosen.
6. Apply the patch.
7. Run link_bibs_to_authorities.pl
8. 711 should be linked now.
Repeat testing in similar fashion for authorities:
9. 100/110 $e
10. 111 $j
NB zebra index definition is OK:
kohaidx:index_match_heading tag="111" subfields="acdefghjklnpqstvxyz" subdivisions="vxyz">
in etc/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/authorities/authority-koha-indexdefs.xml
Signed-off-by: Sara Brown <sbrown@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In tools home, we actually see 2 wordings : biblios/bibliographic authorities/authority
Looks like bibliographic is more correct.
Test plan :
1) Apply patch and look at words in tools home /cgi-bin/koha/tools/tools-home.pl
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
For the detail page, the MARC view etc. we use the text:
The record you requested does not exist (488).
I think this is better than "not found", because that sounds
like it might be an issue with the search index, which we can
rule out in this case.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Just checking with a regex that whether an input looks like a biblionumber
is not enough, we need to also verify there is a biblio really existing
in the database and skip processing of hold request for non-existent
biblionumbers.
To test:
1) Go to page /cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumbers=XXXXX
where XXXXX is non-existent biblionumber, notice internal server error
2) Apply patch
3) Repeat step 1 and notice we cannot place a hold
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch corrects the markup for local cover images attached to items.
The correction allows correct display of an "edit" link when the user
clicks an item's cover image and views it in the lightbox-style modal.
To test, apply the patch and make sure the "LocalCoverImages" system
preference is enabled.
- View the details of a bibliographic record in the catalog which has
items attached..
- In the table of holdings, click Edit -> Upload image.
- Upload an image for the item and return to the bibliographic detail
page.
- Your image should now be displayed in the holdings table.
- Click the image to view it.
- In the footer of the modal there is an edit link: "Local cover image
(edit). Before this patch the edit link would lead to a missing page.
After applying the patch the link should take you to the "Image view"
where you have the option of deleting the image or uploading another
one.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch changes the series of events striggered when a non-blocking
modal dialog is displayed during checkin. If the "TransfersBlockCirc"
preference is set to "Don't block," the user can continue to check in
even though a transfer dialog has appeared. This patch hides the modal's
"backdrop" element so that the modal doesn't look like one which blocks
further action.
There is no Bootstrap backdrop option which both hides the backdrop and
makes it non-blocking, so we have to use the default non-blocking option
and "manually" hide the backdrop.
The "show.bs.modal" event must be added in order to make the
necessary change before the modal is displayed. This prevents the
darkened backdrop from appearing and then being hidden.
To test, apply the patch and rebuild the staff interface CSS
(https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Working_with_SCSS_in_the_OPAC_and_staff_client).
- Set the "TransfersBlockCirc" preference to "Don't block."
- Check in an item which belongs to another library.
- A modal dialog should be displayed: "Please return this item to XXX"
- The page "behind" the modal should not be darkened, and the cursor
focus should remain in the check-in field.
- Checking in an item which as a hold should still trigger the
"blocking" behavior: The modal must be dismissed by clicking one of
its buttons (not the backdrop) and the page behind the modal should be
darkend.
- Test with "TransfersBlockCirc" set to "Block." Checking in an item
belonging to another library should trigger the "blocking" modal
behavior.
- Test that other checkins still work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If we no longer offer the sortfield with :asc actively, we should
probably write it somewhere too.
Replaced a few defined tests by empty test. No need to split empty
string or zero etc.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This code is odd -we build a select in the template, then turn it into a list of links using javascript
This patch adds a direction data element and uses it while building the links
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a check for a 'direction' paramter in list sorting.
It maintains the existing syntax for sorting 'sortfield=field:direction'
but adds support for the form used in paginations and more commonly thtoughout
Koha' sortfield=field&direction=direction'
To test:
1 - Create a public list
2 - Add enough items to generate two pages (40 worked for me)
3 - View the list and enforce sorting by date added descending:
sortfield=dateadded:desc
4 - Note the titles shown
5 - Click to second page using the pagination bar
6 - Note the same titles are shown, in a reversed order
7 - Apply patch
8 - repeat 305
9 - Second page is sorted correctly!
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
We now use the codes from the half implimented error_code in place of
the plain text that was being added to the delivery_note field. As part
of that we rename the field to failure_code to clarify it's intended
content.
Test plan
1/ Confirm t/db_dependent/Letters.t passes
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch updates the unit tests to check for failure_code instead of
delivery_note and catches a missing case.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Update the database field name from 'delivery_note' to 'failure_code' to
more accurately denote it's use.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 12759 added the ability to pass list contents to batch record
modification/deletion tools.
Patch Bug 22417 [Restore the 'add to list' feature] removed the fetch
of lists in batch_record_modification.pl I don't understand why.
It still exists in batch_delete_records.pl.
Note that this is needed when first form is displayed.
Test plan :
1) Create a private and a public list of records
2) Open Tools > Batch record modification
3) Check you can use the lists
4) Open Tools > Batch record deletion
5) Check you can use the lists
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Find closest ul for value builders.
Since Bug 22399 changes in biblio editor, value builder unimarc_field_4XX.tt JavaScript
code does not do its job anymore.
This is because a div is added and this call is now wrong:
var subfields = whichfield.parentNode.parentNode.getElementsByTagName('input');
Test plan 1:
1) Use a UNIMARC DB
2) Define value builder unimarc_field_4XX on 463$t
3) Create a record B1 with 200$a, 200$f
4) Create a new record B2
5) Click on value builder in 463$t
6) Search for record B1
7) Click on "Choose"
=> Without patch only 463$t is filled with a value
=> With patch 463 $t, $a, $0 and $9 are filled with a value
Test plan 2:
1) Use a MARC_21 DB
2) Define plugin marc21_linking_section.pl on 773$t
3) Make sure 773$t and other subfields are visible in intranet/editor
4) Create a new record in basic cataloging editor
5) Click on value builder in 773$t
6) Search fro a record
7) Click on "Choose"
=> Without patch fields are not fileld
=> With patch subfields are correctly filled
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In OPAC new purchase suggestion opac-suggestions.pl for library combobox :
actually first value is selected, user library should be selected.
Test plan :
1) Create a new library named 'ZZZ top'
2) Set this library on a user U1
2) Loggin at OPAC with user U1
3) Create a new suggestion
=> Check library 'ZZZ top' is preselected
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
There was another permission check for edit_items directly below,
so instead of changing them to both be edit_items, I think we
can now remove one.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1: log in as a user with edit_items but not edit_catalogue
2: confirm you do not get an Edit Item link on moredetail.pl
3: apply patch, restart, reload
4: confirm link now shows
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Since bug 25026 DBMS errors are raised, but the report module is not
dealing correctly with the errors.
If an error occurred in execute_query, next queries will fail as well,
we should skip them.
Test plan:
1. Create report from SQL queries, containing errors (invalid syntax, etc.)
'SELECT id FROM borrowers' can do it
2. Execute the query
=> Without this patch you get a 500
=> With this patch applied you see that the error raised at DBMS level
is propagated to the UI
3. Confirm that there is no regression on valid queries
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The holds queue builder can take a very long time to run on systems with many holds. For example, a partner with 124,784 unfilled ( not found ) holds, is taking about 64 minutes to run. If we run that same number of holds in 5 parallel chunks ( splitting the number of records as evenly as possible, but *not* taking into account the holds per bib ), it takes 21.5 minutes. If we use 10 loops, it takes less then 14 minutes.
Test Plan:
1) Generate a huge number of holds ( a few thousand at the minimum )
2) Run the holds queue builder, use the `time` utility to track how much
time it took to run
3) Set HoldsQueueParallelLoopsCount to 10
4) Repeat step 2, note the improvement in speed
5) Experiment with other values for HoldsQueueParallelLoopsCount
6) prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
This patch adds a call to track_login_daily for the AuthenticatePatron
method in ILSDI.
Many libraries use this ILSDI endpoint for electron book borrowing and
need to maintain the lastseen based on this type of lending.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The work of the first patch was not yet finished.
[1] Similar changes to template for Cataloging and Authorities
[2] Made a better distinction now between short title on button
and long title on menu and modal
[3] The short title parameter removes need for previewed var
[4] To keep related code closer, moved the dataPreview hidden code
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
For translated interface.
Using 'Order' (the button text) was not a good idea as the interface can
be translated :)
Signed-off-by: Mark Hofstetter <koha@trust-box.at>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Our query for lowest priority holds only needs to adjust holds on the biblio we are looking at
so I add biblionumber
Additionally we can simply find the end of the array and use that rather than 99998
so I set new_rank to scalar @priority
Lastly, we don't need to fetch the lowest priority holds if we are ignoring lowest priority
so I move it into the conditional
To test:
1 - Add holds with lowest priorty to 2 records in the catalog
2 - Add a hold on a third record
3 - Note errors in log like:
[2021/07/23 17:47:17] [WARN] splice() offset past end of array at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 1649
4 - Apply patch and restart all the things
5 - Add a new hold on third record - no warns
6 - Make one of the holds on third record have lowestPriority (click rightmost arrow with line at bottom)
7 - Note no warns
8 - Adjust other holds on record and note no warns
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
TO test:
1 - Enable OAI-PMH server in Koha
2 - Set OAI-PMH:MaxCount to 5
3 - Define 6 sets in Admin->OAI sets configuration
Can setSpec and setName to 1,2,3....
4 - Browse to:
http://localhost:8080/cgi-bin/koha/oai.pl?verb=ListSets
5 - Click 'Show more'
6 - Keep seeing the same 5 - note the page says 'Results fetched -4-0'
7 - Apply patch
8 - Restart all the things
9 - Reload the ListSets URL above
10 - Click 'Show more'
11 - See the 6th set and note no 'Show more'
12 - Set OAI-PMH:MaxCount to 1
13 - Go to the base ListSets url again
14 - Confirm you can 'Show more' until you reach the end
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds regression tests for the behavior.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>