The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The selector is not correct, we must to not rely on the number.
This patch fixes a regression caused by bug 28445, but also a
long-standing bug.
* Regression:
The barcode plugin is broken is autoBarcode=<branchcode>yymm0001
There is a JS error in the console:
Uncaught TypeError: form.field_value is undefined
Focustag_952_subfield_p_878344
Focustag_952_subfield_p_878344_handler
jQuery 11
BindEventstag_952_subfield_p_878344
* Long standing bug:
If there are several item forms on the same page, the branchcode is not
correctly retrieved. For instance on the "Serial edition" page there are
2 item forms, the homebranch that is used by the barcode plugin will be
the one from the last form.
Test plan:
* regression
Set autoBarcode=<branchcode>yymm0001
Catalogue a new item, click into the barcode input
Notice that without this patch you get a JS error in the console
* long standing bug
Create a new subscription, select "Create an item record when receiving this serial".
Receive a serial
Open the 2 item forms ("Click to add item")
Select 2 different home library and click the barcode inputs.
The prefix (branchcode) should be correct with this patch applied.
QA Note: it would be way easier if all add item forms were using the new
methods, it could be:
let loc = document.getElementsByName('items.homebranch')[0].value;
Yes, that's all!
Signed-off-by: Hayley Pelham <hayleypelham@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should remove the debug statements or use Koha::Logger when we want
to keep it.
Test plan:
Confirm that occurrences of remaining occurrences of DEBUG need to be
kept (historical scripts for instance)
Confirm that the occurrences removed by this patch can be removed
Confirm that the occurrences replaced by Koha::Logger are correct
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me, noting a few minor points on BZ.
JD amended patch: replace "warn #Finished" with "#warn Finished", and
put the statement on a single line
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes some minor changes to the JavaScript generated by the
cataloging plugins: <script> "type" attribute removed; single-line
comments converted to multi-line style; obsolete //<
