To Test:
1) Place a hold on an item.
2) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Item is now listed as
waiting.
3) Set branch to a different library.
4) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Notice that nothing but a
local use is recorded.
5) Apply the patch.
6) Repeat steps 1-4. Notice that the hold is triggered around routed to
its original pickup location. A transfer is set and the hold status
is changed from waiting to correctly showing the item as in transit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the wording in the 'lost and found' process to more
closely reflect what the process is achieving by replacing 'RETURNED'
with 'FOUND'
Test plan:
1) Grep codebase for _FixAccountForLostAndReturned and note there are no
longer any instanced of it.
2) Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and note it passes
3) Test returning/renewing an item that has been marked as lost and note
the updated values in the accountlines now use LOST_FOUND as
credit_type_code and 'FOUND' as the status for the 'LOST' fee
(debit_type_code 'LOST')
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Checkout an item with auto renewal set and eligible for auto renew
2 - Set no renewal before in the circ rules to 99 (something greater than the checkout period)
3 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl
4 - Check the statistics table, note the branch for renewal is null
SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE itemnumber={itemnumber} AND type='RENEWAL'
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat 1-4
7 - Note the branch is set to the issuing branch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Veal <eveal@mckinneytexas.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
0 - Do not apply this patch
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Make sure a fee will be charged when lost
3 - Mark the item lost
4 - Make sure the fee will not be refunded on return of the item
5 - Return the item
6 - Check it out to a new patron
7 - Write off the fine for the original patron
=> The item is now checked in
8 - Apply this patch and repeat 1 to 7
=> The item is still checked out
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It appears that the transition to using Koha::Item in AddReturn has introduced a bug. Previously $item was a hashref with the key 'itemtype', now that it's an object, it has no itemtype method and so triggers an error with the message "The method Koha::Item->itemtype is not covered by tests!".
Test Plan:
1) Enable Branch Transfer Limits via itemtype
2) Check in an item
3) Note the error
4) Apply this patch
5) Restart all the things!
6) Check in an item
7) No error!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Maribeth (Turner) Shafer <mshafer@ckls.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Use of uninitialized value $record_restrictions in uc at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Circulation.pm line 3981
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If there is a limit for the number of suspension days
(maxsuspensiondays), the calculation is wrong. We are reducing the
number of days before taking into account the suspension charging
interval.
For instance, a checkin is 1 year late and the circ rules are defined to
charge 7 days every 15 days.
It results in 365 * 7 / 15 days of suspension => 170 days
Before this patch the calculation was:
365 * 7 limited to 333, 333 / 15 => 22 days
Test plan:
Given the examples in the commit messages and the description of the bug
report, setup complex circulation rules and confirm that the debarment
dates are calculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
No changes expected here. For the next patch we are going to need to add
test and calculate the new debarment date. To ease the writing of these
tests the calculation is moved out of the existing subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Wrong conflict resolution, the following
commit 6eade474ed
Bug 18276: Remove GetBiblioFromItemNumber - Easy ones
restored a previous change from
commit 546379cc92
Bug 17680: C4::Circulation - Remove GetItemIssue, simple calls
Not that "easy" or "simple"...
Test plan:
Run the test before and after this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When you use the date picker or book drop mode and check in an item that is due on that date, a fine is assessed and not refunded.
For example: item 12345 is due on 11/19/2109 23:59. On 11/20/2019 I check the item in using date picker/book drop setting the check in date to 11/19/2019 23:59, the patron is charged a fine, and the fine is not cleared as would be expected, since the item is being checked in before it is overdue.
Test Plan:
1) Back date a checkout so it is overdue
2) Run fines.pl to generate the fine
3) Return the item, backdating to the same date/time is was due
4) Note the fine was not removed
5) Apply this patch
6) Repeat steps 1-3
7) Fine should be zeroed out now!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes the calculation of suspension expiration configuration
detached from the finesCalendar syspref. This way libraries have more
flexibility when setting circ rules.
I wrote this path as a bugfix, because the recent change pushed by bug 19204
changed this behavior and libraries have been complaining since they got
upgraded.
It is a minor change, just adding the new syspref, and replacing the
single place in which it is used for debarment calculation for the new
one.
The tests are updated similarly, just adding the new mocked syspref as
it was with the old one.
To test:
- Apply this patches
- updatedatabase
- Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
- Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This adds the ability to alert a librarian of an item claimed as returned is actually returned.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We require next_open_day & prev_open_day to be more flexible. We could
create a separate sub, but that's not very DRY given that they'll do
pretty much the same thing.
So next_open_day becomes next_open_days and prev_open_day becomes
prev_open_days and both functions accept an additional parameter which
determines how many days they add or subtract.
All calls of these two functions have been modified accordingly.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire West and Chester Council
Sponsored-by: Cheshire East Council
Sponsored-by: Newcastle City Council
Sponsored-by: Sefton Council
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the variable name '$branch' to '$branchcode' in a
number of places to make it clearer what the variable contains.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It looks like over progressive rebases of bug 20912 a clause was lost
within CanBookBeIssued such that a fatal error may be triggered if an
item with no corresponding itemtype was passed into the routine.
Additionally the we were passing a Koha::Library object to CalcDateDue
rather than a branchcode which resulted in a different duedate being
used in 'CanBookBeIssued' when compared to 'AddIssue'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
* Update C4::Accounts::chargelostitem
* Update C4::Accounts::manualinvoice
* Update C4::Circulation::_FixOverduesOnReturn
* Update C4::Circulation::_FixAccountForLostAndReturned
* Update C4::Overdues::UpdateFine
* Update C4::Overdues::GetFine
* Update C4::Overdues::GetOverduesForBranch
* Update Koha::Account->pay
* Update Koha::Account->add_debit
* Update Koha::Account->non_issues_charges
* Update Koha::Account::Line->apply
* Update Koha::Account::Line->adjust
* Update controller scripts
* Update reports scripts
* Update tests
Test Plan
1) Run the test suit and ensure everything still passes
2) Test reports/cash_register_stats still works
3) Test that adding manual invoices still works
4) Test that making payments still works
5) Test that lost item fee handling still works
6) Test that invoice printing still works
7) Test that the sco still works
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use the existing pattern of calling schema directly on
Koha::Database rather than creating a new object.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch starts a transaction and only commits if renewal and fines
updates and charges are successful (partial in any cna be problematic)
There is no feedback (as currently there is none either) but if part
fails, all fails.
I didn't include stats and notifications in the transaction, but we
could. (Edit JD: not true, they are included)
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3 - Attempt circs and renewals should be no difference
4 - If possible make part of transaction fail and ensure all fails
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Amended: commit title and one indendation (return statement)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When trying to transfer an unknown barcode in
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl you get the error :
Can't call method "itemnumber" on an undefined value at
/home/koha/src/C4/Circulation.pm line 319.
This comes from C4::Circulation::transferbook which should stop when
finding unknown barcode.
Test plan :
1) Go to /cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl
2) Enter a barcode not existing in database
3) Without patch you get a software error, with patch you get a message
saying 'No Item with barcode'
4) Enter a barcode existing in database and check transfer is OK
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Bin Wen <bin.wen@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t, t/db_dependent/Koha/Account.t,
t/db_dependent/Koha/Account/Lines.t and
t/db_dependent/api/v1/patrons_accounts.t and all should pass.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Circulation::TooMany gets itemtype from $item var beeing a Koha::Item unblessed.
When itemtype is at biblio level, calling $item->{'itemtype'} is wrong.
Test plan :
1) On a catalog with itemtype at item level : pref item-level_itypes=1
2) Create a biblio record with itemtype BOOK
3) Create an item on this biblio record with itemtype BOOK
4) Delete all issuing rules
5) Create a issuing rule with itemtype BOOK, any catagorie, any branch
6) Check-out the item
7) => Checkout is allowed
8) Check-in item
9) Change itemtype at biblio level : pref item-level_itypes=0
10) Check-out the item
11) => Checkout is not allowed
You see message "No circulation rule is defined for this patron and itemtype combination"
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds the ability to set an unlimited number of guarantors
for a given patron. As before, each guarantor may be linked to another
Koha patron, and all the behavior that applies to a given guarantor
remains the same.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Find some patrons with guarantors, verify the still have their guarantor
4) Test adding and removing guarantors on a patron record, both Koha users and not
5) Verify the "Add child" button works
6) Verify NoIssuesChargeGuarantees still works
7) Verify tools/cleanborrowers.pl will not delete a guarantor
8) Verify the guarantors are displayed on moremember.pl
9) Verify the guarantor is removed by members/update-child.pl
10) Verify the guarantor is removed by misc/cronjobs/j2a.pl
11) Verify import patrons converts guarantor_id, relationship, contactfirstname,
and contactsurname into a guarantor
12) prove t/Patron.t
13) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
14) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/NoIssuesChargeGuarantees.t
15) prove t/db_dependent/Items.t
16) prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
17) prove t/db_dependent/Members.t
18) prove t/db_dependent/Patron/Relationships.t
Signed-off-by: Kim Peine <kmpeine@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1. Set up an item type with a rental charge
2. Issue an item with that item type
3. Check fines, a charge of type 'Rent' will be visible with a
description of 'Rental'.
4. Renew the item
5. Check fines, a charge of type 'Rent' will be visible with a
description of 'Renewal of Rental Item TITLE BARCODE' where TITLE and
BARCODE are the items title and barcode.
5. Apply the patch
6. Repeat steps 1-4, charge descriptions should now be empty and charge
types should display 'Rental fee' and 'Renewal of rental item'.
7. Repeat steps 1-6 for an item type with a daily rental charge and note
the charge types are now 'Daily rental fee' and 'Renewal of daily rental
item'
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Matha Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Matha Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch removed references to setting and getting the items.paidfor
field. Where it was used for display, in moredetail.pl, we replace it
with a query on the accountlines.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Pay off a LOST item
3) Check for the associated display of 'Paidfor?:' on the itemdetails
page
4) Writeoff a LOST item
5) Check that a 'Paidfor?:' is not displayed on the itemdetails page.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Up until now we marked lost items as returned in the accountlines, now
we have the oportunity to mark these distinctly with an appropriate
status we should.
Test Plan
1) Find an overdue with fines
2) Ensure you are not forgiving fines when an item is marked as lost
3) Mark the item as lost
4) Confirm the Fine is given a status of 'Lost'
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Convert 'L' to 'LOST' to become more descriptive in it's use.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch will move the list item refund rules from a dedicated table to the circulation_rules table.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Verify lost item refund rules remain unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If a lost item fee is written off, it creates a writeoff with the same itemnumber but the amount column is a negative number.
Now, when the lost item is returned, it calls _FixAccountForLostAndReturned which searchs for all accountlines with an account type of 'L' or 'W'.
Then, if the *first* of those lines has an outstanding balance, a credit is created and *all* the lines found are passed to $credit->apply. The apply method then calls is_debit on each line and when it hits the writeoff, it throws an exception ( Koha::Exceptions::Account::IsNotDebit ).
When this happens, the credit is creating but not applied the the outstanding lost item fee, and the librarian is presented with an error page.
It seems like the solution is to only fetch the first result since it seems like that is the only one we should be operating on.
Test Plan:
1) Create a lost item with a fee
2) Create a manual debit using the barcode of the item
3) Write off that manual debit
4) Check in the item, note the error
5) Apply this patch
6) Repeat steps 1-3
7) Check in the item, no error!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply dependancies
2) Apply this patch set
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Ensure holdallowed and hold_fulfillment_policy rules behavior remains unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test Plan:
1) Checkout an item to a patron
2) Ensure the item has a replacement cost (or itemtype has default)
3) Ensure patrons are charged when items lost
4) Mark the item lost
5) Confirm patron has a fine
6) Write off the fine
7) Delete the patron
8) Check in the item
9) Note the internal server error
10) Apply this patch
11) Repeat steps 1-8
12) Note there is no internal server error!
13) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
