This patch originates from a QA Follow-up on bug 19260.
The first 19260 patch adds CancelExpiredReserves tests to Reserves.t.
But note that we already have some tests in Holds/CancelReserves.t.
This patch does:
Renames Holds/CancelReserves.t to Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t.
Rearranges modules there.
Moves its existing tests into a first subtest.
Moves the new subtest from Reserves.t to CancelExpiredReserves.t.
Replaces $dbh->do('DELETE FROM reserves').
Adds some TestBuilder statements for missing data (by the move): adding
biblio, item, borrower (removing slow AddMember call).
Test plan:
Run Reserves.t and Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Passes QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Move the existing tests
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new Koha::Hold->cancel method and replaces the calls
to C4::Reserves::CancelReserve with it.
Test plan:
- Add and cancel holds
- Change priority of holds
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This GetReserve subroutine can be replaced with Koha::Holds->find
Test plan:
- git grep GetReserve
must not return results where GetReserve is called
- Cancel a reserve
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Change parameters to a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me.
Two calls in migration_tools/22_to_30 still in old style.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
AddBiblio does not return a title; the biblioitemnumber is stored in the
title variable.
The variables for biblioitemnumber are not used and can be removed.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The new subtest in Reserves.t does not need its own transaction.
Move the original rollback to the very end of the test.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18478
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Make sure to build necessary letters
Fix awkward construction
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This method was not previously covered, we don't change it , but
no reason to throw away these tests to ensure messages are created
as expected
To test:
1 - Apply this patch first
2 - Prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
3 - Last tests fail
4 - Apply other patch
5 - All tests should pass
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Updating to use they/them and skipping the ones changed to it
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Comments throughout the Koha codebase assume that
all librarians or borrowers are male by using the
pronoun 'he' universally. This patch changes to
'he or she' / 'him or hers'.
Testing plan:
- ensuring modifying tests still pass:
+ C4/SIP/t/06patron_enable.t
+ t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
+ t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
+ t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Sponsored-By: California College of the Arts
No code changes detected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On the same way of Koha::Biblio->get_holds,
Koha::Biblio->get_holds_placed_before_today and Koha::Patron->get_holds,
this new subroutin will permit to retrieve the holds placed on a
specific item.
Note that at the moment we do not need a Koha::Item->get_holds method:
we do not want to display future holds placed in the future.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Reserve::GetReservesFromBiblionumber took 3 parameters, the
biblionumber, an optional itemnumber and a "all_dates" flag.
If set, the subroutine returned all the holds placed on a given bibliographic
record, even the ones placed in the future. Almost all of the calls had this
flag set, they will be replaced with a call to Koha::Biblio->holds.
But 5 did not have it:
- C4::Biblio::DelBiblio
-tools/batch_delete_records.pl
=> These 2 were wrong, we want to retrieve the holds to cancel them
before deleting the record. We need to get all the holds, even the ones
placed in the future /!\ CHANGE IN THE BEHAVIOR
- acqui/parcel.pl
=> 1 call per item were made to this subroutine. They have been replaced
with only 1 call to the new method Koha::Biblios->holds_placed_before_today
Then we filter on the itemnumbers.
I think this is wrong: we need the number of holds to know if the record
can be deleted, so even if future holds exist, the deletion should not
be possible.
- serials/routing-preview.pl
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords
- C4::SIP::ILS::Item->new
=> Seems ok, we just one to display holds placed before today
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17737 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If the cache has to be cleaned when marc structure is updated.
Before this patch, if the age restriction was not mapped, Reserves.t
failed with:
Tag "" is not a valid tag. at t/db_dependent/Reserves.t line 523.
Test plan:
Just confirm that the tests still pass and that the changes make sense.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
It seems that only removing the key MarcSubfieldStructure- should be
enough, but it does not hurt either to remove those four keys.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On previous bugs
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The GetMemberIssuesAndFines subroutine used to retrieve the issues,
overdues and fines for a given patron. Most of the time, only 1 or 2 of
these values were used.
This patch removes this subroutine and uses the new get_issues,
get_overdues and get_balance method from Koha::Patron and Koha::Account::Lines.
Test plan:
1/ Add overdues, issues and fines to different patrons
2/ On the checkout, checkin and patron search result and the patron
detail pages, these 3 informations, if displayed before this patch, must be
correctly displayed.
3/ Use the batch patron deletion tool and make sure that patrons with a
balance > 0 are not deleted
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
As said in the previous commit, I considered SetAge as unnecessary and
removed it.
Test plan:
1/ Edit a patron using the different 'Edit' links
2/ Play with the patron category limited to age ranges, and date of
birth
3/ You should get the expected warning if the date of birth is inside
the patron category date range.
To finish:
prove t/Circulation/AgeRestrictionMarkers.t t/db_dependent/Reserves.t \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t t/db_dependent/Members.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1. Set patron category "S" with enrolmentfee 1
2. perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
3. Observe following errors:
not ok 59 - Bug 14464 - No fines at beginning
ok 60 - Bug 14464 - 1st reserve correctly created
ok 61 - Bug 14968 - Keep found column from reserve
not ok 62 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge configured
ok 63 - Bug 14464 - 2nd reserve correctly created
not ok 64 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge desired
ok 65 - Bug 14464 - 1st reserve correctly created
not ok 66 - Bug 14464 - Fine applied after cancelling reserve with charge desired and configured
4. Apply patch
5. perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
6. Observe test pass
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
1..72
ok 1 - use C4::Reserves;
ok 2 - CheckReserves Test 1
...
ok 52 - Reserve in waiting status cant be canceled
ok 53 - Reserving an ageRestricted Biblio without a borrower dateofbirth succeeds
DBD::mysql::db begin_work failed: Already in a transaction at
/usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1489.
DBD::mysql::db begin_work failed: Already in a transaction at
/usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1489.
at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm line 1080.
...
Koha::Object::store('Koha::Patron=HASH(0x9e43b20)') called at
/home/ubuntu/kohaclone/C4/Members.pm line 542
C4::Members::ModMember('borrowernumber', 658535, 'dateofbirth', '2001-11-02')
called at t/db_dependent/Reserves.t line 516
This patch fixes this issue by replacing dbh autocommit=0 with
txn_begin.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
1..72
ok 1 - use C4::Reserves;
ok 2 - CheckReserves Test 1
ok 3 - CheckReserves() include reserve_id in its response
ok 4 - CheckReserves Test 2
ok 5 - CheckReserves Test 3
ok 6 - GetReservesControlBranch returns item home branch when set to ItemHomeLibrary
ok 7 - GetReservesControlBranch returns patron home branch when set to PatronLibrary
ok 8 - Item is correctly waiting
ok 9 - Item is correctly priority 1
ok 10 - Item is correctly priority 2
ok 11 - GetWaiting got only the waiting reserve
ok 12 - GetWaiting got the reserve for the correct borrower
Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::GetItem called at /home/ubuntu/kohaclone/C4/Circulation.pm line 1853.
This patch fixes this error. The solution was to use C4::Reserves before C4::Items.
Also due to this edit, change use_ok to require_ok
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This is the fourth and last patch set to remove C4::Branch.
The real purpose of this patch is to standardise and refactor some code
which is related to the libraries selection/display.
Its unconfessed purpose is to remove the C4::Branch package.
Before this patch set, only 6 subroutines still existed in the C4::Branch
package:
- GetBranchName
- GetBranchesLoop
- mybranch
- onlymine
- GetBranches
- GetBranch
GetBranchName basically returns the branchname for a given branchcode.
The branchname is only used for a display purpose and we don't need to
retrieve it in package or pl scripts (unless for a few exceptions).
We have a `Branches` template plugin with a `GetName` method which does
exactly this job.
To achieve this removal, we will use this template plugin and delete the
GetBranchName from pl and pm files.
The `Branches.all()` will now select the library of the logged in user
if no `selected` parameter has been passed.
This new behavior could cause regressions, for instance there are some
places where we do not want an option preselected (batch item
modification for instance), keep that in mind when testing.
GetBranchesLoop took 3 parameters: $branch and $onlymine.
The first one was used to set a "selected" flag, for a display purpose:
select an option in the libraries dropdown lists.
The second one was useless: If not passed or set to 0, the
`C4::Branch::onlymine` subroutine was called.
This onlymine flag was use to know if the logged in user was able to see
other libraries infos.
A patron can see the infos from other libraries if IndependentBranches
is not set OR if he has the superlibrarian permission.
Prior to this patch set, the "onlymine test" was done on different
places (neworderempty.pl, additem.pl, holidays.pl, etc.), including the
Branches TT plugin. In this patch set, this test is only done on one
place (C4::Context::only_my_library, code moved from
C4::Branch::onlymine).
To accomplish the same job as this subroutine, we just need to call the
`Branches.all()` method from the `Branches` TT plugin. It already
accepts a `selected` parameter to set a flag on the option to select.
To avoid the repetitive
[% IF selected %]<option selected="selected">[% ELSE %]<option>[% END %]
pattern, a new `html_helpers` TT include file has been created, it
defines an `options_for_libraries` block, which takes a `selected`
parameter. We could imagine to use this include file for other
selects.
The 'mybranch` and `onlymine` subroutines of the C4::Branch package have
been moved to C4::Context. onlymine has been renamed with
only_my_library. There are only 4 occurrences of it, against 11 before
this patch set.
There 2 subroutines are Context-centric and it makes sense to put them
in `C4::Context` (at least it's the least worst place!)
GetBranches is the tricky part of this patch set: It retrieves all the
libraries, independently of the value of IndependentBranches.
To keep the same way as the existing calls of `Branches.all()`, I have
added a `unfiltered` parameter. If set, the `Branches.all()` will call
a usual Koha::Libraries->search method, otherwise
Koha::Libraries->search_filtered will be called. This new method will
check if the logged in user is allowed to see other libraries or only
its library.
Note that this `GetBranches` subroutine also created a `category` key:
it allowed to get the list of groups (of libraries) where this library
existed. Thanks to a previous patch set (bug 15295), this value was
not used anymore (I may have missed something!).
Note that the only use of `GetBranch` was buggy (see bug 15746).
Test plan (for the whole patch set):
The best way to test this whole patch set is to test with 2 instances: 1
with the patch set applied, 1 using master, to be sure there is no
regression.
It would be good to test the same with `IndependentBranches` and the
without `IndependentBranches`.
No difference should be found.
The tester must focus on the library dropdowns on as many forms as
possible.
You will notice changes in the order of the options: the libraries will
now be ordered by branchname (instead of branchcode in some places).
A special attention will be given to the following page:
- acqui/neworderempty.pl
- catalogue/search.pl
- members/members-home.pl (header?)
- opac/opac-topissues.pl
- tools/holidays.pl
- admin/branch_transfer_limits.pl
- admin/item_circulation_alerts.pl
- rotating_collections/transferCollection.pl
- suggestion/suggestion.pl
- tools/export.pl
Notes for QA:
- There are 2 FIXMEs in the patch set, I have kept the existing behavior,
but I am not sure it's the good one. Feel free to open a bug report and
I will fill a patch if you think it's not correct. Otherwise, remove the
FIXME lines in a follow-up patch.
- The whole patch set is huge and makes a lot of changes.
But it finally will tremendously reduce the number of lines:
716 insertions for 1910 deletions
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The purpose of C4::Members::GetBorrowercategory was to return the patron
category for a given categorycode. This can be done easily with the
Koha::Patron::Categories->find method.
Test plan:
- Same prerequisite as before
- Edit a guarantor and confirm the information will be updated for his/her
guarantee(s).
- Update a child to adult patron (Note: Should not we hide the patron
categories limited to others libraries? If yes, it must be done on another
bug report).
There is a special behavior if there is only 1 adult category, the
user does not need to select a category. So the same as before with
only 1 adult patron category.
- Import a patron with a category_code which does not exist. You should
be warned.
- Modify some patron using the batch patron modification tool. The
patron category descriptions should correctly be displayed.
Note that the overduerules page has already been tested in a previous
patch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
* Removes tests no longer needed
* Updates rules to work with existing tests
* Fixes code issues revealed by unit tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
This patch re-introduces the transaction into t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t
and does some cleaning on the touched tests so they raise less warnings.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Remove $dbh as argument to C4::Items::DelItemCheck
and C4::Items::ItemSafeToDelete, also change all
calls to these functions throughout the codebase.
Also remove remaining reference to 'do_not_commit' in
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t
Fixed doubled "$$" in C4/ImportBatch.pm
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Broust <jean-manuel.broust@univ-lyon2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Unless in t/db_dependent/Context.t where we want to test the cache
behaviors.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
Test 14 in t/db_dependent/Reserves.t fails if syspref LocalHoldsPriority is
set to "[Give] priority for filling holds to patrons whose...
To verify:
- Set syspref as above and run test. Test 14 fails.
- Set syspref to [Don't give] and run test agein, it passes OK.
To test:
- Apply patch
- Run test again with syspref set / not set
Expected result: In both cases test should pass
(AMended to change bug title)
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Fix the following errors:
not ok 59 - Bug 14464 - No fines at beginning
ok 60 - Bug 14464 - 1st reserve correctly created
not ok 61 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge configured
ok 62 - Bug 14464 - 2nd reserve correctly created
not ok 63 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge desired
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended the x==0 test with !x || x==0 to include 0.00 and prevent warn.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
The change in MoveReserve from the previous patch begs for a test.
Here we add some to Reserves.t.
In all six tests we place a hold, move it and check the reserves again.
Depending on the status of ConfirmFutureHolds, and the reservedate the
hold should be moved or not.
Test plan:
Run the unit test.
Bonus: If you run Reserves.t by applying this patch but without the first
patch that changed MoveReserve, tests 60 and 61 should fail:
not ok 60 - MoveReserve filled future hold now
not ok 61 - MoveReserve filled future waiting hold now
This may further illustrate the need of the first patch.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <j.kylmala@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Some additional unit tests of bug 14464 still included a constraint
in the AddReserve calls.
Test plan:
Run Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This followup adds several tests to t/db_dependent/Reserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
This is the original patch for bug 12892 and replaces the older style of
fetching the holds data with Koha Objects. It will be used as a
foundation for future features.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a hold, set to waiting
3) Browse to circulation.pl for that patron
4) Note you see the list of waiting holds
5) Switch your logged in branch to a different branch
6) Note the "Waiting at" line is no longer emphasized.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Cathi Wiggins <CWIGGINS@ci.arcadia.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Megan Wianecki <mwianecki@mplmain.mtpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
C4::Reserves:
* Added OnShelfHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* Added OPACItemHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() changed interface, now takes
$item_record,$borrower_record; calls OnShelfHoldsAllowed()
opac/opac-reserve.pl and opac/opac-search.pl:
* rewrote hold allowed rule to use OPACItemHoldsAllowed()
* also use OnShelfHoldsAllowed() through
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest()
templates:
* Removed AllowOnShelfHolds and OPACItemHolds global flags, they now
only have meaning per item type
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
I have tested this patch left, right and upside down for the last
several months. All tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There is no reason for underage borrowers to reserve ageRestricted material and
then be denied it's check-out due to ageRestriction.
This patch prevents reserving material for borrowers not suitably aged.
# # # # # #
# A PRIORI #
# # # # # #
BOTH THE STAFF CLIENT AND THE OPAC
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You can reserve an ageRestricted Record with ease.
STAFF CLIENT ONLY
5. Check-in an Item from the ageRestricted Record and catch the reservation.
6. Check-out the ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
7. You get a notification about being unable to check-out due to age restriction.
How lame is that for a 12 year old?
# # # # # # # #
# A POSTERIORI #
# # # # # # # #
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Check-out an ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
4. You get a notification about having the maximum amount of reserves.
5. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
6. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden.
Includes Unit tests.
Followed test plan. Patch behaves as expected. (Note: Propagating error messages to template will be handled in Bug 13116 or 11999)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
