To test:
1 - Set a rule to allow multiple holds on a title
2 - Place a single hold in the opac for a patron
3 - Return to record and attempt place a second hold
4 - Note there is no message but that you must match the type placed before (item or record level)
5 - Don't place the hold
6 - Apply patch
7 - Attempt to place second hold again
8 - Note there is a message informing you of which level hold you may place
9 - Test with both item/record level holds and placing a single request or multiple requests
Signed-off-by: Donna Bachowski <donna@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We certainly faced 3 similar bugs due to this syntax: bug 23006, bug
22941 and bug 17526.
To prevent other issues related to this syntax this patch suggests to
replace them all in one go.
Test plan:
Confirm that the 2 syntaxes are similar
Eyeball the patch and confirm that there is no typo!
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The number of parameters of AddReserve makes it hard to read and
maintain.
This patch replace it with a hashref, which will make the calls more
readable.
Moreover the bibitems has been removed as it was not used by the
subroutine.
Test plan:
- Make sure the tests pass
- Read the diff and search for typos
- Place a hold on few items
Note for QA: reservation_date and expiration_date do not match the DB column's names,
should we?
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To avoid double screen
There are several ways to recreate the issue, the easiest is:
/cgi-bin/koha/opac-reserve.pl?biblionumber=
You should see "ERROR: No record id specified."
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
While placing a hold on a book, if a user opens up Inspect Element on the
Pick up location drop down box they can change the pick up location in
the code to a library that is not listed as a pick up location.
How to replicate:
Search for a book
Select book
Click Place Hold
On the screen Home > Placing a hold
Right click on Pick up location
Select 'Inspect Element'
Under
<!-- HOLDABLE -->
<li class="Branch">
<select name="Branch ******"> Pick Up location:</label>=$0
Option values are listed that relate to the pick up location, this value
can be changed to another new location and when the hold is placed
the hold will be placed for this new location instead of the listed options
in the Pick up location drop down list.
To test:
1. Apply patch
2. Repeat "How to replicate"
3. Observe it is no longer possible to place holds on libraries not defined
as pickup location by changing option value via Inspect Element tool
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Unify and clean up subtitle usage so that it's always used as a simple array and not the old hash structure.
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Almost everywhere we call IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest we already have
a Koha::Patron and Koha::Item object. It makes sense to use them to
avoid a refetch
Test plan:
It would be good to test this patch on top of 19300 and 19301 and make
sure everything works as expected
Signed-off-by: Hayley Mapley <hayleymapley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This is a follow-up of bug 5371
The following command must not return anything:
grep ^output_html_with_http_headers `git grep -l -P "authnotrequired\s*=>\s*0" opac`|grep -v force_no_caching
This must be a test somehwere to prevent further regressions.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
In the case of a specific item hold, it can only be fulfilled if the pickup library
matches the hold fulfillment policy. Therefore, if OPACAllowUserToChooseBranch is
set to don't allow, the pickup library should correspond to the policy.
In case of hold that does not specify an item, the homebranch or holdingbranch
can't be determined at this time, so the pickup library still defaults to the
homebranch of the borrower. Same if there is no policy or it states 'any'.
To test:
- Make sure OPACAllowUserToChooseBranch is set to don't allow
- Make sure you have two branches A and B
- Have one item whose homebranch is B
- Have one user whose homebranch is A
- Make sure the circulation rules allow the user to reserve the item's item type
1. Go to Administration > Circulation and fines rules
2. Create a Default holds policy by item type for that item type
- Item type = item's item type
- Hold policy = From any library
- Hold pickup library match = item's home library
- Return policy = item returns home
3. Go to the OPAC and log in with the user's credentials
4. Search for the item
5. Click on "Place hold"
6. Select a specific item and confirm hold
7. In the user's file on the OPAC and check the reservation's pickup library. It should be the item's homebranch
You can then repeat the steps for 'item's holding library' or 'any library' as
the Hold pickup library match. It should also work the same way if there is no
'Default holds policy by item type' for this item type but a 'Default checkout,
hold and return policy' set.
Finally, check that placing a hold without selecting a specific item still
defaults the pickup library to the borrower's homebranch.
Signed-off-by: Hayley Mapley <hayleymapley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
When Koha charges for holds, a message with the fee is
shown before the patron places the hold. The amount needs
to be formatted according to CurrencyFormat system preference.
To test:
- Add a hold fee to your patron category
- Log into the OPAC
- Search for a record to place a hold on
- Click Place hold
- Verify there is a note showing about the hold fee
- Toggle CurrencyFormat and HoldFeeMode and verify
that the formatting is always correct
Signed-off-by: Jack Kelliher <jke0429@stacmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Olangcay Brisebois <mikael.olangcay-brisebois@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Also fully qualifies some subroutine calls that fail for reasons unkown.
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes an issue where patron is not allowed to place a hold in OPAC
while their home library is not a pickup library.
Instead, they should be presented with a list of other available pickup locations.
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch was generated using codespell
Test plan:
Read through changes and confirm they make sense
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21706
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a new collection column to the item table when selecting
a specific item for a hold. The column will only appear if at least
one item has a collection set.
To test, in OPAC:
- Place a specific hold on
- a record with one or more items with collections
- a record with one or more items without collections
- Verify the collections display correctly when they exist
- Verify the table still works as expected
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
-1. Have access to your browser's developer tools in order to modify <select>
dropdown values
1. Go to cgi-bin/koha/admin/branches.pl
2. Configure one of your libraries to "Pickup location" => "No". Remember the
branchcode of this library!
3. Go place a hold in OPAC
4. See the provided "Pick up location" list
5. Observe the library that you configured is not present in the list
6. You should see another library selected by default. Right click that and
in Firefox/Chrome click "Inspect element"
7. You should see a list of <option value="xxxx">blabla</option> elements
8. Double click between value (xxxx in above example) and replace the value
with the branchcode you remember from step 2.
9. Place the hold
10. Observe that you are taken to cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl but your hold
was not successful.
11. Go back to place a hold and this time do not modify any values.
12. Observe that a hold is now placed.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <axelle.clarisse@univ-amu.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset <victor.grousset@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment, when no holds are possible, the OPAC reads something
like:
Sorry, none of these items can be placed on hold.
No items available.
This is confusing to the patrons, because the records have items,
but they are not showing. The record also may have available items,
they are just not permitted to place holds on them.
Changes:
- Only display the first message, when somoene tried unsuccessfully
to place holds on multiple records.
- Change first message to: Sorry, none of these titles can be placed on hold.
- Change the second message to read:
No items available to be placed on hold.
- Remove <strong> around Sorry for better translatability.
To test:
- Try to place a hold on single record, where no hold is possible.
- Try to place a hold on a single record, where a hold is possible.
- Try to place holds on multiple records where no hold is possible.
- Try to place holds on multiple records where at least one hold
is possible.
Verify the screen messages make sense in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Fixed stray </strong> during signoff.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
For consistency with staff, I renamed multi_holds to multi_hold.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The GetMemberAccountRecords may be a perf killer, it retrieves all the
account lines of a patron and then the related item and biblio
information.
Most of the time we only want to know how much the patron owns to the
library (sum of amountoutstanding). We already have this information in
Koha::Patron->account->balance.
This patch replaces the occurrences of this subroutine by fetching only
the information we need, either the balance, the detail, or both.
It removes the formatting done in the module, to use the TT plugin
'Price' instead.
There is a very weird and error-prone behavior/feature in
GetMemberAccountBalance (FIXME): as the accountlines.accounttype is a
varchar(5), the value of the authorised value used for the
ManInvInNoissuesCharge pref (category MANUAL_INV) is truncated to the 5
first characters. That could lead to unexpected behaviors.
On the way, this patchset also replace the GetMemberAccountBalance
subroutine, which returns the balance, the non issues charges and the
other charges. We only need to have the balance and the non issues
charges to calcul the third one.
Test plan:
Add several fees for a patron and play with HoldsInNoissuesCharge,
RentalsInNoissuesCharge and ManInvInNoissuesCharge.
The information (biblio and item info, as well as the account line) must
be correctly displayed on the different screens: 'Fines' module, fine
slips, circulation module
Note that this patchset could introduce regression on price formatting,
but will be easy to fix using the TT plugin.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In order to simplify and make uniform the code, the controller scripts send
a Koha::Patron object to the templates instead of all attributes of a patron.
That will make the code much more easier to maintain and will be less
error-prone.
The variable "patron" sent to the templates is supposed to represent the
patron the librarian is editing the detail.
In the members module and some scripts of the circulation module, the
patron's detail are sent one by one to the template. That leads to
frustration from developpers (making sure everything is passed from all
scripts) and to regression (we got tone of bugs in the last year because
of this way to do).
With this patch set it will be easy access patron's detail, passing only
1 variable from the controllers.
Test plan:
Play with the patron and circulation module and make sur the detail of
the patron you are editing/seeing info are correctly displayed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patchset move The OPACItemHoldsAllowed logic
(issuingrules.opacitemholds) to a new class method of
Koha::IssuingRules: get_opacitemholds_policy
On the way, this patch will certainly fix the same problem as bug
19298 with onshelfholds.
Test plan:
Make sure the opacitemholds policy is correct when placing a hold at the
OPAC or the staff interface.
Followed test plan which worked as described
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Change parameters to a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me.
Two calls in migration_tools/22_to_30 still in old style.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Most of the time C4::Biblio::GetBiblioData is used to retrieve the title
and/or the author of a bibliographic record.
This patch replaces the easy occurrences of GetBiblioData, the ones
where the 2 joins are needed, but only data from biblio and biblioitems
table are.
Test plan:
It will be hard to test everything, I'd suggest a QAer to review this
patch and confirm that the difference occurrences of GetBiblioData have
been correctly replaced by calling Koha::Biblios->find or
$biblio->bibioitem
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To retrieve a biblionumber from an itemnumber, we can use:
Koha::Item->biblio->biblionumber
This is only what this patchset does.
Doing that we will be able to get rid of the
C4::Biblio::GetBiblionumberFromItemnumber subroutine.
Test plan:
- Acquisition module: cancel a receipt
- Export a record to CSV
- Modify items in a batch
Item's info should be correct
Other changes with be checked by QA team, by reading the code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
C4::Circulation::GetItemIssue returned all the issue and item
informations for a given issue. Moveover it also did some date
manipulations. Most of the time this subroutine was called, there
additional information were useless as the caller usually just needed
the basic issue's infos 'from the issue table).
This first patch updates the simple calls, ie. the ones that just need
the issue's infomations.
Test plan:
The following operations should success:
- transfer a book
- create a rule for on-site checkouts and confirm that a patron cannot
check more items out that it's defined in the rule.
- Renew an issue using ILSDI
- Using SIP confirm that you are able to see your issues
Followed test plan, works as expected
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
This patch replace the different calls to GetReservesFromBorrowernumber
with a calls to Koha::Patron->get_holds.
In some places we need to get a restricted set of holds, that's why we
process a search on this holds returned by ->get_holds (on the found
status for instance).
The changes are quite trivial and reading the diff should be enough to
catch bugs.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17737,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Tested both patches together, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lari Taskula <lari.taskula@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The changes in this patch set obsolete this variable.
Remove confusing comment about reserve via host record.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On the same way of Koha::Biblio->get_holds,
Koha::Biblio->get_holds_placed_before_today and Koha::Patron->get_holds,
this new subroutin will permit to retrieve the holds placed on a
specific item.
Note that at the moment we do not need a Koha::Item->get_holds method:
we do not want to display future holds placed in the future.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Reserve::GetReservesFromBiblionumber took 3 parameters, the
biblionumber, an optional itemnumber and a "all_dates" flag.
If set, the subroutine returned all the holds placed on a given bibliographic
record, even the ones placed in the future. Almost all of the calls had this
flag set, they will be replaced with a call to Koha::Biblio->holds.
But 5 did not have it:
- C4::Biblio::DelBiblio
-tools/batch_delete_records.pl
=> These 2 were wrong, we want to retrieve the holds to cancel them
before deleting the record. We need to get all the holds, even the ones
placed in the future /!\ CHANGE IN THE BEHAVIOR
- acqui/parcel.pl
=> 1 call per item were made to this subroutine. They have been replaced
with only 1 call to the new method Koha::Biblios->holds_placed_before_today
Then we filter on the itemnumbers.
I think this is wrong: we need the number of holds to know if the record
can be deleted, so even if future holds exist, the deletion should not
be possible.
- serials/routing-preview.pl
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords
- C4::SIP::ILS::Item->new
=> Seems ok, we just one to display holds placed before today
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17737 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch is more a bugfix than a refactoring.
Indeed the C4::Koha::get_notforloan_label_of behaviors were buggy:
1/ It does not display the opac description at the OPAC, but always the
staff description
2/ It does not care of the framework of the biblio, but retrieve the
first row of the marc_subfield_structure mapped with items.notforloan
These 2 bugs can easily be fixed using the
Koha::AuthorisedValues->search_by_koha_field
Steps to recreate the issues:
- Create 2 authorised value categories for not for loan (NFL1 and NFL2)
with the same values. Define a different description for the OPAC.
- Define link 952$7 to NFL1 for the default framework and to NFL2 for
the BK framework
- Create 2 bibliographic records (B1 using NFL1 and B2 using NFL2) with
2 items each (1 item should have a not for loan value)
- Go to the "Place a hold" view for this record.
- In the item list, you should see the not for loan value
=> The staff description of NFL1 will always be used, even for the OPAC
Test plan:
- Recreate the issues without this patchset
- Apply this patchset
- Recreate the steps to recreate the issues
=> The staff description of NFL2 should be displayed for the B2 item
=> The opac description of NFL2 should be displayed for the B2 item at
the OPAC
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
From the second patch of bug 15545:
Removing some unused template code related to a former approach.
Adding some changes for future extension by bug 15545.
This patch was tested by Liz Rea when the routine IsHoldNoteRequired was
called by opac-reserve.pl. The only change here is that we do not yet
call this routine; so leaving her original signoff.
Test plan:
[1] Enable OPACHoldNotes.
[2] Place a hold on a serial record. No behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If all the items are either lost, damaged or checked out, then pickup
should be allowed.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If all items are checked out then it should be possible to select the pickup
library for that record.
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds the ability to define patron categories not affected by
the behavior of OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup.
The new pref OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickupExceptions get a list of patron
categories (separated by pipes |).
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
At the moment users can reserve items and choose any library as a pick up
location, but there is no mechanism to prevent users from reserving items that
are available on the shelf at any given location from reserving the item at the
same location, essentially creating a Fetch and Collect scenario.
This has an impact on staff workloads as they are having to process reservations
and check shelves for items that students can already come and collect from the
open library shelves.
The aim of this enhancement is to decrease the impact on staff workload there
should be a restriction in place that prevents users from requesting items for
collection at a library where the item is currently available.
Implementation:
We first tried to add a new circulation rule adding a 4th
“NotIfAvailableAtPickupLibrary” option to "On shelf holds allowed".
That would make the development more flexible.
But in that case we quickly faced non-trivial problematics:
Let's say you have 3 items I1, I2 and I3. The first one has onshelfholds
set to Yes and 2 others has it set to “NotIfAvailableAtPickupLibrary”.
What would be the expected behavior if a hold is placed at biblio level?
And if a hold is placed at item level for I1?
This second point could be answered by reworking the interface to move
the libraries dropdown list elsewhere (1 list per item) or by adding a
lot of JS code to handle the different situation. But it would be
much more complicated to implement.
So finally I moved back to the simple approach and added a new pref to
handle the behavior globally.
Test plan:
0/ Switch off OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickup
1/ Let's say you have 3 libraries L1, L2, L3, create 2 items owned by L1
and L2
2/ Place a biblio level hold. You should only be able to pick it up at
L3
2/ Place a item level hold. You should only be able to pick it up at
L3
3/ Create a third items owned by L3
4/ Now you should not be able to place a hold on this record anymore
Sponsored-by: University of the Arts London
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
All the values different from the ones GetMember returned has been
managed outside of GetMemberDetails.
It looks safe to replace all the occurrences of GetMemberDetails with
GetMember.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Same as other patches, reservefee is only used in opac-reserve.pl
Test plan;
Set reserve fee for a patron category
Place a hold at the OPAC with one of these patrons.
You must get a message about the reserve fee.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The is_expired value is used in 2 places, let's use
Koha::Patron->is_expired instead.
Test plan:
Depending on the different value of BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions for
the patron category, a patron must be blocked if he has expired.
Confirm that behavior from opac-renew and opac-reserve scripts
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The amountoutstanding value set by GetMemberDetails was only used in a
few places. In that case it makes sense to only retrieve it when needed.
Test plan:
1/ Add fines to a patron, on the OPAC patron info page, you should see a
"Fines" tab
2/ Add credit to a patron, you should see the credit displayed
3/ Set the pref maxoutstanding to 3
4/ Add a fine of 4 to a patron
5/ Try to place an hold for this patron
=> You should get a "too much oweing" message
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The correct way to get the value of BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions from a
patron object is to get the patron category then call the
effective_BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions:
$patron->category->effective_BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions
So this patch applies this change and remove this value from the
GetMemberDetails subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
This patch adds logging for several holds actions. Specifically for:
- CREATE
- CANCEL
- DELETE
- RESUME
- SUSPEND
- MODIFY
To test:
- Enable the HoldsLog syspref
- Add a hold on a record/item
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the CREATE action
- Click on the <Suspend> button
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the SUSPEND action
- Click on the <Unsuspend> button
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the RESUME action
- Click on the red cross, to delete the hold
=> SUCCESS: The log view shows the CANCEL action
Note: The DELETE action is logged when DelMember is called, with bug 16819 patches applied.
Sponsored-by: NEKLS
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
I also wonder about this going in defaulted on, but since the other logs are as well it seems ok to me.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In order to move IsMemberBlocked to Koha::Patron it makes sense to move
the code from Koha::Patron::Debarments::IsDebarred to
Koha::Patron->is_debarred.
Test plan:
1/ Add a restriction to a patron
2/ make sure he is not able to checkout items any more
3/ Make sure he cannot get a discharge
4/ Put a hold and make sure you get "Patron has restrictions"
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Some libraries would like the ability to select the itemtype to request
when placing holds. For example, if a record has 3 copies of BookA and 3
copies of BookA in large print, this feature would allow a person to
place a hold on the record, but still be able to target only the Large
Print edition so that the first Large Print copy that becomes available
is targeted, rather than forcing the patron to select a particular copy
to hold.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Create a record with items of two or more itemtypes
4) Place a record level hold on the record while choosing one particular
itemtype
5) Check in an item from the record that is not of that itemtype
6) Notee it is not trapped for the hold
7) Check in an item from the record that does match the selected itemtype
8) Note the item is trapped for the hold
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hedström Mace <andreas.hedstrom.mace@sub.su.se>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The 'borrower' should not be used anymore, especially for new code.
This patch move files and rename variables newly pushed (i.e. in the Koha
namespace).
Test plan:
1/
git grep Koha::Borrower
should not return code in use.
2/
Prove the different modified test files
3/ Do some clicks in the member^Wpatron module to be sure there is not
an obvious error.
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Works as described. Tested with Circulation, Members/Patrons, Discharge,
Restrictions modules and the must common functionalities
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
The singleBranchMode system preference does not make sense.
Either the install has only 1 library defined or several. In both case,
we can easily guess the behavior to follow.
So the idea of this patch is to replace the fetch of this syspref with a
call to count the number of libraries defined in DB.
Test plan:
1/ From a fresh Koha install, execute the DB entry to remove the pref.
2/ Define only 1 library
3/ Confirm that Koha behaves the same as before (try to change your
library, look at the facets)
4/ Create another library (or more) and reinsert the pref and set it:
insert into systempreferences (variable, value)
values('singleBranchMode', 1);
5/ Execute the DB entry
You should get a warning message.
6/ Repeat 3.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Does what it says, but will change behaviour for any Koha install that
has 2 branches defined, One circulation, and this preference set.
If that is an acceptable change, we might need to make sure this is noted well in the
release notes.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Remove C4::Dates from files:
- opac/opac-memberentry.pl
- opac/opac-reserve.pl
- opac/opac-search-history.pl
- opac/opac-showreviews.pl
- opac/opac-suggestions.pl
- opac/opac-serial-issues.pl
- opac/opac-alert-subscribe.pl
- opac/opac-ics.pl
To test:
- Apply patch
- Verify, that self registration and holds work as before
- Verify that tabs in catalog item detail work and display
as before
- For serials: Verify that subscriptions work as before. It is a
little bit hidden, in tab Subscriptions, then 'More details', then
tab 'Brief history', button 'Subscribe to email notificatin on
new issues'
- For ics: Can not be tested at the moment, not yet used (Bug 5456),
pls. have a look at the code changes
(Amended following comment #2)
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Works as advertised
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
- opac-suggestions.pl
- opac-readingrecord.pl
- opac-reserve.pl
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Koha is currently not engineered to handle multiple holds per record.
Until such time that is does, we should not allow them to be created.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Log in to the opac
3) Place a hold
4) Hit the back button on your browser
5) Place the hold again
6) Note the new message
Signed-off-by: David Kuhn <kuhn@monterey.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
In order no to slow too much the browsing, it is certainly not a good
idea to add this cache-control value for all pages at the OPAC.
This patch just adds where the author found it could be useful.
Test plan:
1/ Login at the OPAC
2/ Go on the account page (opac/opac-account.pl)
3/ Click log out
4/ Use the back button of your browser
Without this patch you will see the previous page.
With this patch, the previous page will be reloaded and you will be
redirected to the login form.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
The call to GetReserveFee in opac-reserve.pl is useless in its current
form. The first parameter undef takes care of receiving 0.
But note that the user is warned correctly for the charge via param
variable RESERVE_CHARGE on the opac form.
When the hold is placed, AddReserve calls GetReserveFee. So if the routine
would work correctly, we would not need this extra call in opac-reserve
in the whole place. Unfortunately, the routine is not working correctly.
I will submit a fix for GetReserveFee under a new report (14702).
Test plan:
[1] Add a hold fee to some category.
[2] Check the warn for placing a hold on such a book in OPAC.
[3] Observe that the actual fee is not charged. This is a current bug and
it will be addressed on report 14702.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
4) prove t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
5) prove t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t
6) prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
7) prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
AMENDED: An else branch in reserve/placerequest.pl was removed. This had
the effect of making it no longer possible to place an any hold in the
staff client.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Verified placing a biblio level and an item level hold.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The borrow permission was used but uselessly.
For instance, at the opac, the flagsrequired parameter was set to
'borrow' but the 'authnotrequired' was set also (which means no auth
required).
At the end, this permission was used at only 1 place: for the basket,
intranet side.
This can be replaced with the catalogue permission (which is used to
search).
Test plan:
1/ Confirm that you are able to show/download/sent the cart (intranet side)
with the catalogue permission.
2/ At the OPAC, you should be able to access the same pages as before
with any other permissions.
Concretely it is quite difficult to test this patch, you should have a
look at the code.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is a followup for Bug 14186 that removes the extraneous tab
char on line 470, so that the patch can clear QA tools.
This patch sets $reservedfor to an empty string.
Test plan
=========
1/ in a terminal, run `tail -f ` on your instance's opac-error.log
2/ go to the opac and search from an item that exists on the Koha
instance.
3/ Select the title (if more than one title is returned) and click on
'Place hold' link to go to opac-reserve.pl
4/ notice the warning - "opac-reserve.pl: Use of uninitialized value
$reservedfor" appear in the `tail`ed opac-error.log
5/ apply the patch
6/ reload the page (opac-reserve.pl)
7/ page works but the warning in step #4 is no longer thrown up
8/ run qa test (i.e. koha-qa.pl -c 1 -v 2), there should be no error
Remarks: Testing result match expected test plan output. The QA tests
pass with "OK" for the commit.
Signed-off-by: Indranil Das Gupta (L2C2 Technologies) <indradg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch sets $reservedfor to an empty string.
Test plan
=========
1/ in a terminal, run `tail -f ` on your instance's opac-error.log
2/ go to the opac and search from an item that exists on the Koha
instance.
3/ Select the title (if more than one title is returned) and click on
'Place hold' link to go to opac-reserve.pl
4/ notice the warning - "opac-reserve.pl: Use of uninitialized value
$reservedfor" appear in the `tail`ed opac-error.log
5/ apply the patch
6/ reload the page (opac-reserve.pl)
7/ page works but the warning in step #4 is no longer thrown up
8/ run qa test (i.e. koha-qa.pl -c 1 -v 2), there should be no error
Remarks: The QA test failed - "forbidden pattern: tab char (line 470)".
Marking this as 'FAILED QA'
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This way ILS-DI HoldItem and HoldTitle services also benefit from this
check
Test plan:
1/ Define some default holds policies by item type in
/admin/smart-rules.pl
2/ Use ILS-DI HoldItem service and check that those rules are respected
3/ Check that staff and opac hold behaviour is unchanged regarding
these rules.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script. No regressions found,
improves the ILS-DI HoldItem response.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
1)
Prepare an URL that put's a hold in OPAC (see comment #1), e.g.
[YOUR SERVER]/cgi-bin/koha/opac-reserve.pl?biblionumbers=1
2)
Set system preference 'RequestOnOpac' to 'Don't allow patrons to place holds on items from the OPAC.'
3)
Go diectly to this URL.
Result: The page displays to confirm hold (wrong)
4)
Apply patch
5)
Repeat step 3
Result: Redirect to 404 page (OK)
6)
Set system preference to "Allow"
7)
Repeat step 3
Result: The page displays to confirm hold (OK), like it would be from link in OPAC.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
C4::Reserves:
* Added OnShelfHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* Added OPACItemHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() changed interface, now takes
$item_record,$borrower_record; calls OnShelfHoldsAllowed()
opac/opac-reserve.pl and opac/opac-search.pl:
* rewrote hold allowed rule to use OPACItemHoldsAllowed()
* also use OnShelfHoldsAllowed() through
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest()
templates:
* Removed AllowOnShelfHolds and OPACItemHolds global flags, they now
only have meaning per item type
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
I have tested this patch left, right and upside down for the last
several months. All tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
No matter what the selection of OPACShowHoldQueueDetails is, if it is
enabled it displays a line "Holds and priority:" even if you've opted to
hide one of those!
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Test each setting of OPACShowHoldQueueDetails
3) Ensure each setting displays the correct fields ( or lack thereof )
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@debian.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is the same issue as bug 12134.
Test Plan:
1) Add a manual restriction to a patron with expiration date in the past
2) Go on the OPAC and connect
3) Try to add an hold on a record (opac-reserve.pl)
3) Note the warning message
"Sorry, you cannot place holds because your account has been frozen ..."
4) Apply this patch
5) Repeat step 2
6) Note the warning message does not appear anymore
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Makes code cleaner, also works as described.
NOTE: If you set a debarment with date in the past in the GUI,
there will be no entry in borrowers.debarred and you won't be
able to see the problem. Set one with a date in the future and
then alter the date in borrower_debarments and borrowers.debarred.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since the bootstrap OPAC's place hold interface doesn't use tables
there is no use for the colspan calculation being done in the script.
This patch removes it.
To test, place one or more holds in the OPAC and confirm that there are
no display problems. The OPAC error logs should show no associated
error.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
No display problems, no related errors on log, no koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script, no regressions found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Re-add the system preference maxreserves.
All the code using maxreserves is still in place. Though it
is not used in the Reserves module, it is used in all the
scripts where holds are placed.
Also adds a check so that a borrower cannot exceed the maximum
number of allowed holds by using the multi-hold feature via
the opac.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Set maxreserves to 3, set opactheme to bootstrap
4) Log into the opac as a patron
5) Place 3 holds
6) Attempt to place a 4th hold
7) Note you get an error message and cannot place a forth hold
8) Delete two of those holds
9) Attempt to place 3 or more holds as a multi-hold
10) You should see a warning that you cannot place this many holds
11) Try to anyway
12) You should see an alert to tell you to reduce the number of holds
you are placing.
13) Reduce the number for holds you are placing to 2
14) Your holds should now be placed
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
A dollar sign is hard-coded in opac-reserve.pl and becomes apparent when trying to place a reservation
when one has "too_much_oweing" or too much fines.
Removing the dollar sign so we just get
<"Käyttömaksujen katto ylitetty. Et voi tehdä varauksia. Sinulla on maksamattomia maksuja 9.50.">
instead of
<"Käyttömaksujen katto ylitetty. Et voi tehdä varauksia. Sinulla on maksamattomia maksuja $9.50.">
Patch removes hard coded $ sign.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
The dollar sign is gone and the message still displays correctly.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since we switched to Template Toolkit we don't need to stick with the
sufix we used for HTML::Template::Pro.
This patch changes the occurences of '.tmpl' in favour of '.tt'.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Install koha, and verify that every page can be accesed
Regards
To+
P.S. a followup will remove the glue code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Pick a patron, note the patron's category
5) Issue an item to this patron
4) Edit that category, set "Block expired patrons" to "Block"
5) Verify the patron cannot renew or place holds in the OPAC
6) Edit the category again, set "Block expired patrons" to
"Don't block"
7) Verify the patron *can* renew and place holds in the OPAC
8) Edit the category again, set "Block expired patrons" to
"Follow system preference BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions"
9) Set the system preference BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions to
"Block"
10) Verify the patron cannot renew or place holds in the OPAC
11) Set the system preference BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions to
"Don't block"
12) Verify the patron *can* renew and place holds in the OPAC
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Melia Meggs <melia@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Testing notes on last patch in series.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This parameter is a boolean, if true, the hours won't be displayed if
the time is 23:59 (24hr format) or 11:59 PM (12hr format).
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
There are 2 useless routines in the Koha::DateUtils
module:output_pref_due and format_sqlduedatetime. We can call
output_pref and format_datetime with dateonly = 0.
format_sqlduedatetime is only used in one place: opac-reserve.pl
Test plan:
1/ Verify on the opac-reserve.pl page that the date is correctly
displayed for for onloan items (you should use the "specific copy"
feature).
2/ Launch prove t/DateUtils.t UT file and verify all UT pass.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Due date on opac-reserve shown correctly. Unit tests pass.
Did a grep on both function names.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
No references to subs found. Passes koha-qa.pl, t and xt
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The return from GetReservesFromBiblionumber contains an unnecessary
extra variable. In scalar context an array returns its element count.
Maintaining a separate count can lead to unforeseen bugs
and imposes ugly constructions on the subroutine's users.
Remove the useless count variable from the return
This patch also changes the parameters: now the routine takes a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Placed biblio holds, future holds and item holds. Works as expected.
Tested Holds.t and Reserves.t. Pass.
Tested /cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id=999 with two holds on
one item. Fine.
C4/SIP/ILS/Item.pm: Looked for "whatever" and "arrayref" and could not find
them anymore. Looks good.
Handled a few unneeded calls in QA follow-up.
Left only one point to-do for serials/routing-preview.pl. See Bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
1/ CURRENT_DATE() is a MySQLism and should be replaced with CAST(now() AS
DATE).
2/ The date formatting should be done in the template (using the TT
plugin).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Before bug 9788 the alldates parameter of GetReservesFromItemnumber was
actually not used in the codebase.
The first patch of bug 9788 did change that and passed true by default.
But a closer look revealed that we do not really need it.
The parameter is removed by this patch; the SQL statement is slightly
adjusted: if reservedate<=now or a waitingdate is filled for the
requested itemnumber, GetReservesFromItemnumber will return the reserve.
This includes so-called future waits: a future hold that has been confirmed
ahead of time with pref ConfirmFutureHolds > 0 days.
Note that future item-level holds are not really interesting to return; this
just corresponds to original behavior. Future next-available holds are not
in view at all; they do not contain an item number.
Test plan:
Actually, the test plan of the first patch is valid. But for completeness I
repeat it here:
[1] Enable future holds and set ConfirmFutureHolds to 2 days.
[2] Place a future next-available hold for 2 days ahead.
[3] Check item status on catalogue detail. Available? That is fine.
[4] Confirm the future hold by checking it in. ('future wait')
[5] Look at item status again on catalogue detail. Must be Waiting now.
[6] Switch to OPAC and login as another opac user. Goto Place a hold.
[7] Check item status with item level hold info. Is it waiting?
[8] Try to place hold in staff, check item level status again. Waiting?
[9] Make a transfer for the item. Switch branch. Check hold status on
Transfers to receive.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch makes GetReservesFromItemnumber also returns the waiting
date and removes some repeated code.
Improves item status display on catalogue detail, when placing a hold at
opac-reserve and in staff, and on transfers to receive form.
This patch builds on work from reports 9367 and 9761.
Test plan:
Place a future next-av. hold (enable future holds prefs), say 2 days ahead.
Check item status on catalogue detail. Nothing to see.
Enable ConfirmFutureHolds by inserting a number of days, say 2.
Confirm earlier hold by checking it in. Look at item status again on detail.
Switch to other opac user. Try to place a hold again. Check item status with
item level hold info. Try to place hold in staff, check item level status.
Make a transfer for that item. Switch branch. Look at transfers to receive.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a more extensible and flexible debarments system to Koha. The fields
borrowers.debarred and borrowers.debarredcomment are retained for compatibility and
speed.
This system supports having debarments for multiple reasons. There are currently
three types of debarments:
OVERDUES - Generated by overdue_notices.pl if the notice should debar a patron
SUSPENSION - A punative debarment generated on checkin via an issuing rule
MANUAL - A debarment created manually by a librarian
OVERDUE debarments are cleared automatically when all overdue items have been returned,
if the new system preference AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions is enabled. It is disabled
by default to retain current default functionality.
Whenever a borrowers debarments are modified, the system updates the borrowers debarment
fields with the highest expiration from all the borrowers debarments, and concatenates
the comments from the debarments together.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Verify the borrower_debarments table has been created and
populated with the pre-existing debarments
4) Run t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t
5) Manually debar a patron, with an expiration date
6) Verify the patron cannot be issued to
7) Add another manual debarment with a different expiration date
8) Verify the 'restricted' message lists the date farthest into the future
9) Add another manual debarment with no expiration date
10) Verify the borrower is now debarred indefinitely
11) Delete the indefinite debarment
12) Verify the debarment message lists an expiration date dagain
13) Enable the new system preference AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions
14) Set an overdue notice to debar after 1 day of being overdue
15) Check out an item to a patron and backdate the due date to yesterday
16) Run overdue_notices.pl
17) Verify the OVERDUES debarment was created
18) Return the item
19) Verify the OVERDUES debarment was removed
20) Disable AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions
21) Repeat steps 15 though 18, verify the OVERDUES debarment was *not* removed
22) Add issuing rules so that an overdue item causes a temporary debarment
23) Check out an item to a patron and backdate the due date by a year
24) Return the item
25) Verify the SUSPENSION debarment was added to the patron
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
CheckReserves was using the CircControl system preference to determine what
patrons an item can fill a hold for. It should be using ReservesControlBranch
instead.
Test Plan:
1) Set ReservesControlBranch to "item's home library".
2) Create an item at Library A, place holds for it for patrons at
Library B, Library C, and Library A in that order,
for pickup at the patrons home library.
3) Make sure the holds policy for Library A is set to
Hold Policy = "From home library" and
Return Policy = "Item returns home".
Make sure the holds policies for the other libraries are set to
Hold Policy = "From any library".
4) Check the item in at Library C, the hold for the patron at Library B
should pop up, even though it's in violation of the circulation rules.
Don't click the confirm button!
5) Apply this patch, and reload the page,
now the hold listed should be for the last hold,
the hold for the patron at Library A, which is correct.
This patch adds the subroutine C4::Reserves::GetReservesControlBranch as
an equivilent to C4::Circulation::_GetCircControlBranch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed POD so that arguments and explanation match (C<$item>).
Also tested opac-reserves.pl for regressions.
Passes all tests, QA script, and Reserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
As QA followup on report 9722. Built on top of another followup report 10321.
Test plan:
Run the db revision included in the other patch.
Enable OpacHoldNotes. Check that you can add a hold note on opac-reserve.
Do you see it on opac-user and in staff on catalog detail of that biblio?
Do a grep on ShowHoldNotes on the Koha code: grep -i ignores case. You should
find three occurrences only in updatedatabase.pl (the old dbrev and this dbrev
renaming them). These are fine.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Based on work for report 9722.
This patch resolves a small display problem with the number of columns of the
table on opac-reserve.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The option of adding a note is controlled by new pref OpacShowHoldNotes.
This development is part of a larger one (see umbrella report 9721).
Test plan:
1 Verify if new pref is disabled by default. Place a hold. You can't add a note.
2 Enable the pref. Place a hold and add a note. Check in staff if you can see
the note in Catalogue Detail/Holds tab.
3 Toggle SingleBranchmode, AllowHoldDateInFuture/OPACAllowHoldDateInFuture,
OPACShowHoldQueueDetails, or OPACItemHolds.
Check the display of columns when placing a hold from opac.
4 Place a few holds with notes from opac search results in one run (enable
DisplayMultiPlaceHold). Check results in staff again.
Remark: A few lines already refer to mandatory note reasons. This is handled
in a subsequent report. No reason to worry.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
The $anyholdable variable was set to 0 or 1. However, as it is set in
a loop, and future changes to the opac-reserve.pl script may require
knowing how many items the patron is going to place a hold on, it makes
more sense to treat $anyholdable as a counter. This follow up turns it
into one.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
opac-reserve.pl tries to check whether all selected titles in a
multiple-hold batch are unavailable to be placed on hold. However, the
logic is flawed in such a way that if the last item in the batch cannot
be placed on hold the script assumes none can be placed on hold.
This patch modifies the way the script tracks the "no titles available
for holds" variable in order to correct the error.
To test, place multiple holds by selecting titles from a list of search
results. Test three conditions:
- All titles are available to be placed on hold
You should see no onscreen warnings, and all titles should be
selectable on the place hold screen. A "Place hold" button should
appear at the bottom.
- Some titles can be placed on hold, some cannot
The titles which can be placed on hold should be selectable.
Titles which cannot be placed on hold should show a warning
message. A "Place hold" button should appear at the bottom.
- No titles can be placed on hold
"Sorry, none of these items can be placed on hold." should appear at
the top of the page. All titles should appear with warning messages.
There should be no "Place hold" button.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
