The FIXME comments in the new test script were based on
an assumption that GetIssuingRules() should return
multiple rules if no or only partial parameters are
passed. This is not the intent of that routine, whose
purpose is to return the *singular* rule that best
applies to a given loan situation. In other words,
GetIssuingRule() is not a traditional accessor function.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The test are wrap in a transaction.
To test:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_Issuingrule.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation_Issuingrule.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=9, 17 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.34 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.40 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comment: No koha-qa errors
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_Issuingrule.t run without errors
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
