Add an unallocated option to CreateQueue and pass through as needed
Avoid deletion of the tmp_holdsqueue, and only check holds
and items that are not currently matched
A future hold with a higher priority will still fail here - because the
item may already be assigned, but on next change to the biblio it would
be corrected
To test:
1) Apply both patches
2) Enable RealTimeHoldsQueue and set HoldsQueueSkipClosed to "open"
3) Add a holiday to the calendar for all libraries for today, visit:
/cgi-bin/koha/tools/holidays.pl
-- Click today's day on the calendar and pick "Holiday repeated every same day of the week"
-- Click "Copy to all libraries". Hit "Save.
4) Place a biblio-level hold on a biblio record and set the pickup location to a library that has available copies, visit:
-- /cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=76&borrowernumber=51
-- Click the first "Place hold" button to place the biblio-level hold.
5) Verify that that hold got added to the holds queue, visit:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/view_holdsqueue.pl?branchlimit=&itemtypeslimit=&ccodeslimit=&locationslimit=&run_report=1
6) Place a biblio-level hold on a biblio record where there are no other holds and copies are available at another location, but not the pickup location, visit:
-- /cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=437&borrowernumber=51
-- On the "pickup at" dropdown, pick something else other than "Centerville", e.g. "Fairfield".
-- Click the first "Place hold" button to place the biblio-level hold.
7) Check the holds queue again, notice that this 2nd hold was not added to the queue:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/view_holdsqueue.pl?branchlimit=&itemtypeslimit=&ccodeslimit=&locationslimit=&run_report=1
8) Run the updated cronscript:
perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl --force --unallocated
9) Notice nothing changed in the holds queue, visit:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/view_holdsqueue.pl?branchlimit=&itemtypeslimit=&ccodeslimit=&locationslimit=&run_report=1
10) Remove the holiday we created previously, visit:
/cgi-bin/koha/tools/holidays.pl
-- Click today's day on the calendar and pick "Delete this holiday"
-- Click "Copy to all libraries". Hit "Save.
11) Run the updated cronscript:
perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl --force --unallocated
12) Confirm the second hold is added to the holds queue, visit:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/view_holdsqueue.pl?branchlimit=&itemtypeslimit=&ccodeslimit=&locationslimit=&run_report=1
Signed-off-by: Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
PULL_BRANCHES and PULL_BRANCHES2 felt a little arbitrary, moved
to using a last in the outer loop.
Swapped 'next unless' for an if to more directly show when we are acting
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
The code here is going to check items held the the pickup location for a request
or from the least cost branch matching the patron's home library against the HoldsQueuePrioritizeBranch
setting
The loop is the same in both case, so lets simplify this a bit to make the intent more clear
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
2 - It should pass before and after this patch
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
There are a series of repeated checks throughout MapItemsToHoldRequests.
This patch simply consolidates them into a single routine that can be called.
To test:
1 - prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
2 - Confirm it passes before and after this patch is applied
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
When using background jobs, there is a possibility of a race condition where two jobs will be updating the holds queue for the same biblio. We should try to minimize those cases (see bug 34596)
In the meantime though, we should prevent jobs possibly dying, and allow the most recent update to succeed.
There is a possibility two updates wil assign different items to the same reserve, and that a reserve could end up in the queue twice, however, whichever one is filled first will delete both entries. as filling the hold deletes by reserve id (see bug 24359)
This patch adds a transaction to delete and then inset the new row
To test:
1 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
2 - It fails
3 - Apply patch
4 - t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
5 - It succeeds!
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Test Plan:
1) Generate the holds queue
2) Load the holds queue viewer page
3) Apply this patch
4) Restart all the things!
5) Reload the page
6) Note nothing has changed
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Current code removes all items without an active transfer, and any with completed transfers.
This patch moves the conditionals for transfers into the join, then adds a new
condition to remove items with active transfers.
To test:
1 - Apply unit test patch only
2 - prove -v t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
3 - It fails
4 - Apply second patch
5 - prove -v t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
6 - Success!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Right now the holds queue builder starts filling bib-level holds with
items whose patron's home library matches the item's home library.
It would be good and reasonable to have the option to prioritize
item's whose patron's home library matches the item's holding library
to minimize transfers.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
update_queue_for_biblio currently
1 - gets the holds on a bib
2 - gets the items available to fill any holds
3 - combines these to build the queue, exiting if there are no holds or items
If there are no holds at step 1, we don't need to do step 2 or 3
This patch simply deletes the queue for this biblio, then exits if there are no holds
To test:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold.t t/db_dependent/Koha/BackgroundJobs/BatchDeleteItem.t t/db_dependent/Koha/BackgroundJobs/BatchDeleteBiblio.t t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t t/db_dependent/Circulation_holdsqueue.t t/db_dependent/Biblio_holdsqueue.t t/db_dependent/Biblio.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The introduction of _checkHoldPolicy has made this check superfluous.
Test plan stolen/updated from 27068
To test:
1) In library groups add a root group and check it as hold group.
2) Add two libraries to the group
3) In circulation and fines rules, in 'Default checkout, hold and return
policy', in Hold pickup library match change the value to 'From patron's hold group'
4) Place a hold from a patron whose home library is from the group
4.5) perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holdsqueue.pl
5) Go to /cgi-bin/koha/circ/view_holdsqueue.pl
6) Select the holding branch of the item with a hold
7) observe no results
8) Apply Patch
9) Repeat 5-6
10) The item should come up on the holds queue results
11) Place a hold on an item where 1 record has 2 copies, 1 in the hold group, 1 not.
12) Run the HoldQueue for the library not in the group and make sure the hold isn't showing.
13) Turn on transportation cost matrix and set costs for the libraries within the group.
14) Place a hold for a patron where multiple copies are on the bib.
15) Check both branch's hold queue for the item, it should only show on the lower cost branch's list if both copies are available.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes the GetTransfers call from
GetItemsAvailableToFillHoldRequestsForBib instead replacing it with an
inline JOIN in the initial query.
Test plan
1/ Run the holds queue
2/ Check the results
3/ Put one of the items in the holds queue into transit
4/ Run the holds queue again
5/ Check that the results do not contain the item that is in transit
6/ Apply the patch
7/ Run the holds queue again
8/ Check that the results still do not contain the item that is in
transit
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
I suppose this is similar to circular dependency on other patch
HoldsQueue uses Circulation uses BatchUpdateBiblioHoldsQueueuse HoldsQueue
Without this the background job builds the queue, but reports failure:
Holds queue for biblio The Jacobite clans of the Great Glen, 1650-1784 /. An error occurred (Undefined subroutine &C4::HoldsQueue::GetTransfers called at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/HoldsQueue.pm line 351. )
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The CreateQueue() method deletes the holds queue data, fetches some
configuration (branches to use, transport cost matrix) and then loops
through a list of biblionumbers, generating the tmp_holdsqueue and
hold_fill_targets rows for the specified biblio.
This patch simply moves that last bit that is run inside the biblios
loop into a separate sub.
The update_queue_for_biblio sub is designed so it does the exact same
thing it did inside the loop, but also gets added the capability of
querying those parameters if not passed, and it also gets a 'delete'
parameter so it deletes the biblio-specific holds queue rows before
starting to work.
This way, it can be reused to write a background job for real-time holds
queue update :-D
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests still pass! Behavior is kept!
4. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Montgomery County Public Libraries
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
and some more...
There are lot of inconsistencies in our ->search calls. We could
simplify some of them, but not in this patch. Here we want to prevent
regressions as much as possible and so don't add unecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes the code for itemtypeslimit work, and adds options for shelving location and collection code
This also remove the 'post' method from the form to allow easy bookmarking
To test:
1 - Add holds to your system
2 - Run the holds queue builder
3 - Browse to Circulation->Holds queue
4 - Note the library dropdown
5 - Apply patch
6 - Reload and note new options
7 - Test that both limits and 'All' options work as expected
8 - Note that description at top includes options when selected
"### items found for All libraries and item type:(Books)"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This reverts commit d284735d05.
The following test was failing randomly:
# Failed test 'take from lowest cost branch (don't use cost matrix) holding branch'
# at t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t line 1494.
# got: 'LHKtxLk'
# expected: 'JL9C_OR'
# Wrong pick-up/hold for first target (pick_branch, hold_branch, reserves, hold_fill_targets, tmp_holdsqueue)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It makes sense to use items by branch to get the list of branches, as it
already tells use which branches have available items. We could use
branches to pull from instead, but all we would accomplish is added
extra ununsed loop iterations. We already know that any additional
branches in the branches to pull loop have no items to fill holds.
If they did, they would be in the items_by_branch hash.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We no longer need to act as if closed branches were marked as
disable_transfer. This allows us to clean up a nice bit of code.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 28510: Remove unused variable
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Right now we skip closed branch's items as we iterate over all items looking for ones to fill a hold. If HoldsQueueSkipClosed is enabled, no items held be a closed library can be targeted, so it would be more efficient if we never selected the items from those branches to begin with. This is how the holds queue works if we are not using the transport cost matrix, so we should make it work the same way if we *are* using the matrix.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
3) All tests should continue to pass
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - set AllowHoldItemTypeSelection to 'Allow'
2 - Find a patron from Library A
3 - Find a record with an item from Library A
4 - Place a title level hold with itemtype specified for a delivery at Library A for patron and record above
5 - perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
6 - There are warns:
Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/HoldsQueue.pm line 523.
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/HoldsQueue.pm line 523
7 - Apply this patch
8 - perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
9 - No more warns!
10 - prove -v t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
11 - All tests pass!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If HoldsQueueSkipClosed is enabled, and a library happens to be closed
on the day you edit the transport cost matrix, all the values for that
library will not show. Instead they will appear disabled, and if you
were to edit the cell and save a new value in it, it will also
'disappear' when the page is reloaded.
Test Plan:
1) Set today as a holiday for a library
2) Set HoldsQueueSkipClosed to 'open'
3) Go to the transport cost matrix editor
4) Edit a cell where the 'from' is for the closed library
5) Note the value doesn't 'save', it is still in the database though
6) Apply this patch
7) Restart all the things!
8) Reload the transport cost matrix editor
9) The value now appears correctly!
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
MapItemsToHoldRequests has three sections: Local holds, item level holds, bib level holds
Only one of them was setting the reserve_id. This patch makes al three set it and adds tests
To test:
1 - Repeat test plan on bug
2 - sudo koha-mysql kohadev
SELECT * FROM hold_fill_targets
3 - Ensure reserve_id is set at appropriate times
4 - prove -v t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 18958: (QA follow-up) Fix number of tests
In HoldsQueue.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After looking at Marcel's comments, the problem is in our matching
to hold_fill_targets - rather than adjusting to find filled/waiting holds we
could ensure that hold_fill_targets only refers to the specific hold it
is intended to
This patch is clearer, if slightly less performant than last (we now return all
the reserves and have to find the 'highest')
Test Plan:
1 - Create and use a patron that can place multiple record level holds per record
2 - Create a record with X items, each at a different library
3 - Place X 'Next available' holds on the record for the patron using the 'Holds to place' box
4 - perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holdsqueue.pl
5 - Check in LibraryA's copy as LibraryA and confirm the hold
6 - Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line is now item-specific
7 - Checkout the item to the patron, notice the remaining hold is marked waiting
8 - Attempt to place another hold for your patron, notice that it requires an item-specific hold
8 - Apply this patch
9 - Repeat steps 1-5
10 - Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line has *not* become item-specific
11 - Checkout the item to the patron, ensure the first hold is filled and the second remains record level
12 - Repeat whole test plan without building holds queue to confirm holds are still treated correctly
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
JD amended patch: remove unecessary indentation changes
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the ability to exclude patrons (by category) from local
holds, and items, by editing the item itself or by batch item
modification tool.
To test:
1. apply patches
2. updatedatabase
3. Enable LocalHoldsPriority preference, and leave
LocalHoldsPriorityPatronControl in pickup library, and
LocalHoldsPriorityItemControl in holding library.
4. Search for a biblio with one item.
5. Place a hold with a patron (patron1) and set pickup location to a different
library of the item's home library
6. Place another hold with another patron (patron2) and set pickup location to be
the same as the item's home library
7. ./misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
8. Go to circulation -> holds queue
9. Search by the item's home library
CHECK => only the hold for patron2 (with the pickup location the same as the
item's home library) appears in the table
10. Go back to the biblio details page and click on "Items" tab
CHECK => There is a new section in the item's details between "Statuses"
and "History" called "Priority"
11. Set exclude to "Yes" and update
12. repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => only the hold for patron1 now appears, even the other hold had local
hold priority
13. Repeat step 10 and 11 but this time set exclude to "No"
14. repeat steps 7 to 9
CHECK => the hold for patron2 is back
15. Edit patron2's category and set exclude from local holds priority to
"Yes"
16. Repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => the hold for patron1 is back
17. Go to tools -> Batch item modification and in barcode list place
several (existing) barcodes and press continue
CHECK => There is a new section in the bottom called "Priority"
18. Set exclude to "Yes" and save
SUCCESS => all items in the list now have exclude setted to "Yes"
19. Try to checkout the first item to a patron3
SUCCESS => Alert message appears saying that patron1 has a hold on that
item
20. Click on Yes and then checkin that item
SUCCESS => There is a modal window saying that a hold was found for
patron1
21. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
22. Sign off
Sponsored-by: Cooperative Information Network (CIN)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Added a feature that displays edition information of the book
together with title in "Holds queue" report.
Edition information is fetched from "biblioitem" table
as "editionstatement" and transferred to template.
1. Place a hold on a book with edition information.
2. Run build_holds_queue.pl cron job.
3. Go to /cgi-bin/koha/circ/view_holdsqueue.pl and check the "title"
table of that book that you placed hold on.
4. Observe that there's no information about edition of that book.
5. Apply patch.
6. Repeat step 3.
7. Observe that cinformation about edition of that book appeared
in the title table after book's title and author.
Mentored-by: Andrew Nugged <nugged@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 23934 removed the limitation that prevented item level holds from
getting local holds priority. The problem is the code has never checked
if the item level hold matches the given item! This means the wrong item
may be requested to fill an item level hold.
Test Plan:
1) Create 3 items on a record
2) Place a hold for the 2nd item you created
4) Ensure that hold would be picked up by local holds priority
5) Build the holds queue
6) Note the holds queue is asking for the wrong item!
7) Apply this patch
8) Rebuild the holds queue
9) Holds queue should now be asking for the correct item!
Signed-off-by: Kim Peine <kim@williston.lib.vt.us>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The holds queue builder does not honor
the new item_level_hold flag. Instead, it only item_level_request if
in the loop dealing with item level holds. This is incorrect. Item level
holds may be trapped in the local holds priority loop as well. It's
trivial to just pass though the correct item/biblio level hold flag.
I do not know how to write a reproducable test plan for these issues.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kim Peine <kim@williston.lib.vt.us>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
- Set LocalHoldsPriority to "Give priority for filling holds to patrons
whose pickup library matches the item's holding library"
- set yourself at Library A
- find at item at Library A
- place an item-level hold (Hold 1) for item for pickup at Library B
- set an item-level hold (Hold 2) for item for pickup at Library A
- Confirm Hold 1 shows priority=1
- Check in item
- confirm item would be captured for Hold 2, ignore hold
- run holds queue
- check item in
- confirm item is captured for Hold 2
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Looks like we introduced an error during a rebase somewhere on bug
11529. This patch siply replaces a missng comma in the SQL query for
C4::HoldsQueue::GetHoldsQueueItems.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
