Librarians should be warned that a patron is restricted when placing
holds, as they are warned that a patron's acount has expired.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Add a restriction for a patron
3) Attempt to place a hold for that patron
4) Note the notice at the top notifying you that the patron is restricted
Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If a patron owes more than the system preference maxoutstanding in fees
and fines, the patron will be unable to place holds via the opac.
However, a librarian placing a hold for a patron is not even warned!
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set maxoutstanding to 1.00
3) Find a patron owing more than 1.00
4) Attempt to place a hold
5) Note the warning that the patron owes money
Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This bug removes deprecated C4::Dates from reserve/request.pl
To test:
- Apply patch
- In staff client, search a biblio and try to put a hold for a borrower (Home > Catalog > [Some Biblio] > Place a hold to [Some biblio])
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1) Create a new record in Cataloguing
2) When done, instead of adding an item to the record, click on the Holds tab in the left nav
3) Notice warns
4) Apply patch and refresh page
5) Click on Holds tab again
6) Notice warns are gone and page still works
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Warns disappear; note that the display of the error message is still ugly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
In the staff client we had still some remains referring to the
constraint types.
Also touched one comment line from SIP.
Test plan:
Add a hold in the staff client.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
4) prove t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
5) prove t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t
6) prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
7) prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
AMENDED: An else branch in reserve/placerequest.pl was removed. This had
the effect of making it no longer possible to place an any hold in the
staff client.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Verified placing a biblio level and an item level hold.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This way ILS-DI HoldItem and HoldTitle services also benefit from this
check
Test plan:
1/ Define some default holds policies by item type in
/admin/smart-rules.pl
2/ Use ILS-DI HoldItem service and check that those rules are respected
3/ Check that staff and opac hold behaviour is unchanged regarding
these rules.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script. No regressions found,
improves the ILS-DI HoldItem response.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The due dates should be displayed as due dates :)
i.e not displayed with 23:59
On the way, this patch fixes the sort on the info column.
The column is now sorted using the due dates
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Squashed this rogue variable initialization
Test plan:
1/ Place a hold at a biblio level (on the next available item)
2/ Without this patch you get
placerequest.pl: Use of uninitialized value $checkitem in string ne at /home/koha/src/reserve/placerequest.pl line 75.
placerequest.pl: Use of uninitialized value $checkitem in string ne at /home/koha/src/reserve/placerequest.pl line 101.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed a tab.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In the case where only 1 result is returned by the search, the
borrowernumber should be passed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Important note: This will modify the UI.
The patron list will now be displayed in a table (instead of a select).
Test plan:
1/ Place a hold on a record
2/ Search for a patron
3/ Select a patron and submit
4/ The hold workflow should continue as previously
No behavior changes should be observed.
Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
C4::Reserves:
* Added OnShelfHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* Added OPACItemHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() changed interface, now takes
$item_record,$borrower_record; calls OnShelfHoldsAllowed()
opac/opac-reserve.pl and opac/opac-search.pl:
* rewrote hold allowed rule to use OPACItemHoldsAllowed()
* also use OnShelfHoldsAllowed() through
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest()
templates:
* Removed AllowOnShelfHolds and OPACItemHolds global flags, they now
only have meaning per item type
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
I have tested this patch left, right and upside down for the last
several months. All tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To reproduce, edit, index notice with utf-8 char and search for it
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin@rot13.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When placing a new hold, the listed priority for the hold will be
incorrect if there are any holds with items in transit ( i.e. found = T ).
Test Plan:
1) Place 3 holds on a record with at least 2 items
2) Fill one hold so it is marked as waiting
3) Fill on hold so it is marked as in transit
4) Begin placing a new hold
5) Note the expected priority would be 2, but is actually 3
6) Apply this patch
7) Reload the patch, now the expected priority shows correctly
Signed-off-by: Coralie Barsacq <c.barsacq@mairie-laciotat.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Re-add the system preference maxreserves.
All the code using maxreserves is still in place. Though it
is not used in the Reserves module, it is used in all the
scripts where holds are placed.
Also adds a check so that a borrower cannot exceed the maximum
number of allowed holds by using the multi-hold feature via
the opac.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Set maxreserves to 3, set opactheme to bootstrap
4) Log into the opac as a patron
5) Place 3 holds
6) Attempt to place a 4th hold
7) Note you get an error message and cannot place a forth hold
8) Delete two of those holds
9) Attempt to place 3 or more holds as a multi-hold
10) You should see a warning that you cannot place this many holds
11) Try to anyway
12) You should see an alert to tell you to reduce the number of holds
you are placing.
13) Reduce the number for holds you are placing to 2
14) Your holds should now be placed
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since we switched to Template Toolkit we don't need to stick with the
sufix we used for HTML::Template::Pro.
This patch changes the occurences of '.tmpl' in favour of '.tt'.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Install koha, and verify that every page can be accesed
Regards
To+
P.S. a followup will remove the glue code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If an item needs to be transferred to fill a hold, the hold will be
listed as 'Waiting to be pulled" while it is in transit.
Test Plan:
1) Place a hold for pickup at another library
2) Check in the item, confirm the hold transfer
3) View the holds for that record ( request.pl )
4) Note the priority is "In transit" and the status is 'Waiting to be
pulled".
5) Apply this patch
6) Reload the holds page
7) Note the status is now "Item being transferred to $branch"
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The return from GetReservesFromBiblionumber contains an unnecessary
extra variable. In scalar context an array returns its element count.
Maintaining a separate count can lead to unforeseen bugs
and imposes ugly constructions on the subroutine's users.
Remove the useless count variable from the return
This patch also changes the parameters: now the routine takes a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Placed biblio holds, future holds and item holds. Works as expected.
Tested Holds.t and Reserves.t. Pass.
Tested /cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id=999 with two holds on
one item. Fine.
C4/SIP/ILS/Item.pm: Looked for "whatever" and "arrayref" and could not find
them anymore. Looks good.
Handled a few unneeded calls in QA follow-up.
Left only one point to-do for serials/routing-preview.pl. See Bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
1/ CURRENT_DATE() is a MySQLism and should be replaced with CAST(now() AS
DATE).
2/ The date formatting should be done in the template (using the TT
plugin).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Before bug 9788 the alldates parameter of GetReservesFromItemnumber was
actually not used in the codebase.
The first patch of bug 9788 did change that and passed true by default.
But a closer look revealed that we do not really need it.
The parameter is removed by this patch; the SQL statement is slightly
adjusted: if reservedate<=now or a waitingdate is filled for the
requested itemnumber, GetReservesFromItemnumber will return the reserve.
This includes so-called future waits: a future hold that has been confirmed
ahead of time with pref ConfirmFutureHolds > 0 days.
Note that future item-level holds are not really interesting to return; this
just corresponds to original behavior. Future next-available holds are not
in view at all; they do not contain an item number.
Test plan:
Actually, the test plan of the first patch is valid. But for completeness I
repeat it here:
[1] Enable future holds and set ConfirmFutureHolds to 2 days.
[2] Place a future next-available hold for 2 days ahead.
[3] Check item status on catalogue detail. Available? That is fine.
[4] Confirm the future hold by checking it in. ('future wait')
[5] Look at item status again on catalogue detail. Must be Waiting now.
[6] Switch to OPAC and login as another opac user. Goto Place a hold.
[7] Check item status with item level hold info. Is it waiting?
[8] Try to place hold in staff, check item level status again. Waiting?
[9] Make a transfer for the item. Switch branch. Check hold status on
Transfers to receive.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch makes GetReservesFromItemnumber also returns the waiting
date and removes some repeated code.
Improves item status display on catalogue detail, when placing a hold at
opac-reserve and in staff, and on transfers to receive form.
This patch builds on work from reports 9367 and 9761.
Test plan:
Place a future next-av. hold (enable future holds prefs), say 2 days ahead.
Check item status on catalogue detail. Nothing to see.
Enable ConfirmFutureHolds by inserting a number of days, say 2.
Confirm earlier hold by checking it in. Look at item status again on detail.
Switch to other opac user. Try to place a hold again. Check item status with
item level hold info. Try to place hold in staff, check item level status.
Make a transfer for that item. Switch branch. Look at transfers to receive.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The method of checking the logged in user for superlibrarian privileges
is obtuse ( $userenv && $userenv->{flags} % 2 != 1 ) to say the least.
The codebase is littered with these lines, with no explanation given. It
would be much better if we had one subroutine that returned a boolean
value to tell us if the logged in user is a superlibrarian or not.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Verify superlibrarian behavior remains unchanged
Signed-off-by: Joel Sasse <jsasse@plumcreeklibrary.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Comments on second patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
On intranet, when placing a hold requst:
If borrower has reached the request limit, a warning should appear :
Cannot place hold
* Too Many Holds: TEST has too many holds.
This works when quota defined in circulation rules is reached but not
when limit specified in syspref maxreserves is reached, in case this
limit is lower than the one defined is circulation rules.
This is because template param maxreserves is set twice, this patch
corrects this bug.
Also moves warnings and messages conditional variable from Perl to
template because it cause the same bug as for maxreserves.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
One just needed parentheses, but the one on line 219 reflects
a slightly deeper problem -- it's running patron checks when
a patron hasn't actually been supplied.
To test:
[1] From the staff interface, bring up a biblio that has no
holds on it, then go to the holds tab.
[2] Verify that the Apache log has no new warnings containing:
request.pl: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /home/gmc/koha/reserve/request.pl line 219
or
request.pl: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /home/gmc/koha/reserve/request.pl line 488
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch switches from using a combination of
biblionumber/borrowernumber to using reserve_id where possible.
Test Plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Maxime Pelletier <maxime.pelletier@libeo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Let the template take care of generating the display.
Lets at least part of request.pl be more succinct.
To test, place a hold and search for the patron using a partial name.
You should get a dropdown select list of patrons and be able to select
the patron to hold for from there.
The functionality should remain unimpaired after this patch is applied.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test Plan:
1) Enable IndependantBranches
2) Apply this patch
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Verify that the system preference still functions correctly
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If IndependantBranches is enabled, all holds for an item display the
currently logged in library no matter what, and modifying the holds will
set all pickup locations for all the holds to that logged in library!
Test plan:
1) Disable IndependantBranches
2) Place 3 holds on a record with 3 different pickup locations
3) Enable IndependantBranches
4) Refresh the holds page for that record, all the holds show now
show a pickup location of the logged in branch
5) Modify the order of the holds
6) Disable IndependantBranches
7) Refresh the holds, verify the holds all now have a pickup
location of the logged in branch
8) Apply the patch
9) Repeat steps 1-3
10) Refresh the holds page for that record, all the holds should
now show the correct pickup branch, but it cannot be changed
as IndependantBranches is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
In my tests the above test plan only worked out if my user
had no superlibrarian permission. But then behaviour for
independentbranches off/on was all correct.
All tests and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
In current implementation (mostly commented out in this patch)
uses heuristic to guess which strings need decoding from utf-8
to binary representation and doesn't support utf-8 characters
in templates and has problems with utf-8 data from database.
With this changes, Koha perl code always uses utf-8 encoding
correctly. All incomming data from database is allready
correctly marked as utf-8, and decoding of utf8 is required
only from Zebra and XSLT transfers which don't set utf-8 flag
correctly.
For output, standard perl :encoding(utf8) handler is used
so it also removes various "wide character" warnings as side-effect.
Test scenario:
1. make sure that you have utf-8 characters in your biblio
records, patrons, categories etc.
2. try to search records on intranet and opac which contain
utf-8 characters
3. install language which has utf-8 characters, e.g. uk-UA
dpavlin@koha-dev:/srv/koha/misc/translator(bug_6554) $
PERL5LIB=/srv/koha/ perl translate install uk-UA
4. switch language to uk-UA and verify that templates
display correctly
5. test search and Z39.50 search and verify that caracters
are correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I followed the test plan, adding utf-8 characters to library names,
patron categories, titles, and authorized values. I tried the uk-UA
translation and everything looked good.
When performing Z39.50 searches for titles containing utf-8 characters I
got results which were still occasionally contaminated with dummy
characters [?] but I assume this is Z39.50's fault not the patch's.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Already signed, add mine.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
This follow up reinstates or add check for undef returned
by C4::Context->userenv, only where previous patch touch
code.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
This patch replace use of CGI::scroll_list() to show list of branches.
In two files, marc21_linking_section.pl and unimarc_field_4XX.pl,
the scrolling list is created but not used in the template file,
so the code is removed.
Also minor renaming/normalizing of variables.
To test:
1) Install with some branches, records and patrons
2.1) Select a record, click 'Place hold', select user,
there is a library pull-down next to 'Pickup at:',
list is ordered case sensitive
2.2) Go to Reports > Average loan time,
next to Library is a pull-down,
list without order
2.3) Go to Reports > Catalog by item type,
next to 'Select a library' is a pull-down,
list is ordered case sensitive
2.4) This is tricky, go to Reports home,
change last part of URL 'reports-home.pl' with
'manager.pl?report_name=issues_by_borrower_category'
(can't find a direct link), next to 'Select a library'
is a library pull-down,
list without order
2.5) Edit/Add a patron, on section 'Library management'
there is a library pull-down, case sensitive
2.6) OPAC, as logged user, make a suggestion or hold,
there is library pull-down, correct order
3) Apply the patch
4.1) Repeat 2.1), correctly ordered list
4.2) Repeat 2.2), correctly ordered list
4.3) Repeat 2.3), correctly ordered list
4.4) Repeat 2.4), correctly ordered list
4.5) This is a bit more work
There are 3 possible situations to test:
A) No branches, must show a message that are no
libraries defined
B) New patron, must show a correctly ordered
list of branches, current branch selected
C) Edit patron, must show a correctly ordered
list of branches, patron branch selected
4.6) Small changes on variable names, so retest 2.6)
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
- the dateformat value is send to all templates (from
C4::Auth::get_template_and_user)
- remove all assignment of dateformat in all .pl files
- the DHTMLcalendar_dateformat variable is unused
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed conflicts:
- opac/sco/sco-main.pl
- reports/acquisitions_stats.pl
- tools/cleanborrowers.pl
All tests pass, perlcritic problems appeared in some files
before and after these patches were applied.
Checked sorting in following pages:
- acqui/addorderiso2709.tt - list of staged imports in acq
- acqui/histsearch.tt - sorting of dates in acq search result list
- acqui/invoices.tt - billing date in list of invoices in acq
- acqui/lateorders.tt - list of late orders in acq
- acqui/ordered.tt - ordered titles and estimated costs for a fund
- acqui/parcels.tt - receive shipment page
- acqui/spent.tt - received titles and actual costs for a fund
...
- serials-search.tt - subscription search result list
...
- opac/sco/sco-main.tt - due dates in list of checked out items
- reports/acquisitions-stats.tt - date searches, display of dates
- tools/cleanborrowers.tt
- tools.holidays.tt - different views of dates library is closed,
adding dates
Checked dates display according to system preference everywhere and
searching, entering dates etc. still worked as expected.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Added a system preference to turn on/off this feature.
By default the system allow the patron to place holds even if it is in his possession.
Script to place holds check if the system preference is off and if patron has at least one item to block holds.
Messages to say that are already in patron possession added to templates.
Method to check if patron has one issue from one record added to C4::Circulation
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
If user supplies renewal with a new due date it should add
a time using the same logic as dateduespec in circulation.pl
rather than defaulting to 00:00
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
If you check-in an item through the "Check Out" tab of the Patron Record, the return/check-in ignores the "InProcessingToShelvingCart" and "ReturnToShelvingCart" circulation system preferences. Or rather, there just isn't any logic to handle them in the renewscript.pl file.
I'm pretty much just bringing the code straight across from returns.pl, although some minor changes need to be made due to context.
Both system preferences are important to include, since you can check-out an in processing item to a patron. While a regular check-in will clear the in processing status, a check-in through the Patron module will cause the item to have its status returned to "In Processing" rather than going to "Shelving Cart", if the preference is set, of course.
To test the scenario, turn on one of (or both of) these settings and try checking books in through the Circulation module and the Patron module.
Before the patch, you will see that only the Circulation module will change the shelving location.
After the patch, you should see identical behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7189
For request.pl, there are two ways to suspend a reserve, either
by using the 'suspend' button for an individual reserve, or by
using the 'Update hold(s)' button with suspend until dates set.
If the 'suspend' button is used, any date in the 'suspend until'
field is ignored. This commit fixes this issue.
* Add suspend_until date to suspend button link via jquery
* Add optional date to ToggleSuspend()
* Add KohaDates plugin where necessary
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
passes tests, tested:
* suspend all holds from circ.pl
* suspend one hold from circ.pl
* suspend all holds from moremember.pl
* suspend one hold from moremember.pl
--- NOTE: clicking suspend all holds without setting a date will mean the holds must be manually unsuspended. I'm not sure this is intentional?
* suspend a specific hold using the in-table button on reserves
* suspend a specific hold using the "update hold" button
500 error is gone.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8084
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Adds the ability to suspend reserves. The new system preference
AutoResumeSuspendedHolds enables the ability to set a date for
a suspended hold to automatically be resumed.
When a hold is suspended, it will continue to increase in priority
as the holds above it are fulfilled. If the first holds in line
to be filled are suspended, the first non-suspened hold in line
will be used when an item can fulfill a hold that has been placed.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7641
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Tested with the preference on and off:
1. placed several holds in the staff client
2. suspended some with a date
3. suspended some without a date
4. triggered hold message by checking in for hold with suspensions
5. the suspended hold was skipped as it should be
6. tested suspending holds in the OPAC w and w/out dates
7. ran the cron to clear suspensions with dates
All the above tests worked as expected. Signing off.
