Test plan:
0. Apply patches
1. Update database
2. Go to administration -> libraries, try to update some library and
fill in some value into Marc Organization code field
3. Save this library and edit again - the code should be stored
correctly
4. Go to system preferences and fill in some value into MARCOrgCode
preference, note there is enhanced description mentioning the ability to
set organization code on library level
5. Set active library to the one with own org code stored
6. Go to cataloguing, create new empty record and click into field 003 -
there should be the code you filled for that library
7. Set active library to one withou marc org code
8. Go to cataloguing, create new empty record and click into field 003 -
there should be the code from system preference
9. Go to system preferences again and set AutoCreateAuthorities to
'generate' and BiblioAddsAuthorities to 'allow'
10. Go to cataloguing and create some biblio record, fill in any author
in to create its authority record, save the biblio
11. Go to authorities and find this created authority, go to details and
check the fields: 003, 040$a, 040$c, 670$a - there should be used right org code
12. prove t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t t/db_dependent/Biblio.t t/db_dependent/Koha/Libraries.t
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
0) Apply the patch
1) Edit a template and use any of the new icons, see
http://fontawesome.io/icons/
2) Verify that the added icon is shown
For alternative test see comment #2. Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
- Run the circulation wizard
- Export to csv
- Note there is no total row
- Apply patch
- Export to csv
- Total row totally there!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This does not make sense, but fix a bug (why?)
Without this patch, the tests failed on po files:
[17:14:26] t/00-merge-conflict-markers.t .. Failed 1/1 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/00-merge-conflict-markers.t (Wstat: 9 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero wait status: 9
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 1 tests but ran 0.
Result: FAIL
Note that this is not related to bug 19227.
if the ^>>>>>> and ^<<<<<< matches are done on the same line, the test fail
As saw it failed on *-pref.po files
misc/translator/po/kn-Knda-pref.po
misc/translator/po/ja-Jpan-JP-pref.po
misc/translator/po/nl-BE-pref.po
misc/translator/po/sr-Cyrl-pref.po
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the basic_workflow.t selenium tests read ENV for the
following vars:
KOHA_USER
KOHA_PASS
KOHA_INTRANET_URL
SELENIUM_ADDR
SELENIUM_PORT
to properly configure the running environment. If absent, all variables
fallback to current behaviour:
KOHA_USER // 'koha'
KOHA_PASS // 'koha'
KOHA_INTRANET_URL (unchanged)
SELENIUM_ADDR // 'localhost'
SELENIUM_PORT // 4444
[*] Selenium defaults are documented on the Selenium::Remote::Driver docs.
Prerequisites:
Make sure you have a working environment for the Selenium tests:
- Run:
$ sudo apt update
$ sudo apt install xvfb firefox-esr
To test:
- Run:
$ sudo koha-shell kohadev
k$ cd kohaclone
k$ wget https://selenium-release.storage.googleapis.com/2.53/selenium-server-standalone-2.53.1.jar \
-O /tmp/selenium.jar
k$ SELENIUM_PATH=/tmp/selenium.jar
k$ Xvfb :1 -screen 0 1024x768x24 2>&1 >/dev/null &
k$ DISPLAY=:1 java -jar $SELENIUM_PATH &
k$ prove t/db_dependent/selenium/basic_workflow.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass
- Apply this patch
- Run:
k$ prove t/db_dependent/selenium/basic_workflow.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
- Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Resolves:
The method found is not covered by tests at C4/Reserves.pm line 815.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Holds/CancelReserves.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It's done!
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is something wrong with the DELETE log, it should be replaced with
a FILLED log.
Anyway, here we do not want it to be logged.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is bonus, let's add new tests
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Move the existing tests
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new Koha::Hold->cancel method and replaces the calls
to C4::Reserves::CancelReserve with it.
Test plan:
- Add and cancel holds
- Change priority of holds
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
1-go to C4/Accounts.pm
2-there should not be a trailing space at line 279.
Signed-off-by: Dominic Pichette <dominic@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This enhancement just exposes the quantity field to the OPAC suggestions
form to permit the end user to enter this if they wish. The librarians
can of course override this quantity when they process the suggestion.
Test Plan (assuming using kohadevbox VM):
1) apply patch and turn on purchase suggestions
2) Go to http://localhost:8080/cgi-bin/koha/opac-suggestions.pl?op=add
and notice that there is now a quantity field available.
3) Make a purchasing suggestion using this form, including a quantity.
4) Log in as a member of library staff and go to Home › Acquisitions ›
Suggestions
5) Confirm that the previously entered suggestion is there, and that the
correct quantity appears in the "Acquisition information" section.
6) Edit the purchasing suggestion, change the quantity, save it and
check that the new quantity appears in the suggestion.
I've popped an ID attribute of "opac-suggestion-quantity" to the
surrounding <li> so that CSS can easily make this optional field
disappear (as suggested by cait on IRC).
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Due to the way members-home.pl handles the variable $branch, the number
of patron modifications listed on members-home.pl may differ from the
number listed on mainpage.pl. When the librarian clicks this link, he or
she may see a different number than was listed, or none at all!
Test Plan:
0) Set IndependentBranchesPatronModifications = Yes
1) Create a number of modification request for BranchA
2) Log into the staff intranet with a patron without superlibrarian
permissions and set your branch to BranchB
3) Note the modifications alert to does not display on mainpage.pl
4) Click the "Patrons" link to take you to members-home.pl
5) Note the modifictions alert does display on this page
6) Apply this patch
7) Reload members-home.pl, note the alert no longer displays
QA notes: What was the point of the branch variable?
Followed test plan, patch worked as described. Also passed QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Internal server errors are good, user feedback is better.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tiny change: removed the obsolete 'use Koha::Exceptions'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the following changes:
[1] Removes Default from the template list. We should not merge with the
Default framework, since it does not have a reporting tag.
[2] Rearranges the error section in the template. It is confusing to have
two error sections in this template. The error CANNOT_MOVE is not used.
The error FRAMEWORK_NOT_SELECTED is replaced by WRONG_FRAMEWORK.
[3] Do not allow to merge a record with itself.
[4] Check if the merge reference record still contains any MARC tags.
[5] Additional polishing: Simplify passing frameworks to template. Remove
an unused Koha::Authority::Types->search. Remove obsolete POD header
for functions from the script.
Test plan:
[1] Select two authorities to merge. Verify that you cannot select Default
anymore as framework for the reference record.
[2] Reproduce error WRONG_COUNT by adding another authid=999 in the URL
after you selected two authority records for merging.
[3] Remove the third authid from the URL and change the first or second
authid into an unexisting record id. You should generate an Internal
Server Error. The log should show the exception message.
[4] Merge two authorities. Deselect all MARC tags. Should trigger the
error EMPTY_MARC in the template.
[5] Select the same authority record twice for merging. Should trigger the
error DESTRUCTIVE_MERGE in the template.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Altough this patch deals with a mostly hypothetical case and this report
makes it practically impossible anymore to merge with records in the
Default framework (having no reporting tag), we can make the code of
sub merge still a bit more robust here.
If you would merge biblio records from one authtype to another and the new
framework would not have a reporting tag, before this patch the result would
be data loss. Merge would handle this request as a delete. This patch makes
merge handle it differently: instead of clearing the biblio records, it
keeps $a and $9 in order to make a future corrective merge possible.
Note: The additional condition on line 1468 for $tags_using_authtype
makes sure that we do not select all fields when the authtype should
unexpectedly be empty string (Default). This prevents crashing on
a "Control fields do not have subfields" error.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If we got an authtypecode from the database and this value is not NULL
since the table column does not allow it, there is no need to call
GuessAuthTypeCode for empty string (read: Default framework) in the
sub get_from_authid.
Furthermore, we remove three Koha::MetadataRecord::Authority->new calls.
They are useless, since we do not pass a record. It just generates:
No record passed at authorities/merge.pl line 96.
Can't bless non-reference value at Koha/MetadataRecord/Authority.pm line 66.
Instead we throw an ObjectNotFound exception.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Koha_Authority.t
[2] Interface will be tested in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Resolves:
Use of uninitialized value $biblio_fields in scalar chop at authorities/detail.pl line 212.
Can't call method "authtypetext" on an undefined value at authorities/detail.pl line 216.
Can't call method "authtypecode" on an undefined value at authorities/detail.pl line 180.
NOTE: Some of these problems have actually been resolved now by bugs 18801
and 18811, but it is still better imo to have these checks.
Test plan:
[1] Verify unchanged behavior. Search for some authorities on authorities.pl
and click on the details of a record.
[2] Open an authorities detail page and change the authid in the URL to a
not existing number. Instead of an internal server error, you should see
a message like "The authority record you requested does not exist".
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Trivial changes to silence qa tools on POD warnings for Subfields and Tags.
Note: Since Subfield and Tag only contain one sub which is considered as
private by Pod::Coverage, these modules are listed as unrated (no public
symbols defined) and trigger a FAIL on pod coverage in qa tools. This fail
can be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Renaming t/db_dependent/Authorities to Authority
Adding Subfields.t and Tags.t
Test plan:
[1] prove t/db_dependent/Authority
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The warning encourages people to run the auth_show_hidden_data script
to check for data in hidden fields and adjust their frameworks.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If you edit an authority record while having data in hidden fields or
subfields, that data will be lost now.
This script can help you to unhide some fields and prevent data loss.
Test plan:
[1] Add a PERSO_NAME record. Fill e.g. 100b.
[2] Hide 100b in the PERSO_NAME framework.
[3] Run auth_show_hidden_data.pl and verify that it reports 100b in
the PERSO_NAME framework.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Trivial copy and paste activity.
Will be used in a later patch.
No test plan needed.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The check is now <=-4 or >=5, but the framework uses 0 for Show all and
-5 for Hide all. (Note that sql installer scripts also use 8.)
When modifying an authority, the script also showed hidden fields when
filled, since it did not check the hidden field but only the tab field.
NOTE: The proposed solution restores consistency, but will remove hidden
fields from the MARC record.
Test plan:
[1] Set field 942a to Show all in an authority framework.
[2] Open a new record in this framework and verify that you see 942a.
[3] Edit an existing record in this framework and verify again.
[4] Set field 942a now to Hide all in this framework.
[5] Open a new record in this framework and verify that 942a is hidden.
[6] Edit an existing record in this framework and verify again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If you run `prove xt/author/pod_spell.t` without having Test::Spelling installed, it will skip the tests.
If you install the lib-test-spelling-perl, the test will fail:
xt/author/pod_spell.t .. You said to run 0 tests at xt/author/pod_spell.t line 21.
xt/author/pod_spell.t .. Dubious, test returned 25 (wstat 6400, 0x1900)
No subtests run
This is because the call to all_pod_files_spelling_ok is expecting a path
If we try to fix it with adding "." as parameter, the tests will raise tone of errors.
Let's remove this file
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The number of tests on jenkins is sometimes confusing:
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D8/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/t_00_merge_conflict_markers_t/
shows that 00-merge-conflict-markers.t ran 10,751 tests, 124 less than
the previous run. However 124 files have not been removed from the
codebase!
I suggest to count only 1 test for all files.
Moreover files from blib and cover_db are counted, they should be
excluded.
Test plan:
prove t/00-merge-conflict-markers.t
must return green
echo ">>>>>>>" >> mainpage.pl
and run the test again
It should now fail
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <magnus@libriotech.no>
Works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The HTML code was "text" instead of "password".
TEST PLAN
----------
1) 'Allow' PatronSelfRegistration system preference
2) Define the PatronSelfRegistrationDefaultCategory system preference (e.g. PT)
3) Open OPAC
4) Click 'Register here' on the right. (/cgi-bin/koha/opac-memberentry.pl)
5) Scroll to bottom
6) enter some passwords
-- visible
7) apply this patch
8) refresh page
9) repeat 5-6 as needed
-- passwords should not be visible while entering
10) run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch was my first attempt to fix the issue.
I think it is good to have it, if issue.timestamp and issue.issuedate are the same,
the result will be orderd by issue_id.
The tests highlight the fact that checkouts must be displayed in the
correct order.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This issue has been highlighted by a failing test: ISSUESLIP displays checkouts in random order
I thought it was because of dates comparison, but it comes from the following line in C4::Letters::_get_tt_params
my $objects = $module->search( { $key => { -in => $values } } );
The DBMS will return data like there is ordered in the DB.
For instance:
select borrowernumber from borrowers where borrowernumber in (5, 3, 1);
or
select borrowernumber from borrowers where borrowernumber=5 or borrowernumber=3 or borrowernumber=1;
will return 1, 3, 5
I did not find a generic way to do that, so used "ORDER BY FIELD" which will not be portable.
Test plan:
If you do not apply this patch, the tests will sometime fail
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1) Create a budget, add a fund
2) Delete budget. Notice this is successful and triggers no warning
message etc.
3) Go to Funds. Notice the funds appear as if they are not there
4) Go into mysql and view the aqbudgetperiods table - notice the funds
are still there and are now inaccessible.
5) Apply patch
6) Create a budget, add a fund
7) Attempt to delete budget. Notice you can't click Delete button.
Confirm number of funds in hover message is correct.
8) Delete fund
9) Confirm you can now delete budget.
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Felix Hemme <felix.hemme@thulb.uni-jena.de>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Bug 18351: [FOLLOW-UP] Some code fixes
See Comment 5. Ready to test.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Bug 18351: [FOLLOW-UP] Code fix
See comment 10.
Ready for testing.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Bug 18351: [FOLLOW-UP] Prevent deletion from forcing URL
This patch adds a check in the script for existing funds so that the
budget cannot be deleted when forcing the URL and has other small fixes.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Bug 18351: [FOLLOW-UP] Prevent deletion if funds are added after clicking 'Delete' and before confirming delete
Followed test plan and patch works as described.
Signed-off-by: Dilan Johnpullé <dilan@calyx.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The statement for head3 NB ('nota bene'?) looks like a hash key
in the list of possible return values for $needsconfirmation.
Moved it up and prefixed it with IMPORTANT.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The returns from C4::Circulation::CanBookBeIssued used
to be structured as a hashref of entries like
REASON => {
data => 'foo',
moredata => 'bar',
};
Some entries still are. But many are now
REASON => 1,
data => 'foo',
moredata => 'bar',
The sip Checkout routine still assumed the former, as it
reports any causes it was not aware of (to maintain support for
a changing api) The data fields could leak into the screen message
field of the response. e.g. the borrowernumber or surname of the
borrower who has a hold on an issued title. Some real messages were
getting obscured by this
This patch sanatizes the return from from CanBookBeIssued
by removing keys which are not all uppercase
It also fixes a case where the key's data element was used
for the screen message when we should use the key itself
Updated the documentation of CanBookBeIssued to flag up
the assumption re case and the fact that 3 elements rather
than two may be returned
The loop through the returned keys was a bit bogus
so we now explicitly jump out if noerror is unset
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested quite extensively. Test results put on Bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Followup correcting a typo of previous patch :
name="holdingbranch" options = branche
it is branche[s]
Test plan :
- Look at 'Current location' in item search
=> Without patch you see only 'All libraries'
=> With patch you see 'All libraries' and each existing library, like in 'Home library'
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment we have 2 different modules for acquisition orders:
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and Koha::Acquisition::Order
The later has been added before the creation of Koha::Object.
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] has been created to make the TT syntax for notices
works with acquisition order data.
This patch removes the temporary packages Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and adapt
the code of Koha::Acquisition::Order[s] to be based on Koha::Object[s].
It also overloads Koha::Object->new to add the trick that was done in
Koha::Acquisition::Order->insert. This is needed because acqui/addorder.pl
is called from several places and CGI->Vars is used to retrieved order's
attributes (and so much more). To avoid regression, the easiest (but not
cleanest) way to do is to filter on aqorders column's names.
This is *not* a pattern to follow!
Test plan:
Create basket and add orders from different ways, then continue a whole
acquisition process
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The following warn is triggered when I click the Reverse button next to
an individual payment on the Account tab:
CGI::param called in list context from package
CGI::Compile::ROOT::home_vagrant_kohaclone_members_boraccount_2epl line
63, this can lead to vulnerabilities. See the warning in "Fetching the
value or values of a single named parameter" at /usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm
line 436.
To test:
1) Go to a members detail page in staff side, create a manual invoice,
pay it
2) Go to the Account tab, click Reverse next to the payment you just
made
3) Notice warns
4) Apply patch and repeat steps 1 & 2
5) Warns should be gone
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The following warns are triggered when I click the Pay selected button:
CGI::param called in list context from package
CGI::Compile::ROOT::home_vagrant_kohaclone_members_pay_2epl line 267,
this can lead to vulnerabilities. See the warning in "Fetching the
value or values of a single named parameter" at
usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm line 436.
CGI::param called in list context from package
CGI::Compile::ROOT::home_vagrant_kohaclone_members_pay_2epl line
273, this can lead to vulnerabilities. See the warning in "Fetching
the value or values of a single named parameter" at
/usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm line 436.
To test:
1) Go to a members detail page in staff side and create a manual
invoice
2) Go to the pay fines tab, select the fine you just created and click
Pay selected
3) Notice warns
4) Apply patch and repeat steps 1 & 2
5) Warns should be gone
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The following warns are triggered when I click the Write Off button next
to an individual fine or charge:
CGI::param called in list context from package
CGI::Compile::ROOT::home_vagrant_kohaclone_members_pay_2epl line 171,
this can lead to vulnerabilities. See the warning in "Fetching the
value or values of a single named parameter" at
/usr/share/perl5/CGI.pm line 436. (this shows many times)
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at
/usr/share/perl5/URI/Escape.pm line 184.
To test:
1) Go to a members detail page in staff side and create a manual
invoice
2) Go to the pay fines tab, click the Write off button next to the
invoice you just created
3) Notice warns
4) Apply patch and repeat steps 1 & 2
5) Warns should be gone
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1) Go to a members detail page in staff client
2) Select the Fines tab in the left pane
3) Select the Create manual invoice tab below the button menu bar
4) Create a fine and click save (e.g. Type: Fine, Amount: 5.00)
5) Select the Pay fines tab below the button menu bar
6) Click Pay on the item
7) Blank the staff error log
8) click confirm
-- staff error log has message
9) apply this first patch
10) repeat steps 3-8
-- staff error log is blank
11) run koha qa test tools
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
