One day late patrons were restricted even with dropbox mode activated
1) Check in the calendar (Tools/Calendar), that the
previous days you are about to use as date due are
really entered as opening day (never know).
2) Add a suspension in the suspension days parameter
of the circulation rules (Administration/Circulation
and fine rules) to the MOST specific category of
borrower and MOST specific type of document among the
existing rules of the LOGGED IN Site(cf explications
in the circ-rules page).
3) Choose a borrower using the search by category and an
item through the advanced search using the limit by type.
4) Checkout the item selecting the previous opening date
in the Specify-due-date box.
5) Click on Circulation in the upper menu, then on Checkin
and check the Book drop mode. The Book drop date showed
should be the previous opening date.
6) Check in the item : you can see that the patron is restricted
7) apply the patch
8) Redo 1 to 5 : Now, you can see that the patron is not restricted.
9) If you redo the test with two day late, you will see that
the patron is not restricted : that's ok because his
restriction of one day is already finished.
10) If you redo the test with more than two day late, you see
that the patron restriction is, as expected, one day shorter
than it were if the item had been returned without dropbox mode.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test Plan ( using sample data included with Koha )
1) Catalog a record and item with the title "Oh no! or, (How my
science project destroyed the world) /"
2) Edit the DEFAULT template
a) Set layout type to Biblio
b) Set data fields to "title, author, isbn, issn, itemtype,
barcode, itemcallnumber"
c) Set font size to 10
3) Create a batch with just the one item you created
4) Export the PDF with the Avery template and the DEFAULT layout
5) Note the weirdness
6) Apply this patch
7) Re-export the PDF, note it's no longer weird ; )
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch only fixes the KW order.
Test plan:
1/ Choose/create a record with several 6XX (for KW), see the code source
to know which fields you can use
2/ Export this record in RIS format
3/ Verify that the KW lines are ordered following the marc record fields
order.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
We really should refactor this whole thing into Koha::RIS sometime, it's
a horrible module at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Check_Userid assumes that a borrowernumber will always be passed in
and thus fails to to return 0 for an already used userid when creating
a new patron.
Unit tests must now also me modified to no longer assume it is possible
to create multiple patrons with the same userid.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Check RentalFeesCheckoutConfirmation is activated
- Try to check out an item without rental fine
- Verify confirmation message without explanation
is shown
- Apply patch
- Verify confirmation message is no longer shown
- Configure itemtype to have rental fee
- Veirfy now the confirmation message appears as
it should
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
I would prefer not to hide this "stuff".
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When using a z3950 connexion with UNIMARC authorities, you get an error :
Unsupported UNIMARC character encoding [ ] for XML output for UNIMARCAUTH; 100$a -> 20141119
I've seen thant Bug 2060 when adds authorities import adds a special behavior for UNIMARC : marc flavor must be UNIMARCAUTH instead of just UNIMARC.
This patch adds the same behavior when using z3950 connexion and import.
Test plan :
- Use a UNIMARC install
- Define a z3950 connexion for UNIMARC authorities
- Go to Authorities module
- Click on "New from Z39.50"
- Perform a search
=> Without patch : you get the error
=> With patch : you get results
- Import one result
=> You get the authoritie creation form with all datas
You may check same plan with MARC21 install
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
NOTE: depending on the target, the syntax in the configuration
might not be UNIMARC, but MARC21/USMARC instead!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This is introduced by Bug 12874.
Without this patch, it's not possible to clear (set to an empty string)
an item field.
This appended for field linked to an AV list but even if it's not.
The regex tried to prefix 'my_field' with 'items.' to have
'items.my_field'. It wanted to take care of the case where the prefix
already exists (Actually only 1: 'items.cn_source').
The regex is changed to: "add the prefix only if the string does not
contain a dot".
Moreover an ambiguity existed on the prefix: in marc_subfield_structure,
the kohafield is prefixed, but not in the key of the hash sent to
ModItemFromMarc.
Test plan:
- edit an item, set a status that is controlled by an authorized value
examples tested: damaged, not for loan
- check the status saved correctly
- edit the item again, reset the status to empty
- check the status saved correctly
- edit the item again, reset fields, edit fields
- check the fields saved correctly
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To avoir further issue, it's better to explicitely list the fields we
want to retrieve.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch moves the publisher information out of its own
always empty column into the Summary column below the title,
as it is on other acq pages.
The information was never displaying, as publishercode is in
biblioitems and that table was not selected by GetInvoiceDetails.
Also modified the code to take into account that UNIMARC uses
biblioitems.publicationyear and MARC21/NORMARC use bibio.copyrightdate
for the copyright year.
To test:
- create an invoice for records that
- have a publication year
- have no publication year
- have a publisher...
- 'finish receiving' and check the invoice summary page
...acqui/invoice.pl?invoiceid=?
- Make sure all the information displays now but didn't witout the patch.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To Test
1/ Create 3 (or more holds) on one biblionumber, make sure at least
one item is not on loan
2/ Check out the not on loan item to a borrower (maybe number 2 in the
queue)
3/ Look in the database (or on the holds tab on the moredetail.pl)
notice the priorities have not been reordered
4/ Apply patch and try again, notice now they have
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Confirmed the problem without the patch, and confirmed that the patch
corrects it.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
GetHistory iterated on the orders to calculate the quantity and price.
These values are never used by the called.
It can be removed.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on acqui/histsearch.pl and
catalogue/detail.pl
Actually you just have to check that the total quantity and price are
not displayed on these views.
QA: note that 'count' and 'toggle' are never used in the template.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Minor code tidy to clean up qa script warning.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9165
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
A small enhancement to clear existing synced passowrd should this
config option be enbled. This followup is related to bug 12831
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9165
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This adds a configuration option to LDAP that prevents it from storing
user's passwords in the local database. This is useful when users of
hosted Koha wish to prevent any form of offsite password storage for
security reasons.
Notes:
* if the option is not included in the koha-conf.xml file, then the
current default behaviour of saving the password locally is retained.
* this has no impact on passwords that are already in the database.
They will not be erased.
To use:
* edit the koha-conf.xml for a system that uses LDAP for
authentication.
* in the <ldapserver> configuration, add:
<update_password>0</update_password>
* feel a greater sense of security.
To test:
1) have a Koha system that authenticates using LDAP.
2) note that when a user logs in, their password is saved (hashed) in
the database.
2.5) it is important to note that, for whatever reason, a user's
password is not stored on a login where their account is created,
only when they log in after being created. Thus perhaps log in and
log out a couple of times to be sure.
3) add the <update_password>0</update_password> option to the
<ldapserver> section of koha-conf.xml.
4) login with a new user (or erase the password from the database for
an existing user) and note that the password field is not populated.
5) log out and log back in just to be sure, check the password field
again.
Sponsored-By: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Local only logins should continue to function when LDAP is enabled.
This was not the case after bug 8148 [LDAP Auth should FAIL when ldap
contains a NEW password]. For this case, we need to diferentiate
between local accounts and ldap accounts. This is somewhat challenging
and thus this patch is only part of the story.
The other half can be achieved with bug 9165
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch fixes a major issue introduced by the
commit 5c4fdcf Bug 11742: A letter code should be unique.
The interface should let the possibility to create a default template
letter and some specific ones, with the same letter code (letter.code).
The patches submitted on bug 11742 tried to fix an issue based on a
(very bad) assumption: letter.code should be considered as a primary key and
should be uniq.
This patch reintroduces this behavior.
Note that the interface will block a letter code used in different
module (this is consistent not to have the same letter code used for different
needs).
This patch is absolutely not perfect, it just tries to change as less
change as possible and to use new tested subroutines.
Test plan:
1/ Verify that the problem raised on bug 11742 does not appears anymore.
2/ Verify there are no regression on adding, editing, copying, deleting
letters.
3/ Verify you are allowed to create a default letter template with a letter
code and to reuse for a specific letter (i.e. for a given library).
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These 2 bugs are in conflict.
The first one always join the issue table, the second one join on this
table too if the OnSiteCheckouts pref is enable.
So DBI raises an error if the pref is enabled (2 joins on the same
table).
This patch removes the conditional join.
Test plan:
Go on a detail record page with items and verify that items are list and
that the error no more appears in the log file.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Reproduced the problem, the patch fixes it, no noticeable regression found.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, items are visible again.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If a library is using Talking Tech for phone notices, any waiting hold
phone notice will show up twice!
This is because Koha generates on at the time the hold is set to
waiting, and then the cronjob TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl generates
it's own notice as well.
The former notice will always have a status of 'pending', as the
TalkingTech_itiva_inbound.pl script will update the notice the outbound
script created.
The solution is to prevent Koha from creating a phone notice for waiting
holds if TT is enabled, and let the cron script do it.
Test Plan:
1) Enable Talking Tech from the system preferences
2) Set a hold waiting phone notice in the notices and slips editor
3) Choose a patron, enable hold phone notices for that patron
4) Place a hold for a patron, and check it in so it's marked as waiting
5) Note the phone notice generated for the patron
6) Apply this patch
7) Repeat step 4
8) Note that this time, a phone hold waiting notice is not generated
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Amends condition with an additional or statement. Shoudn't affect
anything but phone notices. Change appears logical.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Without patch:
-------------
Make payment for patron who has fines
Select the Pay Amount button and add a note in the note box.
Select confirm
Result: The note does not display in list
With patch:
----------
Result: The note displays in list
Bonus testing: The note is included in system logs as well (Home:Tools:Logs)
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If you use a claimissue notice to claim serials, the generated letter
will be
<order>Title1, Author1</order>
<order>Title2, Author2</order>
...
<order>TitleN, AuthorN</order>
This patch geds rid of these tags.
Test plan:
1/ Create a claimissue notice with something like:
<<LibrarianFirstname>>
<<LibrarianSurname>>
The following issues are in late:
<order><<biblio.title>>, <<biblio.author>> (<<biblio.serial>>)</order>
2/ Generated late serial issues.
3/ Send notifications to vendor.
4/ The order tags should not exist anymore in the sent email.
You can see bug 5342 for a more detailled test plan.
Note for QA: This should have been done in GetPreparedLetter, but I did
not find a better way to do.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described. Tested having the <order> tags on one line
and also for a multi-line layout.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Fix a typo. Not test plan required, just a look at default UNIMARC framework.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
According to the manual, "Items will stay in the PROC location until
they are checked in".
This is not the actual behavior. Right now items will only change from
PROC to CART, and that is only if InProcessingToShelvingCart is enabled.
Some libraries want to use the PROC to permanent location feature,
without using the CART.
Additionally, the location is only removed if using returns.pl, but
that is not what the manual says either. What if the library uses
SIP2 devices for handling returns? This should be taken into
account.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set an item's current location to PROC, and it's permananet location
to a different location.
3) Check the item in any way you wish
4) Note the shelving location is updated to the permanent location
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
I tested this with items which had items.location set to 'PROC' and
items.permanent_location set to NULL, '', and a real value, and it
worked correctly in all cases. I tested with check-ins from returns.pl
and from the table of checkouts in circulation and the PROC location was
correctly removed in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
You may define in config a folder (usually /tmp) for TT cache :
template_cache_dir in etc/koha-conf.xml.
Some perl pages may be launched from commandline, like tools/export.pl.
Also, the script gather_print_notices.pl uses C4::Templates.
The problem is that when script is launched from Apache, the Unix owner of cache files will be www-data. When script is launched from commandline, like in a cronjob, the Unix owner will be different (like a user named "koha"), causing a crash because cache files can only be read by its owner.
This script disables the template cache if perl script is called from commandline. This cache is certainly only useful for web access.
Using GATEWAY_INTERFACE env var comes from tools/export.pl
Test plan :
- Use a dev install of koha installed in a user home, ie "/home/kohadev"
- Define a folder for template_cache_dir in etc/koha-conf.xml. For example : <template_cache_dir>/tmp</template_cache_dir>
- Check there is no cached templates already in this forder
- Create a file "bib.list" containing a few existing biblionumbers
- As user kohadev, launch : tools/export.pl --record-type=bibs --id_list_file=bib.list
- Look at cache folder
=> Without patch you see cache files owned by user kohadev
=> With patch there are no cache files
- Use the Koha interfaces OPAC and Intranet
=> Without patch you get an error : Template process failed: file error - cache failed to write ...
=> With patch you have no error and cache files are generated with Apache user as owner
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, good test plan!
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
No commit message
No test plan.
No regressions found on opac/staff item display
No improvements either, but could be just my test data
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script.
Tested detail and item pages in OPAC and staff, no regressions found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 2546 removes the description DB field value in some case (3.15.00.003).
But the receipt generated by scripts members/printfeercpt.pl and
members/printinvoice.pl displays this field.
When the description field is empty, the default value (based on
accountlines.accounttype) should be displayed.
Test plan:
- Generate and pay some different kinds of fees for a patron without
filling the 'description' field.
- In Fines>Account, click on the 'print' link.
- Before this patch, the "description of charges" values is empty if no
description was given.
It is a regression introduced by bug 2546, a default value was
inserted in the description field depending on the account type
selected.
- After this patch, the "description of charges" values should be based
on the account type. The string display on printing receipt should be
the same as on the account screen (staff and opac).
Note for QA: If removed the "payment" key, it is not used in template
and generated a warning ("odd number of elements...").
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
This fixes the display of payments and other charges on the
fines slip.
Note: This patch fixes a line where the description in the
database was still updated to say "Payment thanks" for partial
payments. It might be worth to do a follow-up correcting the
accountlines table and removing the unwanted comment (see bug 2546).
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch simplifies the SQL query in Letters.pm for table
borrower_modifications.
It also addresses the only case this query is used in opac-memberentry.
An unused variable in Letters.pm is removed.
Test plan:
Enable selfregistration on opac.
Set verification by email to required in prefs too.
Self-register two new users.
Check the email notices generated.
Verify the new users with the tokens in their notice.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Much cleaner SQL
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Cleaner and works as described, no regressions found.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In inventory results, CSV or screen, the item withdrawn information is missing.
This information can be usefull to understand why an item was not scanned.
Test plan :
- Check you have in default framework an item subfield mapped with items.withdrawn
- Create a biblio with default framework
- Create an item with barcode='000AAA1', callnumber='ZZZAAA1' and withdrawn=0
- Create an item with barcode='000AAA2', callnumber='ZZZAAA2' and withdrawn=1
- Go to inventory tool : /cgi-bin/koha/tools/inventory.pl
- Enter item callnumber between 'ZZZ' and 'ZZZZ'
- Submit
=> You see a column 'Withdrawn' with withdrawn value
- Go to inventory tool : /cgi-bin/koha/tools/inventory.pl
- Enter item callnumber between 'ZZZ' and 'ZZZZ'
- Check 'Export to CSV file'
- Submit
- Open exported file
=> You see a column 'Withdrawn' with withdrawn value
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Modified:
C4/Letters.pm - remove aqbooksellers.* from SELECT statement
In Letters - SendAlerts subrotine, is safe to remove aqbooksellers.* from SELECT statement
for type=claimacquisition or claimissues. Aqbooksellers is passed to GetPreparedLetter subrotine in tables variable.
Testing:
I Apply the patch
Select Tools -> Notices and slips;
Edit ACQCLAIM;
Add :
<order>Ordernumber <<aqorders.ordernumber>> (<<biblio.title>>) (<<aqorders.quantity>> ordered) ($<<aqorders.listprice>> <<aqbooksellers.listprice>> each) has not been received.</order>
Save modifications;
Create a vendor (Acquisition module);
Create an order (Acquisition module);
Click Acquisitions -> Late orders;
Select the order created;
Click Claim order button;
Valide <<aqorders.listprice>>;
Valide <<aqbooksellers.listprice>>.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described. It's now possible to output the actual price
in the claim notice.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If no order is selected on the acq claim page when clicking
'Claim order' an ugly perl error message is displayed.
This patch corrects the behaviour to display a human readable
'No order selected'
instead.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Reworded commit message to reflect what the patch achieves.
Works as described and passes tests.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a better check in message for patrons with indefinite restriction.
To test:
Check out an item to a patron.
Add a manual restriction without expiry date to that patron.
Check in the item.
Without patch, the checkin message reads:
Reminder: Patron was earlier restricted until 9999-12-31
Apply patch and repeat steps above.
The message should now read:
Reminder: Patron has a restriction (no expiry date)
NOTE: Changed wording at two places following Owen's suggestion. New: "Patron
has an indefinite restriction"
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Thanks Marc for catching this case. I was thinking like you that the wording
sounded strange while playing with bug 13242. Merge the original patch and the
followup, containing a better wording, thanks to Owen comment.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
TO REPLICATE:
Prepare a bunch of Items (6+) for checking out, or have a set of barcodes ready for copy-pasting.
Check-out those items quickly within one minute and observe that the sorting order is not always from the first checkout to the last.
This is because the issuedate doesn't have seconds defined.
AFTER THIS
The bunch of Items is sorted properly.
Tiny patch, works as expected. Passed QA script.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This fix is a global fix for the MarcModificationTemplate feature.
Some unit tests were missing and some behaviors were wrong.
For instance, if you tried to update a non existent field, the script
crashed.
The following line was completely stupid:
if $from_field ne $to_subfield
The field_number equals 1 if the user wants to update the first field
and 0 for all fields.
The field_numbers (note the s) variable contains the field numbers to
update. This array is filled if a condition exists (field exists or
field equals).
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Make sure the ModifyRecordWithTemplate routine returns undef.
This patch also removes a warning if GetModificationTemplates is called
without parameter.
Verify
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
returns green.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch series is a bugfix for the Marc modification templates tool.
Bug description:
If you want to do an action (delete/update/move/...) on a multivalued
field and if a condition is defined on the same field, it is highly
probable the resulted record will not be what you expect.
For example:
Deleting All (or the first) fields 650 if 245$a="Bad title" works with
the current code.
BUT if you want to delete All (or the first) fields 650 with a condition
on 650$9=42, and if at least one field matches the condition :
- if you have selected all, all fields 650 will be deleted, even the
ones who do not match the condition.
- if you have selected first, the first 650 field will be deleted, even
if it does not match the condition.
The expected behavior is to delete the fields matching the
condition (and not all the 650 fields).
What this patch does:
This patch introduces 2 changes in the logic of Koha::SimpleMARC.
The first change is a change of the prototypes for the 2 routines
field_exists and field_equals. Now they return the "field number" of the
matching fields.
The second change is the type of the "n" parameter for all routines
using it in Koha::SimpleMARC. Before this patch, the "n" parameter was a
boolean in most cases. If 0, the action was done on all fields, if 1
on the first one only. Now it is possible to specify the "field numbers"
(so the array of field numbers which is returned by field_exists or
field_equals) for all routines which had the n parameter.
Test plan for the patch series:
Note: This test plan describes a specific example, feel free to create
your own one.
0/ Define a marc modification template with the following action:
Delete field 245 if 245$9 = 42
1/ choose and export a record with several 245 fields.
For ex:
245
$a The art of computer programming
$c Donald E. Knuth.
$9 41
245
$a Bad title
$c Bad author
$9 42
2/ import it using the Stage MARC for import tool.
3/ verify the imported record does not contain any 245 field.
4/ apply all the patches from this bug report
5/ do again steps 2 and 3
6/ verify the imported record contains only one 245 field, the one with
245$9=41
7/ verify the unit tests passed:
prove t/SimpleMARC.t
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
DateTime::Format::DateParse (called in Koha::DateUtils::dt_from_string)
does not manage to parse 9999-12-31 if a time zone is given.
my $date = DateTime->new(year => 9999, month => 12, day => 31);
=> OK
DateTime::Format::DateParse->parse_datetime( '9999-12-31' );
=> OK
DateTime::Format::DateParse->parse_datetime( '9999-12-31',
'America/Los_Angeles' );
=> KO (~20sec on my laptop)
It should not be considered as a valid date when the letter is parsed.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Note that to reproduce the problem you much be checking in items from an
account which has been restricted indefinitely (either manually or by
the overdues process). With this patch such checkins go from taking
around 50 seconds (in my test system) to around 7 to 10 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Good catch! Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
1) Be more careful when checking the NorwegianPatronDBEnable syspref.
Before:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
After:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') && C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
This should avoid complaints if the syspref is not initialized.
2) Fix some empty =head2 POD sections
3) Fix some indentation in patrons.pref, to make xt/yaml_valid.t happy
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
I couldn't find any regressions with adding, editing and deleting members.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The QA script was complaining about some dodgy POD in C4/Members.pm,
that was not introduced by bug 11401. This patch fixes the POD, to
keep the QA script happy.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch makes it possible to sync patron data between Koha and the
Norwegian national patron database, in both directions.
In order to use this, the following information is necessary:
- a username/password from the Norwegian national database of libraries
("Base Bibliotek"), available to all Norwegian libraries
- a special key in order to decrypt and encrypt PIN-codes/passwords,
which is only available to Norwegian library system vendors
- a norwegian library vendor username/password
See http://www.lanekortet.no/ for more information (in Norwegian).
While this is of course an implementation of a specific synchronization scheme
for borrower data, attempts have been made to prepare the ground for other sync
schemes that might be implemented later. Especially the structure of the new
borrower_sync table might be reviewed with an eye to how it might fit other
schemes.
To test:
Since the password and cryptographic key needed to use this functionality
is only available to Norwegian library system vendors, only regression testing
can be done on the submitted code. Suggested things to check:
- Apply the patch and make sure the database update is done. This should add
the new "borrower_sync" table and five new systmpreferences under the
"Patrons" > "Norwegian patron database" category:
- NorwegianPatronDBEnable
- NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint
- NorwegianPatronDBUsername
- NorwegianPatronDBPassword
- NorwegianPatronDBSearchNLAfterLocalHit
- Check that patrons can be created, edited and deleted as usual, when
NorwegianPatronDBEnable is set to "Disable"
- Check that the new tests in t/NorwegianPatronDB.pm run ok, e.g. on a
gitified setup:
$ sudo koha-shell -c "PERL5LIB=/path/to/kohaclone prove -v t/NorwegianPatronDB.t" instancename
- Check that all the other tests still run ok
- Check that the POD in the new files itroduced by this patch looks ok:
- Koha/NorwegianPatronDB.pm
- members/nl-search.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-from-koha.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-to-koha.pl
- t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
Sponsored-by: Oslo Public Library
Update 2014-09-18:
- Rebase on master
- Split out changes to Koha::Schema
- Incorporate new way of authenticating with NL
Update 2014-10-21:
- Rebase on master
- Use Module::Load to load Koha::NorwegianPatronDB in non-NL-specific
scripts and modules
- Fix the version number of Digest::SHA
- Fix a missing semicolon in kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Calls to C4/Charset.pm's NormalizeString function with an
undefined string were triggering warnings when running:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Sadly, t/Charset.t was also lacking calls to NormalizeString.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- This should generate the uninitialized string warnings.
Make sure CPL and MPL are in your branches to save
yourself from headaches due to expected data.
2) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are no function calls to NormalizeString.
You can see other shortfalls in the tests beyond
NormalizeString with: grep ^sub C4/Charset.pm
3) prove -v t/Charset.t
4) Apply patch
5) prove -v t/Charset.t
-- Run as before with more tests.
6) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are now function calls to NormalizeString.
7) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- Nice and clean run! :)
8) koha-qa.pl -v 2 -c 1
-- all should be Ok.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Removes this warning: Use of uninitialized value $template_id in string eq
at C4/MarcModificationTemplates.pm line 84.
GetModificationTemplates has no template_id if called from
marc_modification_templates.pl without operation (first click from
interface) and from tools/stage-marc-import.pl.
Slightly adjusted the POD lines accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In order to avoid a long list of parameters, it should be better to
pass all of them into a hashref.
This patch does not add or modify a behavior.
Test plan:
Verify the unit tests still pass
- prove t/SimpleMARC.t
- prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current holds behavior in Koha allows a situation like this:
- Patron A has an item currently checked out.
- Patron B places a hold on the next available copy of that title.
- Then Patron A will not be able to renew his item, even if there are
other available copies of that title that could potentially fill Patron
B's hold.
Since this seems unfair to Patron A, we should allow renewal of items
even if there are unfilled holds, but those holds could all be filled
with currently available items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a record with two items
3) Check out the item to a patron
4) Place a hold on the record
5) Note you cannot renew the item for the patron
6) Enable the new system preference AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
7) Note you can now renew the item, as all the holds can be satisfied
by available items.
8) Place a second hold on the record
9) Note you can no longer renew the item, as all the holds *cannot*
be filled by currently available items
Signed-off-by: Holger Meissner <h.meissner.82@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Rohde <crohde@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch
- rename _entity_clean as _clean_ampersand
- rename the script to sanitize_records.pl
- add a --fix-ampersand switch (the only one FOR NOW, enabled by
default) so it is obvious what the script does.
- make POD and usage reflect this changes.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
