On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This makes the comparison between bibliographic field and authority field more robust and per subfield. This makes the comparison not consider the same e.g. the following fields:
$a Test User
$a Test $b User
The actual issue cannot be as easily reproduced with the patches for bug 21826 applied, but here's a test plan anyway:
1. Make sure tests pass (especially t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc*)
2. Make sure authority linking still works properly
3. Make sure authority and biblio frameworks allow subfield i
4. Make sure that even if you add subfield i to 700 in biblio, authority link is kept the same
5. Make sure that even if you add subfield i to the authority record, the authority link is kept the same
Signed-off-by: Frank Hansen <frank.hansen@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Tests in db_dependent may expect a Koha database, but should not rely on
hardcoded categories, currencies, branch codes, etc.
This patch fixes a bunch of those. But this is a continuous project. We also
need QA to closely watch new edits.
Accounts.t: hardcoded category PT replaced
Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t: hardcoded USD
Acquisition/StandingOrders.t: same
ArticleRequests.t: create itemtype, branch and category for testing
AuthorisedValues.t: remove $dbh, add two test branches
AuthoritiesMarc.t: add hardcoded GEOGR_NAME authtype
Bookseller.t: add test currency
Koha.t: add test itemtype instead of hardcoded BK
UsageStats.t: add test branch and category
Test plan:
Run the adjusted tests.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
All tests successful (see comment #9)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
We will need a few additional parameters for merge later on. This patch
puts the original parameters in a parameter hash.
For the same reason DelAuthority gets a parameter hash here.
Note: We remove the second parameter from the DelAuthority call in
authorities/authorities-home.pl here. It was not used and could have
presented problems in the future.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t.
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Instead of using the MAX(authid)+1 logic, AddAuthority should just save
the record and get the new id. The authid column is an autoincrement.
This eliminates problems where a newly assigned authid also refers to a
previously deleted record. (And it will not cause problems when refining
the dontmerge functionality on report 9988.)
Note: ModAuthority also calls AddAuthority to update an existing record; in
that case we should not create a new record even if the record should not
be found any more (which should be exceptional).
This patch also simplifies handling of 001 in the authority record: in all
cases this field is updated now; no need to check its contents.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
[2] Add a new authority record via the interface
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Since AddAuthority uses max(id)+1 logic to produce the next authid,
authority id's will be reused when you delete the last record. This may
be a source of problems and will be addressed on the next patch.
This patch add a test to expose the problem.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Modern::Perl, Koha::Database, etc.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The problem is the template in authority type summary is not respected
at all. It is only read to see which fields and subfields should appear
in the summary.
This patch fixes that.
It also fixes a bug in auth_finder.pl plugin when summary contains
fields other than 2XX.
Test plan:
0/ You must use a UNIMARC setup for those tests
1/ edit an authority type summary with:
NP : [200a][, 200b][ 200d][-- 152b --][ ; 200c][ (200f)] [001*] [ppn: 009*]
2/ create a new authority with previous fields (it is possible some
fields don't exist).
3/ search this authority and verify the summary is someting like:
NP : Name, D.-- NP -- 23849 ppn: my_ppn
4/ Verify some summary for existing authorities and check they are
correct.
5/ Edit a biblio record and use the plugin auth_finder.pl (for example
in a 7XX field)
6/ Do a search and verify the summary is correct
7/ Click on 'choose' or one of the numbered links ('1', '2', ... ; you
should have multiple 2XX fields for the numbered links to show up)
8/ Verify that the biblio field is correctly filled.
/!\ For the ppn, it should be defined in the zebra indexes.
In MARC21 and NORMARC setups, this patch should change nothing, please
verify that too (you can check that the auth_finder.pl plugin is still
working and the auth type summary is correctly displayed in authorities
search and auth_finder.pl plugin).
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
It works as described, both in authority search result page, and in authority
data entry plugin.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds unit tests for C4::AuthoritiesMarc::BuildSummary
for both UNIMARC and MARC21 and a regression test for the "Odd
number of elements in anonymous hash" warning.
To test:
[1] Run prove -v t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t. It should
report one failure.
[2] Apply the main patch.
[3] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t again; it should pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
