This adds Devinim to the 'Contributing companies and
institutions' section on Koha's about page.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
root@koha-debian9:/# koha-z3950-responder --start d9
[....] Starting Z39.50/SRU daemon for d9:Can't open perl script "/usr/share/koha/bin/z3950_responder.pl/z3950_responder.pl": Not a directory
failed!
Test plan:
On a dev install, copy the debian script and run it
Same on a package install
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There was an error in the precedent code, in 12hr format, 12PM is
actually 00:00
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes a problematic integer casting happening in TO_JSON.
The original need for this cast (a DBD::mysql bug) is now fixed. We
remove the cast as it is causing random failures.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/acquisitions_orders.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail with select high values (i.e. casting gives wrong
results)
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests now pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
returnbranch has to pass an itemtype key when setting the rule (here
setting it to unlimited for any item types)
Test plan:
1. Go the "Circulation and fine rules" admin page
2. Set a rule for "Default checkout, hold and return policy"
3. Unset it
4. Select a library
5. Set a rule for "Default checkout, hold and return policy"
6. Unset it
Display should be consistent with what you selected
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Follow-up work
commit bbb504c86f
Bug 23463: Replace ModItem with Koha::Item->store
Test plan :
- Create a biblio with default framework
- Create an item with barcode='000AAA1', callnumber='ZZZAAA1'
- Create an item with barcode='000AAA2', callnumber='ZZZAAA2'
- Create a file 'barecodes.txt' containing 2 lines '000AAA1' and '000AAA2'
- Go to inventory tool : /cgi-bin/koha/tools/inventory.pl
- Choose file in 'Barcode file'
- Enter item callnumber between 'ZZZ' and 'ZZZa'
- Check 'Compare barcodes list to results'
- Submit
=> without patch, you get an error trace
- Apply patch, it works
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Amended commit title.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In order to prevent typos or further regressions it is better (I think)
to have this code into a loop
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the code set the *_storage fields when adding new
fields to an existing course item. And reverts those fields correctly
when removing the item from the course.
If a new field is enabled on an existing course reserve, the storage
field is not given a value, so when the item goes off reserve, the
item field will always be updated to NULL.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/CourseReserves/CourseItems.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail, data is not reverted correctly
3. Apply this patch and repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Data is correctly reverted
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
root@koha-debian10:~# koha-translate --install es-ES
/bin/bash: /usr/share/koha/misc/bin/clear_cache.pl: No such file or directory
The script is in /usr/share/koha/bin/clear_cache.pl
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
During the web-install onboarding process, when the default circulation rule gets created, "circulation_rules" table gets populated with empty rule_name/rule_value items. This behavior differs from how the "unset" button on the smart-rules.pl page in "Default checkout, hold and return policy" group acts and leads to unpredictable bug when empty "holdallowed" rule_name prevents holds from any user.
This fix removes creation of these empty name/value pairs.
To reproduce:
1) Start with an empty installation (or delete all circulation rules and press "unset" in hold and return policy section on /cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl page). This is to have the circulation_rules table empty so onboarding.pl will work.
2) Go through the onboarding.pl process and create a default circulation rule.
3) Make sure that circulation_rules table contains will contain empty "patron_maxonsiteissueqty", "max_holds", "patron_maxissueqty", "returnbranch", "holdallowed" and "hold_fulfillment_policy" fields.
4) Apply the patch.
5) Repeat steps 1 and 2.
6) Observe that there are none of six mentioned above name/value pairs appeared.
To reproduce the bug with empty "holdallowed" rule_name:
1) Repeat steps 1, 2 and 3 that are listed in the previous instruction of reproduction, in order to get empty "holdallowed" field.
2) Find existing or create a new book with available status and place a holding on it.
3) Observe the yellow notification window with "Cannot place hold. No items are available to be placed on hold." warning.
4) Apply the patch.
5) Repeat steps 1 and 2.
6) Observe that hold was successfully placed and yellow notification does not appear anymore.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is a try to fix failures in both
t/db_dependent/Template/Plugin/Branches.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
On a 'dev' install, MO files will be installed in
<intranetdir>/misc/translator/po
On 'standard' and 'single' installs, they will be installed in
<intranetdir>/../../misc/translator/po
This patch makes Koha::I18N try to use the "dev" directory first, and
fallback to the "standard" directory.
If none of these directories exist, it dies.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The update statement did not respect the original value of
CalcalateFinesOnReturn and so would result in an unexpected functional
change during upgrades.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
As promised, I am commenting out the configuration for git repositories
to use for searches by default prior to release. To enable the feature,
simply uncomment the relevant github repositories or add your own.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
I'm not sure what we need to test here, besides we get results. I'm
pretty sure we shouldn't allow a plain GET return all objects because it
could cause a DOS very easily. But it certainly belongs to a separate
bug/discussion.
In this case, I put a constraint on the items domain (by using
_per_page=10 in the query params) so it won't happen that under certain
conditions the user agent used by Test::Mojo time outs.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch undoes the move of the JavaScript block to the footer made in
Bug 22734. The item information tab can include embedded JavaScript for
cataloging plugins, and these don't currently work with JS in the
footer.
To test, apply the patch and test the JavaScript driven features of the
"Add to basket from a staged file" page:
- Acquisitions -> Vendor -> Basket -> Add to basket from a staged file
- MARC and Card previews, select all/clear all
- Item information tab: Cataloging plugins for fields like
date acquired, barcode
- Default accounting details tab: Show inactive control
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Well, this is actually the real root of the error!
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It must be NULL/undef, the default from the DB.
The method Koha::Patron::Attribute::Type->categorycode is not covered by tests!
To recreate:
Create a new patron attribute type, don't select a patron's category (and not repeatable or unique)
Go to the batch patron modification tool, enter a cardnumber, next.
=> boom!
Apply the patch, edit the patron attribute, save
Go to the batch patron modification tool, enter a cardnumber, next.
=> success!
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Now that we have the reserve_id PK on the reserves table we should use
it (instead of the couple borrowernumber, biblionumber)
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
ReserveSlip call need to be adjusted in test.
We also add a new reserve (same biblio, same patron) to highlight the problem.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch modifies the script and template for showing the details of
an authority record so that if the authority subfield is configured to
be a link the link is correctly output in the template.
To test you must have an authority type configured with at least one
subfield designated as a URL:
- Go to Administration -> Authority types
- Select "MARC structure" from the actions menu for the authority type
you want to modify.
- Select "Subfields" from the actions menu for the tag containing
the subfield you want to modify (for instance 856).
- Edit the subfield you want to display as a link (e.g. subfield u).
- In the subfield configuration form under "Advanced constraints" check
the "Is a URL" checkbox and save your changes.
- Apply the patch and go to Authorities in the staff interface.
- Search for or create an authority record which contains URL
information in the right subfield (for instance 856$u).
- View the details for the record. Using the 856 example, the "8" tab
should contain an active link pointing to the correct URL.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Broken since
commit 0ab22e1c7c
Bug 18789: Send Koha::Patron object to the templates
Test plan:
Create or modify a patron, fill the "email" field of the "alternate
address" block (B_email)
Go to the detail view of the patron
=> Without this patch the email is not display
=> With this patch applied you see it!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Perl warning on the "About Koha" page:
Use of uninitialized value in string eq
at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/about.pl line 220.
Fixed by adding additional precheck for
C4::Context->config('zebra_auth_index_mode') being Perl's "true".
To test:
1) Ensure you don't have "<zebra_auth_index_mode>...
</zebra_auth_index_mode>" in your koha-conf.xml so you will have
"C4::Context->config" returning "undef"
2) Go to the "About Koha" page.
3) Observe the warning in the log file.
4) Apply patch.
5) Repeat step 2.
6) Check that previous warning was suppressed.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Roussos <a.roussos@dataly.gr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
On bug 24386 we prevent double form submission using the our own preventDoubleFormSubmit JS function.
The problem is that we are checking some conditions, and prevent the
form submission if something is not filled (for instance no checkbox
checked, or no fund selected).
Technically it means that:
- click the submit button
- it submits the form
- we disable the submit button
- we prevent the form to be submitted before something is wrong
At this stage the button is disabled and the form cannot be longer be
submitted.
This patch replaces the "on submit" event of the form with the "on click" event of the submit button.
Which means we are going to:
- click the submit button
- we prevent the form to be submitted before something is wrong
=> The button will only be disabled if the form is really submitted
Test plan:
- stage a marc record
- acquisitions: have a basket
- click on "Add to basket"
- "From a staged file"
- Don't tick the record
- Save
- You should see an expected error message
- Tick the record
- Save
- You should see an expected error message
- Choose a fund
- Click the "Save" button as many times as you can, to try double submit
it.
=> The order is saved
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch implements the required logic in the API code so plugins are
not affected by the new RESTPublicAnonymousRequests system preference.
It is up to the plugin develpers to handle this
To test:
1. Apply the tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/REST/Plugin/PluginRoutes.t
=> FAIL: Notice the tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Yay! Not bad for a friday evening!
5. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds tests the new RESTPublicAnonymousRequests syspref
doesn't apply to routes added by plugins.
It is up to the plugin developer to handle those conditions.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/REST/Plugin/PluginRoutes.t
=> FAIL: Notice the tests fail
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
