Add option show or no inactive budget and more options
Use subroutine GetBudgetHierarchy for return all budgets
Delete subroutine GetBudgetPeriodDescription and theire tests
Use Price TT plugin
Correct name of column and capitalization the first letter
Add checkbox for show inactive budgets, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Not use [i] for inactive budgets, i add (inactive) at the end of inactive budget
Add vendor note in the list of show attribute
Test case:
Go to Home > Reports > Orders by fund
Select one or all budgets
You can show the inactive budget, default the drop down list containt a active budget
Choose output to screen ou csv file
Works as expected. QA tools OK with Bug 16104 applied.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
- changed 'Fund (budget):' back to 'Fund:', as the budget
no longer shows in the pull down.
- Fixed number of tests in Budgets.t
- Removed &GetBudgetPeriodDescription
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Modification in Acquisition.t to support in test the new fields
of the table aqorders:
line_item_id, suppliers_reference_number,
suppliers_reference_qualifier, suppliers_report
Original patch by Zeno Tajoli
I amended to include the report field (ColinC)
Signed-off-by: Paul Johnson <p.johnson@staffs.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sally Healey <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This column was not used in the Koha codebase, it can be removed.
Test plan:
Execute the updatedatabase.pl script and confirm that the column has
been dropped.
QA step:
1/ git grep totalamount
2/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These two subroutines did the same job (same select, same join, etc.)
Test plan:
Go on the basket list page and verify you see the pending and the
cancelled baskets.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Two small things are adjusted in separate follow-ups.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
It seems that this column has never been used.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the updatedatabase entry.
2/ git grep supplierreference should not return occurrence in the code (except
in Koha/Schema/*
3/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t should return green.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller module and put in
it the code from GetBookSeller and GetBookSellerFromId.
Test plan:
1/ Create a bookseller, modify it.
2/ Add contacts for this bookseller
3/ Create an order, receive it, transfer it
4/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
GetHistory iterated on the orders to calculate the quantity and price.
These values are never used by the called.
It can be removed.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on acqui/histsearch.pl and
catalogue/detail.pl
Actually you just have to check that the total quantity and price are
not displayed on these views.
QA: note that 'count' and 'toggle' are never used in the template.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The unit tests did not take into account the new DB field.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script. Also all Acquisition related
patches.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Order module and put in
it the code from NewOrder and NewOrderItem.
Test plan:
1/ Create an order, modify it, receive it, cancel the receipt.
2/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
It seems that this column has never been used.
Test plan:
1/ Execute the updatedatabase entry.
2/ git grep cancelledby should not return occurrence in the code (except
in Koha/Schema/*
3/ prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t should return green.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
I couldn't find any trace of this column being used.
Passes tests and QA script, updates all necessary files.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
NewOrder should be more tested!
This patch moves the existing unit tests into a new file and adds some
unit tests.
Note that there is no DB field aqorders.subscription, so the test in
NewOrder can be removed.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/NewOrder.t
and
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
should return green.
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since the basketno parameter is needed to insert an order, it is useless
to return it.
This patch changes the prototype for the C4::Acquisition::NewOrder
subroutine. The return value is now a scalar containing the ordernumber
created.
Test plan:
Verify there is no regression on an acquisition workflow:
1/ Create an order with several items
2/ Modify the order
3/ Receive some items
4/ Cancel the receipt
4/ Receive some items
5/ Receive all remaining items
6/ Cancel the receipt
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The behavior is quite weird, but
$schema->resultset('Table')->create($data)->id
does not return the id inserted if $data contains the key.
To be more clear, in this case
$schema->resultset('Aqorder')->create($new_order)->id
returns an empty string because $new_order->{ordernumber} is an empty
string!
This was not caught by the unit tests, I added one.
Test plan:
- AcqCreateItem set to ordering
- Create an order with items and verify items are correctly linked to the
order.
Signed-off-by: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin@rot13.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Confirmed that without the patch the created item is not linked to the
order (entry in aqorders_items). With the patch, it works as expected.
Passes tests and Koha QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds direct unit tests of the new biblionumber filter
for SearchOrders. It also moves the ordernumber filter test
to the rest of the SearchOrders tests.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds a new system preference 'OPACAcquisitionDetail'.
If it is enabled, information about items on order will be displayed on
the OPAC detail page.
Test plan:
- switch on the OPACAcquisitionDetails pref.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'receiving'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the "Holdings" tab contains the
line "X item are on order." (at the bottom of the table containing the
item list).
- receive the items.
- verify the number of items has decreased.
- set the AcqCreateItems pref to 'ordering'.
- create some orders on 1 or more items.
- go to the opac detail page and verify the item list contains the items
with the "on order" status.
- receive the items.
- verify the received items no longer have the the "on order" status.
To test completely this feature, you should verify there is no
regression on the pref OpacMaxItemsToDisplay, OpacSeparateHoldings and
OpacSeparateHoldingsBranch.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Also removed some blank lines from the original patch and bumped up
the DBRev.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch teaches the ordering receiving process how to
set vendor and internal order notes.
One observation: I'm not sure it's entirely useful to set
a note to communicate to the vendor during receiving --
how is it to be sent to them, and why?
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes UT, to take into account the new fields
order_internalnote and order_vendornote.
Note that "notes" field is still returned as well by some
acquisition subs (those which return all the fields of biblio
and biblioitems table)
Test plan :
run prove t/db_dependant/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/Invoices.t
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/OrderFromSubscription.t
all should return green.
NOTE: Any error messages are the same between master and this
patch, and are unrelated to the added/revised tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Revised test plan:
1/ Create an order with 2 items
2/ Receive 1 item and enter a note for the order
3/ Verify the note is not saved
The note should be visible on the Mod Order Details screen,
but it isn't there.
4/ Apply patch
5/ Receive the second item and enter a note for the order
6/ Verify the note is correctly saved
The note is visible on the Mod Order Details screen.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Works as described. The note now saves correctly and also remains when
you undo a receipt.
Note: it would be nice to show the note on the receive page as well.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If GetOrder is called with a nonexistent ordernumber or without any
ordernumber, it should return undef.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Updated number of tests to 68, tests and QA script all happy now.
Looked at a few pages in aquisition using GetOrder as well.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The SearchOrders routine should return the booksellerid and this
patch adds it.
This fixes several problems:
[1] The link to the vendor on the order receive page breadcrumbs
was broken.
[2] The tax calculation in finishreceive.pl didn't run.
[3] The item booksellerid field never got updated during
receipt.
Booksellerid was returned before bug 10723.
Quick test plan:
Go on orderreceive.pl and verify that the vendor link is correct.
Followed test plan. Vendor link is now correct.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch also adds POD and UT for the change in SearchOrders()
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch removes the remainder of the old unit test
for bug 10723 and updates the label of the new test that
now checks that SearchOrders({ pending => 1}) omits received
orders.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
C4::Acquisition need more UT, and more robust ones. This patch
adds some.
This patch adds UT to
- GetOrder
- GetOrders
- GetCancelledOrders
- GetLateOrders
It refactors UT for SearchOrders
New UT use 2 new routines, used for check the list of fields returned
by a routine:
_check_fields_of_order
_check_fields_of_orders
These 2 routines could later be used by other UT
_check_fields_of_order has its own UT (tests n°14,15,16).
to test :
prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Unit tests pass, passes koha-qa.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa and t
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a regression test for ensuring that the
authorisedby field is returned by SearchOrders().
To test:
[1] Upon applying the main patch, verify that
prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch moves the GetBudgetByOrderNumber() test from
Budgets.t to Acquisition.t, thereby making it easier to
test without doing a direct SQL insert into the aqorders table.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Budgets.t passes
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Right now there is no way to change the budget or fund when receiving an
item, which is annoying, particularly at the end of the fiscal year when
every item not already received has to be switched to the following
year's budget. This patch adds the ability to change the budget and fund
when receiving.
To test:
1) Apply patch.
2) Create an order for a vendor, choosing a fund to use for that order.
3) Receive the order, leaving the fund unchanged. Make sure the fund
did not change.
4) Create another order for a vendor, choosing a fund to use for that
order.
5) Receive the order, this time changing the fund. Make sure the fund
is changed.
6) Run the unit test:
> prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
7) Sign off.
(Notes: this patch depends on the Acquisitions.t unit test improvements
in bug 10274; the seemingly-unrelated change in SQLHelper quiets an
irritating warning caused by the NewOrder call in ModReceiveOrder)
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In particular, verify that the pending filter option works.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t passes
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In the C4::Acquisition module, 2 routines do the same work. This patch
merges these 2 routines.
Test plan:
test the acqui/orderreceive.pl, acqui/uncertainprice.pl
and serials/acqui-search-result.pl, acqui/parcel.pl scripts.
Note: on acqui/parcel the basket filter is a search on basket name (was
on basket id, which was not relevant).
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa.pm, no adverse bahaviors noted. All sub calls updated.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Try before the patch:
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
And after, it should produce:
t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=41, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.42 cusr
0.02 csys = 0.47 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Tests pass and the bookseller is deleted.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
Signed-off-by:Mathieu Saby <mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr>
I made 2 tests :
$prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition/GetOrdersByBiblionumber.t
and
$prove -v t/db_dependent/Acquisition.t
The 2 tests are successful.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Revised patch according to QA comments. No more dependent from bz 9780.
At present, merging records breaks the link order/record, except
if an item of the deleted record is used in the order.
This is a serious issue for libraries creating items on receipt.
This patch moves existing orders from deleted record to destination record.
It creates a new function Acquisitions::GetOrdersByBiblionumber,
that could be used by other patches later.
To test :
Check the problem :
1. Set syspref AcqCreateItem = Create an item when receiving an order
1. Create a basket with one order
2. Put the record used by this order in a list
3. Put an other record in the list
4. Merge the 2 records, keeping as a reference the record NOT used in the order
5. In the order, you will see for that order "Deleted bibliographic information..."
6. Apply the patch
7. Repeat steps 1-4
8. In the order, you will see the title/author of the kept record.
9. Set syspref AcqCreateItem = Create an item when placing an order
10. Repeat steps 1-4 (an item will be created)
11. In the oreder, you will see the title/author of the kept record
(it is already the case at present. the patch should not alter this behavior)
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Test plan, test suite and QA script pass.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
