.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
- Remove SplitKohaField
- Avoid using Stash in templates
- Improved display of part fields
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Unify and clean up subtitle usage so that it's always used as a simple array and not the old hash structure.
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
REPLICATE ISSUE:
1. Map biblio.frameworkcode to 999$b
2. Map biblio.biblionumber to 999$c
3. Add a record with something in 999$b
4. 999$b is removed by C4::Biblio::AddBiblio()
After this patch, the field used by biblio.biblionumber or biblioitems.biblioitemnumber
is not removed and created anew, thus dropping all existing additions.
There is no point in dropping the field in any case, since we can just replace
the existing subfields in-place with no need to recreate the whole field.
UNIT TESTS INCLUDED
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
