The configs in koha-conf.xml needed to be mocked. There was also
a problem with how the NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint syspref was
getting checked in the .pm.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
1) Be more careful when checking the NorwegianPatronDBEnable syspref.
Before:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
After:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') && C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
This should avoid complaints if the syspref is not initialized.
2) Fix some empty =head2 POD sections
3) Fix some indentation in patrons.pref, to make xt/yaml_valid.t happy
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
I couldn't find any regressions with adding, editing and deleting members.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The QA script was complaining about some dodgy POD in C4/Members.pm,
that was not introduced by bug 11401. This patch fixes the POD, to
keep the QA script happy.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch makes it possible to sync patron data between Koha and the
Norwegian national patron database, in both directions.
In order to use this, the following information is necessary:
- a username/password from the Norwegian national database of libraries
("Base Bibliotek"), available to all Norwegian libraries
- a special key in order to decrypt and encrypt PIN-codes/passwords,
which is only available to Norwegian library system vendors
- a norwegian library vendor username/password
See http://www.lanekortet.no/ for more information (in Norwegian).
While this is of course an implementation of a specific synchronization scheme
for borrower data, attempts have been made to prepare the ground for other sync
schemes that might be implemented later. Especially the structure of the new
borrower_sync table might be reviewed with an eye to how it might fit other
schemes.
To test:
Since the password and cryptographic key needed to use this functionality
is only available to Norwegian library system vendors, only regression testing
can be done on the submitted code. Suggested things to check:
- Apply the patch and make sure the database update is done. This should add
the new "borrower_sync" table and five new systmpreferences under the
"Patrons" > "Norwegian patron database" category:
- NorwegianPatronDBEnable
- NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint
- NorwegianPatronDBUsername
- NorwegianPatronDBPassword
- NorwegianPatronDBSearchNLAfterLocalHit
- Check that patrons can be created, edited and deleted as usual, when
NorwegianPatronDBEnable is set to "Disable"
- Check that the new tests in t/NorwegianPatronDB.pm run ok, e.g. on a
gitified setup:
$ sudo koha-shell -c "PERL5LIB=/path/to/kohaclone prove -v t/NorwegianPatronDB.t" instancename
- Check that all the other tests still run ok
- Check that the POD in the new files itroduced by this patch looks ok:
- Koha/NorwegianPatronDB.pm
- members/nl-search.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-from-koha.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-to-koha.pl
- t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
Sponsored-by: Oslo Public Library
Update 2014-09-18:
- Rebase on master
- Split out changes to Koha::Schema
- Incorporate new way of authenticating with NL
Update 2014-10-21:
- Rebase on master
- Use Module::Load to load Koha::NorwegianPatronDB in non-NL-specific
scripts and modules
- Fix the version number of Digest::SHA
- Fix a missing semicolon in kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There's no point creating a MARC record with undef subfields
for testing holds. This patch avoids that so no warnings are shown.
To test:
- Run
$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
=> FAIL: verify several warnings show
- Apply the patch
- Re-run
=> SUCCESS: no warnings showed.
- Sign off :-D
Regards
NOTE: Not noticable under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, but verifiable under
Debian Wheezy.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Calls to C4/Charset.pm's NormalizeString function with an
undefined string were triggering warnings when running:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Sadly, t/Charset.t was also lacking calls to NormalizeString.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- This should generate the uninitialized string warnings.
Make sure CPL and MPL are in your branches to save
yourself from headaches due to expected data.
2) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are no function calls to NormalizeString.
You can see other shortfalls in the tests beyond
NormalizeString with: grep ^sub C4/Charset.pm
3) prove -v t/Charset.t
4) Apply patch
5) prove -v t/Charset.t
-- Run as before with more tests.
6) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are now function calls to NormalizeString.
7) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- Nice and clean run! :)
8) koha-qa.pl -v 2 -c 1
-- all should be Ok.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Add or edit a new or existing subscription in the serials
module
Patch changes "biblio" to "record" and fixes capitalization:
Search for record | Create record
Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 12833 allows to find a patron with his cardnumber.
But this won't never append if the firstletter parameter is given.
Actually the firstletter param is the only one to take into account if
it exists.
Test plan:
Search patrons by a first letter and verify that the feature is back.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
To reproduce the problem you need at least one borrower with a blank
cardnumber
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
works as descrobed, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
As requestedby people testing the patch, I add references to the new
xslt files on the Z39.50/SRU servers help.
Example usages are also provided.
Test:
- Apply the patch
- Go to the help page on the 'Z39.50/SRU Servers' page
=> SUCCESS: Notice there's a section documenting XSLT file(s) usage
and provides some examples that cover the introduced files.
- Sign off
Thanks
Tomas
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Help page does shed some light to the XSLT usage. Enough to my taste.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds the following sample files:
- Del952.xsl
- Del995.xsl
- Del9LinksExcept952.xsl
- Del9LinksExcept995.xsl
Thay can be used on the new SRU/Z39.50 XSLT processing feature. At the same
time they can be used to solve this bug.
To test:
- Have an SRU/Z39.50 target configured
- Have a search that returns at least a record with the following
properties:
* It contains $9 links
* It contains items (952 or 995 fields in MARC21/NORMARC and UNIMARC respectively).
MARC21/NORMARC test:
- Do a Z39.50/SRU cataloguing search that retrieves the desired record
- Verify it includes $9 and 952 field(s) by clicking on the MARC link
- Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field
- Re-run the search
=> SUCCESS: the MARC view of the imported record doesn't contain the 952 field
- Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del9LinksExcept952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field
- Re-run the search
=> SUCCESS: the MARC view contains the 952 field (including the $9 subfield), and
all other $9 subfields have been removed
- Edit your Z39.50 target and add
Del952.xsl, Del9LinksExcept952.xsl
to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field (both, comma separated)
- Re-run the search
=> SUCCESS: the MARC view doesn't contain $9 subfields nor items.
- Repeat for UNIMARC, replacing 952 for 995.
- Sign off :-D
Regards
Tomas
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested under MARC21. Works fine. (Additionally verified 995 with xsltproc.)
As noted on Bugzilla, we could still improve documentation but imo no need
to block these example transformations.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
I can't resist to put my own signature on this patch, confirming it works as
described with z39.50 Unimarc targets.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On the new checkouts page there is some padding above the checkouts,
relatives' checkouts, and holds tables caused by extra markup in the
table's sDom configuration (http://legacy.datatables.net/ref#sDom):
<'row-fluid'<'span6'><'span6'>r>t<'row-fluid'>t
This creates several empty <div>s which don't serve any purpose. This
patch simplifies it to:
rt
To test, apply the patch, clear your browser cache, and check out to a
patron who has items checked out, holds on their account, and child
records attached which also have checkouts.
The padding above the table of checkouts, the table of relatives'
checkouts, and the table of holds should match that on the sides.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Checked per plan on both Check Out and Details pages, spacing appears correct.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
* Allow on shelf holds needed to be enabled
* Added some error supression code for undefined string comparison
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Removes this warning: Use of uninitialized value $template_id in string eq
at C4/MarcModificationTemplates.pm line 84.
GetModificationTemplates has no template_id if called from
marc_modification_templates.pl without operation (first click from
interface) and from tools/stage-marc-import.pl.
Slightly adjusted the POD lines accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The last test (#74) did not print anything. It now does..
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch add template modifications for the restrictions:
- the source field is always mandatory
- on move and copy, the source and destination subfield should be both
filled or blank.
- on move and copy, the destination subfield should be filled.
- on update, the subfield value should be filled.
Test plan:
Verify you are not able to create/modify template actions according to
these restrictions.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch only adds unit tests for the copy and move actions.
They test if the action does not create a field/subfield if the source
did not exist.
Also it adds a unit tests for the existing behavior (in order not to
lost it): we can use the '^' and the '$' character in regex for
substituing. For example: Copy 245$a to 245$a with the regex s/^/BEGIN /
This will add the string "BEGIN " at the beginning of the 245$a fields.
To test: prove t/SimpleMARC.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Currently the Koha::SimpleMARC module call a "field" a "subfield".
And the way to manage field is not implemented for all routines.
This patch does not modify the API. The routine's names are kept. It
just creates 2 privates routines for each action (e.g. delete_field
will call _delete_field if the action affects field and _delete_subfield
if the action affects subfields).
Before this patch the move action was authorised by the interface but
caused an error if executed.
Note: I don't see the meaning for the add/update action if no subfield
is given. So the call without subfield raises an error.
Test plan:
- apply all patches
- create or modify an existent template
- try at least the correct behavior for the following actions:
* delete subfield and field
* add new subfield to an existing field
* add new subfield to an nonexisting field
* move a subfield
* move an entire field
* copy a subfield
* copy an entire field
- import a biblio and use this template
- verify the imported biblio matches actions defined.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In order to avoid a long list of parameters, it should be better to
pass all of them into a hashref.
This patch does not add or modify a behavior.
Test plan:
Verify the unit tests still pass
- prove t/SimpleMARC.t
- prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These new unit tests will fail due to the fact that Koha::Database
uses a separate dbh handle than C4::Context->dbh
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current holds behavior in Koha allows a situation like this:
- Patron A has an item currently checked out.
- Patron B places a hold on the next available copy of that title.
- Then Patron A will not be able to renew his item, even if there are
other available copies of that title that could potentially fill Patron
B's hold.
Since this seems unfair to Patron A, we should allow renewal of items
even if there are unfilled holds, but those holds could all be filled
with currently available items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a record with two items
3) Check out the item to a patron
4) Place a hold on the record
5) Note you cannot renew the item for the patron
6) Enable the new system preference AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
7) Note you can now renew the item, as all the holds can be satisfied
by available items.
8) Place a second hold on the record
9) Note you can no longer renew the item, as all the holds *cannot*
be filled by currently available items
Signed-off-by: Holger Meissner <h.meissner.82@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Rohde <crohde@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This follow-up adds some style improvements and corrects some errors in
the previous patch:
- The path to datatables.css has been corrected
- Unused CSS has been removed from datatables.css (particularly related
to pagination controls, which are currently unused in the OPAC).
- Style has been added to datatables.css to make the table search form
look better.
- The configuration of the course details table has been enhanced to
include a title sort which ignores articles and date sorting according
to the "title-string" method for date format agnostic sorting.
- Unrelated: A message <div> has been modified to have the correct style
for the Bootstrap theme.
To test you should have multiple courses and at least one course with
multiple reserves. Clear your browser cache if necessary and view the
list of courses in the OPAC. All table sorting should work correctly, as
should the table search form.
View the details of a course which has multiple reserves. All sorting
should work correctly, including title sort excluding articles. Sorting
by date due should work correctly for any dateformat system preference
setting.
View the details of a course which has no reserves. You should see a "No
reserves" message box with a style consistent with similar messages in
the Bootstrap OPAC.
View other sorted tables in the OPAC to confirm that the CSS changes
have not negatively affected their appearance: opac-user.pl for
instance, or opac-detail.pl.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
We should use datatables for the courses and course items tables. This
will make the tables sortable and searchable from the client side.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) View the courses in the OPAC, try sorting and searching
3) View the course details for a course, try sorting and searching the items.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signing off, but have a follow-up to address some missing stuff.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch
- rename _entity_clean as _clean_ampersand
- rename the script to sanitize_records.pl
- add a --fix-ampersand switch (the only one FOR NOW, enabled by
default) so it is obvious what the script does.
- make POD and usage reflect this changes.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds:
- a new maintenance script batch_sanitize_records
- a new subroutine C4::Charset::SanitizeRecord
- new unit tests for the new subroutine
Test plan:
1/ prove t/db_dependent/Charset.t
2/ Create a record containing "&amp;" (could be follow with as many
'amp;' as you want) in one of its fields and the same for the field
linked to biblioitems.url.
The url should not be sanitized, it may contain "&".
3/ Launch the maintenance script with the -h parameter to see how to use
it.
4/ Launch the script using the different parameters:
--filename=FILENAME
--biblionumbers='XXX'
--auto-search
The auto-search permits to sanitize all records containing "&amp;" in
the marcxml field.
Use the verbose flag for testing.
Without the --confirm flag, nothing is done.
5/ Use the --confirm flag and verify in the biblioitems.marcxml field
that the record has been sanitized.
6/ Try the --reindex flag to reindex records which have been modified.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This follow-up corrects some of the QA issues affecting the other patch,
as well as changing the way the "filter" option is displayed:
- Added the use of the DataTables include file
- Removed redundant document.ready
- Fixed single quotes
- Fixed default sort (should be date descending to match the current
functionality)
- Adding missing <tr>
- Converted filter button to a link
The last change is a judgement call, but the button in the DataTables
toolbar looked awkward and caused ugly wrapping at narrower viewport
sizes. I think a link is more keeping with the pattern established by
"select all / clear all" links.
To test, apply both patches and view the account page
(members/boraccount.pl) for a patron who has paid and unpaid fines (the
more the better).
- Confirm that the default sort is by date descending.
- Confirm that DataTables controls (paging, search, result count) work
correctly.
- Confirm that clicking the "Filter paid transactions" link works
correctly to toggle display of paid transactions.
Works as expected. Passed koha-qa.pl.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Passes QA script and tests.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test steps :
* Create a few manual invoices with fines.
* Pay a fine.
* Go back to the account tab.
* Try the "Filter paid transactions" button. It should filter everything with 0.00 in the Outstanding column.
* Try the "Show all transactions" button.
* Play around with the buttons
Followed test steps. Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch contains the compiled opac.css file generated from the
revised LESS file in this bug's other patch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Item statuses in the OPAC displayed according to a cascading hierarchy:
If something is lost it will appear as lost, "else if" it is checked out
it will appear as checked out, etc. I don't think there is a logical
reason why statuses should appear this way.
This patch modifies the logic in the template so that multiple statuses
can be displayed at the same time. The patch also wraps each status in
its own class so that libraries can apply custom CSS if they wish.
Some tweaks have been made to the LESS file adding some style to the
common "item-status" class for display of item statuses.
To test, apply the patch and view one or more titles in the OPAC which
have items with the following statuses: lost, checked out, damaged, not
for loan, waiting, on order, in transit, withdrawn, and available.
Modify items to have more that one status simultaneously, in particular
not for loan and damaged.
Also test the display of item statuses in the OPAC cart and the OPAC's
course details page (Course reserves -> [Course name]) since these pages
use the same include file.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
inactive and active are not defined anymore. They should be removed. The
filter is done with DataTables.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Note that bug 12984 changes the view of this table.
On the acqui-home page, the total was not updated.
With this patch, the footer (totals) will be updated on filtering rows.
Test plan:
1/ Go on the acqui home page.
2/ Verify the totals are correct.
3/ Filter the table using the filter input and verify the totals are
updated with the rows shown.
4/ Hide/Show inactive budgets and verify the totals are still corrects.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 11578 improved the funds list view in the administration module.
It would be great to have the same improvement on the acquisition
home page.
This improvement groups funds by budget and displays them with a
hierarchy.
Test plan:
0/ Create a budget and fund hierarchy, with active and inactive budgets.
1/ Go on the acquisition home page and verify the values are the same as
before
2/ Verify the funds are correctly listed
3/ Verify the links on top of table work (expand/collapse all, show/hide
inactive budgets).
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On the budget list view, the total was not updated.
With this patch, the footer (totals) will be updated on filtering rows.
Test plan:
To test with both CurrencyFormat pref values.
1/ Go on the budget list view
2/ Verify the totals are correct.
3/ Filter the table using the filter input and verify the totals are
updated with the rows shown
4/ Hide/Show inactive budgets and verify the totals are still corrects.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In working on bug 10480, I noticed that these plugins needed some attention:
[2] unimarc_field_123i.pl: added missing template
[3] unimarc_field_123j.pl: resolved missing template with same file
[4] unimarc_field_210c_bis.pl: removed a warn, corrected some POD lines
Note about UNIMARC field 123i and 123j: Subfields $i and $j are each 8
characters long and contain the same components as subfields $f and $g
except that character position 0 contains a plus sign (for the northern
celestial hemisphere) or a minus sign (for the southern celestial hemisphere).
Test plan:
Connect unimarc_field_123i and 123j to some field.
Look especially at changing + or - for the hemisphere in the popup.
Check left-padding with zeroes for the other positions.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script.
Checked plugin in a UNIMARC installation.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This bug adds a new preference, "SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEdition,"
but the use of the term "Edition" in this context is incorrect. I think
it would be more clear to change the preference name to
"SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing." This patch makes this change.
I realize this isn't a big issue since the preference has a good
description, but I thought that if we were going to make this as clear
as possible now would be the time to do it.
To test, start with a database which hasn't previously been used to test
Bug 7673. Apply all patches and run the database update. Follow the test
plan as described in the bug.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, change appears complete.
All tests and QA script still pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Also fix a typo in the permission description
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Patches pass QA script and tests.
Copying the test plan from the bug report:
Test plan:
1/ add the following permissions to the logged in patron:
edit_item, edit_items_restricted, delete_all_items,
items_batchmod, items_batchmod_restricted
2/ Fill the prefs SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEdition
and SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod with some
subfield (for instance "995$f 995$o" and "995$o")
3/ Verify you are allowed to edit the item fields defined
in the pref SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEdition.
4/ Try to edit item in a batch and verify you are allowed
to edit the item fields defined in the pref
SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod.
5/ Try to delete all items of a record
Play with the pref/permissions and verify they are
correctly taken into account.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If the sysprefs are empty, we assume that the librarian can edit all
subfields, even if s/he has the restricted permission.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds:
3 permissions:
- edit_items_restricted
- delete_all_items
- items_batchmod_restricted
2 system preferences:
- SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEdition
- SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To know if the user is a superlibrarian, we have to call
C4::Context->IsSuperLibrarian
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Two permission names have been changed since the first patch.
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
