Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are using raw SQL statements, we should use Koha::Hold instead.
This patch does not seem optimal, we would like to increment priority in
only 1 statement and without the need to fetch and loop all holds.
== Test plan ==
- apply patch
- place some holds on the same record
- check that the priorities look good
- mark one hold as waiting by doing a check-in
- revert the waiting status
- confirm that the priorities are recalculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves the accountline->store call below the FinesLog code
such that we return the same 'thing' from _FixOverduesOnReturn as the
other clauses of the routine.
We also take the oportunity to clean up the warning thrown by an errant
call to the routine such that we output the actual itemnumber rather
than a HASH reference marker.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes any overdues which would be reversed on a backdated
return if CalcFineOnBackdate is enabled and the user has not already
attempted to pay off the accruing fine.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The item's location where not passed to UpdateStat
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is the commit where you will find useful information about this development.
The goal of this new feature is to add a way to pseudonymize patron's
data, in a way they could not be personally identifiable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudonymization
There are different existing way to anonymize patron's information in
Koha, but we loose the ability to make useful report.
This development proposes to have 2 different tables:
* 1 for transactions and patrons data (pseudonymized_transactions)
* 1 for patrons' attributes (pseudonymized_borrower_attributes)
Entries to pseudonymized_transactions are added when a new transaction
(checkout, checkin, renew, on-site checkout) is done.
Also, anonymized_borrower_attributes is populated if patron's attributes are
marked as "keep for pseudonymization".
To make those informations not identifiable to a patron, we are having a
hashed_borrowernumber column in pseudonymized_transactions. This hash will be
generated (Blowfish-based crypt) using a key stored in the Koha
configuration.
To make things configurable, we are adding 3 sysprefs and 1 new DB
column:
* syspref Pseudonymization to turn on/off the whole feature
* syspref PseudonymizationPatronFields to list the informations of the
patrons to sync
* syspref PseudonymizationTransactionFields to list the informations
of the transactions to copy
* DB column borrower_attribute_types.keep_for_pseudonymization that is a
boolean to enable/disable the copy of a given patron's attribute type.
Test plan:
1/ Turn on Pseudonymization
2/ Define in PseudonymizationPatronFields and
PseudonymizationTransactionFields the different fields you want to copy
3/ Go to the about page
=> You will see a warning about a missing config entry
4/ You need to generate a key and put it in the koha-conf.xml file. The
following command will generate one:
% htpasswd -bnBC 10 "" password | tr -d ':\n' | sed 's/$2y/$2a/'
Then edit $KOHA_CONF and add it before of the end of the config section (</config)
it should be something like:
<key>$2a$10$PfdrEBdRcL2MZlEtKueyLegxI6zg735jD07GRnc1bt.N/ZYMvBAB2</key>
5/ Restart memcached then plack (alias restart_all)
=> Everything is setup!
6/ Create a new transaction (checkin for instance)
=> Confirm that a new entry has been added to pseudonymized_transaction with the data
you expect to be copied
7/ Edit some patron attribute types and tick "Keep for pseudonymization"
8/ Create a new transaction
=> Confirm that new entries have been added to pseudonymized_borrower_attributes
11/ Delete the patrons
=> Confirm that the entries still exist in the pseudonymized_* tables
12/ Purge the patrons (ie. use cleanup_database.pl to remove them from
the deleted_borrowers table)
=> Confirm that the entries still exist in the pseudonymized_* tables
See bug 24152 to remove data from the anonymized_* tables
Sponsored-by: Association KohaLa - https://koha-fr.org/
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If the subroutines are not exportable we get the following crash:
> Undefined subroutine &C4::SIP::SIPServer::set_logger
To test:
In kohadevbox run for example:
$ ps -aux # check that no existing sip server is running, kill the process if exists
$ perl /kohadevbox/koha/C4/SIP/SIPServer.pm /etc/koha/sites/kohadev/SIPconfig.xml
$ koha/misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --item 3999900000001 -m item_information
After applying this patch the Undefined subroutine error should be gone.
Note: when using the sip_cli_emulator.pl the credentials can be anything.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Coming from:
Bug 23463: Use new method Koha::Object->set_or_blank
We have DB fields that are not mapped with MARC fields, for instance paidfor. They are not handled correctly.
In ModItemFromMarc, we get a MARC record in parameter and update the item in DB. But we are loosing the fields that are not in the MARC record
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
If 'Actual cost' has not been set then it has the value of 0.00 which
Perl evaluates to true so this patchset resets it to 0, so the fallback
to ecost_tax_included/ecost_tax_excluded happens.
Test plan:
1. Add item to acquisition basket (make sure the vendor has: tax rate: 15%, 'List prices: Include tax', 'Invoice prices: Include tax')
2. Set 'Vendor price' = 10 and do not set 'Actual cost'
3. Save order
4. Observe basket.pl shows 'Total tax exc.' has a value of 0.00 and GST
column has value of -8.70
5. Jump into the database:
select tax_value_on_ordering from aqorders where
ordernumber=<ordernumber>;
[You can get the ordernumber from clicking on the 'Modify' line the item
is listed in]
6. Observe a negative value: -8.70
7. Apply patch and restart plack
8. Add a second item to the basket
9. Set 'Vendor price' = 10 and don't set 'Actual cost'
10. Save order
11. Observe basket.pl shows 'Total tax exc' has value of 8.70 and GST
has value of 1.30
12. Repeat step 5 and observe tax_value_on_ordering = 1.30
13. Run t/Prices.t unit test:
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
prove t/Prices.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua District Council, NZ
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
% prove t/db_dependent/Serials.t
t/db_dependent/Serials.t .. 8/49 "my" variable $DEBUG masks earlier declaration in same scope at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Barcodes/ValueBuilder.pm line 45.
"my" variable $DEBUG masks earlier declaration in same scope at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Barcodes/ValueBuilder.pm line 87.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes some new error cases introduced during rebase
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
0) Apply the patch
1) Go to all of these pages
Patron detail
Other patron pages - look on the left side (circ-menu)
Patron search
Guarantor search ( go to child patron -> edit -> in guarantor
section click "Set to patron"
Search through "Check out" (in the header)
2) Confirm that does show date of birth and date consistantly,
try it on patrons with and without date of birth set to find
possible reggressions
Signed-off-by: Aleisha Amohia <aleishaamohia@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If we limit the JOIN to rows with the correct subpermission we won't
duplicate the returned patrons
To test:
1 - Give a patron full acquisitions permissions
2 - Also give them several subpermissions on other areas
3 - Go to Acquisitions
4 - Edit a fund
5 - Add a user to the fund
6 - Search for user above
7 - They return multiple times in results
8 - Apply patch
9 - Restart all the things
10 - Repeat search
11 - Patron appears once
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This warning was thrown:
Use of uninitialized value $info{"invalid_username_or_password"}
in numeric eq (==) at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/InstallAuth.pm
line 387.
There is the case when hash key can be undefined in numeric comparison.
Fixed by adding additional precheck for
$info{"invalid_username_or_password"} being Perl's "true".
To test:
1) Go to the first page of the web-installer where it asks to login.
2) Observe the warning in the log file.
3) Apply patch.
4) Repeat step 1.
7) Check that previous warning suppressed.
Mentored-by: Andrew Nugged <nugged@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
* Add POD to get_table_settings
* Remove USE Dumper debug statement
* Add missing "10" entry
* Fix newly created test file (and renamed)
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch is the main patch of this patchset, you will find the
description and the test plan.
The idea of this new enhancement is to add the ability to define the
default sort order and the default number of rows displayed on the
acquisition basket page.
The existing "columns settings" feature was replaced by a
"tables settings" feature. To prepare the ground, there were some
works that were needed:
* rename variables and files
* Modify the structure of the yml files
* Create a new DB table to store the tables settings
Test plan:
0)
a. Execute the update DB entry to create the new table
b. Restart all (to get a new version of the yml file, that is cached by
memcached)
c. Create several orders for a given basket
1) Go to the basket view page
=> The default values are the same than without this patchset, the
number of entries to display is set to "20" and the table is sorted by
basket number (first column)
2) Go to the "Columns settings" page
3) Unfold the "Acquisition" tab
=> Notice the 2 dropdown lists at the bottom of the basket table
4) Select different values for "Default display length" and "Default
sort order"
5) Refresh the basket view page
=> Notice that the default settings are now effective on the table
QA note: We can decide to replace the different occurrences of "Columns settings"
by "Tables settings" if needed.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Tallaght
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are preparing the ground with this patch. As the "Columns settings"
page will now add the ability to modify settings for the whole table, it
makes sense to rename the file and the variables.
Note that the controller script (admin/columns_settings.pl) and the yml
(admin/columns_settings.yml) files have not been moved to not break
shortcuts and abits people could have. But if QA decides, it could be
easy to do.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch changes the new circulation rule that's introduced from
useDaysMode to daysmode to improve consistency with other rule names.
We also update the accessors and code using them to reflect the new
term.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are 3 other occurrences where the new circ rule can be used:
* C4::Circulation::checkHighHolds
* Koha::Hold->set_waiting
* misc/cronjobs/thirdparty/TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl
Test plan:
* checkHighHolds
Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds and fill decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
Setup things to hit a "high demand" alert with a shortened due date
Check an item out
=> The due date must be recalculated depending on the circ rule useDaysMode.
* set_waiting
Set ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay to "1" (note that there is currently
a bug in the description of the syspref, see bug 22381 comment 19)
Mark a hold waiting
The expiration date should have been set depending on the value of the
circ rule.
* TalkingTech cronjob
Cannot test this
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Moving the useDaysMode system preference to a circulation rule will add
much more flexibility in the calculation of the due date.
The initial request was to make hourly loan returned on closed when
(when checked out on the same close day).
To do so we do not want to take into account the calendar.
However the calendar need to be taken into account for other loan item types.
Other scenarios are possible, for instance depending on the branch.
This patchset will add a new "Days mode" column (next to "Loan period")
to the circulation rules page, with the different values of the
"useDaysMode" system preference + a "default" value, to default to the
system preference value.
Test plan:
- Define a long loan item type (like 10 days) that will use the calendar
(or default to the pref value, if the pref is not set to "ignore the
calendar")
- and a hourly loan (like 2 hours) that will ignore the calendar
- Create items with those item types
- Mark today as a closed day
- Check the items out
=> The hourly loan is due the same day
=> The other loan is due on an open day
QA note:
There is the need to force the "days_mode" option when Koha::Calendar is
initiated for the due date calculation. To make sure devs will not
forget it, the methods that need have it defined will throw an
exception.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Carlow
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is a companion/alternative to bug 25184, in that it allows an
explicit workflow for placing returned books into temporary storage for
a few days for decontamination purposes.
The idea here is to create a specific notforloan value for "In
Decontamination" or something along along those lines. This notforloan
value would never be trappable. At the end of decon,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin could be used to remove the
notforloan status and allow checkins to be trapped to fill holds.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Restart all the things!
3) Give an item a negative notforloan value
4) Place a hold on the item
5) Check the item in
6) Note the item is trapped for hold
7) Set SkipHoldTrapOnNotForLoanValue to the same notforloan value
you used in step 3
8) Check the item in again
9) Note Koha did not ask you to trap the item for hold!
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This bug is basically the same as bug 24966, but for hold_patron_name instead of hold_patron_bcode.
The subroutine hold_patron_bcode should always return an empty string, not undef.
Test Plan:
1) Using the SIP cli emulator, checkin an item that is not checked out
2) Note the DA field contains someting like "C4::SIP::SIPServer=HASH(0x88175c8)"
The hex number will almost certainly be different from this example
3) Apply this patch
4) Restart the SIP server
5) Run the SIP checkin again
6) Note the DA field is no longer present!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Automatic authority creation assumes that if we don't match we need a new authority.
Using the Default linker, however, we don't match if there exists more than one match.
This leads to repeatedly generating authorities once there is a duplicate in the system
We shoudl instead only create a new authority if there are no results
To test:
1 - Set Linker Module to 'Default'
2 - Enable AutoCreateAuthorities and BiblioAddsAuthorities and CatalogModuleRelink and LinkerRelink
3 - Add two copies of a single authority via Z39
4 - Add a heading for that authority to a bib record
5 - Save the record and note a new authority is generated
6 - Repeat and see another is generated
7 - Apply patch
8 - Restart all the things
9 - Save the record again, no new authority created
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 23934 removed the limitation that prevented item level holds from
getting local holds priority. The problem is the code has never checked
if the item level hold matches the given item! This means the wrong item
may be requested to fill an item level hold.
Test Plan:
1) Create 3 items on a record
2) Place a hold for the 2nd item you created
4) Ensure that hold would be picked up by local holds priority
5) Build the holds queue
6) Note the holds queue is asking for the wrong item!
7) Apply this patch
8) Rebuild the holds queue
9) Holds queue should now be asking for the correct item!
Signed-off-by: Kim Peine <kim@williston.lib.vt.us>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The holds queue builder does not honor
the new item_level_hold flag. Instead, it only item_level_request if
in the loop dealing with item level holds. This is incorrect. Item level
holds may be trapped in the local holds priority loop as well. It's
trivial to just pass though the correct item/biblio level hold flag.
I do not know how to write a reproducable test plan for these issues.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kim Peine <kim@williston.lib.vt.us>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
WWW::YouTube::Download is broken and not reliable.
Other alternative was to use HTML::Video::Embed but not updated since
years.
The best alternative seems to follow youtube advise and use an iframe
https://developers.google.com/youtube/iframe_api_reference
Test plan:
Put youtube video in 856$u (using different url formats, youtu.be,
youtube.com/embed, etc.)
Enable HTML5MediaEnabled and HTML5MediaYouTube and confirm that the
youtube videos are correctly embeded.
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This was the only occurrence of GetBooksellersWithLateOrders and it was
the only subroutine of C4::Bookseller
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It seems that this regression comes from bug 14419, but I have not found
a logic reason behind that.
This patch restores the behaviour we always had: facet groups must be
displayed in a given order: the Zebra index (au, ccode, holdingbranch,
etc.)
Test plan:
Apply this patch, restart all and confirm that the facets are not moving
up and down when you refresh your search result page.
QA note:
I think the following line must be removed
@facets_loop = sort {defined $a->{expand} && defined $b->{expand} && $a->{expand} cmp $b->{expand}} @facets_loop;
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In order to prevent typos or further regressions it is better (I think)
to have this code into a loop
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the code set the *_storage fields when adding new
fields to an existing course item. And reverts those fields correctly
when removing the item from the course.
If a new field is enabled on an existing course reserve, the storage
field is not given a value, so when the item goes off reserve, the
item field will always be updated to NULL.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/CourseReserves/CourseItems.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail, data is not reverted correctly
3. Apply this patch and repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Data is correctly reverted
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Now that we have the reserve_id PK on the reserves table we should use
it (instead of the couple borrowernumber, biblionumber)
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If think this case does not apply to real-life, but the logic needs to
be fixed.
If an item is due now, and AddReturn is called now with a return date in
the future, the issue is overdue and the patron must be debarred.
However it is not as we compare with now and not the return date
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In an OO package, the logger initialization should happen in the
constructor. This is not an OO package and the initialization is
happening on loading it. This is a wrong behaviour and certainly breaks
in environments where initialization cannot happen (package building,
for example). There could be several options to solve this, as it is
used in a single sub on this package, I opted for initializing on that
sub.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
== Test plan ==
1 - Have two patrons with userids and no cardnumber
2 - Note which of these has the higher borrower number
3 - Use the SIP cli emulator to connect and checkout a book to the patron with higher borrowernumber
See example after
4 - Note the book may checkout to the wrong patron!
5 - Apply patch
6 - Checkout to both patrons via sip
7 - The patrons get the correct checkouts
=== SIP CLI emulator ===
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 -su term1 -sp term1 \
-l CPL --patron 23529001000463 -m checkout --item 39999000001259
translation: via the koha user term1, checkout item 39999000001259 to
patron 23529001000463
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch implements the use of the ViewPolicy record processor filter
inside C4::Search::searchResults. The idea is that the $record_processor
is instantiated once and reused inside the loop. This leaves options for
further optimizations I will do on a follow-up bug.
The filter is applied to the MARC data before it is passed to the XSLT
processor.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Search.t
=> FAIL: This is not implemented, tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
5. Feel the joy in your body from a long standing bug being solved
6. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes use of the 'variables' parameter in XSLTParse4Display
method in the different places that it is used in the OPAC. It does by
passing this parameter with
anonymous_session => 1|0
The value will depend on the output from get_template_and_user (i.e. if
there's a returned borrowernumber).
A special case takes place in search results, as the call to
XSLTParse4Display happens in C4::Search::searchResults. So a new
parameter 'xslt_variables' is added to it.
To test:
1. Apply the [DO NOT PUSH] patch
2. Open the OPAC in your browser
3. Try detail pages, search results, tags and lists/shelves pages with
or without an active session
=> FAIL: It always says (somewhere) 'Anonymous session: Yes'
4. Apply this patch, restart_all
5. Repeat 3
=> SUCCESS: It will tell the Yes/No correctly regarding anonymous
sessions!
6. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Universidad ORT Uruguay
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
