FAIL C4/Reserves.pm
FAIL pod
in file C4/Reserves.pm
*** ERROR:
Spurious =cut command
Test plan:
perl -e "use Pod::Checker;podchecker('C4/Reserves.pm');"
Should not return any errors.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
4) prove t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
5) prove t/db_dependent/Holds/RevertWaitingStatus.t
6) prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
7) prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
AMENDED: An else branch in reserve/placerequest.pl was removed. This had
the effect of making it no longer possible to place an any hold in the
staff client.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Verified placing a biblio level and an item level hold.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This followup adds several tests to t/db_dependent/Reserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Test plan:
1. Ensure that ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelayCharge is set to 0.
2. Place a hold (doesn't matter whether it's a bib/item-level hold),
then confirm the hold by checking it in.
3. Check in the item again, and hit Cancel.
4. The reserve in question should be cancelled.
5. Repeat steps 2-4 twice, once after setting
ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelayCharge to a nonzero value and again
after clicking the "Forgive fees for manually expired holds"
checkbox.
A fine should only be applied when the syspref is enabled and the
checkbox is not checked. Also, the checkbox should only appear after
enabling the syspref. And finally, the checkbox should remember whether
it is checked across multiple checkins, same as the "Forgive overdue
charges" and "Book drop mode" checkboxes.
Signed-off-by: Jason Burds <jburds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Amended patch: Removed 2 debugging lines.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Most of them were found and fixed using codespell.
Fix also some related grammar issues.
In C4/Serials.pm a variable was renamed to make future codespelling
checks easier.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14383
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This way ILS-DI HoldItem and HoldTitle services also benefit from this
check
Test plan:
1/ Define some default holds policies by item type in
/admin/smart-rules.pl
2/ Use ILS-DI HoldItem service and check that those rules are respected
3/ Check that staff and opac hold behaviour is unchanged regarding
these rules.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script. No regressions found,
improves the ILS-DI HoldItem response.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
C4::Reserves:
* Added OnShelfHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* Added OPACItemHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() changed interface, now takes
$item_record,$borrower_record; calls OnShelfHoldsAllowed()
opac/opac-reserve.pl and opac/opac-search.pl:
* rewrote hold allowed rule to use OPACItemHoldsAllowed()
* also use OnShelfHoldsAllowed() through
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest()
templates:
* Removed AllowOnShelfHolds and OPACItemHolds global flags, they now
only have meaning per item type
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
I have tested this patch left, right and upside down for the last
several months. All tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Imagine this scenario: we have one record with four items. Two of those
items are checked out, one of those items is a waiting hold, and one of
those items is available. We would expect to see this on the search
results page. Instead, we will see both non-checked out items as
unavailable due to waiting holds.
This is due to a semantic issue GetReserveStatus.
C4::Search::searchResults uses GetReserveStatus to get the reserve
status of each item, but unlike all other calls to the sub, this one
passes in not only itemnumber, but biblionumber.
When no reserve is found for the available item, the subroutine uses the
biblionumber to grab what is essentially an arbitrary reserve to use for
the status. This makes no sense and this functionality should be
entirely removed from the subroutine so regressions like this will be
prevented in the future.
Test Plan:
1) Create one record with 4 items
a) check two of the items out to patrons
b) set one of the items as a waiting hold
c) leave the fourth item as available
2) Run a search where this record will be in the results list
3) Note that the results list 2 items on loan, two unavailable
4) Apply this patch, reload the search results
5) Note that the results list 1 available, 2 on loan, 1 unavailable
Signed-off-by: John Andrews <jandrews@washoecounty.us>
Signed-off-by: Sheila Kearns <sheila.kearns@state.vt.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Note: This is for the staff search result list!
Works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
C4/Reserves.pm is unreadable with my vim configuration.
It appears I am the only one having this problem.
For an incomprehensible reason, a string constructs with
qq/my string/;
completely breaks the syntax color for all the rest of the file (~2300l).
If I replace it with
qq{my string};
all is fine!
Test plan:
launch
git show HEAD
and verify this patch won't break anything.
Additionally, prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
This will trigger the three functions that were modified.
The prove currently fails on test 8, but the other succeeding
tests prove that this change is fine.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests pass on my installation.
No problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To Test
1/ Create 3 (or more holds) on one biblionumber, make sure at least
one item is not on loan
2/ Check out the not on loan item to a borrower (maybe number 2 in the
queue)
3/ Look in the database (or on the holds tab on the moredetail.pl)
notice the priorities have not been reordered
4/ Apply patch and try again, notice now they have
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Confirmed the problem without the patch, and confirmed that the patch
corrects it.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
If a library is using Talking Tech for phone notices, any waiting hold
phone notice will show up twice!
This is because Koha generates on at the time the hold is set to
waiting, and then the cronjob TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl generates
it's own notice as well.
The former notice will always have a status of 'pending', as the
TalkingTech_itiva_inbound.pl script will update the notice the outbound
script created.
The solution is to prevent Koha from creating a phone notice for waiting
holds if TT is enabled, and let the cron script do it.
Test Plan:
1) Enable Talking Tech from the system preferences
2) Set a hold waiting phone notice in the notices and slips editor
3) Choose a patron, enable hold phone notices for that patron
4) Place a hold for a patron, and check it in so it's marked as waiting
5) Note the phone notice generated for the patron
6) Apply this patch
7) Repeat step 4
8) Note that this time, a phone hold waiting notice is not generated
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Amends condition with an additional or statement. Shoudn't affect
anything but phone notices. Change appears logical.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current holds behavior in Koha allows a situation like this:
- Patron A has an item currently checked out.
- Patron B places a hold on the next available copy of that title.
- Then Patron A will not be able to renew his item, even if there are
other available copies of that title that could potentially fill Patron
B's hold.
Since this seems unfair to Patron A, we should allow renewal of items
even if there are unfilled holds, but those holds could all be filled
with currently available items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a record with two items
3) Check out the item to a patron
4) Place a hold on the record
5) Note you cannot renew the item for the patron
6) Enable the new system preference AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable
7) Note you can now renew the item, as all the holds can be satisfied
by available items.
8) Place a second hold on the record
9) Note you can no longer renew the item, as all the holds *cannot*
be filled by currently available items
Signed-off-by: Holger Meissner <h.meissner.82@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Rohde <crohde@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There is no reason for underage borrowers to reserve ageRestricted material and
then be denied it's check-out due to ageRestriction.
This patch prevents reserving material for borrowers not suitably aged.
# # # # # #
# A PRIORI #
# # # # # #
BOTH THE STAFF CLIENT AND THE OPAC
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You can reserve an ageRestricted Record with ease.
STAFF CLIENT ONLY
5. Check-in an Item from the ageRestricted Record and catch the reservation.
6. Check-out the ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
7. You get a notification about being unable to check-out due to age restriction.
How lame is that for a 12 year old?
# # # # # # # #
# A POSTERIORI #
# # # # # # # #
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Check-out an ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
4. You get a notification about having the maximum amount of reserves.
5. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
6. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden.
Includes Unit tests.
Followed test plan. Patch behaves as expected. (Note: Propagating error messages to template will be handled in Bug 13116 or 11999)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
- use Modern::Perl;
- fix a typo
- remove an old comment
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This feature will allow libraries to specify that, when an item is returned,
a local hold may be given priority for fulfillment even though it is
of lower priority in the list of unfilled holds.
This feature has three settings:
* LocalHoldsPriority, which enables the feature
* LocalHoldsPriorityPatronControl, which selects for either tha patron's
home library, or the patron's pickup library for the hold
* LocalHoldsPriorityItemControl, which selects for either the item's
holding library, or home library.
So, this feature can "give priority for filling holds to
patrons whose (home library|pickup library) matches the item's
(home library|holding library)"
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
Signed-off-by: Joel Sasse <jsasse@plumcreeklibrary.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch fix the subroutine name and add a restriction on the
arguments: both argument are mandatory!
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
User may cancel his own reservation at waiting or in transit status
through calling opac-modrequest.pl. Cancel button is disabled in
interface but possibility to cancel should be checked also in
opac-moderequest.pl, before calling CancelReserve().
Similar situation is with opac-modrequest-suspend.pl
This patch provides new soubroutine to chceck if user can cancel given
reserve. It's possible only when he's owner of hold and hold isn't in
transfer or waiting status.
Additionaly there are new test for this function in Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests, QA script and new tests.
Works as described, tested with:
.../cgi-bin/koha/opac-modrequest.pl?reserve_id=XXX
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
CancelHold takes two parameters: patron_id and item_id.
If item_id is considered as an itemnumber, holds on title can't be
canceled.
If item_id is considered as a biblionumber, all holds on this
biblionumber (for a borrower) will be canceled.
So CancelHold have to consider item_id as a reserve_id.
- Added subroutine C4::Reserves::GetReserve
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords now returns the reserve_id
- Fix the text in the ilsdi.pl?service=Describe&verb=CancelHold page
- Unit tests for CancelReserved and GetReserve
- Do not delete row in reserves table if insert in old_reserves fails
Signed-off-by: Leila and Sonia <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <bensinober@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signing off, while noting a style issue in the patch review
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script.
Placed and cancelled a hold using ILS-DI successfully.
Adding a follow-up to also update the ils-di documentation
page in the bootstrap theme.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
EDIT: I removed the changes it did to the prog theme.
If you suspend a hold, the item does not show Available. It still shows
the person next in line, who isn't eligible for the hold yet because of
the suspension. This is not the case for a delayed hold, where you
originally place the hold and tell it not to start until a future date.
If you do that, it shows as Available. This is confusing and
inconsistent.
Test Plan:
1) Create an item level suspended hold for a record with no other holds
2) Note in the record details that the hold shows an item level hold
3) Apply this patch
4) Refresh the record details page, note the item is "Available"
5) Optional: prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test Plan:
1) Set ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay
2) Set ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to 1
3) Place a hold, set it to waiting
4) Using the MySQL console, modify the waiting date and set it to the
day before yesterday.
5) Set today as a holiday for the pickup branch in question.
6) Run misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl
7) The hold should remain unchanged
8) Remove today as a holiday
9) Run misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl again
10) The hold should now be canceled
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Leila <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
1) Test record has 1 single item, checked out to patron X
2) Place 3 holds for patrons A, B and C, all title level hold this time
A, B, C, item branches and staff branch are the same.
3) Return item, confirm hold
4) Confirm item is now waiting for patron A
Priorities are: A = Waiting, B = 1, C = 2
5) Open patron account of user B, checkout book
Koha asks: Item X has been waiting for patron A... Revert
waiting status
Confirm.
6) Check priorities:
Hold list shows: A = 1, C = 1
Database says: A = 1, C = 3
7) Apply this patch
8) Repeat steps 1-6
9) Note the priorities are correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Test plan correctly predicts the error and the correction made by the
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When itemtype is defined on biblio (item-level_itypes syspref), the
method C4::Reserves::CanItemBeReserved uses item->{itemtype}. But
ithe item comes from C4::Items::GetItem and it does not have an
'itemtype' key; in this method the item type value is always in
'itype' key.
This patch corrects it.
Test plan:
You should have itemtype on biblio and 'item-level_itypes' syspref
set to biblio.
This test plan is with ReservesControlBranch on ItemHomeLibrary.
- Choose a branch, a borrower category and an item type, for example
'NYC', 'CHILD' and 'DVD'
- Set an issuing rule for 'NYC', CHILD' and 'DVD' with 'Holds allowed'
set to 10
- Set an issuing rule for 'NYC', CHILD' and all item types with
'Holds allowed' set to 0
- Choose an item of a biblio with itemtype 'DVD', that can be reserved,
with 'NYC' as homebranch
- Choose a borrower with category 'CHILD'
- Try to request the item for the borrower
=> without the patch, you can
=> with the patch, you can't
You may check reserve is allowed with 'Holds allowed' > 0 on issuing
rule for 'DVD'.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Great test plan - thanks!
Confirmed the bug, and the fix. Looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes a situation where a patron that has preferences
set for transport of a notice via a method that is not supported
for that notice type can result in a failure. Rather than
make it a fatal error during checkin, simply log a warning and skip.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch prevents duplicate hold available print notices from being
sent and enforces making a print notice if no other transports can be
used.
-------------------------
- REPLICATING THE ISSUE -
-------------------------
1. Set a Patrons "Hold filled"-messaging preference to SMS + Email
2. Remove the SMS number (sms notification number) and all email
addresses.
3. Make a reservation for this Patron.
4. Check-in the reserved Item.
5. message_queue-table has two generated print notices for the
Hold_filled event.
One for both failed message transport types, email and sms.
1. Set a Patrons "Hold filled"-messaging preference to empty, remove all
checks from boxes.
2. Make a reservation for this Patron
3. Check-in the reserved Item.
4. message_queue-table has no message for the Hold-filled event. This is
problematic because a Patron should get some kind of a notification
for a filled Hold.
-----------------------------
- AFTER APPLYING THIS PATCH -
-----------------------------
If all message transport types for "Hold filled" fail, a print notice is
queued in the message_queue table. Only one print message is queued even
if many transports attempts fail.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The HOLD_PRINT and HOLD_PHONE notices become useless.
This patch modifies existing notices in order to group them into the
main notice type 'HOLD', with any pre-existing print and phone
templates in the appropriate places.
Test plan:
- Apply the patch and execute the update database entry.
- Verify that your previous HOLD_PHONE and HOLD_PRINT are displayed
when editing the HOLD notice (under phone and print).
- Choose a patron and check SMS, email, phone for "Hold filled"
(on the patron messaging preferences).
- Place a hold.
- Check the item in and confirm the hold.
- If the patron has an email *and* a SMS number, 2 new messages are put
into the message_queue table: 1 sms and 1 email.
If the patron does not have 1 of them, there are 2 new messages: 1
sms/email and 1 print.
If the user has neither of them, there is 1 new message: 1 print.
- The generated messages should correspond with the notices defined,
depending the message transport type.
Signed-off-by: Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Just noting that if email and SMS are disabled in the msg prefs, the user
will not have a print message.
And if the SMS driver fails, the record status in message_queue is 'failed',
but staff may not be aware of that.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch modifies _Findgroupreserve so that its one caller,
CheckReserves(), would include the reserve_id field in the
hold request it returns.
Failure to include reserve_id in every circumstance resulted
in bug 11947. This patch is therefore a complementary fix for
that bug, but is not meant to preempt the direct fix for
that bug.
To test:
[1] Verify that t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
[2] Verify that the following test plan taken from
the patch for bug 11947 works for this patch
*without* applying the patch for 11947:
* have a few borrowers, say 4.
* have a biblio with a single item (you can scale this up, it should
work just the same.)
* issue the item to borrower A
* have borrowers B, C, and D place a hold on the item
* return the item, acknowledge that it'll be put aside for B.
* view the holds on the item.
Without the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 2, 1" when they
should be "waiting, 1, 2".
* in the database "reserves" table, they're really "0, 2, 3" when they
should be "0, 1, 2".
With the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 1, 2"
* in the database, they're "0, 1, 2"
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described. No koha-qa errors. Test pass
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Currently when a reserve is moved to "waiting" status because it's
acknowledged on checkin, the reserve priorities aren't renumbered. This
causes things to go a bit haywire in the UI, in particular, some
reserves can unjustly end up with priority 1 when they shouldn't. It
also seemed to mess with the logic of who should get it next, but I
didn't look too closely at that.
This patch forces a renumbering so that all the priorities remain
copacetic.
Test plan:
* have a few borrowers, say 4.
* have a biblio with a single item (you can scale this up, it should
work just the same.)
* issue the item to borrower A
* have borrowers B, C, and D place a hold on the item
* return the item, acknowledge that it'll be put aside for B.
* view the holds on the item.
Without the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 2, 1" when they
should be "waiting, 1, 2".
* in the database "reserves" table, they're really "0, 2, 3" when they
should be "0, 1, 2".
With the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 1, 2"
* in the database, they're "0, 1, 2"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Test plan confirms that the problem exists and that the patch corrects
it.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script, especially t/db_dependent/Reserves.t.
Improves priority calculation.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes an issue originally reported by bug 11702.
RM note: the patch is clear enough and doesn't break existing tests,
but on the other hand, I have been completely unable to reproduce
the original issue.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t passes
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems will stop item-specific holds from being placed
on damaged items, but does not stop Koha from using damaged items to
fill holds. This seems like incorrect behavior.
Test Plan:
1) Set 'AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems' to "Don't Allow"
2) Pick an item, set it to damaged
3) Place a bib-level hold on this item's record
4) Scan the item though the returns system
5) Koha will ask to use this item to fill the hold, click "ignore"
6) Apply this patch
7) Repeat step 4
8) Koha will not ask to use this item to fill the hold
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The priority of new hold requests was not calculated when using ILS-DI.
A new routine is added, C4::Reserves::CalculatePriority(), to calculate
the priority prior to placing a request.
A separate bug report, 11640, covers the changes in reserves to
use this new routine more generally.
This patch does therefore only affect ILS-DI.
Note: ILS-DI already allows you to generate multiple holds on a biblio or
item for the same patron. This patch does not change that behavior.
Test plan:
[1] Place multiple holds using ILS-DI HoldTitle service:
/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=HoldTitle&patron_id=BORROWERNUMBER&bib_id=BIBLIONUMBER&request_location=test
Check the priority.
[2] Do the same using HoldItem service:
/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=HoldItem&patron_id=BORROWERNUMBER&bib_id=BIBLIONUMBER&item_id=ITEMNUMBER
Check the priority again.
[3] Use a biblio with multiple items. Place item level holds on both.
Check in one of these items in another branch. Confirm transfer.
Check in the other item in the original branch. Confirm hold.
Now you have a waiting and a transit hold.
Test HoldTitle and HoldItem service again a few times.
[4] Enable AllowHoldDateInFuture and add a future hold.
Now test HoldTitle and HoldItem again and check if these holds are
inserted before the future hold (lower priority).
January 29, 2014: Rebased this patch and amended it to make a distinction
between fixing the ILS-DI bug and using the new routine.
Updated commit message and test plan (marcelr).
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The return from GetReservesFromBiblionumber contains an unnecessary
extra variable. In scalar context an array returns its element count.
Maintaining a separate count can lead to unforeseen bugs
and imposes ugly constructions on the subroutine's users.
Remove the useless count variable from the return
This patch also changes the parameters: now the routine takes a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Placed biblio holds, future holds and item holds. Works as expected.
Tested Holds.t and Reserves.t. Pass.
Tested /cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id=999 with two holds on
one item. Fine.
C4/SIP/ILS/Item.pm: Looked for "whatever" and "arrayref" and could not find
them anymore. Looks good.
Handled a few unneeded calls in QA follow-up.
Left only one point to-do for serials/routing-preview.pl. See Bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
1/ CURRENT_DATE() is a MySQLism and should be replaced with CAST(now() AS
DATE).
2/ The date formatting should be done in the template (using the TT
plugin).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Before bug 9788 the alldates parameter of GetReservesFromItemnumber was
actually not used in the codebase.
The first patch of bug 9788 did change that and passed true by default.
But a closer look revealed that we do not really need it.
The parameter is removed by this patch; the SQL statement is slightly
adjusted: if reservedate<=now or a waitingdate is filled for the
requested itemnumber, GetReservesFromItemnumber will return the reserve.
This includes so-called future waits: a future hold that has been confirmed
ahead of time with pref ConfirmFutureHolds > 0 days.
Note that future item-level holds are not really interesting to return; this
just corresponds to original behavior. Future next-available holds are not
in view at all; they do not contain an item number.
Test plan:
Actually, the test plan of the first patch is valid. But for completeness I
repeat it here:
[1] Enable future holds and set ConfirmFutureHolds to 2 days.
[2] Place a future next-available hold for 2 days ahead.
[3] Check item status on catalogue detail. Available? That is fine.
[4] Confirm the future hold by checking it in. ('future wait')
[5] Look at item status again on catalogue detail. Must be Waiting now.
[6] Switch to OPAC and login as another opac user. Goto Place a hold.
[7] Check item status with item level hold info. Is it waiting?
[8] Try to place hold in staff, check item level status again. Waiting?
[9] Make a transfer for the item. Switch branch. Check hold status on
Transfers to receive.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch makes GetReservesFromItemnumber also returns the waiting
date and removes some repeated code.
Improves item status display on catalogue detail, when placing a hold at
opac-reserve and in staff, and on transfers to receive form.
This patch builds on work from reports 9367 and 9761.
Test plan:
Place a future next-av. hold (enable future holds prefs), say 2 days ahead.
Check item status on catalogue detail. Nothing to see.
Enable ConfirmFutureHolds by inserting a number of days, say 2.
Confirm earlier hold by checking it in. Look at item status again on detail.
Switch to other opac user. Try to place a hold again. Check item status with
item level hold info. Try to place hold in staff, check item level status.
Make a transfer for that item. Switch branch. Look at transfers to receive.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch corrects a typo that broken ModReserveFill(). This
patch also adds a unit test that (via two levels of indirection)
exercises ModReserveFill().
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch improves the POD for C4::Reserves::_FixPriority()
to (hopefully) describe its function thoroughly. It also
adjusts the call of _FixPriority() by CancelReserve() to
omit passing reserve_id, since by that point no row in
the reserves table for that request still exists.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In various places, deleting a hold request did not trigger recalculating
the priority of the other holds on the bib:
To reproduce the bug:
- select or create 2 users U1 and U2
- select or create an holdable item
- place on hold for both U1 and U2. U1 has priority 1 and U2 has
priority 2.
- delete the hold for U1
- go on circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=XXXX for U2 (or in the DB
directly) and verify the priority has not been set to 1
The issue is repeatable (at least) on these 2 pages:
* circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=XXXX (tab 'Holds', select "yes"
in the dropdown list and submit the form)
* reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=XXXX (click on the red cross)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Reran my tests:
Preparations:
- Create holds for different patrons on a record:
* 1st - title level hold
* 2nd - item level hold
* 3rd - title level hold
* 4th - title level hold
- AllowOnShelfHolds = On/Allow (items were not checked out)
Tests:
Deleted holds from various pages, confirming bugs first,
then testing with applied patches. Reloading database
after each test.
1) Cancel holds from OPAC patron account
/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl#opac-user-holds
- Cancel 4th - ok, before and after applying the patch
- Cancel 2nd - ok, after applying the patch
2) Cancel hold from holds tab on staff detail page
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=7
a) Setting priority to 'del', submitting with 'Update holds'
- Cancel first (1st) - ok, before and after
- Cancel hold in the middle (was 3rd) - ok, before and after
- Cancel last (was 4th) -ok, before and after
b) Using red X
- Repeating tests from a) - before the patch is applied holds
get totally 'out of order' - after applying the patch, it works
correctly
Additional tests done on this page:
- Change priority using up, down, to top, to bottom icons
- Change priority with 'toggle to lowest'
3) Cancel hold from the patron's account
a) Check out tab - Delete? Yes, 'Cancel marked holds'
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=X
- Cancel first (1st) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel hold in the middle (was 3rd) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel last (was 4th) - ok, after applying the patch
b) Details tab - Delete? yes, 'Cancel marked holds'
/cgi-bin/koha/members/moremember.pl?borrowernumber=X
- Cancel first (1st) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel hold in the middle (was 3rd) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel last (was 4th) - ok, after applying the patch
Without the patch, holds priorities get out of order.
Additional tests done:
- Check in one item to trigger first hold
- Check in one item to trigger second hold
- Check out first item
Priorities are kept while the item is waiting, when it's
checked out, priorities of remaining holds get reset correctly.
Conclusion:
Big improvement, no regressions found.
Passes all tests in t, xt and QA script.
Also: t/db_dependent/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch fixes a problem where a patron could receive duplicate
hold waiting notifications. For example, this could happen if a
circ operator checked in an item more than once and confirmed the
same hold each time.
To test:
[1] Set up a test patron that received hold waiting notifications.
[2] Put an item on hold for the patron, then check the item in
and confirm the hold. Verify that a hold notification is
sent (or inspect the message_queue table).
[3] Check the item in again and confirm the hold again. A duplicate
hold notification will be generated.
[4] Apply the patch.
[5] Repeat steps 2 and 3. This time, only one notification should be
generated.
[6] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Works as described.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adds a column to indicate holds on received items, as well as adding
a new column for fund and showing the subtotals per fund above
the total subtotal.
To test:
[1] Create an order basket containing at least one title and
ensure that an item is created for that title. Close the
basket.
[2] Place a hold on the title.
[3] Receive the order. After receiving it, but before finishing
the invoice, the table of already received orders should now
have columns for the order budget and number of holds on the
title as well as lines with the subtotal per fund.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a renewal tool that functions similar to the returns where a
librarian can continuously scan items for renewal. This script blocks
renewals that are impossible, and allow the same renewal overrides
as circulation.pl
Test plan:
1) Apply the patches for bug 8798
2) Apply this patch
3) Browse to /cgi-bin/koha/circ/renew.pl
4) Enter an invalid barcode, you should get an error message
5) Enter a valid, but not checked out barcode, you should get an error
message.
6) Enter a valid barcode that is checkout out and should be renewable,
you should get a success message.
7) Enable AllowRenewalLimitOverride
8) Enter a barcode for an item that has been renewed too many times
9) You should get a warning which you can override.
10) Disable AllowRenewalLimitOverride
11) Repeat steap 8
12) You should get a blocking error message
11) Enter a barcode for an item with unfilled holds on it,
you should get an overridable warning
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Passes all tests and QA script, some issues have been
addressed in follow-ups.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Koha::DateUtils::output_pref took 4 parameters and the last one is a
boolean, so some calls were:
output_pref($dt, undef, undef, 1)
This patch changes its prototype to
output_pref({
dt => $dt,
dateformat => $dateformat,
timeformat => $timeformat,
dateonly => $boolean
});
An alternative is to call the output_pref routine with a datetime
object, without using an hashref:
output_pref($dt);
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch gets rid of finish.
From the man page
finish()
Indicate that no more data will be fetched from this statement handle
before it is either executed again or destroyed.
You almost certainly do not need to call this method.
Adding calls to "finish" after loop that fetches all rows is a common
mistake, don't do it, it can mask genuine problems like uncaught fetch errors.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comment: Similar to other patches from the same author
I run prove t/db_dependent/Reserves.t without errors
don't know if more tests are needed.
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This fixes a regression introduced by the patch for bug
9394 -- when printing a hold slip using the 'print and confirm'
button, the slip would contain only the text 'reserve not found',
not a full hold slip.
This patch also adds a regression test.
To test:
[1] Check in an item that would fill a hold. Use the 'print
and confirm button' to confirm the hold.
[2] The printout will only contain text to the effect of
'reserve not found'.
[3] Apply the patch.
[4] Repeat step 1. This time, a full hold slip should be printed.
[5] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Pass all tests, new and old, and QA script.
Verified wrong and corrected behaviour.
Note: Sometimes there will not be the message 'reserve not found'
showing up, but hold information for a different record. This happens
when there exists a reserve_id with the borrowernumber of the patron
in question in your database.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Description:
A new pref ConfirmFutureHolds is added. When confirming a hold at checkin time,
the number of days in this pref is taken into account when looking for reserves.
Note that this pref does not interfere with renewing, issuing or transferring
a book. For report Holds to pull, the default end date is calculated with this
new preference.
The use of ConfirmFutureHolds is useful only when future holds are allowed.
Test plan:
1) Enable future holds. Add a number of days into ConfirmFutureHolds.
2) Place a future hold within this number of days.
3) Run holds to pull report. Check default startdate and enddate.
4) Check this book in. Can you confirm the hold? Do not confirm.
5) Issue the book to another patron. You should not see a warning.
6) Renew the book for this patron via opac or staff. No warning either.
7) Check in again. Warning pops up again.
8) Transfer book. Switch branch. Check in. Hold found pops up. Do not confirm.
9) Back to first branch. Check in (with popup). Remove the hold. Add new future
hold past the number of days. Check in (no warn).
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch updates the wthdrawn field in items and deleteditems to be
withdrawn instead. No functional changes are made.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Comment: Save for translation files (that will be fixed on next release),
only occurrence of wthdrawn is on updatedatabase.pl
No koha-qa errors.
This touch many files, and I did not test everything,
but all seems normal. I think that any problem could
be fixed later.
Perhaps both entries in updatedatabase.pl could be joined
into one, but thats for QA.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
CheckReserves was using the CircControl system preference to determine what
patrons an item can fill a hold for. It should be using ReservesControlBranch
instead.
Test Plan:
1) Set ReservesControlBranch to "item's home library".
2) Create an item at Library A, place holds for it for patrons at
Library B, Library C, and Library A in that order,
for pickup at the patrons home library.
3) Make sure the holds policy for Library A is set to
Hold Policy = "From home library" and
Return Policy = "Item returns home".
Make sure the holds policies for the other libraries are set to
Hold Policy = "From any library".
4) Check the item in at Library C, the hold for the patron at Library B
should pop up, even though it's in violation of the circulation rules.
Don't click the confirm button!
5) Apply this patch, and reload the page,
now the hold listed should be for the last hold,
the hold for the patron at Library A, which is correct.
This patch adds the subroutine C4::Reserves::GetReservesControlBranch as
an equivilent to C4::Circulation::_GetCircControlBranch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed POD so that arguments and explanation match (C<$item>).
Also tested opac-reserves.pl for regressions.
Passes all tests, QA script, and Reserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test Plan:
1) Enable the syspref emailLibrarianWhenHoldIsPlaced
2) Modify the HOLDPLACED notice, add some item level fields
3) Place an item level hold
4) Check the email you receive ( or just look at it from the db )
You should see the item level fields are new populated
5) Place a title level hold
6) Check the email you receive - item fields are not populated,
but notice still looks ok.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If IndependentBranches is ON, patrons are not allowed to place
hold requests on items whose owning library is different from
the patron's home library, *unless* the canreservefromotherbranches
system preference is also ON.
The patch implements the intended behavior; without it, IndependentBranches
and canreservefromotherbranches were not consulted during the
item holdability check.
To test:
[1] Have IndependentBranches ON and canreservefromotherbranches
OFF. Make sure that the circulation rules are set up to
permit patrons to place hold requests in general.
[2] In the OPAC, log in as a patron from library A, and try placing
a hold on an item from library B. The patron will be able to
place the request.
[3] Cancel the request.
[4] Apply the patch.
[5] Try placing the same hold request. This time, the request should
be forbidden.
[6] Turn on canreservefromotherbranches.
[7] Try placing the hold request. This time, it should go through.
[8] Cancel the request.
[9] Turn off IndependentBranches.
[10] Try placing the hold request and verify that it is permitted.
[10]
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
- fix identation in one line
- remove a commented-out warn
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
A change-and-replace went a tick too far. This patch
adjusts the column alias in the query run in MergeHolds()
to reflect that the value being returned is the number of
hold requests, not an ID.
To test:
[1] This patch should have no visible changes to behavior. To
verify, pick to bib records that have hold requests on them,
then merge them together. Verify that the merged bib
contains sll of the hold requests on it.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
* C4::Reserves::_FixPriority
- The previous code checked the cancellationdate. If think you never pass
in it with bad parameters, but in order to be sure I added the check on
this value.
- The reservedates array was never used.
* circ/circulation.tt
There was a bug: it was not possible to remove an hold from the
circulation page. Passing reserve_id fixes the issue.
* C4::Reserves::GetReserveId
This subroutine did not have a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch switches from using a combination of
biblionumber/borrowernumber to using reserve_id where possible.
Test Plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Maxime Pelletier <maxime.pelletier@libeo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Test Plan:
1) Enable IndependantBranches
2) Apply this patch
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Verify that the system preference still functions correctly
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Script overdue_notices.pl creates a printed letter if borrower as no email.
Actually, unless --email option is used, first valid email of borrower is used. Email field should depend on AutoEmailPrimaryAddress syspref like in other letter creations.
Signed-off-by: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
All tests and QA script pass.
Following test plan from Julien Sicot from Bugzilla:
- with patron's email address specified on "primary email"
field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "home"
=> notice sent to patron | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "secondary email"
field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "work"
=> notice sent to patron | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "alternate email"
field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "alternate"
=> notice sent to patron | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "secondary email"
OR "alternate email" field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "home"
=> no notice sent to patron, overdue notice sent to koha admin | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "primary email" OR
- with patron's email address specified on "primary email" field
AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "home"
=> notice sent to patron | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "secondary email" field
AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "work"
=> notice sent to patron | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "alternate email" field
AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "alternate"
=> notice sent to patron | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "secondary email"
OR "alternate email" field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress"
on "home"
=> no notice sent to patron, overdue notice sent to koha admin | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "primary email"
OR "secondary email" field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress"
on "alternate"
=> no notice sent to patron, overdue notice sent to koha admin | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "primary email"
OR "secondary email" OR "alternate email" field and syspref
"AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "first valid" => notice sent to patron | OK"secondary email" field AND syspref "AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "alternate" => no notice sent to patron, overdue notice sent to koha admin | OK
- with patron's email address specified on "primary email" OR
"secondary email" OR "alternate email" field and syspref
"AutoEmailPrimaryAddress" on "first valid" => notice sent to patron | OK
Note: Options for AutoEmailPrimaryAddress should be like the field names on
the patron form (primary, secondary...), but this is outside the scope of this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Keeping fetchrow close to its execute worked even better in GetReserveStatus.
Instead of returning undef, I return empty string.
I checked all calls; this value is mostly not checked for undef.
So we eliminate a lot of warnings in log.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
This patch rewrites the GetReserveStatus routine in order to take in
parameter the itemnumber and/or the biblionumber.
In some places, the C4::Reserves::CheckReserves routine is called when
we just want to get the status of the reserve. In these cases, the
C4::Reserves::GetReserveStatus is now called.
This routine executes 1 sql query (or 2 max).
Test plan:
Check that there is no regression on the different pages where reserves
are used. The different status will be the same than before applying
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
If a librarian checks out a waiting hold to a different patron
it gives the item conflicting statuses. The item will show as both
checked out to the different patron, and waiting for the original
patron.
This patch fixes this by not allowing this situation to occurr. If
a librarian attempts to issue an item that is waiting for a different
patron, the system will force the librarian to choose to
a) not issue the item
b) issue the item, and cancel the waiting hold
c) issue the item, and revert the waiting hold
In this scenario, reverting the waiting hold means to push it back
on the reserves queue as a hold with a priority of 1, which will push
the priorities of any existing holds back by 1 as well. It will become
an item level hold for the given item, as we cannot know if the hold
was item-level or bib-level given the data we have about the hold.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
All three cases tested, correct outcome each time
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
The slip RESERVESLIP is not replacing fields correctly.
C4::Reserves::ReserveSlip calls C4::Letters::GetPreparedLetter,
and passes the $reserve hashref to it for each table except branches
( which is passed the branchcode ). The problem is, if you pass a
hashref for a table, it uses that hashref for the replacing, rather
than looking up the data from the database.
Fixed by passing the correct keys for each of the tables requested.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Tested following the test plan.
Could reproduce the bug.
After applying the patch slip printed as expected.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
There is a flaw in C4::Members::Messaging::GetMessagingPreferences where
the system assumes that every transport will use the same letter. This
is not necessarily true. Even with the default preferences of just
'email' and 'sms', we should be able to have different letters
for each, as one has a maximum character length ( sms ) and one
does not. GetMessagingPreferences currently uses the letter code
of the last result of its query as the letter code for every transport type.
The returned data is a hashref with a key 'transport_types' that is
an array of transport_types this borrower has selected for the given
alert.
This commit modifies GetMessagingPreferences such that the the
'transport_types' array is now a hash where the name of the transport
type is now a key to the value of the letter code set for that transport
type.
It also modifies code calling GetMessagingPreferences where necessary,
and as a side benefit will correctly get the letter codes for email
and sms correctly, if they are defined differently.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4246
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
In use in production by two libraries: Middletown and Washoe
who give their sign off but don't have git to do so.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
For request.pl, there are two ways to suspend a reserve, either
by using the 'suspend' button for an individual reserve, or by
using the 'Update hold(s)' button with suspend until dates set.
If the 'suspend' button is used, any date in the 'suspend until'
field is ignored. This commit fixes this issue.
* Add suspend_until date to suspend button link via jquery
* Add optional date to ToggleSuspend()
* Add KohaDates plugin where necessary
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
passes tests, tested:
* suspend all holds from circ.pl
* suspend one hold from circ.pl
* suspend all holds from moremember.pl
* suspend one hold from moremember.pl
--- NOTE: clicking suspend all holds without setting a date will mean the holds must be manually unsuspended. I'm not sure this is intentional?
* suspend a specific hold using the in-table button on reserves
* suspend a specific hold using the "update hold" button
500 error is gone.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8084
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
New function was actually returning an arrayref, so made
perldoc and function usage consistent.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Adds a new subroutine in C4::Items, GetItemnumbersForBiblio, which takes a
single biblionumber, and returns an array of all the corresponding itemnumbers.
This patch also replaces the usage of get_itemnumbers_of in C4::Reserves::CanBookBeReserved
with this new subroutine, as the output is more consistent with what we were
lookng for (this is what fixes the bug issue).
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adds the ability to suspend reserves. The new system preference
AutoResumeSuspendedHolds enables the ability to set a date for
a suspended hold to automatically be resumed.
When a hold is suspended, it will continue to increase in priority
as the holds above it are fulfilled. If the first holds in line
to be filled are suspended, the first non-suspened hold in line
will be used when an item can fulfill a hold that has been placed.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7641
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Tested with the preference on and off:
1. placed several holds in the staff client
2. suspended some with a date
3. suspended some without a date
4. triggered hold message by checking in for hold with suspensions
5. the suspended hold was skipped as it should be
6. tested suspending holds in the OPAC w and w/out dates
7. ran the cron to clear suspensions with dates
All the above tests worked as expected. Signing off.
Optionally delete bibliographic record when batch deleting items, if no items remain on the record.
Adds deleting of reserves to DelBiblio. Since subscriptions are deleted automatically,
it made sense for deletion of reserves to maintain the same behavior.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
I like the way this works, and it does. Passes tests.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
At the moment, a reserve will be canceled if it has passed its
expiration date, even if the item is waiting or in the process
of being transferred. The situation could arise where someone
has a hold filled, but it is canceled while in transit, or before
the borrower can pick it up.
If the new syspref ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay is enabled,
this will cancel holds that have been waiting for longer than the
number of days specified in the syspref ReservesMaxPickupDelay.
If ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelayCharge is set, the borrower charged the fee set therein.
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <koha.sekjal@gmail.com>
Altered circulation.pref to include currency class and [% local_currency %] param
Branches can have their own version of notices - added branchcode to
letter table.
Support html notices - added is_html to letter table.
Support for borrower attributes in templates.
GetPreparedletter() is the interface for compiling letters (notices).
Sysprefs for notice and slips stylesheets
Added TRANSFERSLIP to the letters
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
To test:
Create 4 holds on a bib, for patrons A, B, C, and D,
Check in the item to mark hold as waiting for patron A
Check out the item to patron B -> reserve for patron B should be removed
Check in the item to mark hold as waiting for patron A
Check out the item to Patron A, hold should complete normally
Check in the item to mark hold as waiting for patron C
Check out the item to patron D -> reserve for patron D should be removed.
Check in the item to mark hold as waiting for patron C
Check out the item to patron C, hold should complete normally
Check in the item -> there should be no more reserves.
We also tested:
Created 4 holds on a bib with two items, for patrons A, B, C, and D
All worked as expected.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Replaces call to GetMemberDetails with a call to GetMember. Much more efficient,
and since only branchcode is used, no required data is lost.
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
CanBookBeReserved uses the very heavy-weight function GetItemsInfo to simply retrieve
the itemnumbers attached to a given biblio. The function get_itemnumbers_of() is much
lighter-weight and returns the required information; switching to it will reduce the overall
system resource cost of placing a hold.
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
C4::Search is not used, so removing it from C4::Reserves
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Display links to parent biblios, show linked items in holdings, allow holds on
linked items. This uses MARC to maintain relationships.
Sponsored by the Mississippi Department of Archives and History and RapidRadio
Solution. Originally developed by Savitra Sirohi and Amit Gupta at OSSLabs, with
UNIMARC support added by Zeno Tajoli. Commits squashed and merge conflicts
resolved by Chris Cormack from Catalyst. Respect for NORMARC and some small
framework portability fixes made by Jared Camins-Esakov of C & P Bibliography
Services.
IMPORTANT NOTE: A bug in the 773 coding for MARC21 was corrected from the
original OSS Labs code. The 773s generated by the pre-release code did not have
the first indicator set to '0', which means that they were not supposed to
display. Going forward, the first indicator will be set correctly, but existing
records created with this code will no longer appear (they appeared before only
due to another bug). To correct this, you could globally (or, to make sure you
only modify records created with the Analytics tool, for records with 773$0)
change the first indicator of the 773 from blank to '0'.
== Background ==
An analytic record for an item is a more detailed, monographic biblio for an
item attached to a serial record . This is often used for special issues of a
journal that are released as books on their own (assigned an ISBN, as well as an
ISSN/volume/issue). It is important for researchers to be able to search for
these items both as issues of the serial, and as monographs. It is equally
important for the library to not have duplicate item records for the item in
question to have to keep synchronized.
== Establishing relationships ==
Analytical records are connected to items belonging to parent or host
bibliographic records. This can be accomplished by:
* From an analytical bibliographic record linking to an host item by providing
the item barcode as input
* From a host item by using option "analyze", this creates a new empty
bibliographic record with field 773 (MARC21) populated
* Running a new CLI script that establishes a relationship between the
analytical record and the host item identified by the barcode in the
analytical record's 773$o (MARC21)
== Connecting Records ==
The relationships are maintained in the MARC records, we have not used database
tables at all.
== MARC Representation ==
In MARC21/NORMARC we have used:
* 773$9 to store the Koha item number of the host item
* 773$0 to store the Koha biblio number of the host bibliographic record
The above fields are used to display the relationships in various screens in the
OPAC and the staff interface. Additionally, when populating field 773 with host
item's details, we have used following MARC 21 mapping:
* 'a' <= 100/110/111 $a (author main)
* 'b' <= 250$a (edition)
* 'd' <= 260$a, 260$b, 260$c (place, publisher, year)
* 'o' <= barcode
* 't' <= 245$a (title)
* 'w' <= (003)001 --> if no 001 is available, we can populate biblionumber
* 'x' <= 022$a (issn)
* 'z' <= 020$a (isbn)
In UNIMARC, this code uses:
* 461$9 to store the Koha item number of the host item
* 461$0 to store the Koha biblio number of the host bibliographic record
When populating field 461 in UNIMARC, the following mapping is used:
* 't' <= 200$a (title)
== Treatment of Holds ==
A key requirement was to allow holds to be placed on host items from the
analytical record. We have accomplished this by allowing holds on specific
copies only. Biblio level holds are not allowed. This ensures that holds are
placed on specific items that are relevant to the analytical record.
== Deleting host items with linked analytical records ==
As we have not used database tables to maintain relationships, we had to use
search to find out if any linked analytical records are present. If 1 or more
analytical are present, we do not allow deletion of items. This is similar to
what we see when we try to delete authority records.
== Importing analytical records ==
Analytical records can be imported using bulkmarcimport or the GUI tools. The
new CLI script can be executed after the import to establish relationships with
host items. The script will establish relationships using the host item's
barcode, the barcode must be present in 773$o of the analytical record.
== What if there are two or more copies of the host item? ==
The current design will require that there be two host (773) fields, one for
each copy.
== What if there is no barcode available for the host item? ==
It is still possible to establish a relationship, by populating 773$9 with the
host's item number. However the CLI script uses barcode in 773$o to establish
relationships so it won't work where barcodes are unavailable. Also from an
analytical record, it is possible to establish a relationship to a host item by
providing the barcode as input, this option will not be available as well.
Commits that added the following features were squashed by Chris Cormack (this
is not a list of every commit):
* Display links to host records from biblio detail screens
* Support for UNIMARC, respecting the system preference 'marcflavor'
* Support holds from the OPAC
* Ability to link to items belong to host records from a analytical record
* Display items belonging to host records in the moredetail page
* Ability to edit items belonging to host records, also ability to delink from
them
* Move get host items code into a C4 routine, also calling the new routine in
related perl scripts
* Move host field population to a C4 routine, all changes in pl files to call
new routine
* Allow only specific copy holds for analytical records plus changes to use new
C4 routines
* Support for holds on items linked via host records
* Storing bibnumber and itemnumber in subfields 0 and 9, plus other mapping
changes
* New command line script that establishes relationships between analytical
records and host items and bibs. The script looks for host field (MARC21 773)
in records, and based on barcode in subfield 'o' populates host bibnumber in
subfield '0' and host itemnumber in subfield '9'. The script can be run after
an import of analytical records, it can also be run in the crontab to maintain
the relationships
* Ability to create analytical records from items, to view linked analytics, and
prevent deletion of items that have linked analytics
* New template for catalogue/detail.pl (NOTE: not a new template file, just a
new way of displaying analytics), template displays linked analytics and
allows creation of analytical records
* New zebra index for item number in host fields. This index will be used to
display links to analytical records from host records
* Display title of host record instead of the phrase host record
* Using detail.tmpl for analytics tab instead of a new template file
* Improved qualification info prepration in Prephostmarcfield
* Check for linked analytics before deleting item
* Display link to host record and more meaningful anchor text for edit item link
* Analytical record: Unimarc index in record.abs and help in
create_analytical_rel.pl
* Adding a sys pref that controls display of options to create analytical
relationships
* Add host entry in XSLT stylesheet in staff item detail
* Added host record support to OPAC detail XSLT
* Adding 773$0 and 773$9 to all frameworks
* Adding 773 subfields 0 and 9 to default marc framework via updatedatabase.pl
* Display create analytics and used in links in catalog detail
* Fixed problem where analytical records not showing in OPAC search results
because GetMarcBiblio now needs a flag to add item records
* Fixed problem where analytics count was set to 1 for all records, not just
those with analytics
* Fixed catalogue detail page not to show analytics counts if count is 0
Conflicts:
installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl
koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/cataloguing/addbiblio.tt
kohaversion.pl
Co-author: Savitra Sirohi <savitra.sirohi@osslabs.biz>
Co-author: Zeno Tajoli <tajoli@cilea.it>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Holds are now shifted and reordered by date placed.
Holds already marked waiting, or in transit are not reordered.
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
With item level itypes activated only the item for which holds were
allowed in circulation rules triggered the hold notice on checkin.
Also checked that biblio level itype still trigered correctly.
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
The subroutine for sending HOLD and HOLD_PRINT notices only checked the
"email" field of the borrowers table and didn't check the value of the
AutoEmailPrimaryAddress preference. With this patch, "Hold filled"
notices can now be sent using the other email addresses of the member.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5867
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
When the message name was updated from "Hold Filled" to "Hold_Filled" for T::T compatibility,
the line in _koha_notify_reserve that looked up the letter code by the message name no longer
matched, so none of the messages were sent. This patch just replaces the space with an underscore
to get the names aligned properly.
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <ian.walls@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
In Liz's second comment on this bug, she points out that local-only
holds (and also no-holds) items are being used to fill the first hold
in the queue, no matter where located, transitting if necessary. If
all the items on a biblio are set to no-holds types, this problem
would never arise, as no holds could be *placed*. But if you have
one or more unlimitedor local-hold items, then holds are getting
filled by the first item to cross a scanner, no matter what.
This patch will check during C4::Reserves::CheckReserves to make sure
that the hold being handed back to AddReturn is actually fillable by
the item just scanned. One caveat: If CircControl is set to "the library
you are logged in at", this will cause items checked in at
other-than-their-home-library to fill local holds at the library where
scanned. This is, however, an edge case!
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <lrea@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
This patch improves the phrasing of several messages by
breaking the message variable into distinct parts for more
natural-sounding warnings when:
- Checking out an item on hold for another patron
- Checking out an item which is waiting for another patron
- Checking out an item which is checked out to another patron
- Checking out an item which is checked out to this patron
- Checking out to a patron who has too many checked out
I would appreciate special attention to my changes to the
TooMany function in Circulation.pm to make sure I handled
it correctly.
Signed-off-by: Nicole Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
The function was too complex for so simple stuff, not we check if one of all items of the record can be issued.
[Note by Galen Charlton: not only does this patch simplify the routine,
it also makes it behave correctly.]
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
This patch defines a new values of reserves.found, 'T', to indicate that
an item has been allocated to fill a hold request and is currently
in transit from one branch to another. This explicit value is meant
to filter out hold requests from processing by holds queue batch
job.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
This add a function to check the reserve status, and add a check in IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() to allow request on items that are waiting
Conflicts solved:
C4/Reserves.pm
Signed-off-by: Henri-Damien LAURENT <henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Fixes bug reported by Colin Campbell where reserves.expiratedate
was defaulting to '0000-00-00' instead of NULL.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
This patch add information to hold transfer slip:
* itemcallnumber
* location
* waiting date
Signed-off-by: Henri-Damien LAURENT <henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
This is done by saving the notices in the message_queue table with
type 'print'. The notices are generated from a notice named
HOLD_PRINT. At the end of the day, they are dumped to an HTML file and
marked as sent by a new cronjob.
This setup is intended to be temporary; modules/batch/ shouldn't be around
forever.
Mandatory SQL:
INSERT INTO message_transport_types (message_transport_type) values ('print');
[cherry-picked from 3.0.x]
This add a new letter in database, and each time a new hold is placed, a new mail is enqueued.
Signed-off-by: Henri-Damien LAURENT <henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com>
* export C4::Reserves::CancelExpiredReserves
* rename misc/cronjobs/cancel_expired_reserves.pl
to misc/cronjobs/holds/cancel_expired_holds.pl
* added cancel_expired_holds.pl to example crontab
* fix staff crash if AllowHoldDateInFuture is on
* expirationdate is now nullable instead of relying
on 0000-00-00
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
This is a much improved re-implementation of the reserves updates from dev_week.
Less new code has been added, and more existing functions are used instead of adding new ones.
The 'Lock Hold' function has been removed due to it not working as intended.
[RM note for documentation: this adds the following features:
* ability to specify an expiration date for a hold request
when placing it via the staff interface or OPAC
* daily batch job to cancel expired holds
* nice interface to change the priority of hold
requests for a bib in the staff interface]
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
This update the way Member is added and editing so that import and Edition
could be best automatized
GetMember evolves and allow ppl to serach on a hash of data
Adding SQLHelper A new package to deal with INSERT UPDATE and SELECT
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Adding finedays and reservesallowed and renewalsallowed management in smart rules
Adding Clone Rules
Adding CanBookBeReserved and CanItemBeReserved in C4::Reserves
Manage Reservesallowed in opac and staff interface
Manage renewalsallowed in C4/Circulation.pm
Update Database follow
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Allows temporary locations corresponding to 'in processing' and 'shelving'
so that newly-created items, and newly-returned items do not show
immediately as a available. Three new system preferences govern the usage
of these features.
NewItemsDefaultLocation. If system pref NewItemsDefaultLocation is set to a location code,
all newly catalogued items will be set to the location set in this preference.
Location code must be a valid LOC authorized value type.
InProcessingToShelvingCart. if the system pref InProcessingToShelvingCart is turned on,
any items run through returns.pl with a location code for 'PROC', will be modified to
have a new location code of 'CART'.
ReturnToShelvingCart. If the syspref ReturnToShelvingCart is turned on,
all items returned other than confirmed holds will have a new location code of 'CART'.
Any item issued is automatically taken of the shelving cart.
Adds a cron script shelf_to_cart.pl which should be run hourly.
Updates all items with a location of CART to the item's permanent location.
The original location code is stored in the new items column 'permanent_location'.
Original Author: PTFS Contractor <dbavousett@ptfs.com>
This work co-sponsored by
Middletown Township Public Library, Middletown, NJ USA and
East Brunswick Public Library, East Brunswick, NJ USA
Signed-off-by: Colin Campbell <colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
This adds to the interface and code the ability to set the reserve date when
requesting a hold.
Resubmit. Sorry, I formatted it from the wrong branch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Only one argument is needed, as the name suggests.
Also removed unused package variable, added comments.
Fix POD for GetReservesFromBiblionumber
Only one argument is needed, as the name suggests.
Also removed unused package variable, added comments.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
Mostly formatting SELECT statement for readability. Also updated POD
and added a comment. This command:
git diff -w C4/Reserves.pm
shows only the POD and comment chnages.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
Send a hold filled notification only when the item
is (assumed) to enter the hold shelf, i.e., when
the request status (reserves.found) is set to 'W'.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sweeney <daniel.sweeney@liblime.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
Change to GetReservesFromBiblionumber() had effect
of causing all requests of constrainttype other
than 'o' to not be included in result.
while ($foo) {
$bar or next;
# do stuff
# do other stuff
}
is not equivalent to
while ($foo) {
if ($bar) {
# do stuff
}
# do other stuff
}
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
This patch check that an item is not "Waiting" before do something in GetOtherReserves(because is the item is waiting, we don't need to do something).
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
This patch was not fully tested because the actual behavior intended
by constraints 'o' and 'e' was apparently never implemented here.
But it had no chance of success as with:
my $sth = $dbh->prepare("");
This uses the inteneded query, removes unneeded $sth->finish calls and
fixes *some* redeclaration of my $variables in the same scope, as
would be needed to run under warnings pragma.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
This adds holds policy creation support to smart rules and read support to
C4/Circulation.pm, and the two reservation pages. It also adds a system
preference, AllowHoldPolicyOverride, to control whether the staff can override
these policies.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sweeney <daniel.sweeney@liblime.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
This adds notification code to Reserves.pm to send notifications through email
or SMS to patrons when their hold is filled. It does not send the letter
directly, but instead uses EnqueueLetter. Also, it relies on
EnhancedPatronMessaging being on and the hold notification being turned on for
the specific patron through the 'Messaging' tab.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
_Findgroupreserve, which identifies which hold request an
item should fill, is modified to check to see if
that item is targeted to fill a specific hold request.
It first checks for a targeted match with an item-level hold request,
then a targeted match with a title-level request. If no
such targeted match exists, it then checks for the top entries
in the holds queue.
The hold targeting map (i.e., the hold_fill_targets table) is
populated by the build_holds_queue.pl batch job. If that
job is not used, the behavior of _Findgroupreserve
is not changed.
This patch also
* adjusts ModReserveMinusPriority so that it calls
_FixPriority().
* adjusts circ/returns.pl so that it
correctly detects transfers.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
* Changed C4::Reserves::ModReserve so that if using it to take an
item off the hold shelf, reserves.waitingdate is cleared.
* Improved POD.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <galen.charlton@liblime.com>
When returning an item that has an item-level hold on it,
CheckReserves() will not consider it waiting unless the
priority has been set to 0 (i.e., the item has specifically
been marked as filling the request.)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
If an item is not for loan (i.e., items.notforloan is not null),
do not use it to fill a title-level hold request when
item is checked in. Prior to this patch, a notforloan item
could fill a request - CheckReserves() was checking only
the item's item type's not for loan flag.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
Fixed rules for determining whether an item is
available for an item-level hold request. Create a
new function in C4::Reserves, IsAvailableForItemRequest(),
that checks whether an item is potentially available for
an item-level hold request.
An item is considered available if:
* it is not lost AND,
* it is not marked not for loan AND,
* it is not withdrawn AND,
* it is not damaged (unless the AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems syspref is ON), AND
* it is not on loan (unless the AllowOnShelfHolds syspref is ON)
Preventing a hold request on withdrawn items is bug 1739, as is
the new preference on whether to allow holds on damaged items.
Removing the condition that an item cannot be requested if
it has already been requested by another patron is the topic of bug 1710.
Note that this patch does not change the behavior where if
independent branches is on and the canreservefromotherbranches
syspref is off, a staff operator is prevented from placing
an item-level hold request on an item from a different branch.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
C4::Reserves::_Findgroupreserves(), instead of
getting all requests for a bib, now gets only the
requests that are title-level (itemnumber is null)
or for that specific item. This prevents an item
from filling an item-level hold for a different item
attached to the same bib, which is the expected
behavior for item-level holds.
[LL Bug 22]
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
The new tables have the same structure and constraints
as the tables they archive with the following exceptions:
* borrowernumber and biblionumber in old_reserves can be
NULL
* the FK constraints (e.g., for itemnumber) on old_reserves
set the child column to NULL if the parent row is deleted
instead of deleting the child row.
* there is no FK constraint on old_issues.branchcode, allowing
a branch to be deleted without changing archived requests.
Some miscellaneous cleanup was done as part of this patch:
* GetMemberIssuesAndFines (C4::Members) now uses bind variables
* fixed POD for GetMemberIssuesAndFines
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
