Caused by bug 28158, the batch item modifications tool does not longer
display the table with the items that have been modified on the result screen.
There is no more fork and so no more completedJobID var.
We must process the items THEN build the items' info.
Test plan:
Use the batch item modification tools to modify some items.
Confirm that with this patch the table with the modified items is
displayed on the last screen.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Undefined subroutine &CGI::Compile::ROOT::kohadevbox_koha_tools_batchMod_2epl::haspermission called at /kohadevbox/koha/tools/batchMod.pl line 89
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We are using Koha::Logger when it makes sense to keep the info,
otherwise we simply remove it
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 28572: Replace missing occurrence in misc/admin/koha-preferences
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We used to display a list of items that cannot be deleted (checked out
or on hold) on the Batch item deletion tool.
With bug 8132 we improve the error handling, but the info is spread in
the table.
This patch adds, at the top of the page, the list of items (barcode)
that cannot be removed.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
== Test plan ==
1 - In the default framework make sure the 952$1 is visible in opac & catalog & editor
2 - Set WhenLostChargeReplacementFee to charge
3 - Set MarkLostitemsAsReturned to return from batch modification
4 - Find/edit an item with a replacement cost
5 - Check out the item to a patron
6 - Batch modify the item
7 - Set the lost status
8 - Item is not returned or charged
9 - with the patch, it is
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch is the result of making the same changes we did on the
t/db_dependent/AuthorisedValues.t file (replacing the calls to
Koha::AuthorisedValues->search with the tricky branchcode param, and
call ->search_with_library_limits, with the library_id as a third
parameter.
What I did was:
$ git grep 'Koha::AuthorisedValues\->search'
and then revisited each of the grep results to check if they added the
'branchcode' parameter to the filters.
This patch changes the calls to ->search, for
->search_with_library_limits in all the places that require it in the
current codebase [1].
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Charges/Sales.t \
t/db_dependent/Ill*
3. Verify the batchmod.pl script is working and filtering the authorised
values keeps working
[1] Some places like the Koha/Template/Plugin/AuthorisedValues.pm plugin
don't seem to be tested, at first glance.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In the code we prepare items for display if less than or equal to the pref, but we don't allow
the edit if greater than or equal to the pref. The second case should be only 'greater than'
To test:
1- Set MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod to 1000
2- Go to Reports
3- Make a report for itemnumbers that will give you at least 1000 items (ex. SELECT itemnumber FROM items)
4- Save and run the report
5- In "Rows per page", choose 1000
6- Click on "Batch operations with 1000 visible records" > Batch item modification
7- Notice that the item modification form isn't there and that the message says "Too many items (1000): You are not allowed to edit more than 1000 items in a batch."
8- Apply patch
9- Restart all the things
10- Run the report again and display 1000 rows
11- Click on "Batch operations with 1000 visible records" > Batch item modification
12 - Sucess!
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It looks like the field was intentionally removed from the list
of batch editable fields in the past. This makes sense as we
used to have a unique index on it at some point - but we do have
no more.
This removes the exception so that the invendory number behaves
like the other fields on the batch item edit form.
To test:
- Create some items with and without stocknumber
- Go to tools > batch item modification
- Enter the barcodes of your selected items in the list or
upload a file with them
- Verify that the stocknumber/inventory number is not showing
in the item edit form below
- Apply patch
- Reload the page - inventory number is there now
- Batch edit the inventory number and verify it works as expected
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
em is better for accessibility
We should set the field to 0 when it was previously unset
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
JD amended patch: remove unecessary indentation changes
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the ability to exclude patrons (by category) from local
holds, and items, by editing the item itself or by batch item
modification tool.
To test:
1. apply patches
2. updatedatabase
3. Enable LocalHoldsPriority preference, and leave
LocalHoldsPriorityPatronControl in pickup library, and
LocalHoldsPriorityItemControl in holding library.
4. Search for a biblio with one item.
5. Place a hold with a patron (patron1) and set pickup location to a different
library of the item's home library
6. Place another hold with another patron (patron2) and set pickup location to be
the same as the item's home library
7. ./misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holds_queue.pl
8. Go to circulation -> holds queue
9. Search by the item's home library
CHECK => only the hold for patron2 (with the pickup location the same as the
item's home library) appears in the table
10. Go back to the biblio details page and click on "Items" tab
CHECK => There is a new section in the item's details between "Statuses"
and "History" called "Priority"
11. Set exclude to "Yes" and update
12. repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => only the hold for patron1 now appears, even the other hold had local
hold priority
13. Repeat step 10 and 11 but this time set exclude to "No"
14. repeat steps 7 to 9
CHECK => the hold for patron2 is back
15. Edit patron2's category and set exclude from local holds priority to
"Yes"
16. Repeat steps 7 to 9
SUCCESS => the hold for patron1 is back
17. Go to tools -> Batch item modification and in barcode list place
several (existing) barcodes and press continue
CHECK => There is a new section in the bottom called "Priority"
18. Set exclude to "Yes" and save
SUCCESS => all items in the list now have exclude setted to "Yes"
19. Try to checkout the first item to a patron3
SUCCESS => Alert message appears saying that patron1 has a hold on that
item
20. Click on Yes and then checkin that item
SUCCESS => There is a modal window saying that a hold was found for
patron1
21. prove t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t t/db_dependent/Holds/LocalHoldsPriority.t
22. Sign off
Sponsored-by: Cooperative Information Network (CIN)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
0 - Perform a search in the staff client
1 - Click a title to go to the details page for a record
2 - Click the 'Edit' button and select 'Edit items in a batch'
3 - Note the searchid is in the url
4 - Make a change and hit 'Save'
5 - Note the 'Return the the record' link at the top, and the button on the bottom include searchid in URL
6 - Click one and note the brwoser is stil there
7 - Click 'Edit' and select 'Delete items in a batch'
8 - Delete one item
9 - Click return to record
10 - Browser is there
11 - Click 'Delete items in a batch again
12 - Select all and check 'Delete records if no items remain'
13 - Delete them
14 - Note you have a link to 'Go back to the results'
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes some new error cases introduced during rebase
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The last_item_for_hold case cannot be guessed (easily), and so we are going to
delete the items in a transaction. If something wrong happened we
rollback and display a list of items that caused the rollback.
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When the list of items is displayed we already know if there will be a
problem during the deletion. So let's disable the checkbox to tell the
user in advance that items cannot be deleted.
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
Go to Home › Tools › Batch item modification
Insert barcodes and continue
=> Without this patch you will get warning in the log
=> With this patch applied you warning does no longer appear
Confirm that the number of holds is correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
- Find/create a bib with at least one item
- From detail.pl, use the checkboxes in the holdings table to select one or more items
- click the "Modify Selected Items" link just above the holdings table to take your item(s) to batch modification
- Change something and click save
- Observe that the Return to the Record link points to a url without a biblionumber: "/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber="
- Apply patch
- Repeat
- The link now works!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Bug 24423: Fix for deletion - cleanup accidental debug inclusiopm
To test:
Repeat prior test plan with 'Delete selected'
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
- go to Tools > Batch item modification,
- select items to modify,
- for one or some text fields, check the second checkbox (Use regular
expression) and type your regex,
- check the regex has been applied.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathilde Formery <mathilde.formery@ville-nimes.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The lines with my @barcodes makes no sense anymore.
Test plan:
Test with a barcode file.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The solution for items does not work, since it compares barcodes.
Instead of a grep in a map, we could do simpler.
Test plan:
Try barcode file, order not by itemnumber. Toggle with case. Add wrong code.
Try same via barcode list text area.
Try an itemnumber file, reorder again. Add wrong number.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
They must be displayed in the same order they have been scanned (or they
appear in the file)
This is an alternative patch. Same behavior for barcodes or itemnumbers,
as well as if a file has been used or items scanned.
Code is duplicated, but refactoring is out of the scope.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If a bibliographic record is deleted after having deleted all their items in a batch,
we should not display a "return to the record" button but "return to cataloguing" instead
Test plan:
1 - Have/make a bib with items
2 - On details page select Edit->Delete items in a batch
3 - Select all items and check "Delete record if no items remain"
4 - Delete the things
5 - On confirmation screen you have a count of items/bibs deleted
=> Without the patch there is a 'Return to record' button that leads to nowhere
=> With this patch there is a "Return to cataloging module" button
6 - Repeat using the "Delete selected items" link on top of the items table
=> Without the patch there is a 'Return to where you were' button that leads to nowhere
=> With this patch there is a "Return to cataloging module" button
Note that there is a link AND a button, coming from
commit 928c0af2b6
Bug 15824 - 'Done' button is unclear on batch item modification and deletion
I do not think it makes sense to have both.
Signed-off-by: George Williams <george@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes batchMod.pl and inventory.pl pick the barcode
separators from a new pref BarcodeSeparators (instead of hardcoding
these separators differently).
A few other code locations may be potential candidates for such a change
too.
Test plan:
Test inventory with a few variations of BarcodeSeparators.
Test Batch item modification similarly.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Note: this fixes the bug that is present right now where batch item
modification barcode matching is case sensitive, but if Koha barcodes
ever do become case sensitive, this patch will need to be removed.
To test:
1) Make/use an item with a barcode with letters in it. For testing
purposes, I'll be using an item with the barcode 'abcde'.
2) Go to Tools -> Batch item modification and enter this barcode in the
barcode list text input field, but change the case of one or some
letters. (i.e. enter the barcode in the field as 'abCDE')
3) Click Continue
4) Notice that the next page shows an error 'the following barcodes were
not found', but the item still shows underneath (was correctly fetched from database).
5) Create a text file and put the changed-case barcode in it (i.e. put
the barcode 'abCDE' in the text file)
6) Go back to batch item modification and upload the
text file as a barcode file
7) Notice same error as in Step 4
8) Apply patch and refresh page
9) Run through steps 1 to 6. There should no longer be an error and the
barcodes should be found as expected.
Sponsored-by: South Taranaki District Council
Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Donna Bachowski <donna@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Have a list of barcodes that exist in your catalog
2 - Go to Tools->Batch item modification
3 - Attempt to modify items using the list
4 - Get an error page
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat
7 - Modification should work correctly
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Set MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchMod to some number
2 - Modify less items than that
3 - Note they show
a - Note if over 1000 they show in a simple display
4 - Modify more items
5 - Note they do not show and you see a note
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Get a list of itemnumbers or barcodes
2 - Set MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod to less than this number of items
3 - Attempt to batch edit, you arent allowed
4 - Set MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod to some hugh number like 60000
5 - Try a list of as many items as possible 30000 was good for me (they
should exist in your system)
6 - Try to batch edit, system will timeout on displaying these items
7 - Apply patch, update database
8 - Set MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchMod to 1000 (default)
9 - Try large file again, should not display items, but allow
modification, wait for this to finish
10 - SetMaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod to 1000 and try large file again
11 - Should be prohibited as before
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Note: This is here for information purpose, feel free to test it if you
wan to play with it.
TODO: C4::Reserves::_get_itype is not longer in use
No more GetItem must be returned by:
git grep GetItem|grep -v GetItemsAvailableToFillHoldRequestsForBib|grep
-v GetItemsForInventory|grep -v GetItemsInfo|grep -v
GetItemsLocationInfo|grep -v GetItemsInCollection|grep -v
GetItemCourseReservesInfo|grep -v GetItemnumbersFromOrder|grep -v
GetItemSearchField|grep -v GetItemTypesCategorized|grep -v
GetItemNumbersFromImportBatch|cut -d':' -f1|sort|uniq
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Add a shelving location with code "ZZZZ" and lib "Awake"
2 - Load some items in batch modification
3 - Note shelving location dropdown is wrong
4 - Apply patch
5 - Reload page
6 - Note order is correct
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
In several places we escape quotation marks using
$value =~ s/"/"/g;
All the occurrences are wrong and must be removed.
Most of them are leftover of bug 11638 (Remove HTML from
addbiblio.pl), which removes the construction of html from pl scripts.
The problem has been highlighted by bug 13618, I did not track down why
the issue did not exist before (?)
Test plan:
0/ Use strings with quotation marks, like:
'Fiddle tune history : "bad" tunes'
You can also use other html characters to make the tests more complete,
like 'Fiddle tune history : <"bad" tunes>'
1/ authorities/authorities.pl
a. Edit an authority filling different fields with quotation marks
b. Edit it again
=> The display (inputs' values) is wrong, if you save the escaped quotes
will be inserted
2/ cataloguing/addbiblio.pl
Same editing a bibliographic record
3/ cataloguing/additem.pl
Same editing items
4/ members/memberentry.pl
Edit a patron's record and fill some fields with quotation marks
+ fields borrowernotes and opacnotes
=> The quotes are inserted directly in DB (escape is done before the
insert!)
5/ opac/opac-review.pl
For QA only: $js_ok_review is never used
6/ tools/batchMod.pl
For QA only: $value is always undefined at that point
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Add some items to bathc modification
2 - Note there is no indication fo holds
3 - Apply patch
4 - Reload and note you can see how many holds (or none)
5 - Note you can hide this column with css:
#batchMod-edit .holds_count { display: none; }
6 - Note the column has a tooltip to indicate item vs. record holds
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
batchMod.pl: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: 'koha_kohadev.authorised_values.authorised_val
ue' isn't in GROUP BY [for Statement "SELECT authorised_value, lib FROM authorised_values LEFT JOIN authorised_values_branches ON ( id = av_id ) WHERE category = ? AND ( branchcode = ? OR branchcode IS NULL )
GROUP BY lib ORDER BY lib, lib_opac" with ParamValues: 0='WITHDRAWN', 1="CPL"] at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/tools/batchMod.pl line 396.
We must use Koha::AuthorisedValues->search instead of a raw SQL query.
Test plan:
Edit some items in a batch
Confirm that the dropdown list (AV) are correctly filled
We will lose speed efficiency here, but better to be consistent, then cache AV in Koha::AuthorisedValues
Signed-off-by: Andrew Isherwood <andrew.isherwood@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
I am not sure to understand what's going on here.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
C4::Items::GetItemnumberFromBarcode calls can be replaced with
Koha::Items->find({ barcode => $barcode });
We should make sure the barcode existed in DB and so that ->find
returns an object. Note that most of the time we just wanted to know if
the barcode existed.
The changes are very simple, the only one that need attention is
the one in batchMod.pl. It is basically reusing what we did on
bug 21141.
Test plan:
Use the batch item modification/deletion tools to modify/delete items
from their barcode (using the textarea or a file)
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Batch item/record modification/deletion tools does not open uploaded
files in utf-8
Test plan:
Edit and delete records and items using a file which will contain:
valid and invalid barcodes with and without utf-8 chars (💕)
You should see the warning message:
"The *** 39999000💕001679 does not exist in the database."
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The itemnumber list passed from a file in the batch item
modification/deletion tools is not tested.
Like barcodes we should make sure they refer to a valid items in the DB.
Test plan:
- Create a file with barcodes, itemnumbers and random lines
- Use the batch item modification and deletion tools with this file
You should see a table with a list of invalid barcodes and itemnumbers.
Without this patch you got the following error:
Can't call method "title" on an undefined value at
/home/vagrant/kohaclone/tools/batchMod.pl line 580
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
