This patch adds call-number sorting to the staff client cart. Sortining is enabled
on the 'Items' column which uses a custom sorting routine to sort the callnumbers.
If the sort is ascending, each column will be sorted by the highest ordered
callnumber for that row. Likewise, if the sort is descending the table will be
sorted by the lowest valued callnumber for that row.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds the following items back to the cataloging
toolbar:
- Edit items in batch
- Delete items in a batch
My rationale: the question of the best UI for selecting items for
batch operations is not yet settled. Adding the ability to select
items from the bib details page is indeed useful, but as currently
implemented, it can hide the availability of the batch
edit/deletion operations if no item is yet selected. Although
having both the toolbar items and the links that display when an
item is selected is a bit redundant, for now I think we can live
with that until we get more eyes on the UI.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Filters now shows correctly. No errors
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
This feature is a little controversial as it removes
the batch edit/delete options from the menu and moves them
to the item table, additionally controlled by a system
preference. Maybe later on, we can think about the UI a bit
more, but it works nicely.
Tested with.
- SeparateHoldings and SeparateHoldingsBranch activated/deactivated.
- Search filters.
- None, both, or one of the permissions.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
That's the one I sign.
Comment: At first I don't know where to find links, until
I selected an item.
Works as described. No koha-qa errors.
Solved merge conflict on updatedatabase.pl
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
1/ Remove filter and sort for the checkboxes column.
2/ Enable the pref by default.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch add a column in the items table of catalogue/detail.pl that
contains checkboxes for item selection and a drop-down list of actions
that can be executed for the selection of items.
Currently available actions are:
- Delete selected items: redirect to batch items deletion
- Modify selected items: redirect to batch items modification
Item selection is only enabled if the new syspref
StaffDetailItemSelection is ON.
Actions are not displayed if user doesn't have the right permissions.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Further testing notes on last patch.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Foreign keys should be added as a matter of course for new tables.
Argubably, borrower_debarments.manager_id could also be linked to
borrowers, but this patch does not do that.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If there are more than one restriction, the "remove" links don't display
the JavaScript alert.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This follow-up to Bug 2720 makes some template changes which I think
make the interface a little more consistent and streamlined.
Instead of incorporating the manual entry form into the table it is
broken out and follows standard form structure. This lets the table be
hidden altogether if there are no existing restrictions.
The manual entry form is hidden by default and shown when you click a
link to add a manual restriction.
These changes have been applied to both the include file used for
circulation and patron detail and to the patron entry form template.
To test, add and remove manual restrictions from the circulation page,
the patron detail page, and the patron edit page. All operations should
work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a more extensible and flexible debarments system to Koha. The fields
borrowers.debarred and borrowers.debarredcomment are retained for compatibility and
speed.
This system supports having debarments for multiple reasons. There are currently
three types of debarments:
OVERDUES - Generated by overdue_notices.pl if the notice should debar a patron
SUSPENSION - A punative debarment generated on checkin via an issuing rule
MANUAL - A debarment created manually by a librarian
OVERDUE debarments are cleared automatically when all overdue items have been returned,
if the new system preference AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions is enabled. It is disabled
by default to retain current default functionality.
Whenever a borrowers debarments are modified, the system updates the borrowers debarment
fields with the highest expiration from all the borrowers debarments, and concatenates
the comments from the debarments together.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Verify the borrower_debarments table has been created and
populated with the pre-existing debarments
4) Run t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t
5) Manually debar a patron, with an expiration date
6) Verify the patron cannot be issued to
7) Add another manual debarment with a different expiration date
8) Verify the 'restricted' message lists the date farthest into the future
9) Add another manual debarment with no expiration date
10) Verify the borrower is now debarred indefinitely
11) Delete the indefinite debarment
12) Verify the debarment message lists an expiration date dagain
13) Enable the new system preference AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions
14) Set an overdue notice to debar after 1 day of being overdue
15) Check out an item to a patron and backdate the due date to yesterday
16) Run overdue_notices.pl
17) Verify the OVERDUES debarment was created
18) Return the item
19) Verify the OVERDUES debarment was removed
20) Disable AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions
21) Repeat steps 15 though 18, verify the OVERDUES debarment was *not* removed
22) Add issuing rules so that an overdue item causes a temporary debarment
23) Check out an item to a patron and backdate the due date by a year
24) Return the item
25) Verify the SUSPENSION debarment was added to the patron
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
2 DB fields are not used: aqbudgets.encumb and aqbudgets.expend.
This patch uses these fields in order to show a warning message if the
budget selected for an order has exceeded.
Test plan:
- Create a new active fund with at least 1 of both warning fields
('Warning at (%)' and 'Warning at (amount)').
- Create a new order for a basket with this new fund and a cost >
warning amount defined for the fund (or using %).
- Save and check that a warning message appears
- Retry playing with all combinations of warning fields
Signed-off-by: Koha Team Lyon 3 <koha@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Since the parcel.pl script get *all* pending orders, there is no reason
not to display all of them.
Like that, DataTable manages pagination and sorting correctly (on all
data).
This patch adds filters on the table header (using columnFilter).
Test plan:
Try filters on the left of the screen and filters on the table header.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Angot <tredok.pierre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script.
Searching and sorting the table works correctly.
Larger result sets are a performance problem on this page,
I have filed bug 10595 for that.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Currently, the location facet only shows if you have singlebranch
mode enabled. In other words, you can either see the library branch
or the shelving location.
This patch simply changes the location facet so that it will always
show the shelving location (if one is available), regardless of the
singlebranch system preference.
Test Plan:
BEFORE APPLYING:
0) Disable singlebranch mode if it is on
1) Do an OPAC or Staff Client search for a record that has items with
shelving locations.
2) Note that you can see the library branch facet under Libraries
but no shelving locations.
3) Enable singlebranch mode
4) Repeat your search
5) Note that you can no longer see the library branch facet under
Libraries. However, you can see the shelving location under Location
N.B. If you don't have more than one branch or the search results
are all from one branch, you might not get a library branch facet.
If this is the case, create additional branches and/or change the
branch for items in your search results so that you have multiple
branches to prompt the appearance of a library branch facet.
AFTER APPLYING
1) Do an OPAC or Staff Client search for a record that has items with
shelving locations.
2) Note that you see a facet under Location on the left sidebar,
regardless of there being a singlebranch mode or the number of branches
there are being represented in the search results.
Signed-off-by: Srdjan <srdjan@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Passes koha-qa.pl, works as advertised.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
misc/commit_file.pl now properly displays the number
of replaced and ignored items.
misc/stage_file.pl now has a new command-line switch --item-action:
--item-action action to take if --add-items is specifed;
choices are 'always_add',
'add_only_for_matches', 'add_only_for_new',
'ignore', or 'replace'
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds the ability to overlay by either itemnumber,
or barcode. Itemnumbers take precendence over barcodes, which
allows us to batch update item barcodes with an overlay.
Test Plan:
1) Create a new record with 2 items, make sure to give it a unique ISBN
2) Download the record as MARCXML
3) Edit the MARC XML
a) Delete one of the two items
b) Change the barcode in the barcode field to something unused
4) Transform the xml file into marc with xml2marc
5) Browse to 'Stage MARC records for import'
6) Upload the binary marc file
7) Choose the following options:
Record matching rule: ISBN
Action if matching record found: Ignore incoming record
Action if no match is found: Ignore incoming record
Check for embedded item record data: Yes
How to process items: Replace items if matching bib was found
8) Click 'Stage for import' button
9) Verify a matching record was found, then click 'Manage staged records' link
10) Verify the rules are still set correctly
11) Click 'Import this batch into the catalog'
12) The import should tell you:
1 record was ignored
1 item was replaced
13) View the record details and verify the item's barcode was replaced
with your updated barcode value
14) Download the record as MARCXML
15) Edit the MARC XML
a) Delete one of the two items
b) Delete the itemnumber field for the remaining item
c) Alter the item's callnumber to a new value
16) Repeat steps 4 through 12
17) View the record details and verify the item's callnumber was replace
with your updated callnumber value
Signed-off-by: Henry Bankhead <hbankhead@losgatosca.gov>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
When staging biblios with items attached you previously had only two
options, add or don't add.
This patch adds a third option to replace an item record if a match is
found on itemnumber or barcode, else it adds the item.
Test Plan:
1) Stage a file of biblios with items attached.
2) Import the batch into the catalog.
3) Run the indexer so the matcher will match
4) Modify the item data for at least one bib in the file
5) Re-stage the file with the item matching option set to "Replace
items if matching bib was found"
6) Let the indexer run again
7) You should see updated item information after the overlay
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Henry Bankhead <hbankhead@losgatosca.gov>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
As configuration variables from koha-sites.conf overwrite the ones in the
koha-create script we need to unset them in case we have USE_MEMCACHED="no".
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch makes the koha-create script adjust the koha-conf.xml file
with the proper string substitutions to enable the use of memcached
for the created Koha instance.
It adds three option switches that control this:
--use-memcached (defaults to "no")
--memcached-servers "host1:port1,..." (defaults to '127.0.0.1:11211')
--memcached-prefix "desired_namespace prefix" (defaults to 'koha_')
It respects the current schema configuration schema, where configuration
values are pondered like this:
hardcoded < koha-sites.conf < koha-create option switches
koha-sites.conf is read for USE_MEMCACHED, MEMCACHED_SERVERS and
MEMCACHED_PREFIX.
Note: the docs discourage setting user's own namespace prefix.
Using memcached is off as the default. The relevant configuration
variables will remain empty if the user doesn't pass --use-memcached
to the command. It matches the current behaviour.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Build your own packages and install them on a test server
a) Create a new instance without using the new switches like:
$ koha-create --create-db memctest
- Check that /etc/koha/sites/memctest/koha-conf.xml contains:
* Empty <memcached_servers> tag.
* Empty <memcached_namespace> tag.
b) Play with the possible combination of option switches
(Note that the code defaults to empty and will remain like that if
--use-memcached is not used, so less tests...)
$ koha-create --create-db --use-memcached memctest
$ koha-create --create-db --use-memcached --memcached-servers "anything:xxx" memctest
$ koha-create --create-db --use-memcached --memcached-servers "anything:xxx" --memcached-prefix "something" memctest
$ koha-create --create-db --use-memcached --memcached-prefix "something" memctest
- Check the koha-conf.xml and /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/memctest
file reflect the chosen options.
c) Run
$ koha-create --help
- It should advertise this addition accordingly.
d) Run
$ man koha-create
- Man page for koha-create should provide good information on the new
switches behaviour
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adds 'memcached' to the control.in file so the user is suggested by apt
to install it.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Sheat <robin@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Using the TransportCostMatrix can cause the same issue. Removing the
last ditch use of the first item causes the the subroutine to continue
with the traditional matching, which will respect the hold policies.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
For some reason MapItemsToHoldRequests will, as a last ditch effort,
grab what seems to be an arbitrary available item to fill a hold request,
even if it will violate the circulation rules for holds.
In other words, even if an item matches a "Holds policy by item type"
that says "From home library", a request to transfer that item to
another library will be added to the holds queue!
Test Plan:
1) Create a record with a an item at BranchA of item type BOOK
2) Set the holds policy such that itemtype BOOK for BranchA is set
to "From home library"
3) Place a bib-level hold request for a patron with a pickup at BranchB
4) Run build_holds_queue.pl
5) You should now see a request for that item to be transfered to
BranchB, even though the rules should not allow this.
6) Apply this patch
7) Run build_holds_queue.pl again
8) View the holds queue again, that request should no longer exist
Signed-off-by: Heather Braum <hbraum@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch also corrects an error in the description of
NewSubscription().
Named parameters for this function cannot come soon enough.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
These tests are split in two parts: "db dependent" and "db
independent".
GetNextSeq requires DB only when checking for irregularities.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
