This is a legacy mode that did not really work.
Test plan:
Play with frameworks and sysprefs and confirm the changes
(add/del/update) are taken into account.
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetReservesForBranch simply returns the waiting holds, for a specific
branch of not. This can easily be replaced with a call to
Koha::Holds->waiting
To avoid any regressions, I reuse the exact conditions (priority = 0),
but I do not think it is useful.
Test plan:
Make sure the holds information are correctly displayed on the waiting
holds screen.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It appears that has never worked.
Could someone confirm?
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch drops the notifys table and its related code in C4::Overdues.
A second patch should remove the 2 columns notify_id and notify_level
from the accountlines table.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After feedback from the dev mailing list, it seems appropriate here to
propose making the Default framework authoritative for Koha to MARC
mappings. This implies checking only the Default framework in the
routines:
[1] GetMarcFromKohaField: The parameter frameworkcode is removed. A
follow-up report (19097) will update the calls not adjusted here.
This is safe since the parameter is silently ignored.
[2] GetMarcSubfieldStructureFromKohaField: Framework parameter is removed
and calls are adjusted. Includes acquisitions_stats.pl.
[3] TransformKohaToMarc: The parameter is removed; all calls are verified
or adjusted.
[4] TransformMarcToKoha: The parameter is no longer used and will be
removed in a follow-up report (19097). It always goes to Default now.
[5] TransformMarcToKohaOneField: The parameter is removed and all calls
are adjusted. Including: Breeding, XISBN and MetadataRecord modules.
[6] C4::Koha::IsKohaFieldLinked: This routine was called only once (in
C4::Items::_build_default_values_for_mod_marc. It can be replaced by
calling GetMarcFromKohaField. If there is no kohafield linked, undef
is returned. (Corresponding unit test is removed here.)
[7] C4::Items::ModItemFromMarc: The helper routine
_build_default_values_for_mod_marc does no longer have a framework
parameter. The cache key default_value_for_mod_marc- is no longer
combined with a frameworkcode. Three admin scripts are adjusted
accordingly; some tests will be corrected in the next patch.
Test plan:
See next patch. That patch adjusts all tests involved.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the following changes:
[1] Added POD for CountItemsIssued, GetBiblioItemData
[2] Moved TransformMarcToKohaOneField closer to TransformMarcToKoha (before
sub CountItemsIssued)
[3] Restructured TransformMarcToKoha by extracting individual kohafields via
TransformMarcToKohaOneField. The latter does no longer call the former.
This small optimization avoids traversing the whole MARC record again
and again.
[4] Moved adjusting copyrightdate/publicationyear to separate helper routine
_adjust_pubyear
[5] Removed obsolete sub _get_inverted_marc_field_map.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Biblio/TransformMarcToKoha.t
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Since the interface allows you to connect a kohafield to a MARC
controlfield, this routine should be able to handle that. Unfortunately
it did not.
Test plan:
Change will be tested in Biblio/TransformKohaToMarc.t in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In order to allow multiple Koha to MARC mappings (for one kohafield), we
need to adjust a few key routines in C4/Biblio.pm. This results in a few
changes in dependent modules too.
Note: Multiple mappings also include 'alternating' mappings. Such as the
case of MARC21 260 and 264: only one of both fields will be used. Sub
TransformMarcToKoha will handle that just fine; the opposite transformation
is harder, since we do no longer know which field was the source. In that
case TransformKohaToMarc will fill both fields. We only use that operation
in Koha for items (in Acquisition and Cataloging).
Sub GetMarcSubfieldStructure
This sub used a selectall_hashref, which is fine as long as we have only
one mapping for each kohafield. But as DBI states it: If a row has the same
key as an earlier row then it replaces the earlier row. In other words,
we lose the first mapping if we have two.
This patch uses selectall_arrayref with Slice and rearranges the output so
that the returned hash returns an arrayref of hashrefs for each kohafield.
In order to improve consistency, we add an order clause to the SQL
statement used too.
Sub GetMarcFromKohaField
This sub just returned one tag and subfield, but in case of multiple
mappings we should return them all now.
Note: Many calls still expect just one result and will work just fine:
my ($tag, $sub) = GetMarcFromKohaField(...)
A possible second mapping would be silently ignored. Often the sub is
called for biblionumber or itemnumber. I would not recommend the use of
multiple mappings for such fields btw.
In case the sub is called in scalar context, it will return only the first
tag (instead of the number of tags and subfields).
Sub GetMarcSubfieldStructureFromKohaField
This sub previously returned the hash for one kohafield.
In scalar context it will behave like before: it returns the first hashref
in the arrayref that comes from GetMarcSubfieldStructure.
In list context, it returns an array of all hashrefs (incl. multiple
mappings).
The sub is not used in C4::Ris. Removed the use statement.
Sub TransformKohaToMarc
This sub got a second parameter: frameworkcode.
Historically, Koha more or less assumes kohafields to be defined across all
frameworks (see Koha to MARC mappings). Therefore it falls back to Default
when it is not passed.
When going thru all mappings in building a MARC record, it also supports
multiple mappings. Note that Koha uses this routine in Acquisition and in
Cataloging for items. Normally the MARC record is leading however and the
Koha fields are derivatives for optimization and reporting.
The added third parameter allows for passing a new option no_split => 1.
We use this option in C4::Items::Item2Marc; if two item fields are mapped to
one kohafield but would have different values (which would be very unusual),
these values are glued together. When transforming to MARC again, we do not
want to duplicate the item subfields, but we keep the glued value in both
subfields. This operation only affects items, since we are not doing this
reverse operation for biblio and biblioitem fields.
Sub _get_inverted_marc_field_map
This sub is a helper routine of TransformMarcToKoha, the opposite
transformation. When saving a MARC record, all kohafields are extracted
including multiple mappings.
Suppose that you had both 260c and 264c in your record (which you won't),
than both values get saved initially into copyrightdate like A | B. The
additional code for copyrightdate will extract the first year from this
string.
A small fix in TransformMarcToKoha makes that it only saves a value in a
kohafield if it is defined and not empty. (Same for concatenation.)
Sub TransformMarcToKohaOneField
This sub now just calls TransformMarcToKoha and extracts the requested
field. Note that since we are caching the structure, this does not result
in additional database access and is therefore performance-wise
insignificant. We simplify code and maintenance.
Instead of modifying the passed hashref, it simply returns a value. A call
in C4::Breeding is adjusted accordingly. The routine getKohaField in
Koha::MetadataRecord is redirected to TransformMarcToKohaOneField.
NOTE: The fourth patch restructures/optimizes TransformMarcToKoha[OneField].
Sub get_koha_field_from_marc
This sub can be removed. A call is replaced by TransformMarcToKohaOneField
in C4::XISBN.
Note: The commented lines for sub ModZebrafiles are removed (directly under
TransformMarcToKohaOneField).
Test plan:
For unit tests and interface tests, please see follow-ups.
Run qa tools in order to verify that the modules still compile well.
Read the code changes and verify that they make sense.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 18478 fixed sms via email problems under the assumption that
to_address was either smsalertnumber or blank.
It seems overdues set the to_address to email. This patch changes the
code to enforce that an sms sent with emial driver will use the
smsalertnumebr and provider defined for the borrower, regardless of what
is set in the queue
To test:
1 - Define a messaging prefs for a patron to recieve hold notices via
SMS
2 - Ensure you have defined an SMS message for an overdue letter
3 - Set an SMS alert number for patron
4 - Set the SMS::Send driver to 'Email'
5 - Checkout an item as overdue to trigger notice above
6 - Run overdue_notices.pl
6 - Check the db and note the address is email
7 - run process_message_queue.pl
8 - Check db - address is email followed by service provider
9 - Apply patch
10 - repeat
11 - Message to_address should be populated with smsalertnumber
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch fixes the following errors:
The method reserve_id is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 859.
The method set is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
Can't call method "store" on an undefined value at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
This is caused by
commit ba1f2f93ef
Bug 19058: Move C4::Reserves::GetReserveId to the Koha namespace
We are calling ->reserve_id on a Koha::Holds set.
Test plan:
- Serials -> Find subscription -> "Edit routing list" in the sidebar
- Add 1+ recipients
- Save -> "Save and preview routing slip"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If on-site checkouts are set to unlimited (i.e. NULL/undef), they are
currently blocked.
Test plan:
1/ Set All/All rule with Unlimited/unlimited for normal/onsite checkouts
2/ Will be able to perform onsite checkout
3/ Edit rule to be 15/Unlimited normal/onsite
4/ Will be able to perform onsite checkout
=> Without this patch it was blocked
5/ Set rule to 15/15
6/ Onsite checkouts work again
Signed-off-by: David Bourgault <david.bourgault@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Occurrences of C4::AuthoritiesMarc::SearchAuthorities must be replaced
by search_auth_compat.
You need to define the search index of matching rule with one of the
values defined in %koha_to_index_name (from
Koha::SearchEngine::Elasticsearch::QueryBuilder::build_authorities_query_compat)
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The code in C4::Matches::get_matches is terrible and a bug has been introduced
by bug 12478 because of its way to handle uniqueness.
If search engine is elastic, simple_search_compat returns array ref of MARC::Record,
used as a string for the key of the matches hashref we get things like
"MARC::Record=HASH(0x8f76ab0)".
Yes, terrible...
The file is never staged and we get an internal server error:
stage-marc-import.pl: Can't locate object method "fields" via package "MARC::Record=HASH(0x8f76ab0)" (perhaps you forgot to load "MARC::Record=HASH(0x8f76ab0)"?) at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Biblio.pm line 2691
To recreate the issue:
- Set SearchEngine == Elastic
- Create a matching rule on 999$c (you need to edit the existing one and specify
'Local-number' as search index, not 'local-number')
- Import a file with bibliographic records and use the matching rule you defined.
Test plan:
Import authority and bibliographic records with Zebra and Elastic using a matching rule.
Everything should work correctly.
Note: I found a bug when importing authorities using Elastic, see bug 17255 comment 38.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <bensinober@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended $item->biblio by $biblio.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If in the circ rules matrix you set "On shelf holds allowed" to "If all unavailable",
default hold policy "From home library" is ignored.
Test plan:
- Have a test user from one branch (eg Centerville)
- Set "On shelf holds allowed" to "If all unavailable" for your patron and item
category (or everyone and everything)
- For "Default checkout, hold and return policy", set hold policy to "From home library"
-> make sure there is no "Default holds policy by item type" to override the setting
- Have two items for a record.
1. An item with home branch same as test user (eg Centerville)
-> check this item out to somebody else
2. an item with a different home branch (eg Fairfield)
-> available, not checked out
- Try to place a hold for your test user. Does not work.
- Apply the patch
- Try to place a hold. Should work now.
Followed test plan, worked as intended
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Followed test plan in the intranet and OPAC, worked as intended.
With few assumptions made:
- when the hold works, should be on the item 1 (Centerville)
item 2 is only there to trigger the bug
- the circ rules were identically setup on each branch and in "Standard rules for all libraries"
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset <victor.grousset@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add limit parameter to POD section.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Having the ability to limit the number of messages sent by process_message_queue.pl on a single run would be very useful for controlling home many messages are sent at a given time. This can help prevent too many messages being sent out at once and getting flagged as a spammer.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Generate some number of messages in the message queue
3) Run process_message_queue.pl with the new --limit option,
set limit to a number smaller than the number of pending messages
4) After the script has run, check the database and note that only
a number of pending messages were sent, and that the remaining amount
of pending messages is the original amount less the number specified
as the limit
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Confirm that only NULL or a string are in the location field of the
statistics table. Test with two items, one with shelving location set,
and one without it set.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries wish to track what the current location of items was at the time they were checked out. This will help libraries track which physical locations in the library patrons are more likely to check out a given book from.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Check out an item that has a location set
4) Renew that item
5) View the checkout and renewal in the statistics table,
verify each has the location column populated correctly
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Mimicking what does BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems we can easily add a new
syspref to block return of lost items.
This patch adds BlockReturnOfLostItems, if set to 'Block' a item marked
as lost cannot be checked in.
Test plan:
1/ Set BlockReturnOfLostItems to 'Do not block'
2/ Check an item out to a patron
3/ Edit the item and mark it as lost (*)
4/ Check the item in
=> The item is checked in
5/ Edit the item and remove the lost status
6/ Check the item out again
7/ Edit the item and mark it as lost (*)
8/ Check the item in
=> The item is not checked in
(*) There are 2 ways to mark an item lost:
- From the item list view (/catalogue/moredetail.pl?biblionumber=42)
If you set the lost status from this form, the issue will be returned
Maybe this should be optional (?)
- From the edit items form (/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=42)
It is the form you must use to not mark the issue returned.
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Dominic Pichette <dominic@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
*** WARNING: Verbatim paragraph in NAME section at line 28 in file C4/Templates.pm
Test plan:
Run podchecker on C4::Templates and verify that the warning is resolved.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Similar to the full path test in sub themelanguage, this patch makes a
change in _get_template_file. This allows you to pass a template
outside the modules directory to get_template_and_user. (Note: the sub
badtemplatecheck already blocks bad paths.)
Especially, this would be helpful for plugins using templates. As can be
seen in Templates.pm, a change was made earlier to overwrite the filename
for a plugin in sub gettemplate. This exception can now be removed.
Also note the small change in Koha/Plugin/Base.pm; mbf_path is already
absolute and if we pass a full path, we do not need it. This allows use of
a regular Koha template or a shared template between plugins (as long as
badtemplatecheck allows the path).
What are the side-effects of this change?
[1] We should not pass absolute paths if we mean relative ones.
A follow-up patch deals with one occurrence in the codebase.
No regressions for regular use.
[2] Plugins can call get_template_and_user directly or go via get_template
in Koha/Plugin/Base (absolute paths don't go via mbf_path).
Note: replaced two single quotes in Auth.pm to show template name in test
description.
Test plan:
[1] Open some page on OPAC or staff client to trigger a template.
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Auth.t to verify not allowing some bad templates.
[3] Run t/db_dependent/Templates.t to verify an absolute path.
[4] Run t/db_dependent/Plugins.t to verify using templates in a plugin.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The check is now extended by only allowing templates from the regular
Koha template directories and additional plugin directories as defined
in koha-conf.xml.
Note: In order to prevent an uninitialized warning on $theme from sub
themelanguage for a not-existing file, I added a trivial assignment. Will
get further attention in a follow-up.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Auth.t
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Templates.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The bad template check in get_template_and_user can be removed, since
this check has been added in gettemplate on bug 18010.
The check moves here to a new sub in C4::Templates. And will be extended
in a follow-up.
Removed unused variable $path in gettemplatefile.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Auth.t (get_template_and_user bad calls).
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Templates.t (bad call to gettemplate).
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some SIP services ( such as Comprise ) require that an attempt at
over-paying a patron's account via SIP2 should fail, rather than create
a credit on the account. We should make this a configurable option on a
per-login basis in the SIP2 config file.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Enable the new parameter
disallow_overpayment="1"
for the login to be used in this test.
3) Restart your SIP server
4) Create or find a patron with fines
5) Attempt to send a payment via SIP for more than what the
patron's balance is
6) Note the response indicates a payment failure
7) Attempt to send a payment via SIP for the account balance or
less
8) Note the response indicates the payment has succeeded
9) Verify in Koha that the payment was processed
Signed-off-by: Rhonda Kuiper <kuiper@roundrocktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
($max is the value of the max size of a card number)
- $max not hardcoded anymore in C4::Memeber
- $max now correctly adapts to the field of cardnumber in database
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
testplan
1 - Apply patch
2 - Run updatedatabase.pl
3 - Update dbix scheme
4 - set the value of CardnumberLength to a value between 16 and 32
5 - Check you can enter a propper cardnumber
(modify to 32 instead 20)
+ max value now depends on the database field value to
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The "does not match" condition does not behave as expected.
We want it to process the action if the subfield exists and that the
value does not match a given pattern.
Test plan:
Be creative and write different template actions using the "does not
match" condition.
Using the "Batch record modification" and the "Show MARC" popup, confirm
that the processed record is the one you are expecting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are several ways to mark an item an lost:
- item list view (catalogue/moredetail.pl, "Items" tab)
- cataloguing (cataloguing/additem.pl)
- Batch item modification tools (tools/batchMod.pl)
- The long overdue cronjob (misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl)
So far only the cronjob is configurable, the others mark the item as
returned (does the checkin).
This behaviour should be controlable using a syspref, to let libraries
choose what fit best for them.
Test plan:
Use the 2 options of the pref, mark checked out items as lost using the
different possibilities, and confirm that the behaviours make sense to
you
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes the OPACShowBarcode syspref in favour of the new
columns settings option introduced by bug 16759.
On the upgrade step, it picks the value for OPACShowBarcode and uses it
to populate the columns_settings table.
To test:
- Verify the upgrade process maintains the current behaviour
Regards
Sponsored-by: Dover
Followed test plan and works as expected. Functionality of patch from bug 16759
appears intact too.
Signed-off-by: Dilan Johnpullé <dilan@calyx.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 17898 provides a way of converting reports that use biblioitems.marcxml so that they will use biblio_metadata.metadata instead.
This only works with reports that do not refer to other columns in the biblioitems table. This is a known limitation. It means that we should be able to do a substitution of every occurrence of biblioitems with biblio_metadata, and every occurrence of marcxml with metadata.
Unfortunately, we're not doing a global replace, we're only replacing the first occurrence.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Reports/Guided.t
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=9, 10 wallclock secs ( 0.11 usr 0.01 sys + 2.85 cusr 0.25 csys = 3.22 CPU)
Result: PASS
Signed-off-by: Dominic Pichette <dominic@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Eivin Giske Skaaren <eivin@sysmystic.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The account offsets table should be used to track increments and
decrements of fines via payments and credits, as well as fine accruals.
It should be able to match fees to payments and visa versa, so we can
know which fee was paid by a given payment, and which payments applied
to a given fee.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase
3) Note the table accountoffsets has been renamed to account_offsets
4) Ensure fine generation creates offsets
5) Ensure creating a manual invoice creates an offset
6) Ensure a lost item charge creates an offset
7) Ensure Reverse Payment creates an offset
8) Ensure a payment creates an offset
9) Ensure a payment for multiple fees creates an offset for each
10) Ensure writeoffs create offsets
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This has been raised by failures on t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
(thanks tests!)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To recreate:
1 - Manually add a lost fine to a ptron and include a barcode
2 - Attempt to write off the fine
3 - Internal server error
4 - Checkout an item and mark lost to checkin and fine
5 - Attempt to write off line
6 - Internal server error
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Just replacing a wrong - by a correct + sign in the comment. The code
itself is fine.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>