In the last patches of bug 16735, we completely broke the feature!
The limit is using library_groups.id instead of branches.branchcode.
Test plan:
Create a group of library with the search feature
Search (OPAC and staff interfaces) using this limit
=> Without this patch you will see that the generated search query does
not contain branchcodes
=> With this patch applied you will see the branchcodes
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Since 19995 warnings are displayed in moredetail.pl, we should get rid
of them.
Test plan:
Hit moredetail.pl with different biblionumbers and confirm you do no
longer see warnings in logs.
Make sure values for rentalcharge, item type, ccode and replacementprice
are displayed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Given the confusion regarding this behaviour it sounds better to make it
configurable.
This pref will take 4 different values, 1 per place an item can be
marked as lost.
Test plan:
Mark items as lost and confirm the item is returned or not, depending on
the value of the system preference.
- from the longoverdue cronjob (--mark-returned takes precedence if set)
- from the batch item modification tool
- when cataloguing an item
- from the items tab of the catalog module
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
1. Start a search from intranet
2. See several warnings in logs
3. Apply patch (&& reload starman)
4. Start a new search
5. Confirm that warnings are gone and that the search still works
Signed-off-by: Roch D'Amour <roch.damour@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The ACQ MARC framework is only used for the ‘Item’ block.
This patch add the ability to define biblio fields (!= 995 or 952) to
customize the display of the bibliographic details when ordering.
This new feature is controlled by a new pref:
UseACQFrameworkForBiblioRecords
Test plan:
- Create a new installation to populate the ACQ framework correctly
- Set the pref UseACQFrameworkForBiblioRecords to "Use"
- Create a new order
=> You will see the lib from the ACQ framework
- Add/remove/update biblio subfields in the ACQ framework
- Create a new order
=> You should see the new subfields displayed
Note for QA: I though I would be able to refactor existing code to make
it more flexible, but it is a bit messy and lost a lot of time. I
finally decided to copy/paste the existing code. I simplified it as, I
think, we do not want the plugin, etc. like in the full biblio editor.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The same pattern was used in other files, this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Koha didn't check for a linked authorised value category for
Koha didn't check for a linked authorised value category for
items.materials correctly which led to displaying false information
on the detail page.
To test:
- before applying the patch:
- make sure sample data and configuration is loaded
- edit any item
- write 2 in the $3 materials specificed
- check the details page normal view - it will display 'restocking'
- apply patch
- check display, it should now show "2"
- link 952$3 (MARC21) to ORDER_CANCELLATION_REASON
- check display again, it should now show 'restocking'
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The subroutine GetBiblioItemByBiblioNumber considers that we have a 1-N
relation between biblio and biblioitems, which is wrong (it's 1-1).
So the calls can be replaced with Koha::biblio->biblioitem, it will ease
the read of the code.
Test plan:
1. Use the ILSDI service to display info of a bibliographic record,
biblioitems fields must be displayed
2. Search for items, biblioitems info must be displayed as well in the
result table
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This reverts commit a67fdf3bd4.
I am not sure we already agreed on that: the UI let the ability to
choose different AV category for each frameworks. I think it should be
discussed widely before removing this possibility.
Even if I am pretty sure it is not handle correctly everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - grep get_biblionumber_from_isbn
2 - verify all occurences are not actual calls (except for test)
3 - Apply patch
4 - grep get_biblionumber_from_isbn
5 - Verify it is removed
Signed-off-by: Roch D'Amour <roch.damour@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Actually catalog detail page shows for damaged and lost items the authorized value description if exists.
We must do the same for withdrawn information.
Test plan :
1) Set for items a subfield linked to items.withdrawn and using the authorized value category 'WITHDRAWN'
2) Edit the authorized value category to add value '2' and description 'Eaten by dog'
3) Edit an item to set this withdrawn value
4) Go to staff interface and look at items in record detail page /cgi-bin/koh/catalogue/detail.pl :
=> Without patch you see 'Withdrawn' and with patch you see 'Eaten by dog'
5) Go to OPAc and look at items in record detail page /cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl :
=> Without patch you see 'Withdrawn' and with patch you see 'Eaten by dog'
Signed-off-by: delaye <stephane.delaye@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On this page we do not have the patron object sent to the template,
let's pass it!
Test plan:
Go on the checkout history of a bibliographic record
(catalogue/issuehistory.pl)
You should not see patron's information that are not part of your group
if you
are not allowed to see them.
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Jon McGowan <jon.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is already a HidePatronName syspref to hide patron's information
on bibliographic
record detail pages and the hold list.
Test plan:
With the HidePatronName enabled, make sure the patron's information are
hidden from
the catalogue and hold list pages. If the logged in user is not allowed
to see the
patron's info, no link and no cardnumber will be displayed
With he HidePatronName disabled, make sure the patron's information are
displayed
if the logged in user is allowed to see the patron's info.
Technical note:
This patch improves the existing patron-title.inc include file to
display patron's
information. Using it everywhere patron's details are displayed will
permit to
homogenise the way they are displayed. The file takes now a patron
object (what
should be, in the future, the only way to use it), that way we can call
the new
method on it to know if patron's information can be shown by the logged
in used.
NOTE: I am not sure this syspref makes sense anymore. Should not we
remove it?
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Jon McGowan <jon.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Note your existing search groups have been ported over to the new
__SEARCH_GROUPS__ group if you had any
3) Create the group __SEARCH_GROUPS__ if one does not already exist
4) Add some first level subgroups to this group, add libraries to those groups
5) Search the library group searching in the intranet and opac
6) Note you get the same results as pre-patch
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
- Check that it now says 'use Modern::Perl;' and not 'use strict; use
warnings;' in the following catalogue perl scripts.
MARCdetail.pl
export.pl
image.pl
imageviewer.pl
issuehistory.pl
labeledMARCdetail.pl
moredetail.pl
search.pl
showmarc.pl
updateitem.pl
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
- fixes callnum and sn
- Removes unecessary syspref transmission to the template.
As the template directly reads the syspref
Test plan:
1. Set sysprefs IntranetCatalogSearchPulldown and
IntranetNumbersPreferPhrase to true
2. Go to staff:/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/search.pl
3. "search for" → "call number" and write anything that won't match a
call number in the field
4. Then you should see
«No results match your search for 'callnum,phr: [...]»
5. Go to the staff homepage
6. Click on "Search the catalog"
7. Do the same search as previouly
8. Then you should see
«No results match your search for 'callnum,wrdl: [...]»
This shows that IntranetNumbersPreferPhrase isn't honored
9. Apply this patch
10. Redo the same two searches and see that phr will now be always used.
So IntranetNumbersPreferPhrase is honored
Signed-off-by: Jon Knight <J.P.Knight@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are several ways to mark an item an lost:
- item list view (catalogue/moredetail.pl, "Items" tab)
- cataloguing (cataloguing/additem.pl)
- Batch item modification tools (tools/batchMod.pl)
- The long overdue cronjob (misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl)
So far only the cronjob is configurable, the others mark the item as
returned (does the checkin).
This behaviour should be controlable using a syspref, to let libraries
choose what fit best for them.
Test plan:
Use the 2 options of the pref, mark checked out items as lost using the
different possibilities, and confirm that the behaviours make sense to
you
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The SQL operator LIKE is always used for filters when searching for
items.
If the filter is a select, we should search for an exact match.
That way we avoid problematic search like "%NFIC%" and "%FIC%" (one
includes the other one).
Test plan:
- Make sure you have collection codes 'Fiction' and 'Non-fiction'
- Do an item search
- Filter column 'Collection', select 'Fiction'
- Result: Column contains items from Fiction only
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Have changed
my $last_page = $pages * ( $results_per_page - 1 );
to
my $last_page = ( $pages - 1) * $results_per_page;
which seems to fix the 'last' button offset! (Comment 10)
Will add the box to jump to a page in a separate patch.
Adding the pagination to the top on the staff client will be dealt with
in Bug 18916 as it is slightly out of the scope of this bug.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
See Comment 8.
Test:
When on first page of results, confirm that the 'First' and 'Previous'
buttons do not show. Confirm they come back on the second page and every
page after.
When on last page of results, confirm that the 'Last' and 'Next' buttons
do not show. Confirm they come back on all previous pages.
Check on both staff side and OPAC.
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds first and last page buttons to the pagination at the
bottom of a page of catalog search results.
To test:
1) Apply patch
2) Do a number of searches
3) For each search, ensure that the first and last page buttons work as
expected
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jamison <ldjamison@marywood.edu>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The following warning is generated by ISBDdetail.pl:
my" variable $biblio masks earlier declaration in same scope
at ./catalogue/ISBDdetail.pl line 171.
This patch removes this unnecessary declaration, which removes the
warning.
_TEST PLAN_
After applying patch:
1) Check code compilation with "KOHA_CONF=/path/to/koha-conf.xml perl -c catalogue/ISBDdetail.pl"
2) Note the only message is "./catalogue/ISBDdetail.pl syntax OK"
2) On /cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/ISBDdetail.pl?biblionumber=1,
view the source of the page and verify that the Javascript
contains a holdcount e.g. "var holdcount = 0".
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Navigation on the left (Normal, MARC, etc...) needs biblionumber in
template variables to work.
Test:
1. go to checkout history for any biblio
2. verify that normal, MARC, etc links on the left no longer work
due to missing biblionumber in URL
3. apply patch and test it again
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Change parameters to a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me.
Two calls in migration_tools/22_to_30 still in old style.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There was a bug that meant a very large offset in the search params
will cause the search script to run forever (or long enough to crash
the machine)
To test
1/ Get ready with sudo top so you can kill the thread before it causes
your machine to OOM
2/ Hit a page like yourdomain.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?q=1&offset=-9999999999999999999
3/ Notice the process runs for a long time
4/ Kill the process
5/ Apply the patch
6/ Hit the page again, notice the it loads (offset is set to zero)
7/ Do the same to search in the staff client
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended: changed -2 to 0 in opac-search.pl.
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetMember returned a patron given a borrowernumber, cardnumber or
userid.
All of these 3 attributes are defined as a unique key at the DB level
and so we can use Koha::Patrons->find to replace this subroutine.
Additionaly GetMember set category_type and description.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Remove second Koha::Biblios->find in imageviewer.pl
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
C4::Biblio::GetBiblio can be replaced with Koha Biblio->find
Test plan:
Import batch, view issue history, search for items, see the image of a
bibliographic record, modify and delete records in a batch
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The subroutine C4::Biblio::GetBiblioFromItemNumber was wrong for several
reasons:
- badly named, we can get biblio info from a barcode
- SELECT * from items, biblio and biblioitems
makes things hard to follow and debug, we never know where do come from
the value we display
- sometimes called only for trivial information such as biblionumber,
author or title
This patchset suggests to replace it with calls to:
- Koha::Items->find for item's info
- $item->biblio for biblio's info
- $item->biblio->biblioitem for biblioitem's info
Test plan:
Item's info should correctly be displayed on the following pages:
- circulation history
- transfer book
- checkin
- waiting holds
QA will check the other changes reading the code, it's trivial
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The C4::Koha::getitemtypeinfo subroutine did the almost same job as
GetItemTypes. On top of that it returned the imageurl value processed by
C4::Koha::getitemtypeimagelocation.
This value is only used from the 2 [opac-]shelves.pl scripts. Then it's
better not retrieve it only when we need it.
Test plan:
Play with the different scripts touched by this patch and focus on item
types. The same description as prior to this patch must be displayed.
Note that sometimes it is not the translated description which is
displayed, but that should be fixed on another bug report. Indeed we do
not expect this patch to change any behaviors.
Signed-off-by: Lari Taskula <lari.taskula@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lari Taskula <lari.taskula@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
1. Go to item search (/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/itemsearch.pl)
2. Fill the form with whatever you want
3. Leave the 'Output' option to 'Screen' and click 'Search'
4. Verify that the search still works
5. Click on 'Edit search' and set 'Output' to 'Barcodes file', click 'Search'
6. You should be able to download a 'barcodes.txt' file, open it and compare it
to the previous search results
7. Now click on the 'Export results to barcodes file' button above the results,
you should have the same result as in step 5
8. Verify that the CSV export still works
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The item search was originally designed to work even with JS disabled.
Since bug 15111, the staff interface does not work at all without JS, so some
parts of this code are useless and should be removed
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On the same way of Koha::Biblio->get_holds,
Koha::Biblio->get_holds_placed_before_today and Koha::Patron->get_holds,
this new subroutin will permit to retrieve the holds placed on a
specific item.
Note that at the moment we do not need a Koha::Item->get_holds method:
we do not want to display future holds placed in the future.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Reserve::GetReservesFromBiblionumber took 3 parameters, the
biblionumber, an optional itemnumber and a "all_dates" flag.
If set, the subroutine returned all the holds placed on a given bibliographic
record, even the ones placed in the future. Almost all of the calls had this
flag set, they will be replaced with a call to Koha::Biblio->holds.
But 5 did not have it:
- C4::Biblio::DelBiblio
-tools/batch_delete_records.pl
=> These 2 were wrong, we want to retrieve the holds to cancel them
before deleting the record. We need to get all the holds, even the ones
placed in the future /!\ CHANGE IN THE BEHAVIOR
- acqui/parcel.pl
=> 1 call per item were made to this subroutine. They have been replaced
with only 1 call to the new method Koha::Biblios->holds_placed_before_today
Then we filter on the itemnumbers.
I think this is wrong: we need the number of holds to know if the record
can be deleted, so even if future holds exist, the deletion should not
be possible.
- serials/routing-preview.pl
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords
- C4::SIP::ILS::Item->new
=> Seems ok, we just one to display holds placed before today
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17737 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
C4::Items::GetItemsCount can be replaced with Koha::Biblio->items->count
Test plan:
Create a bibliographic record with items attached
Try to delete the record from a basket (acquisition module), the detail
page and the batch item deletion tool.
=> You should not be able to delete it.
Remove the items and then try again to delete the record
=> Now you must be able to delete it.
Followed test plan, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch create a Koha::Acquisition::Booksellers module and
Koha::Acquisition::Bookseller::Contract[s] modules.
All code in the acquisition module is adapted to use the CRUD methods of
Koha::Object[s].
The former C4 routines are removed.
Test plan:
Since a lot of files are impacted by this patch, try a complete
acquisition workflow and try to catch errors.
Be focused on bookseller and bookseller' contacts data.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Ready for an archaeology course?
C4::Circulation::GetItemIssues is only used once, from
catalogue/issuehistory.pl
This call has been added by
commit 95d6452462
Adding some more information on issuehistory.
which says "Adding itemnumber to issuehistory.pl API so that one could search
for issuehistory of a specific item."
So it added the ability to see the item issue history but did not
provide a way to access it via the interface.
It's ok so far but this subroutine is broken since
commit aa114f5349
Bug 5549 : Only use DateTime for issues table
because of this change:
- my $today = C4::Dates->today('iso');
+ my $today = DateTime->now( time_zome => C4::Context->tz);
I let you catch the typo ;)
And since this commit the subroutine explodes with "The following
parameter was passed in the call to DateTime::from_epoch but was not
listed in the validation options: time_zome"
Since it has never been raised by someone and that the feature is
hidden, I'd recommend to simply remove it.
Note that the "Checked out from" column would have been wrong even if we
fixed all the previous issue.
Test plan:
Just dig into the code and confirm what this commit message tells
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Looks fine for me.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In order to avoid warnings in the logs, $cgi->param should be forced to
scalar context
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Caused by
commit ac5a1bfece
Bug 16154: CGI->multi_param - Manual changes
The change was wrong, we wanted to retrieve a scalar (the string), not
an array.
We want to retrieve a string with the different column' names, not an
array of 1 element.
Test plan:
Launch an item search and play with column sort
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The subroutine C4::Members::GetHideLostItemsPreference can easily be
replaced with Koha::Patron->find(42)->category->hidelostitems
Test plan:
Create 2 patron categories, 1 with "Lost items in staff client" set to
"shown" and another one to "Hidden by default"
Create 2 patrons using them
On the result search page, the detail page of a record, the item list
page and the page to place a hold, make sure the lost items are
shown/hidden as expected
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Ok I am silly, we needed to replace to use the cache mechanism for
search_by_koha_field, not find_by_koha_field...
Let's create another subroutine
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
