The today parameter is properly handled from C4::Letters subroutines, we
do not need to pass it from callers.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch set the lang parameter when C4::Letters::GetPreparedLetter is
called to generate the notice.
Note that we do not need to pass it if want_librarian is set.
TODO: I do not know what to do with TransferSlip
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The variable $item_format is not used and should be removed from this
subroutine.
Moreover it the letter parameter, but it is never sent to this
subroutine. letter_code is expected instead.
Test plan:
No test plan, just read the code and `git grep `
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Two discussions on koha-devel lead to the same conclusion:
biblioitems.marcxml should be moved out this table
- biblio and biblioitems
http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2013-April/039239.html
- biblioitems.marcxml & biblioitems.marc / HUGE performance issue !
http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2016-July/042821.html
There are several goals to do it:
- Performance
As Paul Poulain wrote, a simple query like
SELECT publicationyear, count(publicationyear) FROM biblioitems GROUP BY publicationyear;
takes more than 10min on a DB with more than 1M bibliographic records
but only 3sec (!) on the same DB without the biblioitems.marcxml field
Note that priori to this patch set, the biblioitems.marcxml was not
retrieved systematically, but was, at least, in
C4::Acquisition::GetOrdersByBiblionumber and C4::Acquisition::GetOrders
- Flexibility
Storing the marcxml in a specific table would allow use to store several
kind of metadata (USMARC, MARCXML, MIJ, etc.) and different formats (marcflavour)
- Clean code
It would be a first step toward Koha::MetadataRecord for bibliographic
records (not done in this patch set).
Test plan:
- Update the DBIC Schema
- Add / Edit / Delete / Import / Export bibliographic records
- Add items
- Reindex records using ES
- Confirm that the following scripts still work:
* misc/cronjobs/delete_records_via_leader.pl
* misc/migration_tools/build_oai_sets.pl
- Look at the reading history at the OPAC (opac-readingrecord.pl)
- At the OPAC, click on a tag, you must see the result
Note: Changes in Koha/OAI/Server/ListRecords.pm is planned on bug 15108.
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeno Tajoli <z.tajoli@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Any discussions about biblioitems.marc bring to the same conclusion:
This field is useless and should be removed.
We are storing MARC data into 2 different fields, that does not make
sense.
Test plan:
Add / update / export / import /delete records
should work as before
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Exclude O, F and M when outstanding == 0.
Check if the issue_id points to a FU record.
Note: We only warn now when we see a second FU record with this issue id.
That should be a rare exception. As before, we are just counting it in
our total. Added a FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested fine on overdue. Renewed and backdated for a second fine. The F
and FU can be seen on the Fines tab and are totaled on Check out.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
It appears that somehow the adding of issue_id to accountlines for new
fines was missed! This is incredibly important, otherwise UpdateFine
will always create a new fine!
Test Plan:
1) Create a new overdue checkout
2) Run fines.pl to generate an accountline for it
3) Note it has no issue_id
4) Apply this patch
5) Repeat steps 1 and 2
6) Note it now has an issue_id!
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Overdues.pm line 588 tries to do an $accountline->set with column outstanding
instead of amountoutstanding.
This patch fixes it.
To test:
- Verify that code change is correct.
- Try to trigger a situation where an existing fine is updated
(see comment in line 574 in C4/Overdues.pm)
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
perl -p -i -e 's/^.*set the version for version checking.*\n//' **/*.pm
+ manual adjustements
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Mainly a
perl -p -i -e 's/^.*3.07.00.049.*\n//' **/*.pm
Then some adjustements
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
perl -p -i -e 's/^(use vars .*)\$VERSION\s?(.*)/$1$2/' **/*.pm
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Most part of the code here is unnecessary complex. We should selected
the currency if it is selected, that's all :)
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Right now, fines are updated based on the fine description. There are a
number of areas where this can go wrong ( date or time format changing,
title being modified, etc ). Now that issues has a unique
identifier, we should use that for selection and updating of fines.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Test creating and updating fines via fines.pl
and checking in overdue items. No changes should be noted.
3) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
To Test:
Read perldoc C4/Overdues.pm
Confirm that it says CalcFine returns four values and that rest of the documentation is correct
NOTE: only a little visual ugliness, but definitely an improvement.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds the ability to set the maximum fine for a given item to
its replacement price ( assuming the replacement price is set ). If
overduefinescap is also set, the fine will be the lesser of the two, if
both apply to the given overdue checkout.
To enable this new limit, create or edit your circulation rules and
check the checkbox for "Cap fines at replacement price"
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Pick an item, and set it's replacement price to 3.99
4) Edit the circulation rule that would apply to this item
and the patron you will check it out to.
5) Check out the item to the patron, and backdate the due date
such that the fine generated would be more than 3.99
6) Enable CalculateFinesOnReturn
7) Return the item, and view the fine generated, it should be 3.99
Signed-off-by: Cindy Murdock Ames <cmurdock@ccfls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch is a _requirement_ to Bug #12771, and will be necessary once we start managing more than 3 levels of overdue notice
TEST PLAN
1) Create or improve on overduerules data
.1) Intranet -> tools -> overdue notices
.2) Make sure to have data in first, second and third tabs
.3) Make sure to have checked mixes of Email/Phone/Print/SMS (depending on availability)
.4) Make sure to have different letters and delay on first/second/third tab for at least one category
.5) Remember it all.
2) Apply patch
3) run installer/data/mysql/atomicupdate/update_13624_overduerules_transport_type.pl
4) run t/db_dependant/Overdues.t
5) Validate Overdue Notice page
.1) validate data entered previously is still there
.2) Add some more, save changes, validate
In installer/data/mysql/atomicupdate/update_13624_overduerules_transport_type.pl
- A new column and primary key, 'overduerules_id', is added to the table 'overduerules'
- A new column referencing a foreign key, 'overduerules_id', is added to the table 'overduerules_transport_types'
- The columns 'branchcode' and 'categorytype' are removed from the table 'overduerules_transport_types'
- Data is migrated from the old tables to the new ones
In installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql :
- Table 'overduerules'
- Added a primary key named 'overduerules_id'
- Table 'overduerules_transport_types'
- Added a foreign key named 'overduerules_id'
- Dropped columns 'branchcode', 'categorycode' since we now have them referenced through 'overduerules_id'
In tools/overduerules.pl
- INSERT and DELETE queries on 'overduerules_transport_types' were changed to reflect the new schema
In C4/Overdues.pm :
- The SQL query of the function 'GetOverdueMessageTransportTypes' is changed to take into account the new design of 'overduerules_transport
In t/db_dependent/Overdues.t :
- The INSERT calls before the tests were changed to take into account the new design of 'overduerules' and 'overduerules_transport_types'
Sponsored by : Halland County Library
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Persson <xarragon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch removes C4::Dates from following files in folder C4:
- C4/Members.pm
- C4/Reserves.pm
- C4/Search.pm
- C4/Utils/DataTables.pm
- C4/Utils/DataTables/Members.pm
- C4/VirtualShelves/Page.pm
To test:
-run tests as appropriate,
- have a close look at the code changes
- try to find regressions
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14985
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 14985: (followup) Remove eval if dates come from database
This patch removes some evals from date-formatting where the dates come
from the database.
See comments #7 - #9
Additionaly, C4/VirtualShelves/Page.pm is removed from the patches (obsolete).
Bug 14985: (followup) Remove C4::Dates from C4/Overdues.pm
Ths patch removes a stray C4::Dates from C4/Overdues.pm
- To test got to a patron who has overdues
(Home > Circulation > Checkouts > [Patron])
- Print overdues
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Some librarians would like to be able to print an overdues slip from the
staff intranet. This slip would be defined as the print transport
version of the ODUE slip.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Locate a patron with overdues
3) Define a print version of the OVERDUES_SLIP slip
4) Try Print > Print overdues
Signed-off-by: Amy Purvis <APurvis@galencollege.edu>
Signed-off-by: Laurie McKee <lmckee@littleelm.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Right now, Koha only charges fines at the end of a given charge period.
For example, let us assume a circulation rule has a charge period of one
week ( 7 days ) and a fine of $5. This means that an item can be overdue
for 6 days without accruing a fine. Koha should allow circulation rules
to be configured to place the charge at the start of the end of the
charge period so the library can decide when the fine should accrue.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation_Issuingrule.t
4) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
5) prove t/db_dependent/Fines.t
6) Ensure you can still create/edit circulation rules
Edit: I removed the DBIx changes after a couple minutes fighting with them.
Will regenerate as usual in a RM followup / Tomas
Signed-off-by: Daniel Grobani <dgrobani@samuelmerritt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch make _debar_user_on_return respect the finesCalendar syspref.
It does so, by replacing the ad-hoc overdue days calculation in favor of
C4::Overdues::_get_chargeable_units (which is renamed C4::Overdues::get_chargeable_units
and exported). There's no behaviour change besides making the calculation simpler
and correct.
To test:
- Set finesCalendar = "directly"
- Have a circulation rule stating:
interval for calculating fines = 1
suspension days = 3
- Have the calendar set for sunday and saturday as holidays.
- Checkout an item with a branch/itype/borrower category that matches the defined circ rule with a hand-writen due date to (say) last friday.
- Check the item in
=> FAIL: Notice that the user is debarred using the calendar (skipping saturday and sunday).
- Apply the patch
- Repeat the previous steps
=> SUCCESS: calculation is correct (counting saturday and sunday as overdue days, i.e. 'directly').
- Set finesCalendar = "calendar"
- Repeat the test
=> SUCCESS: calculation is correct (skipping holidays).
- Sign off.
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Due to the way AddReturn and UpdateFine work, if you pass in a return
date to AddReturn, and that item has a calculated fine of 0, Koha will
insert the 0 amount fine into accountlines.
This is good behavior when we want to update an existing fine, but bad
behavior if there was no fine to begin with!
Test Plan:
1) Apply the unit test patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3) Note the test fails
4) Apply this patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
6) Note the test passes
Signed-off-by: Jen DeMuth <jdemuth@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Confirmed the problem in the staff interface and that the patch
fixes it. Also tested that fines still get calculated.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
An item can be marked as lost by longoverdue.pl, but left checked out to
the patron. In this case, the item will continue to accrue fines.
Test Plan:
1) Check out an item and back date it so it is overdue and should
generate fines.
2) Mark the item as lost by either using longoverdue.pl, or just
by setting itemlost to 1 by directly accessing the database
3) Run fines.pl
4) Note the overdue generated a fine
5) Repeat steps 1-2
6) Apply this patch
7) Run fines.pl
8) Note a fine was not generated
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test plan (see Bug 6858 for using staticfine.pl) :
For a user (of a given category and library) with several overdues, launch the script :
staticfines.pl --category CAT,AMOUNT --library LIB --delay DELAY
Then, check that the user has been charged of AMOUNT if the due date of the most late item plus the delay is *before* today.
One day later, re-execute the script with the same parameters and check that the fine has not been charged twice.
Without patch, the fine is charged twice, with patch the user already charged is skipped (see output in debug mode)
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Without the patch, the fine will be applied every time the script is run.
With the patch the fine will only be applied once.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Overdues::GetBranchcodesWithOverdueRules routine has a bug.
If a default rule *and* a specific rule exist, only the branchcode for
the specific rule is returned.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Overdues.t
and verify the unit tests are consistent.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When using the backdating of returns feature, an item that is not
overdue is treated as being as many days overdue as it is *not* overdue.
This is due to the fact that _get_chargeable_units appears to return the
difference between the return date and the due date without
consideration the return date being earlier than the due date.
Test Plan:
1) Apply the unit test patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3) Note the failure
4) Apply the second patch
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
6) Note there are no failures
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Fixes some badly named variables also
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
In order to test this, you need to activate SpecifyReturnDate.
I confirmed the problem and verified that the bug fixes it
by running the tests, but also by testing in staff.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This reordering avoids the case where a print notice is sent with an
email or sms template is no email or SMS is defined.
Test plan:
Check print, sms and email for an overdue rule
Don't define an email address and generate an overdue for a user
Define 3 templates for the notice used
Launch the cronjob script and verify the print notice is generated using
the print template.
Signed-off-by: Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The unit tests should insert overdue rules.
+ Fix the doc for GetOverdueMessageTransportTypes
Signed-off-by: Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds:
- a new routine C4::Overdues::GetOverdueMessageTransportTypes.
- the ability to define one or more transport types for an overdue
level.
Test plan:
- go on tools/overduerules.pl.
- verify that previous rules still exist and that the 'email' checkboxes
is checked if a rule is defined.
- redefined rules at different levels and check the transport type
needed. Currently, only email, sms and print are relevant
- Save the changes.
Signed-off-by: Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivilahti@jns.fi>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The report also known as "Overdues with fines"
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
All tests pass, this adds data to the Patron column on the
overdues with fines report to show the patron's cardnumber
and phone number.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
This works as described and passes all tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a more extensible and flexible debarments system to Koha. The fields
borrowers.debarred and borrowers.debarredcomment are retained for compatibility and
speed.
This system supports having debarments for multiple reasons. There are currently
three types of debarments:
OVERDUES - Generated by overdue_notices.pl if the notice should debar a patron
SUSPENSION - A punative debarment generated on checkin via an issuing rule
MANUAL - A debarment created manually by a librarian
OVERDUE debarments are cleared automatically when all overdue items have been returned,
if the new system preference AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions is enabled. It is disabled
by default to retain current default functionality.
Whenever a borrowers debarments are modified, the system updates the borrowers debarment
fields with the highest expiration from all the borrowers debarments, and concatenates
the comments from the debarments together.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Verify the borrower_debarments table has been created and
populated with the pre-existing debarments
4) Run t/db_dependent/Borrower_Debarments.t
5) Manually debar a patron, with an expiration date
6) Verify the patron cannot be issued to
7) Add another manual debarment with a different expiration date
8) Verify the 'restricted' message lists the date farthest into the future
9) Add another manual debarment with no expiration date
10) Verify the borrower is now debarred indefinitely
11) Delete the indefinite debarment
12) Verify the debarment message lists an expiration date dagain
13) Enable the new system preference AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions
14) Set an overdue notice to debar after 1 day of being overdue
15) Check out an item to a patron and backdate the due date to yesterday
16) Run overdue_notices.pl
17) Verify the OVERDUES debarment was created
18) Return the item
19) Verify the OVERDUES debarment was removed
20) Disable AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions
21) Repeat steps 15 though 18, verify the OVERDUES debarment was *not* removed
22) Add issuing rules so that an overdue item causes a temporary debarment
23) Check out an item to a patron and backdate the due date by a year
24) Return the item
25) Verify the SUSPENSION debarment was added to the patron
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Removes the following exported but unused subs from Overdues.pm:
CreateItemAccountLine
UpdateAccountLines
CheckAccountLineLevelInfo
CheckAccountLineItemInfo
CheckExistantNotifyid
GetNextIdNotify
GetNotifyId
ReplacementCost
ReplacementCost2
GetOverdueDelays
GetOverduerules
Test plan:
It is hard to test the removal of something that was not used :) Try this:
Do a recursive grep on these routine names in the Koha codebase.
Compile some scripts that use the Overdues module.
And just to be sure we do not break something:
Go to Circulation: Do a checkout, checkin, place and confirm a hold.
Go to Patrons: Goto Check out. Goto Fines.
Run the command line scripts: fines.pl and overdue_notices.pl.
Go to opac-user.pl.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Moving the warn line below the line that returns if amount<=0.
If amount<=0, a false warn is now raised because of the return after it.
We should only warn here if we do not return.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested with fines.pl on overdue.
Before this patch:
Reducing fine for item 199709 borrower 23 from 44 to -1 - MaxFine reached.
This did not happen however because of the return.
After this change: no false warning.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
If a patron has over time accumulated fines greater than the amount
defined in MaxFine, the patron will never get more fines even if they
have previously paid off those fines.
This bug was introduced by the patch for Bug 7420.
Test Plan:
1) Create a patron
2) Create a fine of 10.00 for that patron
3) Pay off the fine
4) Set MaxFines to 5.00
5) Check out an item to the patron, backdate the due date
so the item should generate fines.
6) Run fines.pl, observe that no fine was created
7) Apply the patch
8) Rerun fines.pl
9) Observe that the fine was created correctly
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Renew an issue for a number of days (filled in the issuing rules).
Test if rules work for any i[item]types and if there is no regression.
- new column issuingrules.renewalperiod
- remove all occurrences of an already removed syspref (globalDueDate)
- remove an unused routine (Overdues::GetIssuingRules)
How it works:
- On existing installations, the issuingrules.renewalperiod =
issuingrules.loanlength. So the behaviour is the same before and after
this patch.
- when you add a rule, you can choose a renewal period (the unit value
is the issuingrules.unit). So you can have a renewal period in hours
or days.
- The default value for the renewal period is 21 days (same as
loanlength)
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Test comments on second patch.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
This patch adds the system preference FinesIncludeGracePeriod which
allows the library the choice to include the grace period when calculating
a fine ( Koha's current behavior ) or to ignore the grace period for
the purposes of fines calculation. It is set by default to preserve the
current behavior.
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Dhondi <srikanth@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Rebased March 8, 2013. Included renaming pref.
Works as advertised. Renamed the bug title and opened a new report for the
original bug.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Replaced existing MaxFine syspref logic with overduefinescap.
Repurposed MaxFine to be the overall overdue limit for all items
overdue. Implemented new MaxFine logic in UpdateFine().
Signed-off-by: Elliott Davis <elliott@bywatersolutions.com>
Tested according to Srdjan's test plan and everything worked like he said it would. I set fined equal to $2 and max fine equal to $1. When I ran the fines script for overdue items fines assessed were only $1.
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
If durations are calculated by subtraction they will use units
larger than those we care about and these are not convertable
to the smaller units we are attempting to enumerate
Use the appropriate delta methods to calculate theee fines
Adds a separate hours_between method to calendar
This should strictly be checking opening hours (of which
closed days are a special case) of the relevant branch
These need adding to branches
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7852
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Walls <koha.sekjal@gmail.com>
QA comment: renamed "days_minus_grace" variable to "units_minus_grace"
Also added POD to _get_chargeable_units
Signed-off-by: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Clone the passed duedate as the addition of days was
corrupting it in calling context causing new account recs
to be written rather than updating the existing
