This patch fixes the following errors:
The method reserve_id is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 859.
The method set is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
Can't call method "store" on an undefined value at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
This is caused by
commit ba1f2f93ef
Bug 19058: Move C4::Reserves::GetReserveId to the Koha namespace
We are calling ->reserve_id on a Koha::Holds set.
Test plan:
- Serials -> Find subscription -> "Edit routing list" in the sidebar
- Add 1+ recipients
- Save -> "Save and preview routing slip"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This script takes parameters:
days - how many days waiting to concal an unfilled hold on or after
library - (repeatable) branches to consider
holidays - whether or not to count holidays (default is no)
This patchset adds two methods and covers them with tests:
Koha::Holds->unfilled(); To return holds where found = undef
Koha::Hold->age( $use_calendar ); To return the number of days since a
hold was placed (including or excluding holidays)
To test:
1 - Place some holds with varying reservedates
2 - Run script with different parameters to verify options are respected
(-v for verbosity will assist here)
3 - verify that script does nothing without days parameter
Sponsored by:
Siskiyou County Library (http://www.siskiyoulibrary.info/)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 16187 - Followup
1 - Correct use of original (bad) script name
2 - Explain options better
3 - Remove change from 'W' to 'w'
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
RM note: Squashed for readability
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Move the existing tests
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new Koha::Hold->cancel method and replaces the calls
to C4::Reserves::CancelReserve with it.
Test plan:
- Add and cancel holds
- Change priority of holds
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetReserveId can easily be replaced with a call to
Koha::Holds->search->next->reserve_id
It will ease next changes to use Koha::Hold objects
Test plan:
Cancel a reserve and print a slip reserve
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This GetReserve subroutine can be replaced with Koha::Holds->find
Test plan:
- git grep GetReserve
must not return results where GetReserve is called
- Cancel a reserve
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This subroutine is only used once and can easily be replaced with
Koha::Patron->holds->count
Test plan:
- Set maxreserves=5
- Place 3 holds for a given patron
- Place again 3 holds for this patron
3+3 > 5 => The holds must not be placed
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This subroutine is only used once and can be replaced with a call to
Koha::Holds->find
It will avoid unnecessary joins.
Test plan:
- Define a HOLD_SLIP template notice using fields from the tables
reserves, branches, borrowers, biblio, biblioitems and items.
- Generate one and make sure the values are correctly filled
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replace the different calls to GetReservesFromBorrowernumber
with a calls to Koha::Patron->get_holds.
In some places we need to get a restricted set of holds, that's why we
process a search on this holds returned by ->get_holds (on the found
status for instance).
The changes are quite trivial and reading the diff should be enough to
catch bugs.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17737,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Tested both patches together, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
This patch makes koha automatically set expiration date when reserves become
waitting. Also it adds a new syspref "ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay" that allows to
take holidays into account while calculating expiration date.
Test plan:
- Install this patch and run updatedatabase.pl script,
- allow ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay in system preferences,
- set ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to 5.
- Place an hold on a checked out item and check in this item:
The hold's expiration date should be today + 5.
- Allow ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay in system preferences,
- add holiday during this pickup delay period,
- Create a new hold and make it comes waitting:
The hold's expiration date should be today + 5 + number of closed
day(s).
Also:
- Check that ExpireReservesOnHolidays syspref works again
without ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay.
- Check that cancel fees apply again if wanted.
Signed-off-by: sonia BOUIS <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On the same way of Koha::Biblio->get_holds,
Koha::Biblio->get_holds_placed_before_today and Koha::Patron->get_holds,
this new subroutin will permit to retrieve the holds placed on a
specific item.
Note that at the moment we do not need a Koha::Item->get_holds method:
we do not want to display future holds placed in the future.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
FAIL t/db_dependent/Holds.t
"my" variable $hold masks earlier declaration in same scope
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Reserve::GetReservesFromBiblionumber took 3 parameters, the
biblionumber, an optional itemnumber and a "all_dates" flag.
If set, the subroutine returned all the holds placed on a given bibliographic
record, even the ones placed in the future. Almost all of the calls had this
flag set, they will be replaced with a call to Koha::Biblio->holds.
But 5 did not have it:
- C4::Biblio::DelBiblio
-tools/batch_delete_records.pl
=> These 2 were wrong, we want to retrieve the holds to cancel them
before deleting the record. We need to get all the holds, even the ones
placed in the future /!\ CHANGE IN THE BEHAVIOR
- acqui/parcel.pl
=> 1 call per item were made to this subroutine. They have been replaced
with only 1 call to the new method Koha::Biblios->holds_placed_before_today
Then we filter on the itemnumbers.
I think this is wrong: we need the number of holds to know if the record
can be deleted, so even if future holds exist, the deletion should not
be possible.
- serials/routing-preview.pl
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords
- C4::SIP::ILS::Item->new
=> Seems ok, we just one to display holds placed before today
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17737 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
* Add tests for CanItemBeReserved returns 'itemAlreadyOnHold' to t/db_dependent/Holds.t
* Don't let GetReserveId explode
* Use search instead of map
* Remove instances of resbarcode
* Fix badly formed li closing tag
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
* Removes tests no longer needed
* Updates rules to work with existing tests
* Fixes code issues revealed by unit tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
$category was a categorycode, to help the readability it's better to
name it $categorycode or assign a Category to $category
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
There is actually no need to use the hardcoded patron category S in
this test.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Holds.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Test passes OK
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Accounts.t: Only added a line that ensures the MPL branch exists.
AnonymiseIssueHistory.t: Only add a branch to work with.
Barcodes.t: Replaced clear with delete_all.
CalcFine.t: Remove default issuing rule and add one instead of updating.
Holds.t: Add category S in case it would not exist.
Members.t: Replaced clear with delete_all.
MoveItemFromBiblio.t: Replace last _fk construction.
Test plan:
Run these tests. (See note).
Git grep for only_fk, {_fk} and TestBuilder::default_value.
Note: Holds.t does not pass. Tests 9 and 39 fail, but they did already.
not ok 9 - GetReservesFromItemnumber should return a valid borrowernumber
not ok 39 - Test AlterPriority(), move to bottom
So this test needs attention, but on another report please :)
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Resolves this:
Failed test 'GetReservesFromItemnumber should return a valid borrowernumber'
at t/db_dependent/Holds.t line 97.
got: '2000001890'
expected: '2000001889'
Failed test 'Test AlterPriority(), move to bottom'
at t/db_dependent/Holds.t line 220.
got: '4'
expected: '5'
Test plan:
Run the test before and after applying this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Unless in t/db_dependent/Context.t where we want to test the cache
behaviors.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes C4::Dates from following files:
- t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
- t/db_dependent/Holds.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha_template_plugin_KohaDates.t
- t/db_dependent/Log.t
- t/db_dependent/NewsChannels.t
To test:
- First run all tests above
- Apply patch
- Then run tests again. The results should be the same.
(Note: I get 2 fails with NewsChannels.t, they are the same with
and without patch).
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
NewsChanell pass for me before patch, no after.
Followup follows :)
Rest of tests pass
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The current tests were expecting the first defined branch to be CPL. That's
not the case on my box so they failed. This patch adds the creation of two
new random branches/branchcodes, and replaces the legacy use of CPL and MPL
in favour of the new ones.
It relies on TestBuilder for the task.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Heather Braum <hbraum@nekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This way ILS-DI HoldItem and HoldTitle services also benefit from this
check
Test plan:
1/ Define some default holds policies by item type in
/admin/smart-rules.pl
2/ Use ILS-DI HoldItem service and check that those rules are respected
3/ Check that staff and opac hold behaviour is unchanged regarding
these rules.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script. No regressions found,
improves the ILS-DI HoldItem response.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There's no point creating a MARC record with undef subfields
for testing holds. This patch avoids that so no warnings are shown.
To test:
- Run
$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
=> FAIL: verify several warnings show
- Apply the patch
- Re-run
=> SUCCESS: no warnings showed.
- Sign off :-D
Regards
NOTE: Not noticable under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, but verifiable under
Debian Wheezy.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There are two unnecessary diag statements:
- Creating biblio instance for testing.
- Creating item instance for testing.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/Holds.t .. 1/38 # Creating biblio instance for testing.
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /home/tcohen/git/koha-community-src/C4/Charset.pm line 181.
# Creating item instance for testing.
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /home/tcohen/git/koha-community-src/C4/Charset.pm line 181.
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /home/tcohen/git/koha-community-src/C4/Charset.pm line 181.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=38, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.13 cusr 0.11 csys = 1.28 CPU)
Result: PASS
-- They are in the first and fourth lines of this sample output
2) apply patch
3) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/Holds.t .. 1/38 Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /home/mtompset/kohaclone/C4/Charset.pm line 186.
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /home/mtompset/kohaclone/C4/Charset.pm line 186.
Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /home/mtompset/kohaclone/C4/Charset.pm line 186.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=38, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.78 cusr 0.09 csys = 0.88 CPU)
Result: PASS
-- They are no longer in the first and fourth lines of this sample output
4) run koha QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
[1] Run prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t. The last test
should fail.
[2] Apply the main patch.
[3] Run step 1 again. This time the tests should all pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script. Also checked
t/db_dependent/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
Tested holds triggering with different settings of
AllowHoldsOnDamagedItems. Works as described.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
The return from GetReservesFromBiblionumber contains an unnecessary
extra variable. In scalar context an array returns its element count.
Maintaining a separate count can lead to unforeseen bugs
and imposes ugly constructions on the subroutine's users.
Remove the useless count variable from the return
This patch also changes the parameters: now the routine takes a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Placed biblio holds, future holds and item holds. Works as expected.
Tested Holds.t and Reserves.t. Pass.
Tested /cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id=999 with two holds on
one item. Fine.
C4/SIP/ILS/Item.pm: Looked for "whatever" and "arrayref" and could not find
them anymore. Looks good.
Handled a few unneeded calls in QA follow-up.
Left only one point to-do for serials/routing-preview.pl. See Bugzilla.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
In various places, deleting a hold request did not trigger recalculating
the priority of the other holds on the bib:
To reproduce the bug:
- select or create 2 users U1 and U2
- select or create an holdable item
- place on hold for both U1 and U2. U1 has priority 1 and U2 has
priority 2.
- delete the hold for U1
- go on circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=XXXX for U2 (or in the DB
directly) and verify the priority has not been set to 1
The issue is repeatable (at least) on these 2 pages:
* circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=XXXX (tab 'Holds', select "yes"
in the dropdown list and submit the form)
* reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=XXXX (click on the red cross)
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Reran my tests:
Preparations:
- Create holds for different patrons on a record:
* 1st - title level hold
* 2nd - item level hold
* 3rd - title level hold
* 4th - title level hold
- AllowOnShelfHolds = On/Allow (items were not checked out)
Tests:
Deleted holds from various pages, confirming bugs first,
then testing with applied patches. Reloading database
after each test.
1) Cancel holds from OPAC patron account
/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl#opac-user-holds
- Cancel 4th - ok, before and after applying the patch
- Cancel 2nd - ok, after applying the patch
2) Cancel hold from holds tab on staff detail page
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=7
a) Setting priority to 'del', submitting with 'Update holds'
- Cancel first (1st) - ok, before and after
- Cancel hold in the middle (was 3rd) - ok, before and after
- Cancel last (was 4th) -ok, before and after
b) Using red X
- Repeating tests from a) - before the patch is applied holds
get totally 'out of order' - after applying the patch, it works
correctly
Additional tests done on this page:
- Change priority using up, down, to top, to bottom icons
- Change priority with 'toggle to lowest'
3) Cancel hold from the patron's account
a) Check out tab - Delete? Yes, 'Cancel marked holds'
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=X
- Cancel first (1st) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel hold in the middle (was 3rd) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel last (was 4th) - ok, after applying the patch
b) Details tab - Delete? yes, 'Cancel marked holds'
/cgi-bin/koha/members/moremember.pl?borrowernumber=X
- Cancel first (1st) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel hold in the middle (was 3rd) - ok, after applying the patch
- Cancel last (was 4th) - ok, after applying the patch
Without the patch, holds priorities get out of order.
Additional tests done:
- Check in one item to trigger first hold
- Check in one item to trigger second hold
- Check out first item
Priorities are kept while the item is waiting, when it's
checked out, priorities of remaining holds get reset correctly.
Conclusion:
Big improvement, no regressions found.
Passes all tests in t, xt and QA script.
Also: t/db_dependent/Holds.t
t/db_dependent/HoldsQueue.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
If IndependentBranches is ON and canreservefromotherbranches is OFF,
a patron is not permittedo to request an item whose homebranch (i.e.,
owner of the item) is different from the patron's own library.
However, if canreservefromotherbranches is turned ON, the patron can
create such hold requests.
Note that canreservefromotherbranches has no effect if
IndependentBranches is OFF.
To test, run prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t. Without the bugfix
patch for bug 2394, the last two tests should fail.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
- wrap in a transaction
- create the patron records needed for the test
To test:
[1] Run prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
[2] Verify that all tests have passed.
[3] Verify that the additional patron records created
by the test no longer exist in the database.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
* C4::Reserves::_FixPriority
- The previous code checked the cancellationdate. If think you never pass
in it with bad parameters, but in order to be sure I added the check on
this value.
- The reservedates array was never used.
* circ/circulation.tt
There was a bug: it was not possible to remove an hold from the
circulation page. Passing reserve_id fixes the issue.
* C4::Reserves::GetReserveId
This subroutine did not have a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch switches from using a combination of
biblionumber/borrowernumber to using reserve_id where possible.
Test Plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Maxime Pelletier <maxime.pelletier@libeo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
