On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a "debug" parameter we are passing from the controller scripts
to C4::Auth::get_template_and_user, but it's not actually used!
Test plan:
Confirm the assumption
Review the changes from this patch
Generated with:
perl -p -i -e 's#\s*debug\s*=\>\s*(0|1),?\s*##gms' **/*.pl
git checkout misc/devel/update_dbix_class_files.pl # Wrong catch
+ Manual fix in acqui/neworderempty.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When you create hierarchical groups of libraries you are not allowed to add
several times the same library to a given group/subgroup. The libraries
that are part of the group is not displayed on the interface, to prevent
the user to select it.
However this restriction is only done template-side, the controller and
module does not handle it.
To prevent that this patchset enforces the constraint at DB level, and
display a message to the end user.
Test plan:
- Go to Home › Administration › Library groups
- Add a group
- Add a library
- reload the page several times
=> Without this patch the same library appears several times in the group
=> With this patch applied you will see a friendly error message
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds a new checkbox option 'Is local hold group' when you create a new root group.
To test:
1) In intranet go to Library Groups in admin module
2) Add new root group
3) Check that there is no 'Is local hold group' checkbox
4) Apply this patch
5) Add new root group
SUCCESS => a new 'Is local hold group' checkbox appears
6) Select 'Is local hold group' and save
7) Click edit button for root group
SUCCESS => 'Is local hold group' is checked
8) Sign off
Sponsored-by: VOKAL
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
So far the administration module only allowed for 2 permissions:
- circulation conditions (manage_circ_rules)
- everything else (parameters_remaining_permissions)
With this patch almost every section of the administration page
will have its own granular permission.
To test:
- Create different staff users:
1) One with parameters_remaining_permissions
2) One with parameters
3) One with catalogue and no parameters
4) One superlibrarian
- Apply the patch
- Run the database update
- Check the staff users:
1) All subpermissions, but manage_circ_rules
should be checked
2) Nothing should have changed
3) manage_item_serach_fields shoudl be checked
(page had catalogue permission before)
4) Nothing should have changed
- Try different settings of the permissions and
verify that
- Administration page behaves correctly
- Administration menu behaves correctly
! You shoudl only see what you have permission for
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Add a checkbox to enable/disable the feature for given group of
libraries.
Important note: Only the top level node can turn the feature, the idea
is to avoid confusion, ease testing (by limiting the number of cases)
and force libraries to define one tree per feature (Maybe this is wrong,
but maybe good to start)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Edit: I added !$branchcode && to the checked condition so we can add multiple
libraries back.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
