This routine is only used internally and incorrectly overrides
the precedence of holds rules - it should be removed
This patch removes the routine, adjusts tests, and adds test to
confirm correct precedence is followed
To test:
1 - At the All Libraries level, create a circ rule for a specific patron category and a specific item type that only allows 1 hold
2 - At the branch-specific level for Branch A, create an All/All rule that allows 2 holds
3 - confirm ReservesControll is set to patron's library
4 - find a patron from Branch A of the category for which you made your rule
5 - find two bibs with items of the itype got which you made your rule
6 - place a hold on one bib. success!
7 - try to place a hold on the second bib. you're told you cannot because the patron is only allowed 1 hold
8 - apply patch, restart services
9 - try to place your second hold again, success!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the --reason option to cancel_expired_holds which allows
the library to optionally set a reason for cancellation when running the
cronjob. This will prompt the HOLD_CANCELLED notice to be sent to the
patron.
To test:
1/ Ensure the unit tests continue to pass after the patch
(t/db_dependent/Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t)
Also:
1 - Add an expired hold for a patron:
INSERT INTO RESERVES (borrowernumber, biblionumber, expirationdate, found,branchcode,itemnumber) VALUES (5,5,'2020-01-01','W','CPL',983);
2 - Set ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay to Allow
3 - Run the cronjob:
perl misc/cronjobs/hold/cancel_expired_holds.pl --reason EXPIRED
4 - Visit the patron's notices tab
5 - Confirm they have been sent a cancellation notice
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
.pm must not have -x
.t must have -x
.pl must have -x
Test plan:
Apply only the first patch, run the tests and confirm that the failures
make sense
Apply this patch and confirm that the test now returns green
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Most of the time the tests are failing because the item is not created
correctly (missing biblio and/or biblioitem).
The usual error is:
t/db_dependent/selenium/regressions.t ..... 5/5 Can't call method "leader" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/SearchEngine/Elasticsearch.pm line 534.
In this patch we are making sure $builder->build({ source => 'Item' })
is replace with $builder->build_sample_item
Test plan:
Turn on Elastic and confirm that all the tests pass!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The number of parameters of AddReserve makes it hard to read and
maintain.
This patch replace it with a hashref, which will make the calls more
readable.
Moreover the bibitems has been removed as it was not used by the
subroutine.
Test plan:
- Make sure the tests pass
- Read the diff and search for typos
- Place a hold on few items
Note for QA: reservation_date and expiration_date do not match the DB column's names,
should we?
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Palsson <hans.palsson@hkr.se>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves/AutoUnsuspendReserves.t
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Luc Lapointe <pierreluc.lapointe@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes a regression after bug 14695.
This patch adds itemnumber and barcode as optional params in ReserveSlip used
by hold-transfer-slip.pl to generate HOLD_SLIP. This is for ReserveSlip to be
able to generate correct slips when items in multi-item holds are checked in.
Test plan:
1) activate a circulation rule with multi-item holds
2) Place two holds on same biblio for patron
3) for debugging, either use browser console to observe POST request and responses
or use info from reserves, e.g. reserve_id in the HOLD_SLIP
4) checkin two items from same biblio on pickup branch
5) note that both holds are effectuated, but reserve_id is the same on both slips
6) also note that there is no itemnumber or barcode in the requests from returns.pl
7) Apply this patch
8) repeat 2-4
9) note that reserve_id is now different on the two slips
and/or:
Run tests:
t/db_dependent/Reserves/ReserveSlip.t
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Maksim Sen <maksim.sen@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch originates from a QA Follow-up on bug 19260.
The first 19260 patch adds CancelExpiredReserves tests to Reserves.t.
But note that we already have some tests in Holds/CancelReserves.t.
This patch does:
Renames Holds/CancelReserves.t to Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t.
Rearranges modules there.
Moves its existing tests into a first subtest.
Moves the new subtest from Reserves.t to CancelExpiredReserves.t.
Replaces $dbh->do('DELETE FROM reserves').
Adds some TestBuilder statements for missing data (by the move): adding
biblio, item, borrower (removing slow AddMember call).
Test plan:
Run Reserves.t and Reserves/CancelExpiredReserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This subroutine is only used once and can be replaced with a call to
Koha::Holds->find
It will avoid unnecessary joins.
Test plan:
- Define a HOLD_SLIP template notice using fields from the tables
reserves, branches, borrowers, biblio, biblioitems and items.
- Generate one and make sure the values are correctly filled
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The test files do not need to return 1
Patch generated with:
perl -p -i -e "s/^1;\n//xsm" t/**/*.t
Test plan:
git grep '^1;$' t/**/*.t
should not return any results
NOTE: does not fix C4/SIP/t, nor xt tests.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The biblioitem entry must be added
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Currently, Koha charges all patrons a hold fee in all circumstances, if
a hold fee is applicable to their patron category.
This is immediately applied at point of request.
However, it would be useful to let patrons make requests without a
charge
being incurred until they physically have the item in their hands and
checked out to their cards.
The hold fee will only be added to the account as soon as the item is
checked out to the requesting patron.
With this scenario, we will be certain that patrons have the correct
item, and they are happy with what has been supplied.
It also means that patrons can place holds via the OPAC without reaching
the usage limit that has been selected.
Test plan:
0/ All the following steps must be done with a patron using a patron category with a hold fee
1/ Make sure that the existing options for HoldFeeMode work as before
2/ Select the third option "any time a hold is collected"
3/ Place a hold on an item
4/ Note that the patron has not been charged
5/ Check this item from the staff interface
6/ Note that the patron has been charged
7/ Place another hold
8/ Use the self checkout feature at the OPAC for the checkin
9/ Note that the patron has been charged and a message is displayed to
inform about the fee.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire Libraries
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch updates the current code to make it works with the new
option's name of the syspref.
It also refactor the tests to make them more reusable and robust.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire Libraries
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes notification when same biblio has multiple reserves with same borrower,
introduced in Bug 14695. C4::Reserves::ModReserveAffect uses internal method
_koha_notify_reserve but sends itemnumber and biblionumber instead of record_id.
To test:
Prerequisites:
- One biblio with two items attached
- A patron with hold_filled notification activated
- A letter for HOLD with <<reserves.reserve_id>> in it
1) Place two reservations on same biblio
2) checkin item x on pickup branch, observe patron message generated
3) checkin item y on pickup branch, observe patron message generated
4) note that reserve_id is the same on both messages, which is wrong
5) apply this patch and repeat 1-3
6) now observe notifications have correct (different) reserve_id
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If you run TooMany or MultiplePerRecord.t after
t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t (for instance) and that you are
running memcached, item-level_itypes will be 0.
These tests assume that the pref is 1
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch removes the need for Carp::Always in .../Reserves/MultiplePerRecord.t
which is not actually used.
It also removes 'undef' from Koha::Holds::forced_hold_level's last return, to comply with
our QA rules.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Currently the fee is applied on if all items for the record are issued
and at least one hold already exists on the record.
This patch does not give a complete answer to the problem (see
discussion on bug 13592 for the other user's expectations).
It only adds the ability to charge for any hold placed regardless of the
conditions.
Test plan:
1) Execute the updatedb entry to insert the new pref
2) Confirm that the behavior is the same as before applying this patch
3) Change the HoldFeeMode pref to 'always'
4) Note that the fee is applied for any hold placed
Signed-off-by: Sally Healey <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Tests assume that the branchcodes CPL/MPL/etc. already exist in the DB.
If they need them, they should create them.
Test plan:
Execute the differente test files on a DB without any branchcode or
at least without CPL/MPL branches.
Confirm that the tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run the test: t/db_dependent/Reserves/GetReserveFee.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmala <j.kylmala@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
