As said in the previous commit, I considered SetAge as unnecessary and
removed it.
Test plan:
1/ Edit a patron using the different 'Edit' links
2/ Play with the patron category limited to age ranges, and date of
birth
3/ You should get the expected warning if the date of birth is inside
the patron category date range.
To finish:
prove t/Circulation/AgeRestrictionMarkers.t t/db_dependent/Reserves.t \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t t/db_dependent/Members.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1. Set patron category "S" with enrolmentfee 1
2. perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
3. Observe following errors:
not ok 59 - Bug 14464 - No fines at beginning
ok 60 - Bug 14464 - 1st reserve correctly created
ok 61 - Bug 14968 - Keep found column from reserve
not ok 62 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge configured
ok 63 - Bug 14464 - 2nd reserve correctly created
not ok 64 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge desired
ok 65 - Bug 14464 - 1st reserve correctly created
not ok 66 - Bug 14464 - Fine applied after cancelling reserve with charge desired and configured
4. Apply patch
5. perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
6. Observe test pass
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
1..72
ok 1 - use C4::Reserves;
ok 2 - CheckReserves Test 1
...
ok 52 - Reserve in waiting status cant be canceled
ok 53 - Reserving an ageRestricted Biblio without a borrower dateofbirth succeeds
DBD::mysql::db begin_work failed: Already in a transaction at
/usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1489.
DBD::mysql::db begin_work failed: Already in a transaction at
/usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1489.
at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm line 1080.
...
Koha::Object::store('Koha::Patron=HASH(0x9e43b20)') called at
/home/ubuntu/kohaclone/C4/Members.pm line 542
C4::Members::ModMember('borrowernumber', 658535, 'dateofbirth', '2001-11-02')
called at t/db_dependent/Reserves.t line 516
This patch fixes this issue by replacing dbh autocommit=0 with
txn_begin.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
perl t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
1..72
ok 1 - use C4::Reserves;
ok 2 - CheckReserves Test 1
ok 3 - CheckReserves() include reserve_id in its response
ok 4 - CheckReserves Test 2
ok 5 - CheckReserves Test 3
ok 6 - GetReservesControlBranch returns item home branch when set to ItemHomeLibrary
ok 7 - GetReservesControlBranch returns patron home branch when set to PatronLibrary
ok 8 - Item is correctly waiting
ok 9 - Item is correctly priority 1
ok 10 - Item is correctly priority 2
ok 11 - GetWaiting got only the waiting reserve
ok 12 - GetWaiting got the reserve for the correct borrower
Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::GetItem called at /home/ubuntu/kohaclone/C4/Circulation.pm line 1853.
This patch fixes this error. The solution was to use C4::Reserves before C4::Items.
Also due to this edit, change use_ok to require_ok
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This is the fourth and last patch set to remove C4::Branch.
The real purpose of this patch is to standardise and refactor some code
which is related to the libraries selection/display.
Its unconfessed purpose is to remove the C4::Branch package.
Before this patch set, only 6 subroutines still existed in the C4::Branch
package:
- GetBranchName
- GetBranchesLoop
- mybranch
- onlymine
- GetBranches
- GetBranch
GetBranchName basically returns the branchname for a given branchcode.
The branchname is only used for a display purpose and we don't need to
retrieve it in package or pl scripts (unless for a few exceptions).
We have a `Branches` template plugin with a `GetName` method which does
exactly this job.
To achieve this removal, we will use this template plugin and delete the
GetBranchName from pl and pm files.
The `Branches.all()` will now select the library of the logged in user
if no `selected` parameter has been passed.
This new behavior could cause regressions, for instance there are some
places where we do not want an option preselected (batch item
modification for instance), keep that in mind when testing.
GetBranchesLoop took 3 parameters: $branch and $onlymine.
The first one was used to set a "selected" flag, for a display purpose:
select an option in the libraries dropdown lists.
The second one was useless: If not passed or set to 0, the
`C4::Branch::onlymine` subroutine was called.
This onlymine flag was use to know if the logged in user was able to see
other libraries infos.
A patron can see the infos from other libraries if IndependentBranches
is not set OR if he has the superlibrarian permission.
Prior to this patch set, the "onlymine test" was done on different
places (neworderempty.pl, additem.pl, holidays.pl, etc.), including the
Branches TT plugin. In this patch set, this test is only done on one
place (C4::Context::only_my_library, code moved from
C4::Branch::onlymine).
To accomplish the same job as this subroutine, we just need to call the
`Branches.all()` method from the `Branches` TT plugin. It already
accepts a `selected` parameter to set a flag on the option to select.
To avoid the repetitive
[% IF selected %]<option selected="selected">[% ELSE %]<option>[% END %]
pattern, a new `html_helpers` TT include file has been created, it
defines an `options_for_libraries` block, which takes a `selected`
parameter. We could imagine to use this include file for other
selects.
The 'mybranch` and `onlymine` subroutines of the C4::Branch package have
been moved to C4::Context. onlymine has been renamed with
only_my_library. There are only 4 occurrences of it, against 11 before
this patch set.
There 2 subroutines are Context-centric and it makes sense to put them
in `C4::Context` (at least it's the least worst place!)
GetBranches is the tricky part of this patch set: It retrieves all the
libraries, independently of the value of IndependentBranches.
To keep the same way as the existing calls of `Branches.all()`, I have
added a `unfiltered` parameter. If set, the `Branches.all()` will call
a usual Koha::Libraries->search method, otherwise
Koha::Libraries->search_filtered will be called. This new method will
check if the logged in user is allowed to see other libraries or only
its library.
Note that this `GetBranches` subroutine also created a `category` key:
it allowed to get the list of groups (of libraries) where this library
existed. Thanks to a previous patch set (bug 15295), this value was
not used anymore (I may have missed something!).
Note that the only use of `GetBranch` was buggy (see bug 15746).
Test plan (for the whole patch set):
The best way to test this whole patch set is to test with 2 instances: 1
with the patch set applied, 1 using master, to be sure there is no
regression.
It would be good to test the same with `IndependentBranches` and the
without `IndependentBranches`.
No difference should be found.
The tester must focus on the library dropdowns on as many forms as
possible.
You will notice changes in the order of the options: the libraries will
now be ordered by branchname (instead of branchcode in some places).
A special attention will be given to the following page:
- acqui/neworderempty.pl
- catalogue/search.pl
- members/members-home.pl (header?)
- opac/opac-topissues.pl
- tools/holidays.pl
- admin/branch_transfer_limits.pl
- admin/item_circulation_alerts.pl
- rotating_collections/transferCollection.pl
- suggestion/suggestion.pl
- tools/export.pl
Notes for QA:
- There are 2 FIXMEs in the patch set, I have kept the existing behavior,
but I am not sure it's the good one. Feel free to open a bug report and
I will fill a patch if you think it's not correct. Otherwise, remove the
FIXME lines in a follow-up patch.
- The whole patch set is huge and makes a lot of changes.
But it finally will tremendously reduce the number of lines:
716 insertions for 1910 deletions
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The purpose of C4::Members::GetBorrowercategory was to return the patron
category for a given categorycode. This can be done easily with the
Koha::Patron::Categories->find method.
Test plan:
- Same prerequisite as before
- Edit a guarantor and confirm the information will be updated for his/her
guarantee(s).
- Update a child to adult patron (Note: Should not we hide the patron
categories limited to others libraries? If yes, it must be done on another
bug report).
There is a special behavior if there is only 1 adult category, the
user does not need to select a category. So the same as before with
only 1 adult patron category.
- Import a patron with a category_code which does not exist. You should
be warned.
- Modify some patron using the batch patron modification tool. The
patron category descriptions should correctly be displayed.
Note that the overduerules page has already been tested in a previous
patch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
* Removes tests no longer needed
* Updates rules to work with existing tests
* Fixes code issues revealed by unit tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
This patch re-introduces the transaction into t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t
and does some cleaning on the touched tests so they raise less warnings.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Remove $dbh as argument to C4::Items::DelItemCheck
and C4::Items::ItemSafeToDelete, also change all
calls to these functions throughout the codebase.
Also remove remaining reference to 'do_not_commit' in
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t
Fixed doubled "$$" in C4/ImportBatch.pm
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Broust <jean-manuel.broust@univ-lyon2.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Unless in t/db_dependent/Context.t where we want to test the cache
behaviors.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
Test 14 in t/db_dependent/Reserves.t fails if syspref LocalHoldsPriority is
set to "[Give] priority for filling holds to patrons whose...
To verify:
- Set syspref as above and run test. Test 14 fails.
- Set syspref to [Don't give] and run test agein, it passes OK.
To test:
- Apply patch
- Run test again with syspref set / not set
Expected result: In both cases test should pass
(AMended to change bug title)
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Fix the following errors:
not ok 59 - Bug 14464 - No fines at beginning
ok 60 - Bug 14464 - 1st reserve correctly created
not ok 61 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge configured
ok 62 - Bug 14464 - 2nd reserve correctly created
not ok 63 - Bug 14464 - No fines after cancelling reserve with no charge desired
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended the x==0 test with !x || x==0 to include 0.00 and prevent warn.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
The change in MoveReserve from the previous patch begs for a test.
Here we add some to Reserves.t.
In all six tests we place a hold, move it and check the reserves again.
Depending on the status of ConfirmFutureHolds, and the reservedate the
hold should be moved or not.
Test plan:
Run the unit test.
Bonus: If you run Reserves.t by applying this patch but without the first
patch that changed MoveReserve, tests 60 and 61 should fail:
not ok 60 - MoveReserve filled future hold now
not ok 61 - MoveReserve filled future waiting hold now
This may further illustrate the need of the first patch.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <j.kylmala@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Some additional unit tests of bug 14464 still included a constraint
in the AddReserve calls.
Test plan:
Run Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This followup adds several tests to t/db_dependent/Reserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
This is the original patch for bug 12892 and replaces the older style of
fetching the holds data with Koha Objects. It will be used as a
foundation for future features.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a hold, set to waiting
3) Browse to circulation.pl for that patron
4) Note you see the list of waiting holds
5) Switch your logged in branch to a different branch
6) Note the "Waiting at" line is no longer emphasized.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Cathi Wiggins <CWIGGINS@ci.arcadia.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Megan Wianecki <mwianecki@mplmain.mtpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
C4::Reserves:
* Added OnShelfHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* Added OPACItemHoldsAllowed() to check issuingrules
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest() changed interface, now takes
$item_record,$borrower_record; calls OnShelfHoldsAllowed()
opac/opac-reserve.pl and opac/opac-search.pl:
* rewrote hold allowed rule to use OPACItemHoldsAllowed()
* also use OnShelfHoldsAllowed() through
* IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest()
templates:
* Removed AllowOnShelfHolds and OPACItemHolds global flags, they now
only have meaning per item type
Signed-off-by: Nicole C. Engard <nengard@bywatersolutions.com>
I have tested this patch left, right and upside down for the last
several months. All tests have passed.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch changes the way CanBookBeReserved() and CanItemBeReserved() return error
messages and how they are dealt with in the templates. This change makes it possible
to distinguish between different types of reservation failure.
Currently only two types of errors are handled, all the way to the user, from the CanItemBeReserved():
-ageRestricted
-tooManyReserves which translates to maxreserves
#############
- TEST PLAN -
#############
((-- AGE RESTRICTION --))
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden. (previously you just got a notification about maximum amount of reserves reached)
((-- MAXIMUM RESERVES REACHED --))
0. Set the maxreserves -syspref to 3 (or any low value)
STAFF CLIENT AND OPAC
1. Make a ton of reserves for one borrower.
2. Observe the notification about maximum reserves reached blocking your reservations.
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS STAFF CLIENT --))
3. Observe the error notification "Cannot place hold on some items"
((-- MULTIPLE HOLDS OPAC --))
1. Make a search with many results, of which atleast one is age restricted to the current borrower.
2. Select few results and "Place hold" from to result summary header element.
(Not individual results "Place hold")
3. Observe individual Biblios getting the "age restricted"-notification, where others can be
reserved just fine.
Updated the unit tests to match the new method return values.
t/db_dependent/Holds.t & Reserves.t
Followed test plan. Works as expected and displays meaningful messages for the reason why placing a hold is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There is no reason for underage borrowers to reserve ageRestricted material and
then be denied it's check-out due to ageRestriction.
This patch prevents reserving material for borrowers not suitably aged.
# # # # # #
# A PRIORI #
# # # # # #
BOTH THE STAFF CLIENT AND THE OPAC
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
4. You can reserve an ageRestricted Record with ease.
STAFF CLIENT ONLY
5. Check-in an Item from the ageRestricted Record and catch the reservation.
6. Check-out the ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
7. You get a notification about being unable to check-out due to age restriction.
How lame is that for a 12 year old?
# # # # # # # #
# A POSTERIORI #
# # # # # # # #
STAFF CLIENT
1. Find a Record with Items, update the MARC Subfield 521a to "PEGI 16".
2. Get a Borrower who is younger than 16 years.
3. Check-out an ageRestricted Item for this underage Borrower.
4. You get a notification about having the maximum amount of reserves.
5. Place a hold for the underage Borrower for the ageRestricted Record.
6. You get a notification, that placing a hold on ageRestricted material is
forbidden.
Includes Unit tests.
Followed test plan. Patch behaves as expected. (Note: Propagating error messages to template will be handled in Bug 13116 or 11999)
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch fix the subroutine name and add a restriction on the
arguments: both argument are mandatory!
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
User may cancel his own reservation at waiting or in transit status
through calling opac-modrequest.pl. Cancel button is disabled in
interface but possibility to cancel should be checked also in
opac-moderequest.pl, before calling CancelReserve().
Similar situation is with opac-modrequest-suspend.pl
This patch provides new soubroutine to chceck if user can cancel given
reserve. It's possible only when he's owner of hold and hold isn't in
transfer or waiting status.
Additionaly there are new test for this function in Reserves.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests, QA script and new tests.
Works as described, tested with:
.../cgi-bin/koha/opac-modrequest.pl?reserve_id=XXX
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
CancelHold takes two parameters: patron_id and item_id.
If item_id is considered as an itemnumber, holds on title can't be
canceled.
If item_id is considered as a biblionumber, all holds on this
biblionumber (for a borrower) will be canceled.
So CancelHold have to consider item_id as a reserve_id.
- Added subroutine C4::Reserves::GetReserve
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords now returns the reserve_id
- Fix the text in the ilsdi.pl?service=Describe&verb=CancelHold page
- Unit tests for CancelReserved and GetReserve
- Do not delete row in reserves table if insert in old_reserves fails
Signed-off-by: Leila and Sonia <koha.aixmarseille@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <bensinober@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signing off, while noting a style issue in the patch review
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script.
Placed and cancelled a hold using ILS-DI successfully.
Adding a follow-up to also update the ils-di documentation
page in the bootstrap theme.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
EDIT: I removed the changes it did to the prog theme.
This patch modifies _Findgroupreserve so that its one caller,
CheckReserves(), would include the reserve_id field in the
hold request it returns.
Failure to include reserve_id in every circumstance resulted
in bug 11947. This patch is therefore a complementary fix for
that bug, but is not meant to preempt the direct fix for
that bug.
To test:
[1] Verify that t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
[2] Verify that the following test plan taken from
the patch for bug 11947 works for this patch
*without* applying the patch for 11947:
* have a few borrowers, say 4.
* have a biblio with a single item (you can scale this up, it should
work just the same.)
* issue the item to borrower A
* have borrowers B, C, and D place a hold on the item
* return the item, acknowledge that it'll be put aside for B.
* view the holds on the item.
Without the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 2, 1" when they
should be "waiting, 1, 2".
* in the database "reserves" table, they're really "0, 2, 3" when they
should be "0, 1, 2".
With the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 1, 2"
* in the database, they're "0, 1, 2"
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described. No koha-qa errors. Test pass
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Currently when a reserve is moved to "waiting" status because it's
acknowledged on checkin, the reserve priorities aren't renumbered. This
causes things to go a bit haywire in the UI, in particular, some
reserves can unjustly end up with priority 1 when they shouldn't. It
also seemed to mess with the logic of who should get it next, but I
didn't look too closely at that.
This patch forces a renumbering so that all the priorities remain
copacetic.
Test plan:
* have a few borrowers, say 4.
* have a biblio with a single item (you can scale this up, it should
work just the same.)
* issue the item to borrower A
* have borrowers B, C, and D place a hold on the item
* return the item, acknowledge that it'll be put aside for B.
* view the holds on the item.
Without the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 2, 1" when they
should be "waiting, 1, 2".
* in the database "reserves" table, they're really "0, 2, 3" when they
should be "0, 1, 2".
With the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 1, 2"
* in the database, they're "0, 1, 2"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Test plan confirms that the problem exists and that the patch corrects
it.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes all tests and QA script, especially t/db_dependent/Reserves.t.
Improves priority calculation.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Changed title and author field for UNIMARC.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested for MARC21, NORMARC and UNIMARC by adding temporary set_preference..
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Set marcflavour to MARC21 to make tests pass.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Works for MARC21. But I would prefer a better fix for UNIMARC.
Will send a follow-up for that.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adding a few unit tests, including the following situations:
Placing a hold when there is a wait.
Placing a hold when there is a future hold.
Calculating priority with future date.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Rebased on January 29, 2014 (marcelr)
Added text on the two 'is'-statements.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adds three tests to Reserves.t for GetReservesFromItemnumber.
We test if this routine does not return a future next available hold,
a future item level hold. And if it does return a future wait (that is:
a confirmed future hold, using ConfirmFutureHolds).
Note that Holds.t does also contains some basic tests for this routine,
but the additional tests seem to better located in the direct context of
tests for bug 9761 for ConfirmFutureHolds.
Test plan:
Run both t/db_dependent/Holds.t and t/db_dependent/Reserves.t.
Verify if both tests do not fail.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch implements a regression test for verifying that
duplicate hold notifications aren't sent if ModReserveAffect() is
called repeatedly (as might happen if a circ operator accidentally
checks in an item and confirms its hold more than once).
Note that the test depends on the fact that _koha_notify_reserve()
defaults to sending a HOLD_PRINT letter if the borrower has not
specified an email or SMS hold notification.
To test:
[1] Run prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
[2] The 'patron not notified a second time (bug 11445)' test
should fail.
[3] Apply the main patch and run prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
again. This time all tests should pass.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds unit tests for two parts of DelItemCheck: checking
if the item is on loan, and checking if it is waiting on the hold
shelf.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation/IsItemIssued.t
is successful.
[2] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t is *not*
successful -- as it turns out, there was a latent bug where items
waiting on the hold shelf or in transit to fill a hold could still
be deleted without any warning.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This fixes a regression introduced by the patch for bug
9394 -- when printing a hold slip using the 'print and confirm'
button, the slip would contain only the text 'reserve not found',
not a full hold slip.
This patch also adds a regression test.
To test:
[1] Check in an item that would fill a hold. Use the 'print
and confirm button' to confirm the hold.
[2] The printout will only contain text to the effect of
'reserve not found'.
[3] Apply the patch.
[4] Repeat step 1. This time, a full hold slip should be printed.
[5] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Pass all tests, new and old, and QA script.
Verified wrong and corrected behaviour.
Note: Sometimes there will not be the message 'reserve not found'
showing up, but hold information for a different record. This happens
when there exists a reserve_id with the borrowernumber of the patron
in question in your database.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Adds tests for CheckReserves with lookahead parameter.
Adds tests for AddReturn with regard to future reserve messages.
The following test cases are added, resulting in 8 new tests:
a) Add a reserve without date, CheckReserve should return it
b) Add a reserve with future date, CheckReserve should not return it
c) Add a reserve with future date, CheckReserve should return it if lookahead
is high enough
d) Check ResFound message of AddReturn for future hold
Test plan:
Run the test. No fails?
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Optionally add some branches and categories that may not exist.
Test plan:
Run the test with or without CPL branch or S (staff) category.
Verify that the test does not fail.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
This patch adds a regression test for this bug, effectively
implementing the manual test plan in the previous patch.
To test:
[1] Verify that prove -v t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
CheckReserves was using the CircControl system preference to determine what
patrons an item can fill a hold for. It should be using ReservesControlBranch
instead.
Test Plan:
1) Set ReservesControlBranch to "item's home library".
2) Create an item at Library A, place holds for it for patrons at
Library B, Library C, and Library A in that order,
for pickup at the patrons home library.
3) Make sure the holds policy for Library A is set to
Hold Policy = "From home library" and
Return Policy = "Item returns home".
Make sure the holds policies for the other libraries are set to
Hold Policy = "From any library".
4) Check the item in at Library C, the hold for the patron at Library B
should pop up, even though it's in violation of the circulation rules.
Don't click the confirm button!
5) Apply this patch, and reload the page,
now the hold listed should be for the last hold,
the hold for the patron at Library A, which is correct.
This patch adds the subroutine C4::Reserves::GetReservesControlBranch as
an equivilent to C4::Circulation::_GetCircControlBranch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Fixed POD so that arguments and explanation match (C<$item>).
Also tested opac-reserves.pl for regressions.
Passes all tests, QA script, and Reserves.t.
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
