Bug 27402 is adding it, we do not longer need the query_from_filters JS
function.
This patch also remove the filters on the left. As we have DT
remembering the filter on the table we don't need them anymore.
Technical note:
Prior to this patch, the search on biblio.author, biblio.title and
biblio.isbn was done by adding hidden columns. Now we are using:
"data": "biblio.author:biblio.title:biblio.isbn"
to tell the wrapper we are going to build a search on these 3
attributes.
Another trick is to pass a default_filters parameters to the wrapper, to
tell it we want to filter on the orders of a given vendor (this is a
bugfix, the original implementation was returning all the orders).
However We should not use /acq/orders?vendor_id=42 but /acq/vendor/42/orders instead (which does not exist yet),
otherwise (with bug 27353 ) we are going to display the wrong number of non-filtering rows.
The change in Orders.pm is only formatting to match what's done in
Bug 27353: Set X-Base-Total-Count header for REST API
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch restores the original behaviour: if you jump into receiving
an order, and then go back to receiving, you want the page to remember
your filters.
This feature was overlooked. On fixing it, I wrapped some JS code in a
function for reusing it and simplified it a bit as well.
To test:
1. Enter a search term in either of the search fields
2. Add a note, receive or do another action
=> SUCCESS: The search term is kept
3. Apply this patch set
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: The search term is kept
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan:
1. Create a vendor
2. Create a basket
3. Add an order to the basket (note the existence of the option 'gist'
4 Apply patch
5. Create another order (note the existence of the option 'TaxRates'
instead)
6. Run 'prove t/Prices.t' to confirm the tests were successful
7. If everything above is correct then patch was successful
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When a staged MARC file is used to populate a basket in acquisitions,
the status of the batch is kept as "staged" until a user repeat the operation.
The "imported" status is added to the batch when new orders are added to
a basket "from a new file" (yes!...)
Test plan:
- Create a basket
- Add to basket From a New File
- Select a marc file and stage
- Add titles to your basket
Until all your records are imported the batch will have the status
"staged"
When all your records will be imported, the status of the batch will be
"imported"
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To reproduce:
1- create a basket
2- add more of 20 orders with uncertain price
3- click on uncertain price button
4- on page 1 of list, uncheck uncertain box of an order
5- click on save button
6- orders who were on page 2 are not display anymore in page uncertainprice.pl
7- return to basket view acqui/basket.pl
8- orders who were on page 2 have "rvcd" label and quantity is null
The data in page 2 and beyond is not transmitted, but the code doesn't
handle that. This patch makes sure that all that (empty) data is not (wrongly) processed.
Sponsored by: CCSR
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes code use the new Koha::Acquisition::Basket->close
method and makes CloseBasket obsolete.
It then removes it, and adapts the few places in which it was used.
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ git diff origin/master --name-only | grep -e '\.t$' | xargs prove
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Try playing with baskets, closing them
=> SUCCESS: All works as expected!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment there are several cases, when closing a basket is not
possible:
- when there are no order lines in it
- when there are order lines with uncertain prices
- when the basket is marked as a standing order
The first case wasn't checked correctly as only pending/received
orders would be counted, but not cancelled orders.
To test:
- Create a basket
- Create an order line
- Verify the "close this basket" button shows
- Cancel the order line - the button disappears
- Apply the patch
- Verify the button appears and works now
- Create another basket - make sure you cannot close it
without order lines
- Create an order line with uncertain price checked
- you cannot close it
- Resolve the uncertain price - you can now close the basket.
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the mentioned controller scripts use the new
$order->cancel method instead of DelOrder.
To test:
1. Apply this patches
2. Have a basket with some orders
3. Play with cancelling orders and removing baskets
=> SUCCESS: No behaviour change!
=> SUCCESS: No errors!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This allows to filter on standing orders on the acq advanced search
checkbox. For this purpose a new checkbox is shown behind the order
status search option.
As both not yet ordered and standing orders have the status
'new' or partially received internally, this seems like a good
placement as it will help distinguish these cases clearly.
new + standing order = standing order, but nothing received yet
partially received + standing order = active standing order
all status + standing order = all standing orders
To test:
- Create some baskets with at least one order, some 'standing' and
others not
- In the top toolbar choose tab Orders search > Advanced search
- Make some searches with and without the new 'Standing order' option
- Verify the right orders are found
- In the search results standing orders will now show with the
status + (standing order).
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The rebased patchset subsequnetly re-introduced the now deprecated use
of authnotrequired on staff client controllers.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patchset switches from using DB lookups to using an order object for most things on orderreceive.pl
It simplifies the script and makes minimal changes to the template
To test:
1 - Place some orders and receive them
2 - Have orders with or without subscriptions attached
3 - Try with different AcqCreateItems settings
4 - Apply patch
5 - No behaviour should change
6 - Read code to ensure things make sense
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Before this patch the order receive page (parcel.pl) would show
... Received by: <current user> On: <current date>
This is not really helpful. Whenever you viewed an invoice, it
would tell you it was _you_ who received that _today_.
As we don't store a creator of an invoice and the order lines
in an invoice could have been received by different people (which
we also don't know about), the "Received by" is removed by this patch.
Instead of today's date, we can show the shipment date entered for
the invoice. Again: different order lines could have been received
on different dates for this shipment. So only the shipment date makes
sense as it's on invoice level.
This also makes changes to the page title, breadcrumby and page heading:
When the invoice is closed, they will read:
Receipt summary for [vendor] ...
When the invoice is not closed, they wil read:
Receive orders from [vendor] ...
To test:
- Create a basket with some orders in acq
- Close the basket
- Receive shipment and create an invoice
- Make sure shipment date is not set to today
- Verify the information shown on top of parcel.pl is you and today
- Change staff users
- Go to your invoice, it's now this user and today
- Apply patch
- Received by: should be gone and the On: replaced by Shipment date:
with the date you selected
- Check the page title, breadcrumbs and headings read all the same 'Receive orders...'
- Finish receiving and close the invoice
- "Go to receipt page"
- Verify they now read "Receipt summary.."
If you have older invoices in your system, it would work
even better with these as you'd see that always today's date
is displaying without the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marjorie <marjorie.barry-vila@collecto.ca>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We don't allow editing of orders that are part of a closed basket, but
we don't enforce the rule in the controller file.
This patch use output_and_exit to stop the script and display an error
to the end user.
Test plan:
Create a basket, add an order
On the basket view you see the "Modify" link, open it in a separate tab
=> You can edit the basket
Keep this tab open, get back to the other one and close the basket
Reload the tab with the order edition form
=> You cannot longer edit the basket
QA: Do we need a check in addorder.pl as well?
Signed-off-by: Henry Bolshaw <bolshawh@parliament.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some library would like to delay the importing of invoices until
a time of their choosing. The invoices should be imported into
the database as they do now, but the invoice processing should
be skipped. Instead, any invoice file with a status of 'new'
should have an 'Import' button to process the invoice.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Enable the new syspref EdifactInvoiceImport
4) Run the edi cronjob to import a new invoice file
5) View EDI messages table at /acqui/edifactmsgs.pl
6) Note the invoice files is not processes, and retains the status of 'new'
7) Use the 'import' button to process the invoice
8) Note the invoice is now marked 'received' and the 'import' button is gone
9) Verify the invoice was actually processes
Signed-off-by: Debi Stears <DDStears@washoecounty.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
0 - Be in staff client as a superlibrarian
1 - Place some suggestions
1 for any branch
1 for signed in branch
1 for another branch
2 - Go to Koha main page, 3 suggestions pending
3 - Click 'Suggestions pending approval' - you see one suggestion
4 - Click on 'Acquisitions' in breadcrumbs , 3 suggestions pending
5 - Click manage suggestions - you see one suggestion
6 - Apply patch
7 - On mainpage and acqui-home you now see "Centerville: 1 / All libraries: 3" suggestions
8 - Confirm that the links take you to suggestions view of your branch or all libraries respectively
9 - Turn on IndependentBranches
10 - Create a user with acquisition and suggestions permissions but not superlibrarian in one of the branches used above
11 - Sign in as that user
11 - See "Centerville: 1" suggestion on mainpage and on acqui home
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a ->store call missing when we attempt to create a new item.
Test plan:
- set at least one value in MARCItemFieldsToOrder
- add to a basket via staged file with at least one value matching your MARCItemFields mappings
- set required fields for your order and click Save
=> Without this patch you got:
receive error: "DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): Column 'itemnumber' cannot be null at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/Acquisition/Order.pm line 113
at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Exception.pm line 77"
=> With this patch applied the order has been created successfully
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch modifies the code for parsing MARC framework configurations
so that the placeholder "<<YY>>" translates to a two-year date.
To test, apply the patch and modify a framework to include placeholders.
For example, in MARC21:
- Administration -> MARC structure -> 952 -> Edit subfields -> d
- Expand "Advanced constraints" and add a default value:
<<YYYY>> <<YY>> <<MM>> <<DD>> <<USER>>
- Save your configuration and go to Cataloging.
- Go to the add/edit items page for a record which uses the framework
you edited.
- In the "Add item" form, in the "Date aquired" field, you should see
the correct values. For example: '2019 19 12 03 Leonard'
Perform the same test when adding an item during the Acquisitions
process (depending on your AcqCreateItem setting).
Note that acqui/neworderempty.pl has been modified because the
placeholder-replacement code is repeated there, but I couldn't discover
how to test it (if it is used at all?)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If a fund is created with a amount of 0, it will not appear in the fund
list (when a new order is created for instance).
0 allocated funds can be used to track donations and other situations
where there is not an expected amount for the year.
Test plan:
0. Do not apply the patch
1. Create 1 active and 1 inactive budgets
2. Create some funds for each budgets, with amount > 0 and amount == 0
3. Add orders to basket
=> Note that the funds with amount == 0 are not displayed
4. Apply the patch
5. Add orders to basket (using the different possible ways we have)
=> Note that the funds with amount == 0 are displayed
This change is applied to the different views of the acquisition module.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch make possible the reopening and merging of invoices even if
the logged in user does not have the edit_invoices permission
I don't think it really makes sense but at least it's now possible.
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add a new permission to merge invoices
Test plan:
- Remove the new permission "merge_invoices" for a given patron,
use it to log in into Koha
- Create 2 invoices, try to merge them
=> There is no way to merge it
- Add the permission
=> Now you can merge the invoices
Sponsored-by: Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add a new permission to delete acquisition baskets
Test plan:
- Remove the new permission "delete_basket" for a given patron,
use it to log in into Koha
- Create basket, try to delete it
=> There is no way to delete it
- Add the permission
=> Now you can delete the basket
Sponsored-by: Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add a new permission to delete invoices
Test plan:
- Remove the new permission "delete_invoices" for a given patron,
use it to log in into Koha
- Create an invoice, try to delete it
=> There is no way to delete it
- Add the permission
=> Now you can delete the invoice
Sponsored-by: Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Add a new permission to edit invoices
Test plan:
- Remove the new permission "edit_invoices" for a given patron,
use it to log in into Koha
- Create an invoice, edit it (click "detail")
=> You can see the detail of the invoice, but cannot edit it. It's a read-only view.
- Add the permission
=> The form is back and you can modify the invoices and save the changes.
Also, you are able to create adjustments.
Sponsored-by: Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
New permission to reopen a closed invoice.
Test plan:
- Remove the new permission "reopen_closed_invoices" for a given patron,
use it to log in into Koha
- Create an invoice, close it
=> You are not able to reopen the invoice
- Add the permission
=> You are able to reopen the invoice
Sponsored-by: Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If 'Actual cost' has not been set then it has the value of 0.00 which
Perl evaluates to true so this patchset resets it to 0, so the fallback
to ecost_tax_included/ecost_tax_excluded happens.
Test plan:
1. Add item to acquisition basket (make sure the vendor has: tax rate: 15%, 'List prices: Include tax', 'Invoice prices: Include tax')
2. Set 'Vendor price' = 10 and do not set 'Actual cost'
3. Save order
4. Observe basket.pl shows 'Total tax exc.' has a value of 0.00 and GST
column has value of -8.70
5. Jump into the database:
select tax_value_on_ordering from aqorders where
ordernumber=<ordernumber>;
[You can get the ordernumber from clicking on the 'Modify' line the item
is listed in]
6. Observe a negative value: -8.70
7. Apply patch and restart plack
8. Add a second item to the basket
9. Set 'Vendor price' = 10 and don't set 'Actual cost'
10. Save order
11. Observe basket.pl shows 'Total tax exc' has value of 8.70 and GST
has value of 1.30
12. Repeat step 5 and observe tax_value_on_ordering = 1.30
13. Run t/Prices.t unit test:
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
prove t/Prices.t
Sponsored-by: Horowhenua District Council, NZ
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We did not take into account the vendor selected.
Test plan:
1. Choose Vendor
2. Create Basket
3. Assign a new vendor
Without the patch this new vendor is not changed
With the patch applied the vendor is changed
4. Edit the basket, change the vendor
Reported-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rhonda Kuiper <rkuiper@roundrocktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If no late order we got:
"Argument passed to the 'IN' operator can not be undefined"
It highlights a context error
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This was the only occurrence of GetBooksellersWithLateOrders and it was
the only subroutine of C4::Bookseller
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch is removing the use of GetBooksellersWithLateOrders and use
the late order list to generate the vendors.
Test plan:
Create several vendors, several orders, close the baskets
Also create vendors that do not have orders (or basket not closed)
Go to the late orders page and confirm that the list of vendors is
correctly filled, select one, you can see the "select all" link in the
header of the table
QA: that would be good to test this with production data and compare
execution time.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The feature was there but a condition disabled it.
Test plan:
- modify the default value for 008@ or another subfield in the ACQ framework using one or more of the placeholders above
- activate UseACQFrameworkForBiblioRecords
- create a basket
- create an order from a new record
- verify the values have been replaced
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Specify the UTF-8 charset in the header and Encode the output to avoid encoding issues
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This new enhancement adds the ability to create a CSV profile for the late
orders export.
Prior to this, the CSV profile was hardcoded in a template and not
editable (unless you modify the .tt file of course).
The main difficulty of the request was to make the multiple claims dates
accessible from the CSV profile. So far we only accept columns from the
database. However we would like to use the Koha::Acquisition::Order
object to make things easier (it had a ->claims method to access the
different claims).
To acchieve this, we are going to accept the TT syntax for that CSV profile.
It means that only CSV profiles created for 'late_orders' will have the
capability to use the TT syntax (can be extended later of course if
needed).
The alternative was to use specific placeholders, like %claims_count%,
%claimed_date%, but it sounded more powerful and flexible to allow the
TT syntax instead.
Note that the former export (template based) still exists and is the
default option.
Test plan:
0. Apply the patches and execute the update database entry
1. Create some orders, close the basket
2. Claim some of the orders
3. Note the new button at the bottom of the table that have several
entries.
=> The first entry will generate a CSV file using the previous method
=> The second entry will generate it using the new CSV profile, note
that the number of claims as well as the different claims date are
displayed.
4. Bonus point: Edit the CSV profile (Home › Tools › CSV export
profiles) that is named "Late orders (csv profile)", or create a new
one, and modify it.
Export the late orders using this CSV profile and confirm that the
generated CSV file is the one you expect.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Tralee
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Angela O'Connor Desmond <angela.oconnordesmond@staff.ittralee.ie>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
So far we only record the number of claims and the date of the last
claim, in the aqorders table.
To keep track of the different claim dates, this patchset is going to
make the following DB changes:
* Create a new table 'aqorders_claims' (id, ordernumber, claimed_on)
* Remove the two columns from the aqorders table: claims_count and
claimed_date
This will allow to display the different claim dates where needed: on
the late orders page, and the basket page.
To avoid additional fetches of Koha::Acquisition::Orders, GetLateOrders
has been moved to Koha::Acquisition::Orders->filter_by_late
That way we are going to add consistency, robustness, and cover the
feature with new tests.
Test plan:
0/ Create a bunch of new orders. Make sure they are from different
vendor (with different delivery time).
1/ Go to the late orders page and claim some orders
2/ Reclaim some of those orders
3/ Confirm that you can see the different claim dates for a given orders
(the history of the late orders claims is kept and displayed)
4/ Bonus point: Regression tests:
a. Modify the closedate of the basket in the database. That
will allow you to make sure the patch set did not introduce regressions.
It would be good to test the different filters on the late orders page:
* delay
* Estimated delivery date from/to
* Vendor
b. Confirm that the subtotal and the total values from the late orders
page is correct.
c. Test the update database entry: do not apply these patches, claims
some orders against master. Apply the patch, execute the update DB entry
then confirm that the number of claims is correct (note that the dates
will not as it is not possible to guess them).
QA note: the branchcode parameter has been removed from filter_by_late.
At first glance it seems that it was not used.
Sponsored-by: Cork Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Angela O'Connor Desmond <angela.oconnordesmond@staff.ittralee.ie>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This is simply a SQL change that makes things a bit easier to read
and also prevents too much data being returned in a large system
To test:
1 - Have some orders in your system in the ordered status
2 - Click the 'Ordered' amount for your budget from Acquisitions home
3 - Note the view of orders, possibly screen shot
4 - Apply patch
5 - Restart all the things
6 - Reload the ordered page
7 - Confirm nothing has changed
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
There are 2 subroutines from C4::Acquisition that could be removed:
- GetLastOrderReceivedFromSubscriptionid
- GetLastOrderNotReceivedFromSubscriptionid
After bug 20726 only GetLastOrderReceivedFromSubscriptionid will be used
(from acqui/neworderempty.pl) and this call could be replaced easily with Koha::Acquisition::Orders
The code (+ tests) related to these 2 subroutines could then be removed.
The parameters for the search is basic and does no really deserve its own subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch displays and let the librarian edit the suggestion.reason
information when receiving an order.
Note that if no reason was given the edit is not possible (easily
modifiable if needed but it seems that we do not want to display too
much details unnecessarily)
Test plan:
- Create a suggestion and fill the reason
- Create an order from this suggestion
- Close the basket and start receiving the order
=> The reason is displayed and editable
- Modify the reason and click Save
- Receive again
=> The reason has been correctly modified
- Play with the "Others..." option and give a specific reason
Sponsored-by: BULAC - http://www.bulac.fr/
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds a currency dropdown list to the Actual cost field when
receiving items in the acquisition module.
The idea is to let the librarian entered a price in a foreign currency
that will automatically be converted in the local currency ('active').
This converted value will be use as the actual cost once the form is
submitted.
Test plan:
- Create several currencies with different rates
- Create an order, close the basket and receive
- On the receipt page you will notice a new "change currency" checkbox
right close to the 'Actual cost' input.
- Check it
=> The 'Actual cost' input is readonly and a new line appears at the
bottom.
- Enter a number and select a currency
=> The 'Actual cost' input is automatically filled with the converted
value
- Save
=> The converted Actual cost has been inserted in the database.
Sponsored-by: Athlone Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: Devinim <nazli@devinim.com.tr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Apply mandatory defaults from the ACQ framework to records from external
source in Acquisition.
Test plan:
[1] Add 'BK' as mandatory default in ACQ framework for 942$c.
[2] Add order to basket via external source.
[3] Check 942$c on detail page of new record, MARC tab.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
No other changes than whitespace, guys.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
On bug 24430 we replaced the call to CountBiblioInOrders with
Koha::Biblio->active_orders
In case the bibliographic record is deleted, the count must be set to 0.
This prevent the app to crash with:
Can't call method "active_orders" on an undefined value at
/home/vagrant/kohaclone/acqui/parcel.pl line 244
Test plan:
Create 2+ orders
Receive one, delete it, delete the bibliographic record
Receive the order one
=> Without this patch, on the parcel page you should get the error
=> With this patch applied you must be allowed to finish the receive
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
