Signed-off-by: Sam Lau <samalau@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The commit "Bug 29290: Rename relationships borrower =>
patron" (d46492ac23) renamed the relation for the borrowers table from
'borrower' to 'patron' but the joins were not updated accordingly so a
few scripts got broken.
To test:
1) Notice that
$ perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl -c -s -v
returns 255 error code on exit
2) Apply patch
3) Notice the automatic_renewals.pl works now and exit code is 0
4) Make sure /cgi-bin/koha/tools/batch_extend_due_dates.pl works.
5) Try to grep for 'borrower' in Koha source code and see if there
are any other join done using the Koha::Checkout or
Koha::Old::Checkout objects.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 29380: (follow-up) Fix renewal feature in staff interface
The commit "Bug 29290: Rename relationships borrower =>
patron" (d46492ac23) renamed the relation for the borrowers table from
'borrower' to 'patron' but the usage in the renew.pl script was not
updated.
To test:
1) Try to renew a book in intranet through the renewal tab
2) Notice it gives error
3) Apply patch
4) Notice the error is now gone
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
For sites with very large amounts of due dates to extend ( tens of thousands ), it can take a very long time of the results to load ( if at all ). It would be good to have a way to bypass the confirmation screen, instead directly updating the due dates before displaying the results.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Browse to tools/batch_extend_due_dates.pl
3) Note the new "Preview results" checkbox
4) Submit form with the checkbox unchecked, due dates should be updated
without previewing the checkouts
5) Submit form with the checkbox checked, tool should function as
it did previously
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Bug 25101: (QA follow-up) Add hint to new option
Adds a hint about the large numbers behind the new
checkbox option.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Bug 25101: (QA follow-up) Fix hint for new option
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When selecting a new hard due date, we should keep the time part of the
original checkouts.
Test plan:
1 - Checkout an item specifying a date due
2 - Checkout an item without specifying a date due
3 - Use Tools->Batch extend due date
4 - Select a hard due date
5 - On the confirmation screen you should see that the time part has
been kept
6 - Confirm
7 - Make sure the correct values hava been inserted in DB
8 - Try now using the other option, give a number of days
9 - Repeat 4-7
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With events sometimes leading to unforeseen branch closures (think Coronavirus as
an example), it would be helpful to have a tool that would allow librarians to
update due dates in bulk based on branch and current due date of the material.
It allows to select checkouts given the following parameters:
* libraries
* patron's categories
* range of the due date
You can set a hard due date, or define a number of days to extend the
due date.
Test plan:
Check some items out
Use the new tool to extend the due dates
Test the different filters to make sure they all work
Note: What about holidays?
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
