Revised test plan from Owen:
This patch modifies the hold process so that if one of the titles in a
multi-hold process has no items the process doesn't abort completely.
To test, apply the patch and perform a search in the catalog which will
return one or more records with no items attached.
- Check checkboxes for multiple results, some of which have items and
at least one of which has no items.
- Click "Place hold."
- You should be taken to the page for placing multiple holds, with a
heading, "Cannot place hold on some items."
- Note: You will not be able to complete the holds process without the
next patch.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If you select multiple titles on the search results page in order to
place a bulk hold and some of those titles have no items you get a
JavaScript alert warning you can some cannot be placed on hold. You are
blocked from completing the action until you deselect the invalid hold.
This is unnecessary because the bulk hold process will safely refuse to
place a hold on these titles later in the process.
This patch removes the check that prevents submitting a multi-hold if
one or more records in the multi-hold have no items.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) On the staff interface, do a search
3) On the search results, select at least one record with items and one
record with no items.
4) Click the 'Place hold' button.
5) You should be redirected to reserve/request.pl with the message
"Cannot place hold: this record has no items attached."
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Actually looking at a record search or details, we see a black label
(for example "Author:") and a grey metadata (for example "J.R.R Tolkien").
Seems bad for accessibility.
In my opinion the most important to see is the metadata not the label.
It is possible to change with a custom CSS but I open this report to
propose to change default display.
Test plan :
1) Apply patch and build CSS in OPAC and staff interface
2) Search for any record in OPAC/Staff interface
3) You see grey label and black metadata
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Fixes where sort on lib breaks the test.
Also removes useless params in search_by_koha_field()
Run prove t/db_dependent/AuthorisedValues.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In itemsearch form, the item types filter should be sorted by description.
Test plan :
1) Create several values and descriptions in item types
2) Go to itemsearch
3) See filter by item types sorts on description and not on value
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In itemsearch form, there are several filters build with authorized values.
There values should be sorted by description.
Test plan :
1) Create several values and descriptions in authorized values LOC
2) Go to itemsearch
3) See filter by location sorts on description and not on value
Seems change in search_by_marc_field can not be tested in interface
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1- Create a notice with a 700$a and 700$d
2- Click on 700 $a field Tag Editor
3- Only 700$a is copied in search windows eg /authorities/auth_finder.pl pop up
4- Apply patch
5- Redo 2
6- 700$a is copied in 'Search main heading ($a only)' and $d is copied in 'Search main heading'
Signed-off-by: George Veranis <gveranis@dataly.gr>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
'Can't locate object method "_new_from_dbic" via package "Koha::Linktracker" (perhaps you forgot to load "Koha::Linktracker"?) at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/Object.pm line 334.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Potentially we could have logged a change when no date was passed.
This patch moves the test before logging and updates POD
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Abbey Holt <aholt@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are times when an item that is waiting for pickup needs to have the expiration date extended. This would give staff the ability to modify one by one, as needed, the reserves.expirationdate for a given item awaiting pickup.
Test Plan:
1) Place a hold, trap an item for it such that is is waiting
2) Attempt to update the expiration date
3) Note the new date is not saved
4) Apply this patch, restart all the things!
5) Attempt to update the expiration date
6) The new date should be saved!
Signed-off-by: Abbey Holt <aholt@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
* C4/Items.pm
- Koha::Biblios not used
* Koha/Item.pm
- Koha::Item->orders must return an empty set if no order attached
- no_triggers should be passed to other update calls
* Item.t
- No need to build a fund
- Add new test to test Koha::Item->orders when no order attached
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds tests and handling for calling move_to_biblio on a
Koha::Items set that contains items from more than one source biblio.
Test plan
1/ Inspect the changes to t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t
2/ Run t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t and confirm it passes
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The $from_biblio variable name doesn't exists after a refactoring that
happened. Here we need to re-index both the $self biblio and $to_biblio
biblio.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds Koha::TrackedLink(s) classes based on Koha::Object(s)
and then adds the relationship accessor to Koha::Item and uses it within
the move_to_biblio method.
Tests for new relationship also added to t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
With the addition of foreign key relationships to the linktracker table
we now get a DBIC relationship accessor we can use. This clarifies the
code slightly by using the _result->relationship form to get the DBIC
resultset. We should still introduce a Koha::Object based class for
this table at some point.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves the Koha::Biblio->adopt_items_from_biblio method to the
Koha::Items set class and updates all calls from
Biblio2->adopt_items_from_biblio(Biblio1) to Biblio->items->move_to_biblio(Biblio2)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We need to pass undef itemnumber to build_object() to actually have a
hold without an item tied to it. Otherwise build_object() will create
automatically an item for us (thus making it an item-level hold)
To test:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We need to update the search index record for the old biblio where the
item was moved from to keep the item info in search index up-to-date.
To test:
1) $ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In our test setup we mock the index_records() to produce warnings like
this:
Koha::Item at t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t line
93.
By wrapping all our item creations to warnings_are{} we can silence them.
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
- Tests for adopt_items_from_biblio
- Tests for the relationship between items and acquisition orders
- Tests for indexer calls in adopt_items_from_biblio
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch allows merging of records with many items without the web server timing out.
Test plan:
Without the patch:
- Create 2 records (one with e.g. 1000 items).
- Do a cataloguing search that displays both records, select them and click "Merge selected".
- Choose the record with many items as the one to be eliminated.
- Start the merging.
- After a while the web server should give you a timeout error (the merging process may still continue)
With the patch:
- Do the same as above
- This time verify that the records are merged without timeout
- Create a new biblio with an item
- Add with the item:
* acquisition order
* hold (reserve)
- Merge the biblio to another one
- Verify that the item and its related data was moved
- Verify that tests pass:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The ISBD view in the OPAC interface does not display item information.
This patch fixes that.
Test plan:
0) Have a biblio with at least one item attached to it and include one
of the following snippets in the OPACISBD system preference,
depending on your MARC flavour:
MARC21:
#952|<br/><h2>Items</h2><table><th>Copy number</th><th>Shelving
location</th><th>Koha item type</th><th>Barcode</th><th>Call number
(Full call number)</th><th>Materials specified (bound volume or
other part)</th>|<tr><td>{952t} </td><td> {952c} </td><td> {952y}
</td><td> {952p} </td><td> {952o} </td><td> {9523}</td></tr>|</table>
UNIMARC:
#995|<br/><h2>Items</h2><table><th>Copy number</th><th>Shelving
location</th><th>Koha collection</th><th>Barcode</th><th>Call number
(Full call number)</th><th>Numbering (volume or other part)</th>|
<tr><td>{9956} </td><td> {995e} </td><td> {995h} </td><td> {995f}
</td><td> {995k} </td><td> {995l}</td></tr>|</table>
Switch to the OPAC ISBD view for your biblio; notice how it does
not display item information.
1) Apply the patch, and restart Plack/memcached if necessary.
2) Refresh the OPAC ISBD view page, this time you should see item
information as per the OPACISBD system preference setting.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 23376 we replaced $order, from hashref Koha::Acq::Order, but 2
occurrences have not been corrected.
It causes a bug on the order receive page when the bib is linked with a
suggestion.
Test plan:
Create an order from bib A, create a suggestion for purchase on bib A
(OPAC)
Receive the order.
Without the patch: Notice the "Suggested by: (suggestion #)"
With the patch you see the info of the suggester
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Still found in opac-bottom.inc.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The previous patch removed search_boxes_loop - that's okay, it was always
getting the same three values.
If we don't do something in the template though, we get no boxes
Ultimately this should be a include, and not a hardcoded loop, but keeping changes
small for backporting
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It could lead to server freeze if set to a big value (we are pushing
into an array and so RAM is being fulfilled, and CPU is looping).
I don't understand the point of this cookie.
var numPar = $("#booleansearch fieldset p").size();
if (numPar > [% search_boxes_count | html %]){
jQuery.cookie("num_paragraph", numPar,{ path: '/'});
}else{
jQuery.removeCookie("num_paragraph", { path: '/'});
}
But "#booleansearch fieldset p" does not exist, it's not 'p' but 'div'
elements.
I've removed the code related to num_paragraph and the "Return to the
last advanced search" feature still works as before.
From this comment:
# determine what to display next to the search boxes (ie, boolean option
# shouldn't appear on the first one, scan indexes should, adding a new
# box should only appear on the last, etc.
The only bit that is not working as described is "adding a new box
should only appear on the last", but it has been working this way for
a long time already I think, and I don't see it as a bug.
Test plan:
Read the code, check that the above is correct.
Search for regression in this "return to last adv search" feature added
by bug 13307.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - edit AcquisitionLog, NewsLog, NoticesLog to change their values
2 - in About Koha, see the errors noted above
3 - apply patch, restart services
4 - re-edit AcquisitionLog, NewsLog, NoticesLog to change their values again
5 - reload About, see errors are cleared
6 - confirm that actions are logged as expected when logs are on, not logged when logs are off
Signed-off-by: Kelly <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The previous follow-up changed the link for the Advanced search button on mainpage.pl.
Test plan :
1) Go to intranet main page
2) Click on big button "Advanced search"
=> Without patch you go to item search /cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/itemsearch.pl
=> With patch you go to advanced search /cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/search.pl
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It's failing randomly (at least on Jenkins, cannot recreate locally).
Maybe the plugin is not actually installed?
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan
1. Go to Administration>item types>modify item type
2. There should be a lock item type under the carredart
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test Plan
1. Go to Administration>Item Types>Modify Item Type
2. Under carredart you should see an info item type
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
