Test Plan:
1) Apply dependancies
2) Apply this patch set
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Ensure holdallowed and hold_fulfillment_policy rules behavior remains unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds $branchcode_to parameter to CanBookBeReserved and
CanItemBeReserved. It represents the pickup location for the hold. This patch
checks if the library is configured to be a pickup location (see Bug 7534), and
also if the item can be transferred into the given library (see Bug 18072).
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch introduces unit tests for the new circulation rules option
that allows setting a max holds per day limit.
To test:
- Apply the patch
- Run:
$ sudo koha-shell kohadev
k$ cd kohaclone
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
=> FAIL: CanItemBeReserved doesn't check the amount of holds per day
and the introduced error code is not returned. OK is returned
instead.
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This is the first step in the circulation rules revamp as detailed
in the RFF https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Circulation_Rules_Interface_and_Backend_Revamp_RFC
This patch moves the recent max_holds rule to the new circulation_rules table.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Go to the circ rules editor, note the new max holds rules
by patron category in the "Checkout limit by patron category".
( Should we rename this section? )
4) Create find a patron that is allowed to place a hold, count the
number of holds that patron has. Lets make that number 'X'.
5) Set the new max holds rule to X for "All libraries"
6) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
7) Set the new max holds rule to X + 1 for the patron's home library
8) Note the patron can again place another hold
9) Set the new max holds rule to X for the patron's home library
10) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolution.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
It is possible to set up circulation rules to limit trapping of holds by pickup library and itemtype.
To make it easier to understand which holds will be trapped in a given circumstance,
it would be nice if we could optionally group holds by pickup library and/or itemtype.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Enable AllowHoldItemTypeSelection
4) Pick a record and create holds with various pickup libraries and itemtype combinations
5) Enable HoldsSplitQueueNumbering
6) Try the different combinations of HoldsSplitQueue
7) Ensure the hold "arrows" move the items correctly
* Up and down arrows should move hold above or below the adjacent hold within a hold fieldset
* Top and borrom arrows should move hold to the top or bottom within a hold fieldset
Sponsored-by: Stockholm University Library
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Followed test plan, patch worked as described. Also passed QA test tool
Signed-off-by: Alex Buckley <alexbuckley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hedström Mace <andreas.hedstrom.mace@sub.su.se>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds $branchcode_to parameter to CanBookBeReserved and
CanItemBeReserved. It represents the pickup location for the hold.
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Koha Team AMU <axelle.clarisse@univ-amu.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The last test claims to allow a hold when branch=5 and patron=5, but look
at the preceding statements:
$rule_branch->max_holds(5);
$rule_branch->update();
$rule_branch->max_holds(5);
$rule_branch->insert();
The last insert will not be done, since the record is already present.
A create should have triggered an error on the primary key.
Obviously, we should use $rule_all.
Test plan:
Run the test again.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
It's possible to set a limit on the maximum number of holds for a particular branch/category/itemtype, but not on the total number of holds for a given patron (by branch/category).
This new rule works in conjunction with the existing branch/borrower/item rules in that Koha will use the lower of the two limits. This new rule counts all holds of all types, which prevents bib-level holds from not being counted for the purpose of these limits. This makes the most sense and was also requested by the sponsor.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Go to the circ rules editor, note the new max holds rules
by patron category in the "Checkout limit by patron category".
( Should we rename this section? )
4) Create find a patron that is allowed to place a hold, count the
number of holds that patron has. Lets make that number 'X'.
5) Set the new max holds rule to X for "All libraries"
6) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
7) Set the new max holds rule to X + 1 for the patron's home library
8) Note the patron can again place another hold
9) Set the new max holds rule to X for the patron's home library
10) Note the patron can no longer place another hold
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Basically the idea is:
1. Undefined subroutine &C4::Items::ModZebra called at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Items.pm line 302.
=> Then use C4::Items before C4::Biblio
2. Undefined subroutine &C4::Circulation::GetItem called at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Circulation.pm line 1290
=> Then use C4::Circulation before C4::Items
And sometimes these 2 rules do not work...
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes the following errors:
The method reserve_id is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 859.
The method set is not covered by tests at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
Can't call method "store" on an undefined value at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Reserves.pm line 871.
This is caused by
commit ba1f2f93ef
Bug 19058: Move C4::Reserves::GetReserveId to the Koha namespace
We are calling ->reserve_id on a Koha::Holds set.
Test plan:
- Serials -> Find subscription -> "Edit routing list" in the sidebar
- Add 1+ recipients
- Save -> "Save and preview routing slip"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
[1] Replace corrosponding => corresponding
[2] Replace containts => contains
[3] Replace item_level-itypes => item-level_itypes
[4] Replace Managment => Management
[5] Replace should returns => should return
Test plan:
Note that this patch only deals with POD lines or test descriptions.
So there is nothing to test, just read the patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Patch amended by RM: The release notes should not be modified
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This script takes parameters:
days - how many days waiting to concal an unfilled hold on or after
library - (repeatable) branches to consider
holidays - whether or not to count holidays (default is no)
This patchset adds two methods and covers them with tests:
Koha::Holds->unfilled(); To return holds where found = undef
Koha::Hold->age( $use_calendar ); To return the number of days since a
hold was placed (including or excluding holidays)
To test:
1 - Place some holds with varying reservedates
2 - Run script with different parameters to verify options are respected
(-v for verbosity will assist here)
3 - verify that script does nothing without days parameter
Sponsored by:
Siskiyou County Library (http://www.siskiyoulibrary.info/)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 16187 - Followup
1 - Correct use of original (bad) script name
2 - Explain options better
3 - Remove change from 'W' to 'w'
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
RM note: Squashed for readability
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Move the existing tests
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new Koha::Hold->cancel method and replaces the calls
to C4::Reserves::CancelReserve with it.
Test plan:
- Add and cancel holds
- Change priority of holds
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
GetReserveId can easily be replaced with a call to
Koha::Holds->search->next->reserve_id
It will ease next changes to use Koha::Hold objects
Test plan:
Cancel a reserve and print a slip reserve
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This GetReserve subroutine can be replaced with Koha::Holds->find
Test plan:
- git grep GetReserve
must not return results where GetReserve is called
- Cancel a reserve
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This subroutine is only used once and can easily be replaced with
Koha::Patron->holds->count
Test plan:
- Set maxreserves=5
- Place 3 holds for a given patron
- Place again 3 holds for this patron
3+3 > 5 => The holds must not be placed
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This subroutine is only used once and can be replaced with a call to
Koha::Holds->find
It will avoid unnecessary joins.
Test plan:
- Define a HOLD_SLIP template notice using fields from the tables
reserves, branches, borrowers, biblio, biblioitems and items.
- Generate one and make sure the values are correctly filled
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replace the different calls to GetReservesFromBorrowernumber
with a calls to Koha::Patron->get_holds.
In some places we need to get a restricted set of holds, that's why we
process a search on this holds returned by ->get_holds (on the found
status for instance).
The changes are quite trivial and reading the diff should be enough to
catch bugs.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17737,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Tested both patches together, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
This patch makes koha automatically set expiration date when reserves become
waitting. Also it adds a new syspref "ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay" that allows to
take holidays into account while calculating expiration date.
Test plan:
- Install this patch and run updatedatabase.pl script,
- allow ExpireReservesMaxPickUpDelay in system preferences,
- set ReservesMaxPickUpDelay to 5.
- Place an hold on a checked out item and check in this item:
The hold's expiration date should be today + 5.
- Allow ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay in system preferences,
- add holiday during this pickup delay period,
- Create a new hold and make it comes waitting:
The hold's expiration date should be today + 5 + number of closed
day(s).
Also:
- Check that ExpireReservesOnHolidays syspref works again
without ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay.
- Check that cancel fees apply again if wanted.
Signed-off-by: sonia BOUIS <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
On the same way of Koha::Biblio->get_holds,
Koha::Biblio->get_holds_placed_before_today and Koha::Patron->get_holds,
this new subroutin will permit to retrieve the holds placed on a
specific item.
Note that at the moment we do not need a Koha::Item->get_holds method:
we do not want to display future holds placed in the future.
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17736 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
FAIL t/db_dependent/Holds.t
"my" variable $hold masks earlier declaration in same scope
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The C4::Reserve::GetReservesFromBiblionumber took 3 parameters, the
biblionumber, an optional itemnumber and a "all_dates" flag.
If set, the subroutine returned all the holds placed on a given bibliographic
record, even the ones placed in the future. Almost all of the calls had this
flag set, they will be replaced with a call to Koha::Biblio->holds.
But 5 did not have it:
- C4::Biblio::DelBiblio
-tools/batch_delete_records.pl
=> These 2 were wrong, we want to retrieve the holds to cancel them
before deleting the record. We need to get all the holds, even the ones
placed in the future /!\ CHANGE IN THE BEHAVIOR
- acqui/parcel.pl
=> 1 call per item were made to this subroutine. They have been replaced
with only 1 call to the new method Koha::Biblios->holds_placed_before_today
Then we filter on the itemnumbers.
I think this is wrong: we need the number of holds to know if the record
can be deleted, so even if future holds exist, the deletion should not
be possible.
- serials/routing-preview.pl
- C4::ILSDI::Services::GetRecords
- C4::SIP::ILS::Item->new
=> Seems ok, we just one to display holds placed before today
Test plan:
I would suggest to test this patch with patches from bug 17737 and bug 17738,
to place different kind of holds (biblio and item level, future and
past).
Then do a whole workflow to detect bug, view a record, delete record,
order, place a hold on an item which has been ordered, etc.
The hold's informations should always be the same without or without
these patches.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
* Add tests for CanItemBeReserved returns 'itemAlreadyOnHold' to t/db_dependent/Holds.t
* Don't let GetReserveId explode
* Use search instead of map
* Remove instances of resbarcode
* Fix badly formed li closing tag
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
* Removes tests no longer needed
* Updates rules to work with existing tests
* Fixes code issues revealed by unit tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
$category was a categorycode, to help the readability it's better to
name it $categorycode or assign a Category to $category
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
There is actually no need to use the hardcoded patron category S in
this test.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Holds.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Test passes OK
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Accounts.t: Only added a line that ensures the MPL branch exists.
AnonymiseIssueHistory.t: Only add a branch to work with.
Barcodes.t: Replaced clear with delete_all.
CalcFine.t: Remove default issuing rule and add one instead of updating.
Holds.t: Add category S in case it would not exist.
Members.t: Replaced clear with delete_all.
MoveItemFromBiblio.t: Replace last _fk construction.
Test plan:
Run these tests. (See note).
Git grep for only_fk, {_fk} and TestBuilder::default_value.
Note: Holds.t does not pass. Tests 9 and 39 fail, but they did already.
not ok 9 - GetReservesFromItemnumber should return a valid borrowernumber
not ok 39 - Test AlterPriority(), move to bottom
So this test needs attention, but on another report please :)
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Resolves this:
Failed test 'GetReservesFromItemnumber should return a valid borrowernumber'
at t/db_dependent/Holds.t line 97.
got: '2000001890'
expected: '2000001889'
Failed test 'Test AlterPriority(), move to bottom'
at t/db_dependent/Holds.t line 220.
got: '4'
expected: '5'
Test plan:
Run the test before and after applying this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Unless in t/db_dependent/Context.t where we want to test the cache
behaviors.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
This trivial patch introduces the code needed on the test files so they handle
the DB transaction instead of relying on the (removed) transaction started/rolled back
by TestBuilder.
Tested all of the files before and after applying the patch, resultes are the same.
(Pass exept of t/db_dependent/Barcodes_ValueBuilder.t, this has the same error).
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch removes C4::Dates from following files:
- t/db_dependent/Budgets.t
- t/db_dependent/Holds.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha_template_plugin_KohaDates.t
- t/db_dependent/Log.t
- t/db_dependent/NewsChannels.t
To test:
- First run all tests above
- Apply patch
- Then run tests again. The results should be the same.
(Note: I get 2 fails with NewsChannels.t, they are the same with
and without patch).
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
NewsChanell pass for me before patch, no after.
Followup follows :)
Rest of tests pass
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The current tests were expecting the first defined branch to be CPL. That's
not the case on my box so they failed. This patch adds the creation of two
new random branches/branchcodes, and replaces the legacy use of CPL and MPL
in favour of the new ones.
It relies on TestBuilder for the task.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
