Same as bug 30465 for authorities
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Same as bug 30460 for authorities
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch removes a trivial warning caused by a parameter being
compared to a literal but not being defined. Doing a
$ git grep GetTagsLabels
shows the change is safe as the function is always called with a value
of either 0 or 1.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Authority heading use is based on authority MARC 008/14-16. This could
be useful to show on authority search results, if new system preference
ShowHeadingUse is enabled.
To test:
1. Apply patches, update database, restart services
2. Go to Koha Administration -> system preferences -> searching tab.
Notice new ShowHeadingUse system preference is disabled. Leave it
disabled for now.
3. Do an authority search. Confirm it works as expected and no new
information is shown since ShowHeadingUse is disabled.
4. Do a biblio search and edit a record. Go to one of the authority
fields (1xx, 6xx or 7xx) and launch the authority finder plugin. Do an
authority search and confirm it works as expected and no new information
is shown since ShowHeadingUse is disabled.
5. Go back to system preferences and enable ShowHeadingUse syspref.
6. Repeat steps 3 and 4 but confirm the 'Heading use' column now shows, and
correctly displays what the heading can be used for based on 008/14-16.
Sponsored-by: Education Services Australia SCIS
Signed-off-by: Jessica <jzairo@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
2021-09-28 Updated version
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This makes the comparison between bibliographic field and authority field more robust and per subfield. This makes the comparison not consider the same e.g. the following fields:
$a Test User
$a Test $b User
The actual issue cannot be as easily reproduced with the patches for bug 21826 applied, but here's a test plan anyway:
1. Make sure tests pass (especially t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc*)
2. Make sure authority linking still works properly
3. Make sure authority and biblio frameworks allow subfield i
4. Make sure that even if you add subfield i to 700 in biblio, authority link is kept the same
5. Make sure that even if you add subfield i to the authority record, the authority link is kept the same
Signed-off-by: Frank Hansen <frank.hansen@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Same patch for the authority frameworks/records
Sponsored-by: Orex Digital
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Sometimes you know that the merge is useless, since the reporting
tag did not change.
Might be handy in batch processing of authority records.
Test plan:
Pick an authority with a few linked biblio recs (so that it will
immediately merge; lower than MergeLimit).
Open authority record and save it.
Verify that a linked biblio record was merged. Check time in 005.
You proved that this patch does not break the regular process.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a .perlcriticrc (copied from qa-test-tools) and fixes
almost all perlcrictic violations according to this .perlcriticrc
The remaining violations are silenced out by appending a '## no critic'
to the offending lines. They can still be seen by using the --force
option of perlcritic
This patch also modify t/00-testcritic.t to check all Perl files using
the new .perlcriticrc.
I'm not sure if this test script is still useful as it is now equivalent
to `perlcritic --quiet .` and it looks like it is much slower
(approximatively 5 times slower on my machine)
Test plan:
1. Run `perlcritic --quiet .` from the root directory. It should output
nothing
2. Run `perlcritic --quiet --force .`. It should output 7 errors (6
StringyEval, 1 BarewordFileHandles)
3. Run `TEST_QA=1 prove t/00-testcritic.t`
4. Read the patch. Check that all changes make sense and do not
introduce undesired behaviour
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Lines can be moved. Deletion can be done too if skip_merge is not set.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
At the last development meeting we have voted to remove the
QueryParser-related code
https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Development_IRC_meeting_19_February_2020
Hea tells us that it has not been adopted, and the code/bug tracker that
it is not really usable as it. As nobody is willing to work on it, we
decided to remove it instead.
Test plan:
% prove t/db_dependent/Search.t
must return green
See commits from bug 9239 and confirm that the code is removed in this
patch.
Also play with the search on the UI and confirm that you do not see
obvious regressions
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Note that bug 24267 will fix the issue during Z39 searching for new auth, but the duplicate check at saving will still fail
To test:
0 - Set SearchEngine to Elasticsearch, QueryRegexEscapeOptions to 'Don't Escape'
1 - Browse to Authorities
2 - Select New->New from Z3950
3 - Search for subject 'Short stories'
4 - Auth search explodes
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat and confirm the search results return
7 - Import and save the GENRE/FORM record for Short stories
8 - Repeat the search and import the same record
9 - Confirm that upon save you are notified of duplicate, don't save
10 - set QueryRegexEscapeOptions to 'Escape' and confirm Z39 searching works and importing/save notifies of duplicate
11 - set SearchEngine to Zebra and confirm Z39 searching works and importing/save notifies of duplicate
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Myka Kennedy Stephens <mkstephens@lancasterseminary.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Like this one (16.11 line number):
Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at C4/AuthoritiesMarc.pm line 1070.
We need to add a scalar to some MARC::Field::subfield calls. In list context
an empty list returned affects the hash built around it.
Test plan:
Could reproduce this warning easily from OPAC authority search.
opac-authorities-home.pl calling BuildSummary.
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Set search engine to Zebra
2 - Have some authorities and indexes up to date
3 - Search authorities with option 'search entire record'
4 - No results
5 - Apply patch
6 - Run unit tests, they pass!
7 - Repeat search
8 - Results!
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Marc Thibault <pierre-marc.thibault@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Sponsored-by: National Library of Finland
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Define a rule:
Matching rule code: LCAUTH
Match threshold: 100
Record type: Authority record
MATCH POINTS
Search index: LC-card-number
Score: 100
Tag: 010
Subfield: a
2 - Have a record with an LC number in 010
3 - Export it
4 - Edit the record in Koha, move the value from 010 to another field
5 - Import the original record
6 - Use the matching rule above, you expect it won't match (nothing in 010 anymore)
7 - It matches?!?!?!
8 - Enable zebra logging in koha-conf.xml
<zebra_loglevels>none,fatal,warn,request,info</zebra_loglevels>
9 - tail -f /var/log/koha/kohadev/zebra-output.log
10 - On manage marc apply matchign with no rule, then reapply with rule
11 - View the output in the log - the index searched is 'Any'
12 - Apply patch
13 - Reapply matching
14 - Note we search the expected index and no match is found
NOTE: By applying bug 21579, I was able to view the difference, and
see that it didn't match identically, because I had moved the
value from 010 to 155. No log checking needed. clean/delete batch.
Apply patch, no match. clean/delete batch.
Edit authority back, matches.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
In sub merge the Koha::Authority object was already created, so it was kind
of silly to recreate it each time with new.
In Koha::Authority, the ControlledIndicators object can be saved in the
object too for reuse during its life time. Similarly, we prevent repeated
lookups for the reporting tag (via authority type).
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Authorities.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Limited benchmarking shows me a reduction of 11% on Merge.t and a
reduction of 4% on Authorities.t when comparing with and without this
last patch. The larger impact on Merge.t could be expected.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch does:
[1] Adds Koha::Authority->controlled_indicators (with a test).
[2] Adds a call to controlled_indicators in AuthoritiesMarc::merge.
Unit test Merge.t is extended too.
[3] Simplifies the code in authorities/blinddetail-biblio-search.pl by
calling controlled_indicators.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Authorities.t
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t
[3] Steps 3 to 7 for MARC21:
Create a PERSO_NAME authority with 008/11=r and ind1=3
[4] Edit a biblio and add a 600 linked to the new authority.
[5] Verify that the biblio has ind1==3 and ind2==7 and $2==aat.
(If $2 is not visible, check the metadata in biblio_metadata.)
[6] Edit the PERSO_NAME authority and change 008/11 to '|' (bar).
[7] Verify that merge updated your biblio record: $ind2==4 and $2 gone.
[8] UNIMARC: Follow the pattern from steps 3 to 7.
Create authority, link it in a biblio, check indicators (they should
be copied both). Edit authority, change indicators and verify the
merge results in the biblio record.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested PERSO_NAME and UNIF_TITLE.
For UNIF_TITLE the second authority indicator is copied to ind1 or ind2,
depending on the biblio tag involved.
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
While doing a merge, if a subfield(s) precedes the controlled subfields
(like $i before $a in 7XX, which comes before $a -- rare but will
become more and more usual) after merging will be moved to the end.
This is not right.
The patch (with AuthorityMergeMode == loose) make merge consider the
subfields order: all subfields which originally were found before
the first controlled subfield (e.g. $i before $a in 7XX / MARC 21)
will remain in the front, the rest of not controlled subfields that
should remain in the field will come after the subfields copied
from authority rec.
As a bonus, $9 will be placed at the end.
To test:
0) Have AuthorityMergeMode == loose;
1) Have some field in bibliorecord, controlled by an authority, with
extra subfield(s) (i.e. not present in authority rec.) placed at the
beginning of the field;
2) Open (not necessarily edit) and save the connected authority;
3) See that the extra subfieds were moved to the end of the field
(and $9 is in the front);
4) Apply the patch;
5) Reorder subfields in biblio field;
6) Open (not necessarily edit) and save the connected authority;
7) See that the order has been conserved, additionally $9 the last
subfield in the field.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Amended:
Moved field creation to its original place. Changed $9 handling. Simplified the following add_subfields for loop. Edited comments.
Restored the append_fields_ordered call (see comment6).
With this patch, the Merge.t test now passes.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Commit b4392018bc [Bug 12478: make things using SimpleSearch use the new version] changed sub FindDuplicateAuthority and replaced this call (from 3.22.x) in 16.05 (pushed April 2016):
my ($error, $results, $total_hits) = C4::Search::SimpleSearch( $query, 0, 1, [ "authorityserver" ] );
The new call does unfortunately not include the authorityserver:
my ($error, $results, $total_hits) = $searcher->simple_search_compat( $query, 0, 1 );
Simple_search_compat redirects to C4/Search/SimpleSearch and SimpleSearch assumes a biblioserver if no server is passed.
This effectively makes FindDuplicateAuthority useless since we will no longer find duplicates and we could see an error like this in the log:
16:51:42-04/10 zebrasrv(51) [request] Search biblios ERROR 114 1 1+0 RPN @attrset Bib-1 @and @attr 1=authtype PERSO_NAME @attr 1=Heading Moerenhout
The fix is obviously trivial.
Test plan:
[1] Go to Authorities.
[2] Add a new authority PERSO_NAME with 100a Moerenhout.
[3] Repeat step 2. Verify that you get the duplicate authority warning.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After the introduction of Koha::Authorities->get_usage_count with bug
9988, we can now replace the remaining occurrences of CountUsage.
At the same time we remove CountUsageChildren. This was an empty sub.
The typo get_count_usage in a subtest title is adjusted.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Authorities.t
[2] Perform a search on authorities-home.pl and verify that you see
plausible numbers for 'used in xx records'.
[3] Click on Details for one authority. See the same number?
[4] Do the same as in 2/3 for Authority search on OPAC.
[5] Remember the authid and enter this in the record numbers box on
tools/batch_delete_records.pl. Select Authorities and click
Continue. The next form shows a column "Used in". Do you see
the same count again?
[6] Git grep CountUsage.
You should see just one hit in a comment that can be kept in
Koha/Authorities.pm.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
0. Apply patches
1. Update database
2. Go to administration -> libraries, try to update some library and
fill in some value into Marc Organization code field
3. Save this library and edit again - the code should be stored
correctly
4. Go to system preferences and fill in some value into MARCOrgCode
preference, note there is enhanced description mentioning the ability to
set organization code on library level
5. Set active library to the one with own org code stored
6. Go to cataloguing, create new empty record and click into field 003 -
there should be the code you filled for that library
7. Set active library to one withou marc org code
8. Go to cataloguing, create new empty record and click into field 003 -
there should be the code from system preference
9. Go to system preferences again and set AutoCreateAuthorities to
'generate' and BiblioAddsAuthorities to 'allow'
10. Go to cataloguing and create some biblio record, fill in any author
in to create its authority record, save the biblio
11. Go to authorities and find this created authority, go to details and
check the fields: 003, 040$a, 040$c, 670$a - there should be used right org code
12. prove t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t t/db_dependent/Biblio.t t/db_dependent/Koha/Libraries.t
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Altough this patch deals with a mostly hypothetical case and this report
makes it practically impossible anymore to merge with records in the
Default framework (having no reporting tag), we can make the code of
sub merge still a bit more robust here.
If you would merge biblio records from one authtype to another and the new
framework would not have a reporting tag, before this patch the result would
be data loss. Merge would handle this request as a delete. This patch makes
merge handle it differently: instead of clearing the biblio records, it
keeps $a and $9 in order to make a future corrective merge possible.
Note: The additional condition on line 1468 for $tags_using_authtype
makes sure that we do not select all fields when the authtype should
unexpectedly be empty string (Default). This prevents crashing on
a "Control fields do not have subfields" error.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Change parameters to a hashref.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Looks good to me.
Two calls in migration_tools/22_to_30 still in old style.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The fails in the previous test showed that we need the first three
changes here. Some final polishing in points 4 to 6.
[1] Sub merge: Refine the condition for initializing $tags_new.
A postponed 'modify'-merge (A to B) makes that $authtypefrom is not
defined when running merge later. When crossing the type boundary, we
need a new field too.
[2] Sub merge: Add condition for an empty @record_to array.
This indicates also that a field should be removed, since we should
otherwise only add a $9 subfield.
[3] Sub merge: Adjust initializing @record_from.
This change is tested by verifying a cleared subfield in the test.
[4] DelAuthority: Adding a skipmerge parameter to allow the call from
authorities/merge.pl to skip an unneeded merge.
This also prevents that the 'delete-merge' would precede the
'modify-merge' under a hypothetical race condition.
[5] DelAuthority: There is actually no need to call GetAuthority.
The subfields of the old record are not relevant in this case.
[6] Added a few POD lines to merge.
[7] Removed a trailing space in a comment line in merge.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t.
The last subtest should no longer fail now.
[2] See test plan of next patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
At this point, we are replacing dontmerge functionality by the new
AuthorityMergeLimit logic. Instead of doing this check before calling
merge, we just call merge and check it there. In order to let the cron
job do the larger (postponed) merges, we add a parameter override_limit.
A subtest is added in Merge.t to test the 'postponed merge' feature. Since
merge now also calls get_usage_count, an additional mock is added. All
references to dontmerge are removed.
In merge two lines, initializing $dbh and $counteditbiblios, are moved.
The dontmerge test in DelAuthority and ModAuthority is removed. Since this
did not leave much in ModAuthority, I fixed the whitespace on the remaining
lines rightaway (yes, I know).
A minimal set of changes is applied to the cron script; it will get further
attention on a next patch.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
[2] Set AuthorityMergeLimit to 2. Modify an authority with two linked
biblios. Check that the merge was done immediately.
[3] Now modify an authority with more than 2 linked records.
Verify that the merge was postponed; a record must be inserted in
the need_merge_authorities table.
[4] Testing of the merge cron job is *postponed* to a next patch.
Note: I tested a modification, but the script just needs more
attention.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Since we can now call linked_biblionumbers, we can now remove all Zebra
related code from merge. We also add a parameter biblionumbers; we use it
in the test now, but it may be handy too later in the maintenance script
when we want to trigger a merge for specific biblionumber(s). See bug
report 18071.
All mocks for ZOOM, Context::Zconn, Search::new_record_for_zebra in the
merge test can now be replaced by one mock for linked_biblionumbers. Note
that we test the biblionumbers parameter in the last subtest without that
mock.
Remove unused vars $countunmodifiedbiblio, $counterrors from merge.
Renamed zebrarecords to linkedrecords in the Merge test.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
[2] Modify an authority record. Check the linked biblio records.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
We will need a few additional parameters for merge later on. This patch
puts the original parameters in a parameter hash.
For the same reason DelAuthority gets a parameter hash here.
Note: We remove the second parameter from the DelAuthority call in
authorities/authorities-home.pl here. It was not used and could have
presented problems in the future.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t.
[2] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Ablewicz <abl@biblos.pk.edu.pl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Resolves:
*** ERROR: Spurious =cut command at line 1376 in file C4/AuthoritiesMarc.pm
Test plan:
[1] Run podchecker on C4/AuthoritiesMarc.pm
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Script tools/batch_delete_records.pl only checks the return value of
DelAuthority. The return value depends on DBI rows, which is not always
reliable. It may return -1 when it 'does not know'.
Testing $@ in tools/batch_delete_records.pl should actually be enough.
The return value was discarded in C4/ImportBatch.pm. Removing an unused
variable.
Test plan:
[1] Pick an authority record with a few linked biblios.
Delete this authority record via tools/batch_delete_records.pl.
Check if the linked biblio records are cleaned up.
[2] Bonus: Make a typo in the SQL statement of DelAuthority. Check
if batch_delete_records shows you the error message.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
In order to accomplish this, we need to add some additional checks in
the merge routine. The actual change to remove the field, is quite
small.
Furthermore, we need to add a merge call in DelAuthority and adjust
the merge cron job accordingly.
The change is well supported by additional tests, including a simulation
of postponed removal via cron, if dontmerge is enabled.
Note: Deleting an authority with linked biblios is tested on the next
patch.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
[2] Delete an authority without linked biblios from the Authorities
module. If the indexer is not fast enough, wait a bit and refresh to
verify that the authority is gone on authorities-home.pl.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Instead of using the MAX(authid)+1 logic, AddAuthority should just save
the record and get the new id. The authid column is an autoincrement.
This eliminates problems where a newly assigned authid also refers to a
previously deleted record. (And it will not cause problems when refining
the dontmerge functionality on report 9988.)
Note: ModAuthority also calls AddAuthority to update an existing record; in
that case we should not create a new record even if the record should not
be found any more (which should be exceptional).
This patch also simplifies handling of 001 in the authority record: in all
cases this field is updated now; no need to check its contents.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/AuthoritiesMarc.t
[2] Add a new authority record via the interface
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
We need to add $9 to the skip_subfields hash too. Formerly, it was
added to $exclude as well.
Thanks, Julian, for catching this one.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Kept the same number of lines.
You could verify with diff -w.
Test plan:
[1] Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
[2] As the last patch in this series, also test the interface:
Set AuthorityMergeMode to loose. Set dontmerge to Do.
Modify an authority record attached to multiple biblios.
Edit a subfield, clear a subfield and add a subfield.
Save. Wait a bit for the merge and Zebra update.
Verify that the changes are merged properly into biblio records.
[3] Repeat step 2 with AuthorityMergeMode to strict.
Remember that this affects the extra subfields in biblio records.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Remove some commented warnings
Remove the commented old code at the end of sub merge
Explicitly set merge mode in the first subtest
Move the return to loose mode from the second subtest to the third
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Since strict mode does not allow additional subfields that would make
identical fields linked to the same authority different, there is no
need to keep them while merging.
We achieve this goal by simply:
[1] Count the number of same fields linked to mergefrom in strict mode to
eliminate duplicates.
[2] Replaces the if-statement on auth_number by a next. (Tidy follows.)
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
If you modify an authority and clear a specific subfield, you expect that
merge respects your edit and clears this subfield too in the biblio
records. It does in the new strict mode, but it does not yet in the
default loose mode.
This patch fixes that by adjusting the code around $exclude so that it
uses a new hash skip_subfields, built from the reporting tags from the old
and the new authority record.
This is supported again by some changes in the unit test.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Originally aimed for 9988, adjusted for this report.
Old behavior was: pick the first tag. This is definitely wrong.
If you (would) merge 610 to 611, you don't want to get a 111.
This patch resolves the problem by determining the new tag in a small
helper routine _merge_newtag, and corrects the position of the new field
in the MARC record with append_fields_ordered. Too bad that MARC::Record
does not have such a function; it looks like insert_fields_ordered, but
it is different in case of multiple fields with the same tag.
Note: These two small helper functions are not tested separately, since they
should not be called outside of merge. They are implicitly tested by the
adjusted tests in Merge.t.
Note: In adding tests for this fix, I chose to simplify compare_field_count
(no need for the pass parameter), and replace the pass parameter of sub
compare_field_order by an exclude parameter, a hash of fields to exclude in
counting fields.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Original fix from a patch on bug 11315.
Amended by Marcel de Rooy January 2017.
Test plan:
If you set mode to loose, the test will still pass.
If you set mode to strict, one test will fail. (Fixed later.)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Original fix from a patch on bug 5572.
Amended by Marcel de Rooy January 2017.
Note: This does not yet resolve the field order when merging to another
auth type, but is a good start.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Authorities/Merge.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The marc subfield structure is currently cached using a global variable
of C4::Context. The infos are retrieved every time a new context is
created.
This patch suggests to use Koha::Cache instead.
To achieve this goal, a new subroutine is created
C4::Biblio::GetMarcSubfieldStructure, it will be called from code which
needs to get the marc subfield structure. GetMarcFromKohaField,
GetMarcSubfieldStructureFromKohaField, TransformKohaToMarc and
_get_inverted_marc_field_map are modified accordingly and the cache is cleared
when the table is updated (from the 3 pl scripts modified by this patch).
The caching done in C4::Context (marcfromkohafield) is removed.
Test plan:
Play with the marc subfield structure (in the administration module),
then add and edit records and make sure everything went fine.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Everything works as expected on my functional tests. I'm really happy to see the
patch introduces relevant tests for previously untested functions.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
