There is an error when placing a hold for a club without members:
Uncaught TypeError: err.responseJSON.error is undefined
It seems that we should remove clubs without members from the search.
Test plan:
Create 1 club xx with 2 patrons
Create 1 club xxx with 1 patron and cancel their enrolment
Create 1 club xxxx without patron
Place a hold for club "x", only the first one should be returned with
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The original code for pickup locations when placing item-level holds
picked the currently logged-in library.
We made things more robust, as the logged-in library might not be a
valid pickup location for the patron and item. But it was wrongly chosen
to use the holding branch as the default.
A more robust approach is needed, and this precedence is picked this
time (it could be configuration-driven in the future):
- Logged-in library
- Empty
To test:
1. Pick a biblio with various valid pickup locations, some not including
the logged-in library.
2. Pick a patron for placing the hold
=> FAIL: Notice that (when valid pickup location) the holding branch is
always chosen
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: If valid pickup location, the logged-in branch is picked as
default for item-type level. When it is not, an empty dropdown is used
as a fallback.
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
The code didn't previously correctly do the checks for patron
debarment status and whether the patron has fees, this caused the
intended warnings messages to not appear when they should have.
To test:
1) Create a new club and add a patron to it who has manual debarment
and a manual charge of over $5 (more than the maxoutstanding syspref).
2) Try to create a new club hold for the previously created club and
notice no warnings are listed for the patron.
3) Apply patch
4) Try to create now the club hold again and notice the warnings
being shown in the hold page.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
We can use the Koha::Patron::is_expired accessor instead of re-writing
it in request.pl.
To test:
1) Make that a warning is being shown with and without this patch
when placing a hold to an expired patron account
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The logic in request.pl only passes pickup locations if a hold is allowed,
they are not calculated when the hold is overridden.
This patch copies the pickup locations code into the override conditional,
adjusting to mark the item overridden
This also highlights an condition of override:
If a hold is allowed, but there are no valid pickup locations the override
is not allowed.
To test:
1 - Set a holds rule to allow on-shelf holds only if all unavailable
2 - Set AllowHoldPolicyOverride to 'Allow'
3 - Find a record with several items available
4 - Attempt to place a hold
5 - The items have a yellow triangle, but no pickup locations
6 - Place an item level hold
7 - Note the hold has no pickup location
8 - Cancel the hold
9 - Apply patch and restart all
10 - Attempt hold again
11 - Items still have yellow triangle, but there are dropdowns for pickup location
12 - Place an item level hold, verify a pickup location is set
13 - Cancel the hold
14 - Alter circ rule to allow on shelf holds
15 - Change 'Default checkout, hold and return policy' - 'Hold pickup library match' to "item's hold group"
16 - Ensure there is no group for the item
17 - Attempt to place hold
18 - Override is not allowed 'No valid pickup locations'
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch allows staff patrons to cancel multiple holds in bulk.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. restart_all
3. In cataloge go to a book and place many holds
CHECK => Holds table shows a column of checkboxes
4. Play with checkboxes (have some fun ;-P)
CHECK => When you manually check all checkboxes, the checkbox in the
header also gets checked.
=> When you uncheck one of the checkboxes, the one in the header also gets unchecked.
=> If no checkbox is checked and you check the one in the header,
all checkboxes get checked.
=> If there are some checkboxes that are checked and others are
not, when you click on the checkbox in the header all checkboxes get
unchecked.
=> If all checkboxes are checked, when you uncheck the one in the
header, all checkboxes get unchecked.
=> Every time you play with checkboxes, the number in the button
"Cancel selected" changes.
5. Check some of the checkboxes and click on cancel selected.
SUCCESS => A background job gets fired to cancel all selected holds.
=> A message should appear with a link to the job.
6. Wait a few seconds and click on the link
SUCCESS => A message appears with the report of the execution of the
background job.
7. Grab a patron and search to hold
8. Select multiple biblios and click on "place hold for <patron>"
CHECK => After holds are confirmed, multiple holds table are shown.. one for
each record. Checkboxes work exactly the same as before, but scoped
for each individual table. Checkboxes from one table will not affect
checkboxes from other tables.
9. Repeat steps 4 to 6.
10. Check In some of the items so the get in Waiting state.
11. Update expirationdate os some of those holds and set it to
ReservesMaxPickUpDelay + 1 days earlier
NOTE => ReservesMaxPickUpDelay = 7 days by default, so sql syntax to update would be
=> update reserves set expirationdate = date_sub(expirationdate, interval 8 day) where reserve_id in (...)
12. Repeat steps 4 to 6 but in waitingreserves.pl, in both tabs.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 23678: (QA follow-up) Add missing template filter
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 23678: (QA follow-up) Add missing filters
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 23678: (QA follow-up) Use correct indentation
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
JD amended patch: also Koha/BackgroundJob/BatchCancelHold.pm
JD Amended patch: Full rebase and adjustements made on top of bug 26080.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes a few changes:
1 - If we are not splitting the queue ( HoldsSplitQueue == 'nothing' ) then
there are no changes for 'virtual' vs 'actual' numbering
2 - If we are splitting the queue you cannot use the dropdown, so we do not need to process the options
3 - If the hold is 'found' we do not need to process the options
4 - We can simply use the 'last priority' to build the options, we do not need to process in the script
5 - We can use a block to build the options
6 - Remove a stray holds.index
To test:
1 - Place 5 holds on a bib
2 - 'Find' two of the holds i.e. check them in to set status to 'transit' or 'waiting'
3 - View the holds page for the biblio
4 - Inspect the priorty dropdown for the found holds, note they have options for 1-5 but are disabled
5 - Note the dropdowns for other holds have options 1-5
6 - Note options 4&5 in the dropdowns have no effect
7 - Apply patch
8 - Inspect the priority dopdowns on the found holds
9 - Note they only show their found status
10 - Note the other dropdowns only show options 1-3
11 - Test with other HoldsSplitQueue options and HoldsSplitQueueNumbering
12 - When holds queue is split, no dropdowns should be active and should show only their current priority
13 - When HoldsSplitQueueNumbering is 'virtual' the dropdown should be disabled and correctly count the number of unfound holds in the list
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
JK: Fixed grammar in commit title
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
JD: Remove trailing 'i'
Bug 29049: (QA follow-up) Remove excessive whitespace
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Revised test plan from Owen:
This patch modifies the hold process so that if one of the titles in a
multi-hold process has no items the process doesn't abort completely.
To test, apply the patch and perform a search in the catalog which will
return one or more records with no items attached.
- Check checkboxes for multiple results, some of which have items and
at least one of which has no items.
- Click "Place hold."
- You should be taken to the page for placing multiple holds, with a
heading, "Cannot place hold on some items."
- Note: You will not be able to complete the holds process without the
next patch.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Just checking with a regex that whether an input looks like a biblionumber
is not enough, we need to also verify there is a biblio really existing
in the database and skip processing of hold request for non-existent
biblionumbers.
To test:
1) Go to page /cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumbers=XXXXX
where XXXXX is non-existent biblionumber, notice internal server error
2) Apply patch
3) Repeat step 1 and notice we cannot place a hold
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When we fetch the biblioitems we use a select to limit the columns fetched,
we must include the biblionumber as well
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The loop here gets items from the record, plus analytic items. Because of this
we need to check more than 1 record - we decide to do this via biblioitems.
We need to preserve that, but when checking ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted we
cannot assume that the biblionumber and biblioitemnumber are the same (they should be
but this may not be the best of all possible worlds)
I simply switch the call here
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Test placing holds on single bibs and multiple bibs
3 - Confirm it works as expected
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Currently we send $biblionumbers as the parameter, but this is just apassthrough form when a list of biblios is selected for placing a hold
If passed a single biblionumber we push it into @biblionumbers and use that for building the biblio loop
This patch uses @biblionumbers to avoid sending a blank variable in the URL
To test:
1 - On the staff client click 'place hold' for an individual record
2 - Use the form to find a patron
3 - Note the url is:
http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumbers=
4 - Apply patch
5 - Repeat
6 - The url is now like:
http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumbers=248
(but with whatever biblionumber you chose)
7 - Perform a search and select multiple biblios and confirm you can place holds as before
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
JD Amended patch: Add missing space
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a "debug" parameter we are passing from the controller scripts
to C4::Auth::get_template_and_user, but it's not actually used!
Test plan:
Confirm the assumption
Review the changes from this patch
Generated with:
perl -p -i -e 's#\s*debug\s*=\>\s*(0|1),?\s*##gms' **/*.pl
git checkout misc/devel/update_dbix_class_files.pl # Wrong catch
+ Manual fix in acqui/neworderempty.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes request.pl pass the holding library object to the
template, if it is a valid pickup location for the item. This way, the
template can set a good default to save clicks.
To test:
1. Have "Hold pickup library match" set to "Item's home library"
2. Have a record with items in three different branches. For example:
- item1: homebranch: MPL, holdingbranch: MPL
- item2: homebranch: FPL, holdingbranch: FPL
- item3: homebranch: CPL, holdingbranch: IPT
3. Have FPL marked as 'No' for pickup location
4. On the record, open the page for placing a hold for a patron
(acevedo?)
=> SUCCESS: You are presented the regular hold placing page, with an
extra column on the items for pickup location setting
=> SUCCESS: The item2 (on FPL) cannot be selected, there's a clear message
about not having valid pickup locations
=> FAIL: The other ones don't have anything pre-selected on the
dropdowns
5. Apply this patch
6. Repeat 4 (go back to the record, etc)
=> SUCCESS: Nothing changed BUT the item with holding branch = MPL has
it set by default in the dropdown.
=> SUCCESS: IPT is not a valid pickup location for item3, so not set by
default in this case.
7. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Besides the commit subject, this patch does much more:
- It makes request.pl stop passing a pickup location to
CanItemBeReserved
- It makes the page use the API to render a dropdown for each item, with
their valid pickup locations
- Items with no valid pickup locations have a nice message about why
they are disabled for selection
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Choose a biblio for placing a hold
3. Choose a patron
=> SUCCESS: You are presented with a new layout, that includes a
dropdown for choosing each item's pickup location. If an item is not
holdable, it still isn't.
4. Try having an item whose home branch is not marked as a pickup
location
=> SUCCESS: Notice you cannot choose that item
5. CHoose an item, but do not choose a branch, and click 'Place hold'
=> SUCCESS: It shows an alert about the need to choose a pickup location
6. Choose one of the (only possible) pickup locations for the specific
item
7. Place the item level hold
=> SUCCESS: All goes as expected!
8. Sign off :D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the multi-hold page offer only valid pickup locations
for the selected biblios. Prior to this, all system-wide pickup
locations were offered.
To test:
1. Set 'Hold pickup library match' to 'Item's home branch' so we put a
constraint on the valid pickup locations for easier testing.
2. Choose two or more biblios from a search, which contain in total 2
or 3 item home branches.
3. Click 'Place hold'
4. Choose a patron
=> FAIL: The dropdown offers all system's pickup locations
5. Apply this patches
6. Reload the page
=> SUCCESS: Only valid pickup locations are offered
7. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We don't need to count the number of clubs if we selected a patron or
club already
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
1. Have no existing clubs
2. Apply patch
3. Go to request.tt and you will not see the club tab or any mention of clubs
4. Create at least 1 club
5. Go back to request.tt and now see the tab for clubs
6. Make sure you can place holds as an individual with and without clubs.
7. Make sure you can place holds for clubs.
8. rejoice and sign-off
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch alters C4/Reserves.pm to pass back 'noReservesAllowed' when
allowedreserves=0. This allows passing to the user an appropriate
message about the availability of items for holds
This patch also fixes a FIXME about using effective_itemtype to fetch item rules
To test:
1 - Set one itemtype to allow no holds
2 - Set 'Holds per record' to 0 for another itemtype/patron combination
3 - Create or find 2 records, each with items only of the itemtypes above
3 - Attempt to place a hold for a patron on each record above
4 - The message will be 'Too many holds'
5 - Apply patch and repeat
6 - Message should be "Cannot place hold: no item are available to be placed on hold"
7 - Try placing a multihold with either record above and a holdable record,
message should end "Cannot place hold on some items'
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Rebase - Fix test expectation
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
During bug 27071 development, this line got inadvertedly changed. This
patch restores the original behaviour.
To test:
1. Search for a title
2. Go try place a hold
=> FAIL: Look at the HTML, there's no pickup location with
selected="selected"
3. Switch branch and repeat 2
=> FAIL: Still the same
4. Apply this patch
5. Repeat 2 and 3
=> SUCCESS: Branch is selected, chosen current branch is picked
6. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Doing
$ git grep pickup_locations_code
shows there's some calculated data that is not actually used anywhere.
We can get rid of it.
This patch also reuses $item_object (which is in the same loop scope) to
avoid an extra DB call.
To test:
1. Run:
$ git grep pickup_locations_code
=> FAIL: It is only used/set as a comma separated string, inside
request.pl
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: The unused stuff is not there anymore
4. Open the page for placing some holds
=> SUCCESS: It doesn't explode
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the 'Any library' string translatable, by converting it
into a flag and using it accordingly on the request.tt template.
To test:
1. Have the 'Hold pickup library match' set to 'any library' on the
circultation rules.
2. Open the page to place a hold on a biblio with some items
=> SUCCESS: The item says 'Any library' on the 'Allowed pickup
locations' column.
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: No behavior change
=> SUCCESS: The string is on the template
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We should remove all SQL queries that contain 0000-00-00 and finally
assume we do not longer have such value in our DB (for date type)
We already dealt with such values in previous update DB entries.
The 2 added by this one haven't been replaced already.
The code will now assume that either a valid date exist, or NULL/undef.
Test plan:
QA review is needed and test of the different places where code is
modified.
Not sure about the change from reports/issues_avg_stats.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Pretty much like the opac-reserve.pl does, this patch makes the staff
request.pl script get the branch from the specialized routine from
C4::Reserves instead of falling back to userenv.
To test:
1. Follow the original test plan:
- Create two local hold groups containing distinct lists of libraries.
- In default rules for all libraries, set Hold Policy = "From local hold group" and Hold pickup library match to "Patron's hold group"
- Make sure AllowHoldPolicyOverride is set to Don't Allow
- Make sure you're logged in at a library in Group 1
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 1. Confirm you can place a hold on this title for a patron in Group 1 (correct), but not for a patron in Group 2 (correct).
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 2. Confirm you cannot place a hold for a patron from Group 1 (correct), BUT you also cannot place a hold for a patron from Group 2 (incorrect) -- Koha gives the erroneous message "pickupNotInHoldGroup"
- Change your library to a something in Group 2
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 1. Confirm you cannot place a hold on this title for a patron in Group 1 (incorrect), and not for a patron in Group 2 (correct).
- Find a bib with only 1 item from Group 2. Confirm you cannot place a hold for a patron from Group 1 (correct), but you can place a hold for a patron from Group 2 (correct)
=> FAIL: Things expected to fail on the plan, fail.
2. Apply this patches
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: It now works!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a missing parameter to CanItemBeReserved, we need to know if
the hold can be placed at a given pickup library.
Test plan:
1 - Set preferences:
UseBranchTransferLimits: enforce
BranchTransferLimitsType: itype
AllowHoldPolicyOverride: Don't allow
2 - Set Centerville 'Book' items to not be allowed to transfer to any other library
3 - Make sure Hold policy is set to 'any library'
4 - Find a record with a Centerville item and other items
5 - Attempt to place an item level hold on the Centerville item (with a
pickup library different than Centerville)
=> Without this patch you are taken to the holds list, but your hold is not placed
Nothing indicates why hold has failed
=> With this patch you cannot select the item from Centerville
"Cannot be transferred to pickup library"
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When no desk is defined request.pl returns an internal server
error. Check a desk is defined before asking for reservation deskname.
Plan test:
1. log in with a library with no desk
2. check in a reserved book so it'll be switch to “waiting reserve”
3. go to the book notice and click the Holds tab (request.pl page)
4. boum
5. apply patch, restart plack
6. refresh page
7. now loading properly
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item is checked in and marked 'Waiting' or already 'Waiting'
and there is a desk attached to the session, the item is marked
waiting at the current desk of the current library.
The information is displayed on the OPAC and on the intranet. The
patron can then know at which desk he can retrieve his document.
Desk Management (Bug 13881) is now useful.
Test plan :
1. apply Bug 24201
2. $KOHA_PATH/installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl
3. Check out some document to someone
4. make another one reserve this document
5. check in the document
6. you can see the document is attach to the current library
7. create some desks and attach one to your session (see Bug 13881 and
Bug 24201)
8. cancel the preceding reserve and redo steps 3 to 5
9. you should see the document is waiting at the current library and
current desk on:
a. the intranet document request page
b. the intranet borrower holds tab
c. the item list where the document is listed on the bibliographic
details
d. the borrower's OPAC holds tab.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA
Following Josef Moravec QA comments :
- rewrite Koha::Hold->desk according to Object Oriented Koha
Guidelines and use it to fetch desk name in various templates
- remove unused Desks.GetName
- Check for columns existence in db update
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) QA: useless change
Maybe it was a relic of something usefull... anyway
not anymore.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 24412: (follow-up) Fix POD
Koha::Desk and not Koha::Library...
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds new syspref, HoldsNeedProcessingSIP, which controls whether
a hold that is related to item will be filled automatically or not. If
the user has enabled the syspref then instead of fulfilling the hold
automatically the hold will go to "in processing" state.
To test:
1. Checkout a book to patron A
2. Place a bib level hold to the book for B
3. Patron A returns the book via SIP, to simulate this use:
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --item <ItemBarcode> -m checkin
4. Notice that no notification is generated for Patron B about hold
and that the hold status in intranet and opac is "In Processing".
5. Notice that patron A (or other patrons) cannot checkout a book
that is in processing, because it is considered to be attached to
the holdee (similarly to the waiting state):
./misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -su koha -sp koha -l CPL -a 127.0.0.1 -p 6001 --patron <PatronABarcode> --item <ItemBarcode> -m checkout
Signed-off-by: Timothy Alexis Vass <timothy_alexis.vass@ub.lu.se>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements necesary code to implement non priority feature
To test:
1) Apply all patches.
2) Run updatedatabase.
3) Checkout a specific item for patron1.
4) Place a hold on the same item for patron2 (do not check non priority
hold checkbox).
5) Try to renew the item for patron1.
CHECK => in checkouts table, there is a message that the item could not
be renewed because there was a hold.
6) Cleanup all checkouts and holds.
7) repeat steps 3 to 5, but this time check the non priority checkbox.
SUCCESS => item was renewed
8) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries would like to be able to cancel a hold with the option to
specify a reason. Providing a reason would generate an email to that
patron.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Restart all the things!
4) Create new AV category "HOLD_CANCELLATION", add some cancelation reasons
5) Add new Holds module notice "HOLD_CANCELLATION", add an email version.
A quick test version would be "Reason: <<reserves.cancellation_reason>>"
--
[% USE AuthorisedValues %]
Reason: [% AuthorisedValues.GetByCode( 'CANCELLATION_REASON', hold.cancellation_reason, 'IS_OPAC' ) %]
[% IF hold.cancellation_reason == "MY_AV_VALUE" %]
IF perhaps you'd like to have a much longer explanation than just the
one sentence in the AV description, you can use IF blocks using Template
Toolkit markup!
[% END %]
--
6) Place a hold for a patron
7) On request.pl, select the 'del' option for the hold
8) Select a cancellation reason and choose "Update hold(s)"
9) Note a new message has been queue for the patron with the cancelation reason
11) Test again from circulation.pl
12) Test again from moremember.pl
10) Cancel a hold with no reason, note no email is generated
11) Delete your authorised values, not the feature is disabled
12) Reinstate the authorised values, but delete the notice,
you should now be able to cancel a hold with a reason,
but no email will be generated
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Coert <rcoert@arlingtonva.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Naming mistake came because this sub is used to detect if anything
available for hold, but it used in "if ANY UNAVAILABLE rule", so actually
results of this sub negated (see below "return" in the code).
In details:
when previous refactor was done, name for subroutine was chosen
wrongly in "opposite" direction from what it actually does:
it was named "ItemsAnyAvailableForHold", but this subroutine gave
truth (1) if at least one of the items available on shelf, not lost,
not on loan, not held, and not restricted by smart rules and damaged
status. So, if this sub says that item is still "available", this
actually PREVENTS item from hold in parent sub (see negated return):
sub IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest {
...
my $any_available = ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted...
return $any_available ? 0 : 1;
# ^^^ if any available and not restricted - we don't allow
# on-shelf holds
...
I.e. like it named now: "ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted".
Small aside fix: white space for '&&' inside brackets added to join
operation by priority visually.
Testing plan not needed: all places where sub used it just renamed.
More: all this places/code was introduced in one older commit so there
is also no overlaps or other calls/uses for this subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Software error:
Can't call method "unblessed" on unblessed reference at ../reserve/request.pl line 581.
was caused by recent commit with `wantarray` removal in sub pickup_locations in ‘Item.pm’
and visible on fresher Perls (where experimental feature "autoderef" removed https://www.effectiveperlprogramming.com/2010/11/use-array-references-with-the-array-operators/ )
To test:
1) Get a clean dev environment after "reset_all"
2) Add an empty record for “Default checkout, hold and return policy” on /cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl.
3) Open item record, like /cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=1&borrowernumber=1
4) Observe the error (Can't call method "unblessed" on unblessed reference at ../reserve/request.pl line 581.)
5) Apply patch.
6) Repeat steps 2 and 3.
7) Observe that the error is gone.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
There was a bug, on the biblio's hold list view, if the pickup library
was changed, the next screen was "place a hold for no title"
http://pro.kohadev.org/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?multi_hold=1&biblionumbers=
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If a hold is selected from the result list, we should let the ability to
select an item-level hold.
Test plan:
I. Detail page
1/ Go to a bibliographic record detail page
2/ Click "Place hold"
3/ Select a patron
=> No change expected, you can select an item
II. Search result, multiple holds
1/ Search for an item with more than one search result
2/ Select several items, click 'Place hold'
3/ Enter a patron card number
=> No change expected, item level holds are not available.
III. Search result, single hold
1/ Search for an item with more than one search result
2/ Select only one item, click 'Place hold'
3/ Enter a patron card number
=> With this patch applied, item level hold is available. The screen is the same
as when you place a hold from the bibliographic record detail page
=> Without this patch you cannot place an item-level hold
QA notes: We could go a bit further and remove the 2 biblionumbers and
biblionumber from hold script, as well as remove the checkMultiHold in
request.tt. We should not have a biblionumbers param that contain a list
of biblionumber separated by '/' but several biblionumber parameters
instead.
QA notes 2: About placerequest.pl, see bug 19618 comment 27.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When "reserve/request.pl -> C4/Reserves.pm::IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest" called many times with hundred of items and "on shelf holds" parameter set to "If all unavailable" for these items + patron, it goes slow.
It happens because in subloop it is checking if all items available so it is O(n^2) and it re-checks each time the same info for each item with repeating DB/data requests.
Fix:
The inner loop 1:1 picked out into separate subroutine and called outside of the loop, saving data in 'items_any_available' variable once, this variable passed to IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest to be used inside as the precalculated result.
This made algorithm O(n) instead of O(n^2) so there is noticeable speed increase.
How to reproduce:
1) on freshly installed kohadevbox create/import one book,
remember that biblionumber for later use it in down below,
2) add 100 items for that book for some library,
3) find some patron, that patron's card number we will
use as a borrower down below to open holds page,
4) check for the rule or set up a single circulation rule
in admin "/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl",
that rule should match above book items/library/patron,
check that rule to have a non-zero number of holds (total, daily, count) allowed,
and, IMPORTANT: set up "On shelf holds allowed" to "If all unavailable",
("item level holds" doesn't matter).
5) open "Home > Catalog > THAT_BOOK > Place a hold on THAT_BOOK" page
("holds" tab), and enter patron code in the search field,
or you can create a direct link by yourself, for example, in my case it was:
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=4&findborrower=23529000686353
6) it should be pretty long page generation time on old code, densely increasing for every hundred items added. In the case of this solution, it's fast, and time increases a little only, linear.
I tested on my computer in VirtualBox for page generation times,
did 3-5 runs for same case to check if results are stable, and got such values:
(old code):
100 items: 50 seconds
200 items: 3.2 minutes
300 items: 7.3 minutes
(version with fix):
100 items: 4.4 seconds
200 items: 7.5 seconds
300 items: 10.4 seconds
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
`$can_item_be_reserved eq 'OK'` moved in `&&` before `IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest`
to cut away with static known values before calling to more resource consuming subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
On request.pl, the table of holds shows a suspend_until date picker for each hold, *unless* that hold is waiting or in transit. The script reserve/modrequest.pl assumes that there will be a suspend_until input for each hold, but that is incorrect. Assume there are 20 holds on a record, and 10 of them are waiting or in transit. If you were to then set the suspend until date on the 10 open holds, and use the "Update hold(s)" button, those 10 suspensions would apply to the 10 found holds and not the holds they should apply to!
Test Plan:
1) Place two holds on a record
2) Check in an item and trap it for the first hold
3) Now that one hold is waiting and the other is not, attempt to set
a suspension date using the "Update hold(s)" button
4) Note your hold does not get suspended!
5) Apply this patch
6) Restart all the things!
7) Repeat steps 1-3
8) Your hold should now be suspended!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The number of parameters of AddReserve makes it hard to read and
maintain.
This patch replace it with a hashref, which will make the calls more
readable.
Moreover the bibitems has been removed as it was not used by the
subroutine.
Test plan:
- Make sure the tests pass
- Read the diff and search for typos
- Place a hold on few items
Note for QA: reservation_date and expiration_date do not match the DB column's names,
should we?
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
