Another regression caused by Bug 11703: The list of checkouts on the
circulation and patron detail page shows item type codes instead of the
full description.
Test Plan:
1) View a patron's checkouts, note the Item type column displays the
code rather than the description.
2) Apply this patch
3) Refresh the page, note the description is now displayed
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Works as described.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Before Bug 11703, overdue items in the list of a patrons checkouts had
the renewal checkbox preselected so that librarians could quickly renew
only those items which required it. This is not longer the case.
This patch corrects it. To test, apply the patch and clear your browser
cache. Check out to a patron who has overdues and confirm that the
overdue items have the "renew" checkbox preselected. Check that items
which are not overdue are not preselected.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch modifies the way the checkouts script sets the "Always show
checkouts" cookie so that it is set with an explicit expiration date
(+365 days). This will allow the cookie to persist across browser
sesssions.
To test, apply the patch and clear your browser cookies to start with a
clean slate.
- Check out to a patron who has existing checkouts. Their checkouts
should not load by default.
- Check the "Always show checkouts immediately" checkbox.
- Close your browser.
- Reopen your browser and check out to that patron again. Checkouts
should now be displayed by default.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Works as described. I confirm that without this patch, the un-persistance of
"show checkouts" choice is very perturbing for librarians coming from previous
version of Koha.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Passes tests and QA script, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
TO REPLICATE:
Prepare a bunch of Items (6+) for checking out, or have a set of barcodes ready for copy-pasting.
Check-out those items quickly within one minute and observe that the sorting order is not always from the first checkout to the last.
This is because the issuedate doesn't have seconds defined.
AFTER THIS
The bunch of Items is sorted properly.
Tiny patch, works as expected. Passed QA script.
Signed-off-by: Marc Veron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In some cases (eg. when Staf Client Search is active), when user choose
Edit->Delete record on record tool bar, browser don't wait for
confirmation and goes immediately to delete record.
To reproduce:
1. Search for some biblio records and choose one without items attached.
2. Note that there, must be "Return to search results" box on left side,
bug works in that case, when in normal view everything work fine.
3. Click Edit->Delete record, watch that confirmation box shows, but
don't wait for OK and runs immediately. If you are fast enough to
click OK, then you get error as below, because record was deleted
earlier.
To test:
1. Apply patch.
2. Follow reproduce steps.
3. Check if waits for confirmation in all cases.
4. Check if deletes record after confirm.
Followed test plan. Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Confirmed the problem and that the patch fixes it.
Good catch!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Removes note about Display856uAsImage not working on
the OPAC result page.
To test:
- catalog a record with 856$u = URL to an image, $q = img
- turn on the system preference Display856uAsImage
- check that the pref description makes sense and is correct
- the warning about the pref not working on result pages
has been removed
- make sure your record has been reindexed by Zebra
- verifiy the image indeed displays on the result page
in the bootstrap catalog.
Note: The height=100 doesn't work in the Boostrap catalog,
so the images display in their original size. Will file
a separate bug for this.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch udpates the checkouts JavaScript so that clicking the "show
checkouts" button or the "always show checkouts" checkbox returns focus
to the barcode field. This improves the checkout workflow by eliminating
a mouse click.
To test, apply the patch and clear your browser cache. Check out to a
patron and confirm that focus is returned to the barcode field after
clicking the "show checkouts" button and the "always show checkouts"
checkbox.
Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When using the longoverdue script it's possible that items marked lost
remain on the patron account. I think it's important for staff to see
that some items are marked lost - currently the list of checkouts
doesn't show any sign of the lost status.
Test Plan:
1) Find a patron with a checked out lost item
2) Note the lost status is not displayed in the checkouts table
3) Apply this patch
4) Refresh the page, note the lost status now displays
5) Repeat this test plan for a damaged item
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Tested successfully with damaged and multiple lost values.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
In Koha 3.14 and earlier, an item on hold and in transit would display
the date the item was transferred. This is missing from the new ajax
holds table.
Test Plan:
1) Place an item on hold for delivery at a different library
2) Check the item in, confirm the hold and transfer
3) View the patron's holds tab on circulation.pl and/or moremember.pl
4) Note the item is show as in transit, but does not give the "since"
date
5) Apply this patch
6) Note the in transit status now has a "since <date>"
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Small change, works as described.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Typo error found in the new template itemsearch.tt line 363 "_ matches
only a single charcter"
Test plan:
1) Go to url 'intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/catalogue/itemsearch.tt'
line 363 and check the typo "_ matches only a single charcter" and
change for _ matches only a single character
2) Apply the patch
3) Repeat step 1 and check if the typo is fixed
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When the user selects a patron search by birth date a tooltip is
supposed to appear showing the date format requirement. Bug 9811 (Patron
search improvement) changed the ID on which the tooltip depended to
function. This patch corrects it.
To test, apply the patch and go to the Patrons home page in the staff
client. In the header search form select "Date of birth" from the
"search fields" dropdown. This should trigger a tooltip showing the
required date format.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
I confirm the tooltip comeback with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- catalog a record with 856$u = URL to an image, $q = img
- turn on the system preference Display856uAsImage
- make sure your record has been reindexed by Zebra
- verifiy the image indeed displays on the result and detail page
in the bootstrap catalog.
The image shows in the original size, from the code it's meant
to display with a height of 100 px, but this won't work in bootstrap
as the height is set to auto with CSS.
Patch changes the XSLT to restore the former behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The current code breaks if a dependency is missing. The evals are
rearranged so there's no error on missing dependency.
To reproduce:
- Have a dependency for t/NorwegianPatronDB.t removed
- Run
$ prove t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
=> FAIL: You see an error similar to this (may vary depending on the lib you removed):
t/NorwegianPatronDB.t .. You tried to plan twice at t/NorwegianPatronDB.t line 37.
- Apply the patch
- Run
$ prove t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests are skipped on missing lib
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
As per the discussion, a prompt on a hard coded soft-limit is
far more acceptable as a solution.
TEST PLAN
---------
0) Back up your DB. -- because a backup is always good!
1) Log in to staff client
2) Navigate to any biblio details
(e.g. cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber=#####)
3) Click the 'Edit' dropdown button.
4) Click 'Edit items'.
5) Click 'Add multiple items'
6) Enter a crazy high number (e.g. 999)
7) Click 'Add'
-- Koha just adds it! YIKES!
8) Apply patch
9) Repeat steps 5-7
10) Click 'Cancel'
-- Koha does not add the items.
11) Repeat steps 5-7
12) Click 'Ok'
-- Koha does add the items.
13) run koha QA test tools
14) Restore your DB.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This fix is a global fix for the MarcModificationTemplate feature.
Some unit tests were missing and some behaviors were wrong.
For instance, if you tried to update a non existent field, the script
crashed.
The following line was completely stupid:
if $from_field ne $to_subfield
The field_number equals 1 if the user wants to update the first field
and 0 for all fields.
The field_numbers (note the s) variable contains the field numbers to
update. This array is filled if a condition exists (field exists or
field equals).
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Make sure the ModifyRecordWithTemplate routine returns undef.
This patch also removes a warning if GetModificationTemplates is called
without parameter.
Verify
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
returns green.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test plan:
- add/edit an action on the marc modification templates tools
- choose an action and define a condition
- define the source field as same as the condition field
- verify the All/1st dropdown list is changed to Every/1st
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
These UT reflect this change:
- deletion of the field 245 if 245$a='Bad title'
- move of the 650 field to 651 if 650$9=499
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch series is a bugfix for the Marc modification templates tool.
Bug description:
If you want to do an action (delete/update/move/...) on a multivalued
field and if a condition is defined on the same field, it is highly
probable the resulted record will not be what you expect.
For example:
Deleting All (or the first) fields 650 if 245$a="Bad title" works with
the current code.
BUT if you want to delete All (or the first) fields 650 with a condition
on 650$9=42, and if at least one field matches the condition :
- if you have selected all, all fields 650 will be deleted, even the
ones who do not match the condition.
- if you have selected first, the first 650 field will be deleted, even
if it does not match the condition.
The expected behavior is to delete the fields matching the
condition (and not all the 650 fields).
What this patch does:
This patch introduces 2 changes in the logic of Koha::SimpleMARC.
The first change is a change of the prototypes for the 2 routines
field_exists and field_equals. Now they return the "field number" of the
matching fields.
The second change is the type of the "n" parameter for all routines
using it in Koha::SimpleMARC. Before this patch, the "n" parameter was a
boolean in most cases. If 0, the action was done on all fields, if 1
on the first one only. Now it is possible to specify the "field numbers"
(so the array of field numbers which is returned by field_exists or
field_equals) for all routines which had the n parameter.
Test plan for the patch series:
Note: This test plan describes a specific example, feel free to create
your own one.
0/ Define a marc modification template with the following action:
Delete field 245 if 245$9 = 42
1/ choose and export a record with several 245 fields.
For ex:
245
$a The art of computer programming
$c Donald E. Knuth.
$9 41
245
$a Bad title
$c Bad author
$9 42
2/ import it using the Stage MARC for import tool.
3/ verify the imported record does not contain any 245 field.
4/ apply all the patches from this bug report
5/ do again steps 2 and 3
6/ verify the imported record contains only one 245 field, the one with
245$9=41
7/ verify the unit tests passed:
prove t/SimpleMARC.t
prove t/db_dependent/MarcModificationTemplates.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The ICU configuration files contains a rule to remove control characters :
<transform rule="[:Control:] Any-Remove"/>
This rule is before tokenization.
The problem is that "[:Control:]" regex contains line feed, carriage return and tab. See http://www.regular-expressions.info/posixbrackets.html.
So when several lines are indexed, last word of line is joined with first line of next line. Thoses words are then not searchable.
For example :
First line
Second line
This will become "First lineSecond line", tokenized as "First", "lineSecond" and "line".
Test plan :
- Use ICU in Zebra configuration
- Choose an indexed field, like 300$a
- Create a new record
- Enter several lines in choosen field, like :
First line
Second line
- Index this record
=> Without patch the search on "Second" does not return the record
=> With patch the search on "Second" returns the record
- Same tests with tab and carriage return instead of line feed
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Test:
1. Edit record, add 100.000 chars text to 500a
2. xml export produce the record,
3. mrc export do not produce the record, warning on log export.pl:
Record length of 111000 is larger than the MARC spec allows (99999
bytes). at /usr/share/perl5/MARC/File/USMARC.pm line 314. record
(number 139489) is invalid and therefore not exported because its
reopening generates warnings above at...
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
I confirm that exporting biblio records larger than 10000 characters in
ISO2709 produces invalid files. After applying this patch, the culprit
record (too large, but also other inconsistencies preventing record
parsing with MARC::File::USMARC) is not exported anymore. A warning is
produced in Koha Apache log file. Warnings to the user on WUI would be
better, but it isn't the case yet, so it isn't a regression.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
I agree that a visible warning/result message in the staff interface
would be nice, but this works as described.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Nicole suggested a change of the note, that this patch is implementing:
NOTE: If you change an authorized value code, existing records
using it won't be updated. Changes to value descriptions will show
immediately.
To test:
- Go to administration > authorised values
- Check the note showing on the page
- Select a category from the pull down and edit an existing entry
- Check the note on this page is also correct
Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Create or find an open basket/order in the acquisition module
- Check that "Branch" now reads "library"
- Set to "no library"
- No branches should be seen there.
Signed-off-by: jeremie.benarros <jeremie.benarros@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Patch removes outdated translation tool documentation
from the misc/translator directory.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Enger <digitalutvikling@gmail.com>
Removing these lines sounds like a good idea. I tested by
applying the patch and checking that the files in question
are gone.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When creating an invoice which has a duplicated number, if the user chooses to 'Create new invoice anyway', previously entered shipment date (todays date by default) is not being saved, because the date value is passed to the script in the wrong format (acqui/parcels.pl expects shipmentdate parameter to be in the system-configured date format, but what it's getting in such cases is ISO-formatted date instead). As a consequence (when receiving orders from invoice whith empty shipment date) 'datereceived' field in order records are also not being populated. Here and there, Koha is using datereceived field to establish if the order was received or not received, so such not-quite-complete orders:
- can be cancelled from the basket (even when they are de facto already received),
- it's not possible to cancel receipt of those orders from the invoice (because Koha is considering them as not yet received).
To reproduce:
1) Make sure you have some system date format configured in your test environment which is different from ISO format (e.g., DD/MM/YYYY) and the AcqWarnOnDuplicateInvoice syspref is enabled
2) Create some invoice with e.g. '11111' number,
3) Create another invoice with the same number (using 'Create new invoice anyway' button)
4) Try to create yet another invoice with the same number; observe that already existing invoice created in step 3) does have empty shipment date.
5) Optional: create some orders and receive them from the invoice with empty shipment date; observe that such orders are not being treated as received in all places (e.g. it's not possible to cancel receipts of such orders, and the message displayed is not in any way helpfull to determine why not).
To test:
1) Apply patch
2) Retest
3) Ensure that the issue is no longer reproductible, and that there are no apparent regressions of any kind.
Signed-off-by: simith <simith@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Tiny change fixing a bad bug. No problems found, passes tests and QA script.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
DateTime::Format::DateParse (called in Koha::DateUtils::dt_from_string)
does not manage to parse 9999-12-31 if a time zone is given.
my $date = DateTime->new(year => 9999, month => 12, day => 31);
=> OK
DateTime::Format::DateParse->parse_datetime( '9999-12-31' );
=> OK
DateTime::Format::DateParse->parse_datetime( '9999-12-31',
'America/Los_Angeles' );
=> KO (~20sec on my laptop)
It should not be considered as a valid date when the letter is parsed.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Note that to reproduce the problem you much be checking in items from an
account which has been restricted indefinitely (either manually or by
the overdues process). With this patch such checkins go from taking
around 50 seconds (in my test system) to around 7 to 10 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Good catch! Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The configs in koha-conf.xml needed to be mocked. There was also
a problem with how the NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint syspref was
getting checked in the .pm.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
1) Be more careful when checking the NorwegianPatronDBEnable syspref.
Before:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
After:
if ( C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') && C4::Context->preference('NorwegianPatronDBEnable') == 1 ) {
This should avoid complaints if the syspref is not initialized.
2) Fix some empty =head2 POD sections
3) Fix some indentation in patrons.pref, to make xt/yaml_valid.t happy
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
I couldn't find any regressions with adding, editing and deleting members.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The QA script was complaining about some dodgy POD in C4/Members.pm,
that was not introduced by bug 11401. This patch fixes the POD, to
keep the QA script happy.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch makes it possible to sync patron data between Koha and the
Norwegian national patron database, in both directions.
In order to use this, the following information is necessary:
- a username/password from the Norwegian national database of libraries
("Base Bibliotek"), available to all Norwegian libraries
- a special key in order to decrypt and encrypt PIN-codes/passwords,
which is only available to Norwegian library system vendors
- a norwegian library vendor username/password
See http://www.lanekortet.no/ for more information (in Norwegian).
While this is of course an implementation of a specific synchronization scheme
for borrower data, attempts have been made to prepare the ground for other sync
schemes that might be implemented later. Especially the structure of the new
borrower_sync table might be reviewed with an eye to how it might fit other
schemes.
To test:
Since the password and cryptographic key needed to use this functionality
is only available to Norwegian library system vendors, only regression testing
can be done on the submitted code. Suggested things to check:
- Apply the patch and make sure the database update is done. This should add
the new "borrower_sync" table and five new systmpreferences under the
"Patrons" > "Norwegian patron database" category:
- NorwegianPatronDBEnable
- NorwegianPatronDBEndpoint
- NorwegianPatronDBUsername
- NorwegianPatronDBPassword
- NorwegianPatronDBSearchNLAfterLocalHit
- Check that patrons can be created, edited and deleted as usual, when
NorwegianPatronDBEnable is set to "Disable"
- Check that the new tests in t/NorwegianPatronDB.pm run ok, e.g. on a
gitified setup:
$ sudo koha-shell -c "PERL5LIB=/path/to/kohaclone prove -v t/NorwegianPatronDB.t" instancename
- Check that all the other tests still run ok
- Check that the POD in the new files itroduced by this patch looks ok:
- Koha/NorwegianPatronDB.pm
- members/nl-search.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-from-koha.pl
- misc/cronjobs/nl-sync-to-koha.pl
- t/NorwegianPatronDB.t
Sponsored-by: Oslo Public Library
Update 2014-09-18:
- Rebase on master
- Split out changes to Koha::Schema
- Incorporate new way of authenticating with NL
Update 2014-10-21:
- Rebase on master
- Use Module::Load to load Koha::NorwegianPatronDB in non-NL-specific
scripts and modules
- Fix the version number of Digest::SHA
- Fix a missing semicolon in kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
There's no point creating a MARC record with undef subfields
for testing holds. This patch avoids that so no warnings are shown.
To test:
- Run
$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
=> FAIL: verify several warnings show
- Apply the patch
- Re-run
=> SUCCESS: no warnings showed.
- Sign off :-D
Regards
NOTE: Not noticable under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, but verifiable under
Debian Wheezy.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Calls to C4/Charset.pm's NormalizeString function with an
undefined string were triggering warnings when running:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Sadly, t/Charset.t was also lacking calls to NormalizeString.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- This should generate the uninitialized string warnings.
Make sure CPL and MPL are in your branches to save
yourself from headaches due to expected data.
2) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are no function calls to NormalizeString.
You can see other shortfalls in the tests beyond
NormalizeString with: grep ^sub C4/Charset.pm
3) prove -v t/Charset.t
4) Apply patch
5) prove -v t/Charset.t
-- Run as before with more tests.
6) cat t/Charset.t
-- note there are now function calls to NormalizeString.
7) prove -v t/db_dependent/Holds.t
-- Nice and clean run! :)
8) koha-qa.pl -v 2 -c 1
-- all should be Ok.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
To test:
- Add or edit a new or existing subscription in the serials
module
Patch changes "biblio" to "record" and fixes capitalization:
Search for record | Create record
Patch behaves as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Bug 12833 allows to find a patron with his cardnumber.
But this won't never append if the firstletter parameter is given.
Actually the firstletter param is the only one to take into account if
it exists.
Test plan:
Search patrons by a first letter and verify that the feature is back.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
To reproduce the problem you need at least one borrower with a blank
cardnumber
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
works as descrobed, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
As requestedby people testing the patch, I add references to the new
xslt files on the Z39.50/SRU servers help.
Example usages are also provided.
Test:
- Apply the patch
- Go to the help page on the 'Z39.50/SRU Servers' page
=> SUCCESS: Notice there's a section documenting XSLT file(s) usage
and provides some examples that cover the introduced files.
- Sign off
Thanks
Tomas
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Help page does shed some light to the XSLT usage. Enough to my taste.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds the following sample files:
- Del952.xsl
- Del995.xsl
- Del9LinksExcept952.xsl
- Del9LinksExcept995.xsl
Thay can be used on the new SRU/Z39.50 XSLT processing feature. At the same
time they can be used to solve this bug.
To test:
- Have an SRU/Z39.50 target configured
- Have a search that returns at least a record with the following
properties:
* It contains $9 links
* It contains items (952 or 995 fields in MARC21/NORMARC and UNIMARC respectively).
MARC21/NORMARC test:
- Do a Z39.50/SRU cataloguing search that retrieves the desired record
- Verify it includes $9 and 952 field(s) by clicking on the MARC link
- Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field
- Re-run the search
=> SUCCESS: the MARC view of the imported record doesn't contain the 952 field
- Edit your Z39.50 target and add Del9LinksExcept952.xsl to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field
- Re-run the search
=> SUCCESS: the MARC view contains the 952 field (including the $9 subfield), and
all other $9 subfields have been removed
- Edit your Z39.50 target and add
Del952.xsl, Del9LinksExcept952.xsl
to the "XSLT File(s) for transforming results:" field (both, comma separated)
- Re-run the search
=> SUCCESS: the MARC view doesn't contain $9 subfields nor items.
- Repeat for UNIMARC, replacing 952 for 995.
- Sign off :-D
Regards
Tomas
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Tested under MARC21. Works fine. (Additionally verified 995 with xsltproc.)
As noted on Bugzilla, we could still improve documentation but imo no need
to block these example transformations.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
I can't resist to put my own signature on this patch, confirming it works as
described with z39.50 Unimarc targets.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
On the new checkouts page there is some padding above the checkouts,
relatives' checkouts, and holds tables caused by extra markup in the
table's sDom configuration (http://legacy.datatables.net/ref#sDom):
<'row-fluid'<'span6'><'span6'>r>t<'row-fluid'>t
This creates several empty <div>s which don't serve any purpose. This
patch simplifies it to:
rt
To test, apply the patch, clear your browser cache, and check out to a
patron who has items checked out, holds on their account, and child
records attached which also have checkouts.
The padding above the table of checkouts, the table of relatives'
checkouts, and the table of holds should match that on the sides.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <liz@catalyst.net.nz>
Checked per plan on both Check Out and Details pages, spacing appears correct.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Works as described, no problems found.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
* Allow on shelf holds needed to be enabled
* Added some error supression code for undefined string comparison
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Removes this warning: Use of uninitialized value $template_id in string eq
at C4/MarcModificationTemplates.pm line 84.
GetModificationTemplates has no template_id if called from
marc_modification_templates.pl without operation (first click from
interface) and from tools/stage-marc-import.pl.
Slightly adjusted the POD lines accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The last test (#74) did not print anything. It now does..
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch add template modifications for the restrictions:
- the source field is always mandatory
- on move and copy, the source and destination subfield should be both
filled or blank.
- on move and copy, the destination subfield should be filled.
- on update, the subfield value should be filled.
Test plan:
Verify you are not able to create/modify template actions according to
these restrictions.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch only adds unit tests for the copy and move actions.
They test if the action does not create a field/subfield if the source
did not exist.
Also it adds a unit tests for the existing behavior (in order not to
lost it): we can use the '^' and the '$' character in regex for
substituing. For example: Copy 245$a to 245$a with the regex s/^/BEGIN /
This will add the string "BEGIN " at the beginning of the 245$a fields.
To test: prove t/SimpleMARC.t
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Currently the Koha::SimpleMARC module call a "field" a "subfield".
And the way to manage field is not implemented for all routines.
This patch does not modify the API. The routine's names are kept. It
just creates 2 privates routines for each action (e.g. delete_field
will call _delete_field if the action affects field and _delete_subfield
if the action affects subfields).
Before this patch the move action was authorised by the interface but
caused an error if executed.
Note: I don't see the meaning for the add/update action if no subfield
is given. So the call without subfield raises an error.
Test plan:
- apply all patches
- create or modify an existent template
- try at least the correct behavior for the following actions:
* delete subfield and field
* add new subfield to an existing field
* add new subfield to an nonexisting field
* move a subfield
* move an entire field
* copy a subfield
* copy an entire field
- import a biblio and use this template
- verify the imported biblio matches actions defined.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
